[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ent / 777 / posad / i / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internets about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix

Pleroma

Mumble

Discord

IRC

Text Boards



File: 1628214690929-0.jpg (71.31 KB, 602x401, 1628211931632.jpg)

File: 1628214690929-1.jpg (47.43 KB, 430x640, 87d1060eb64a0fba6ea0bdf83c….jpg)

 No.425759

Do you ever wonder why low-status white men can go to Southeast Asia and can easily get brides compared to the United States? Because even if he's poor in America, he's relatively richer there, meanwhile women in his native country wouldn't give him the time of day because by American standards he's poor, ugly and fat. In other words, that man has been cockblocked in his own country by the rich who have brainwashed everyone. That poor bastard doesn't have millions of dollars, so he's not attractive in America.

Then /pol/yps wonder why white birthrates are declining. Or why men drop out of the dating game. They don't feel like they can live up to these impossible and disgustingly filthy bourgeois standards.

It's all part of a theme, really. A system that benefited men – and particularly white men – in the past is not benefiting them now. Worse for them, the system that white people in America built (although they weren't the only ones who built it) and based their living on is beginning to betray them, or so they feel. Even worse than that, they fear that might end in righteous revenge from the growing ranks of angry black men, angry brown men, and maybe even some angry Asian men too who have been oppressed by the same rich, white elite this whole time, leading to a white "doomsday."

Because after all, someone came to pick the cotton and do the "dirty jobs" that white plantation and business owners or their kids with their inheritances didn't want to do. Or it was fine as long as the people who came to do the jobs (sometimes against their will) "served" as nice, obedient "Uncle Toms" and "Uncle Pedros" and "Uncle Chens" who were oppressed – and still are oppressed – by the same white elite beauty standards.

But you can't expect that to last forever.

So Americans simply need to reeducate themselves. Unite. Protest against the rich. Protest against the beauty standards that the rich, white elite have used to brainwash everyone and that makes poor, ugly, fat white guys hate themselves in their own country so much that they'd rather move to Thailand or Vietnam or the Philippines so they can get married.

While we're at it, the American monopoly capitalists who have enslaved and brainwashed the oppressed masses should refund the third-world countries for the amount of money and blood they suck from them. Americans – and this goes for people in the West generally – should develop a culture of respecting male and female workers of all races. They should also try cheering on marriages between two poor black people rather than two monarchic clowns in London.

Then maybe the /pol/yps can avoid some of the negative "karma" that they've built up over all these years. Then maybe instead of white "doomsday" at the hands of the non-white people who have also been oppressed by the rich, white elites, we can unite and struggle together to build a society without racism, sexism, or class oppression – and where everyone can get married and have a family, because people won't be brainwashed into thinking the poor fat white guys are ugly anymore. They're not ugly! We refuse to accept this bourgeois lie! No longer will a high-born prince or princess be able to refuse to accept the love from an honest, dirty worker.

Some people don't like my ideas. But they can have it the nice way, or the not-so-nice way. Or they can just grow old and angry, just like the boomers, and crawl into a hole in a place they hate and die. Or they can take a leap into communism, which is the only thing that can end this revenge from angry Asian and black and brown men once and for all. It's not too late to stop the upcoming of the doomsday which Asian and African and other people are suffering now.

We have a world to win.
>>

 No.425772

>>425759

Low status asian/indian/black men also need women and those groups make up more than a third of all incels in the west.

The sad truth is ethnic incels will never get laid. They are considered below whites and can't rely on their bourgeois status in the west to get laid in the global south.
>>

 No.425774

Why is this thread made every other week? This is a non issue.
>>

 No.425777

>>425774
>Incel
It is pretty obvious, jannies deleted it.
>>

 No.425784

>>425777
As they should
>>

 No.425785

File: 1628215578112.jpg (142.68 KB, 591x750, 43958903485034.jpg)

>>425772
Yes. They are the oppressed most of all.

And obviously you don't see many male actors from Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesia, India, South Africa etc. dating white women in films and drama the same way the white men dating women all over the world in the screen. And women from those countries leave the country to work as prostitutes leaving them without wives.

A woman doesn't have to be a whore for the rich.

A man shouldn't be cockblocked by the rich.
>>

 No.425787

>>425785
They should top those white boys to assert their dominance.
>>

 No.425790

>>425773

Go without a romantic relationship for the rest of your life. You will see why it is important.
>>

 No.425793

>>425785

Asian/Indian men are literally bottom tier males. Every female makes fun of them and see them as subhumans. Its true. Most wouldn't even date a asian if he was rich and educated. Bougeoise status isn't enough for them.
>>

 No.425794

>>425793
What is up with all the k-pop stat simps? I'm sure that they are well liked by quite a few women in white countries. If you are into white women that should give you some white pill for you.
>>

 No.425798

>>425793
This is just false. Your dating strategy has to change, but it’s not inherently true.
>>

 No.425804

>>425798

What other dating strategy is there? You either try to date people normally or try to flex money. There isn't a third way.
>>

 No.425805

File: 1628216270420.jpg (139.08 KB, 900x599, d4bed9d6d020160c5d3301.jpg)

>>425793
>>425787
Or ask yourself, how many rich, white, western feminist women would marry these construction workers in China? Very few.

So we can see, there is an international class oppression, and (bourgeois / liberal) feminism denies social class oppression.

Elite, privileged men however will support (bourgeois / liberal) feminism, while poor men without the guide of communism will have no choice but to try to take away women's freedom in their area. Otherwise they will be tortured at home by jerking off in front of the laptop, while the majority of the value they produce is taken by their elite boss to spend on more houses, cars and booty call on the poor man's sisters and even mothers who are working in a stripper club to make a living.

We should develop a culture of men respecting women workers and farmers as their comrades, while encouraging women to marry poor men from all over the world.
>>

 No.425815

I wont report you for id/pol/ bait because you actually put effort in this shit topic OP. You can stay on this board
>>

 No.425822

>>425804
You can’t throw yourself at many people and have to be selective, you gotta put more effort into looksmaxing, shit like that.
>>

 No.425825

>>425816

Maybe they don't. You can't force people to fuck others. Inceldom is a real social problem however that should be fixed.
>>

 No.439994

>women in his native country wouldn't give him the time of day because by American standards he's poor, ugly and fat.
If I go to Asia they wouldn't notice I'm fat?? Or do you mean they will worship me like the fat Buddha?
>>

 No.440431

>>425805
these guys look like engineers
>>

 No.440433

Monogamy always was sexual socialism: an equal division of women to placate the peasants and promote social stability.

The sexual marketplace has returned to a state of nature thanks to runaway liberalism and the destruction of feudal mores.

https://youtu.be/ED7g-s07JPk
>>

 No.451825

>>440433
It's pretty much the opposite, numbnuts.
>>

 No.451836

>>425798
imagine a world where "dating strategy" is a thing
>>

 No.455388

I never understood the "incel problem." It's not a problem but a rational rebalancing of the natural law of baby production.

Baby production has always been controlled by the elite because it serves their interests more than your own. They need soldiers to die for their causes, religious followers to adhere to their ideologies and workers to work in their factories.

Women are socially and economically forced to be attractive in order to "game" the system whereby they need a man in order to have sufficient economic and social status.

Men are forced to be more and more capitalist in order to have better social and economic status to attract these same women. In the end, it's a vicious cycle that doesn't breed children but breeds a duplicious, conniving populace fighting amongst one another for diminishing resources and returns on investment.

A more sensible solution to all of these problems is to simply invest in and encourage artificial womb technologies. Removing women from the baby production pipeline will solve most of these problems outright. I envision a day where most women won't even think about owning children, nevermind physically conceiving them.
>>

 No.455389

>>440433
This, the sexual revolution was monogamy. Letting women have as many sex partners as they want just leads to de facto harems and lonely cat ladies.
>>

 No.455390

File: 1653982141901.gif (577.04 KB, 640x560, terminator2.gif)

>>425759
Communism wouldn't necessarily solve the incel problem. The incel problem is caused by Western women having really classist views of relationships and refusing to date "down" while men have no such qualms.

Women could just as easily have such a wide selection of partners both in the West or overseas if they were willing to date based solely on a man's character rather than his pocketbook.

And women in Southeast Asia don't only date and marry because of wealth. As someone that's married to a foreign national from the 3rd world and who knows a lot of married couples where one is a foreign national, I can tell you only a certain percentage of women in any 3rd world country are willing to date and marry a Westerner.
Foreign national brides have sacrifice practically everything to be with their Western husbands, and it's not something a lot of women of any stripe are willing to do for love. Often these brides didn't completely fit into their own culture somehow and as such were willing form an early age to explore a relationship with someone outside their home country.

As hard as it is for chauvinistic burgers to believe, but just because a woman is poor, doesn't mean she has no agency, or ability to consent and that money is the only thing that poor person every thinks about.

If you actually talk to a foreign national bride about the reasons they got married it can range anywhere from being treated a lot better by a Western man than a local, to surreptitious circumstances that put the two in proximity to each other. Money will be the last thing on their mind as my experience has been that many foreign national brides actually come from middle class backgrounds in their home country. And Westerner's waaaaaaayyyyyy over estimate the value of western citizenship.

It always cracks me up that every westerner assumes that a foreign bride married for money. While western women will often straight up say they will not even entertain a relationship a guy that's not a 8/10, something that's very taboo to say in other countries.

One last thing, I don't think Westerners realize how physically UGLY they are to the rest of the world. I used to live in Europe for many years and what would be considered an attractive women in the states would be considered pretty hideous there.

So while OP's picture of a ogre like white many clutching a much more attractive woman is supposed to illustrate a sort of "white fever" that foreign national brides have the fact of the matter is that these "hot" mail order brides wouldn't be considered anything special in their own country. And women in these countries don't put nearly as much emphasis on a man's physical attractiveness as Western women do. The big delta in attractiveness you see really has nothing to do with the fact that they're white or American.
>>

 No.455391

File: 1653995596260.jpg (44.38 KB, 400x400, 48epcYs9_400x400.jpg)

>>455390
it's not just about money women also date on looks. Women, like all humans, are prone to moments of weakness and will, from time to time, sleep with less than attractive men and when they get caught doing this that's why the resort to calling unattractive men rapists and accusing them of sexual assault.

It's not just about income but it's also about outward physical appearance which out society (and capitalism) prioritizes.
>>

 No.455392

File: 1654000785519.jpg (38.29 KB, 620x408, jewel beatle and the bottl….jpg)

I have noticed that in this thread some people seem to have an idealist understanding of beauty and attractiveness. Like it is some kind of platonic ideal.

As expected, sexual selection is indeed an evolutionary pressure that selects for a nice appearance in mate selection. However evolutionary pressures also acts on the brain-patterns that decide about what counts as a nice appearance. There is an evolutionary pressure for evolving the ability to recognizing a good mate. If you are the only one who can find a good mate attractive you have a big evolutionary advantage. So this is a 2 way street.

Picture of a bug mistaking a bottle for a mate, just to highlight the point.
>>

 No.455406

>>425793
You guys should come to Latin America, everyone fucks everyone in here (specialy carnaval in Brazil). The only incels in here exist because of the pandemic isolation, that's all. But don't be an asshole, or we will laugh when drug dealers shoot you in the face
>>

 No.455407

>>455388
The very thing that defines a proletarian is the fact that his "prole" (his children) are the only most important thing they have, historically most proletarians never had access to actual propriety and consumption goods as they do today (mostly in central capitalist countries), family is of central importance to the proletariat as a class. Furthermore woman do have a will to have children themselves, despite all the hedonistic trash that we are all fed into daily. Socialism is supposed to change not only economic, but also social and ideological paradigms, including the way man and woman relate.
>>

 No.455408

>>455390
A man's pocketbook is of a central importance to a woman because she needs a guarantee that their (specially her's) offspring will prospect, so being a supportive male, capable of actually supplying what she needs is what attracts them the most. On the other hand, man tend to be more promiscuous, because having sex with several woman is a somewhat secure way his genes will be passed on
>>

 No.455409

>>455408
That doesn't mean however that a hardworking 3rd world factory worker will be less attractive to a girl in his country. If, for instance, a American shows pure sexual interest in her, she probably would still feel more attracted to that poorest, but compromised factory worker.
>>

 No.455412

>>455406
Yeah I feel that's the case in Mediterranean Europe too lol, there gotta be an incel gene running in protestants and eastern cultures because I don't relate to any of this at all
>>

 No.455417

>>455408
>A man's pocketbook is of a central importance to a woman
It's really not and only Western roasties think this way. A man you can rely on is far mote valuable than one that simply has money.
It's a roastie cope that 3rd world women marry white men for their money. The truth is many of these sexpat "losers" are perfectly fine men, They just aren't ever going to reach a status significantly higher than that of a college educated woman.
Also feminism has choked out all the collective wisdom of women. Most women outside the west know that you can net a high status male by looking at his potential. Western women want guaranteed success and only look at men that have already achived it. But this doesn't work as it has all the women gunning for the same small group of men all while losing out on potentially successful future men.
The old adage "If you want to be an admiral's wife you have to marry a lieutenant." Is true as it ever was and everyone but western women know it.
>>

 No.455436

>>425759
>Incels are poor, low status men
>Make everyone poor and low status
>We solved the incel problem
>>

 No.455437

File: 1654885242876.jpg (26.16 KB, 718x400, wondeful.jpg)

>>455436
>>Make everyone poor and low status
>>

 No.455438

>>455436
>Sharing all expenses doesn't make you wealthier.
Simps everyone.
>>

 No.455441

File: 1654953676669.jpg (68.01 KB, 509x360, 1654285576327.jpg)

Equalization of genetic status is an extremely high form of liberalism. Equalization is Tue naive idealism of the liberal. Communists are concerned with the material causes of societies problems. Everyone should have the opportunity to mate but not the requirement. Even as an incel I cannot imagine supporting such an endeavor.
>>

 No.455446

File: 1654965973404.gif (67.24 KB, 636x381, boobs5.gif)

>>455441
Lol typical feminist, the problem isn't that men need women to be forced to mate to reproduce, it's that men are being subject to artificial scarcity of pussy. They are only allowed to pursue awful man hating feminized western women that see men as mere tool to be used as leverage in the capitalist rat race.
No one outside the west covets western women as can be seen in countless anecdotes of women working overseas and suddenly experiencing a drought of suitors.
If men were allowed to freely court the women of the world, the incel problem would disappear overnight as they would largely be accepted with open arms by women in the rest of the world.
I know you would not be so flippant about this issue if this issue of inceldom were effecting females. But since it's males you can gin up panic about a "Handmaid's Tale" future that has no hope of coming true.
>>

 No.455449

>>455446
>typical generic ideology xyz

What a fag. Let's hypothetically say that society follows your inane logic. There's an artificially scarce amount of poon. How do you plan to go about rectifying this?
>>

 No.455450

Pretty simple solution that has been used for thousands of years. If you want pussy and you cannot get it in a relationship pay for that pussy you know the worlds "oldest profession" prostitution should be more open more legal would solve a lot of problems.
>>

 No.455455

File: 1655018049178.jpeg (66.61 KB, 631x315, charisma-man-199b00b3-12b….jpeg)

>>455449
Let men freely travel abroad. They're only trapped with western roasties because of economics.
If men could just leave work in the US for a few weeks a year it'd change things.
It's been known forever that western men are actually among the best and that western women just gaslight them. Picrel it's moral panic over this fact. This comic came out in the 1990's
>>

 No.455456

It's not even about leaving work.
The capitalist economic system drives young men and people generally into alienation. Alleviating this alienation from the mechanisms of capitalism will ease the incel issue. It's about economic reality not idealistic outcomes being fixed that are caused from.sed economic reality.
>>

 No.455457

>>425759
most moids have the emotional maturity of a child and expect women to be a stand-in for their mother whom they have a bad relationship with and thus cannot count on emotional support from, actual kind and caring men are husband material, but emotionally stunted children are not.
Perhaps wagie life and/or NEET life (one has no time to attend to social needs, one doesn't have enough money to attend social events and is generally a shut-in that refuses to spend what money they do have on any thing but consoomer shit like video games and porn)

Porn has also ruined men's brains, they have deranged ideas surrounding women.

If woman /can/ go on dating apps, what makes you think they want an emotionally retarded man-child, even if the man-child takes care of himself and works out, there's no promises he won't expect you to be his therapist because he's too insecure to show affection and trust to his male friends because he thinks that's "gay" or some shit.

This is why bi men are objectively better partners because there's less "no homo" retard brain, straight men should know they're obsolete.
>>

 No.455458

>>455457
NEET life and fulltime wagie life both give moids no time or in the case of the NEET, little ability due to limited finances and usually social skills to start with, for personal development.

Rather than trying to understand women and be friends with women, both tend to expect sex and relationships from women, and see a facade of friendship as a means to do that, or refuse to be friends with women, considering it the "friend-zone".

If you have friends who are women, you're probably going to have a decent dating life, so long as you're not an entitled and weird prick.
>>

 No.455459

File: 1655122509064.jpg (477.87 KB, 1660x1969, 1654301113986.jpg)

>>455458
Nah this is kind of bullshit idealism too. In my humble experience with femoids all friendships are just a facade and infact all femoids are using a man either by using their pussy as a carrot and stick or by using their pussy to get their own satisfaction from them. Friendship is impossible and given enough time two will either fuck or it will fall apart.

It's biology at this point.
>>

 No.455460

>>455458
There is not any friendship between men and women. Men are pathetic little needy creatures that women have mastered control over especially in the information era. I was in highschool in the 00's and no guy was ever friends with a girl they were all at most acquainted with some of the female population but nothing deep. I mention high school because along with college it is where the majority of guys today will be able to interact with women. Young women are not interested in making friends on dating apps (the place the majority of people meet) unless you have some utility to offer them for free.
>>

 No.455461

>>455455
So you're basically saying "just change the laws bro incels will totally pick up chicks if they have a few weeks off wageslavery". Why would your fetishized submissive Asian women want to date some loser ex-pat from the west? What an absurdly dumb train of thought as if changing some laws will change female nature.
>>

 No.455462

>>455457
>Porn has also ruined men's brains, they have deranged ideas surrounding women.
What do you mean by "deranged" I saw some article about zoomers who are hurting themselves trying to do regular porn shit. Everybody watches porn and this "derangement" is not much to talk about.
>>

 No.455465

>>455459
if you aren't a coom-brained retard obsessed with having sex, the "carrot on a stick" does not exist for you and you can have healthy social relations with any gender.
>>

 No.455467

File: 1655208571785.jpg (68.01 KB, 509x360, 1654285576327.jpg)

>>455465
This is literally impossible as all human interaction is driven at some level by sex and the desire to mate and produce off spring. Only autistic retards tell themselves this little lie to cope but in the back of your mind you know it's true.
We are driven primarily by our desire to reproduce. That is the nature of life itself. Reproduction. Everything we do is a vein attempt to attract a mate.
>>

 No.455468

>>455457
>most moids have the emotional maturity of a child and expect women to be a stand-in for their mother whom they have a bad relationship with and thus cannot count on emotional support from,
If this were true than western men wouldn't have such an easy time getting into relationships with women overseas.
The truth is is that this is pure projection. It's western women that cannot and will not provide emotional support for their looksmatch, or in other words men who are their equal socioeconomically and provide no boost to their status.
You, like most feminists, ooze resentment against men, giving no regard to why so many men do not provide emotional support to you. It's because you don't provide it to them. Either because you are emotionally battered from constantly having sex with Chad and never getting commitment in return, or because feminist ideology informs you that the very man you date are somehow, someway oppressing you.
>Porn has also ruined men's brains, they have deranged ideas surrounding women.
Lol, no, it just undermines you ability to control men's sexuality. Wait until robot girlfriends come online, AI girlfriends are already here.
>This is why bi men are objectively better partners because there's less "no homo" retard brain, straight men should know they're obsolete.
It's really dangerous to have a sexual relationship with a bi man. Statistically they are far more likely to have AIDS than a straight man.
>>

 No.455469

File: 1655253534677.jpeg (83.52 KB, 630x315, charisma-man-31e5869d-35d….jpeg)

>>455468
Forgot pic
>>

 No.455470

>>455458
>Rather than trying to understand women and be friends with women,
Intimate relationships are reciprocal, women need to understand men and their needs which they absolutely have refused to do since they see it as diminishing to themselves because of feminism.
>Both tend to expect sex
Yes, Western women lead men on. Letting them spend tons of their time and energy courting them. Then act indignant when the man who assumes that since their overtures have been accepted, that the woman in interested in sexual intimacy. Weirdo FDS women like you pretend that having the man do all the work is normal in building a friendship. It's not, if you want a platonic friendship that;s fine, but you have put in as much work into the relationship as the man is. I don't expect my friends to take me out to dinner free of charge all the time, if I did, they'd quickly cease being my friends, yet this is exactly what you demand of men.
>and relationships from women, and see a facade of friendship as a means to do that, or refuse to be friends with women, considering it the "friend-zone".
"Friend-zoned" is just another way of saying you feel like you've been taken advantage. My male friends never tell me I've "friendzoned" them, nor I them. But I don't expect them to whisk me away on vacations either.
You women are suffering a type of collective trauma that you blamed men (really just low status) on.
You've have you're love for Chad unrequited and now want someone to make up for the time and heart that you've let yourself be taken by Chad.
>>

 No.455471

>>455461
>So you're basically saying "just change the laws bro incels will totally pick up chicks if they have a few weeks off wageslavery".
YES
>Why would your fetishized submissive Asian women want to date some loser ex-pat from the west?
Why don't you ask them.
>What an absurdly dumb train of thought as if changing some laws will change female nature.
"Female Nature" is a reactionary spook. Western women are consciously accepting the perverse incentives set out by our feminized society. And yes being able to find alternatives in overseas women would absolutely get most incels laid. There's this implicit liberal moralizing in your argument, if western women are rejecting incels, then that must mean their bad and no women would want them. But alias it is not true, just ask literally anyone western man that's traveled overseas.
>>

 No.455472

File: 1655261385166.jpg (40.87 KB, 396x385, 1653957471504.jpg)

>>455471
There's literally biological and genetic differences between moids and femoids my guy. It's not a spook at all it's literally biology.
>>

 No.455477

>>455472
That doesn't explain why Western women are assholes when they don't need to be.
Quit abusing evo psych.
>>

 No.455478

File: 1655308426412.png (372.21 KB, 800x800, 1652240747308.png)

>>455477
That's because women have a lower autism score on average than men because their estrogen riddled brains make them incapable of logical and rational thought on average. It's easy for them to become psychos in a world that turns people into psychos (capitalism)
>>

 No.455485

>>455478
Are you sure you aren't just fantasizing about topping women in bed?
>>

 No.455486

>>455468
>>455469
>>455470
Based. Are you a non-western woman? I'm guessing since you mentioned:
>My male friends never tell me I've "friendzoned" them, nor I them. But I don't expect them to whisk me away on vacations either.
>>

 No.455488

>>455485
I just hate women, anon.
>>

 No.455491

>>455450
stupid. legalize rape so every rostie will actually get the amount of money xer actually deserves, ie zero

there could be government sponsored sexual disability tho, or a form of sexual marxism
>>

 No.455492

also doll-whores have so mad success that ppl even have to close them down
>>

 No.455493

i wouldn't call them doll-whores b t w, thats rather where you can fuck a doll
kawaii
>>

 No.455494

>>455491
>government sponsored sexual disability
I think they have that in some parts of Europe.
>>

 No.455495

If you think dating hasn't been fucked up by economic conditions and those alone, you're ignoring the fact that material conditions are responsible for social changes and not the other way around. The fact that young men can't pair up is directly driven by material conditions and not some kind of "human nature" scapegoat.

If a woman can gain better material conditions by getting a more rich man to provide for her, they're going to compete for that. If they can rake in tens of thousands on onlyfans then they're going to whore themselves out on social media until you start simping.

Under socialism you could be better looking or more talented to get hotter bitches. Under capitalism you just need to be wealthy, and you can bs your way through to being perceived as talented and handsome, not to mention that if you grow up rich you will fit the beauty stereotypes set about by the ruling class (your parents).

instead of accepting this I'm reading shit like this:

>>455388
>A more sensible solution to all of these problems is to simply invest in and encourage artificial womb technologies. Removing women from the baby production pipeline will solve most of these problems outright

Good job dude. Instead of overthrowing the ruling class to prevent them from keeping all the pussy for themselves you choose to cuck everyone into accepting a rubber vagina for all eternity. You sound like you would be a fan of eugenics too.
>>

 No.455496

Yes socialism is the solution to incels or men marked as "doomed" their dating problems are always inherit in a capitalist system. Incels are not that big of a group at least in the west though.
>>

 No.455497

>>455496
Incels are a huge issue in the west what are you talking about?
>>

 No.455499

>>455495
>If you think dating hasn't been fucked up by economic conditions and those alone, you're ignoring the fact that material conditions are responsible for social changes and not the other way around.
The first world is not the world. Incels are only a phenomenon in the West. While there's declining birthrates overall, you're not seeing half of all men go without sex in Africa for over a year like you do in the West, or 50% of all men be virgins like in Japan.
It very much is a problem caused by ideology and the perverse incentives that the West's matriarchy gives women.
>>

 No.455500

>>455499
>Incels are only a phenomenon in the West
No there are many thousands of quasi-incels in China and India many more there than the west.
>>

 No.455501

>>455500
China yes, India no. China is a developing country that's practically first world at this point so doesn't really count.
>>

 No.455502

>>455495
>You sound like you would be a fan of eugenics too.
What's wrong with eugenics? Genetic engineering is only scary to those who don't understand it.
>>

 No.455504

>>455497
Incels are not a huge issue in the west lol.
>>

 No.455506

>>455504
Should have said quasi-incels are a huge problem (I'm part of that group) in America. I'm young have no resources, inflation is only getting worse, and have no GF or any possibilities with women. There are a lot of young men like me, may be good chances of some crazy shit (lots of violence) going down around the next election. The possibility of some Yugoslavia balkanization esk violence is probable in the near future.
>>

 No.455507

>>455501
>China is a developing country that's practically first world at this point
Parts of China have reached first world levels but not all of it has, it's a really big place, and development was a little uneven.
>>

 No.455516

>>455488
I would agree with you when it comes to terfs jesus christ are those lesbians annoying
>>

 No.455517

>>455504
how many school shootings have happened because of incels?
>>

 No.455520

File: 1655836824821.jpg (377.41 KB, 725x658, 1653808404852.jpg)

>>455517
I know the last one wasn't.
>>

 No.455550

>>455471
Do not that well off women want to couple up with pasty ass ex-pat incel losers? It may start to become a trend I mean with global warming the women in the area being stricken with say drought may have some options. Everything you said has been shit on like 10 or more years ago in MGTOW circles you are even using comics from the early 90's like what. Also what is going to stop your racist stereotype of a submissive Asian women from acting like western women?
>>

 No.455551

>>455517
How would you solve inceldom?
>>

 No.455554

maybe it's just that they don't seem as unattractive in a different culture. the personality and behaviors seen as repulsive in one culture could maybe be less of an issue in another.

maybe the foreign women that the foreign men don't want seem attractive by western standards and the western men that western women don't want seem attractive by foreign standards.

maybe when they look at each other they don't see what you see.
>>

 No.455555

>>455458
or maybe it's not a facade of friendship, it's just that men want to fuck their hot female friends. or are romantically interest in their hot female friends. to a man, if a woman is interesting or enjoyable enough to be friends with, that makes her attractive, romantically. especially if he doesn't have much else going on and that female friends becomes the closest relationship with a woman he has. and maybe that feels bad for the man, feelings he can't control of being romantically interested when he knows she isn't and its not going to happen. why be friends with a woman when you're only going to develop a crush on her that neither of you wants.

so you suggest a guy plays a numbers game making as many female friends as possible, what then, somehow he gets a date or something. not if none of them find him attractive. if you're an unattractive man you could be friends with a thousand women its not going to land you a single date. friendmaxing females does not entitle you to sex
>>

 No.455556

File: 1656678499468.jpg (190.27 KB, 1200x1041, dunning-kruger-3.jpg)

>>

 No.455570

>>455554
I really doubt it man. Who knows though they can live their lives as they please nothing I can do about it..
>>

 No.455616

wow, what a thread. on that leftypol.org you can't even breath without getting your thread deleted. This place looks awesome. This place looks cool.

Unique IPs: 43

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ent / 777 / posad / i / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]