>>453017>Since its pretty obvious you are arguing in bad faith or flat out trolling, I will make a set of general points for others:Ah, but it is you who is trolling sir. You frame popular uprising against street slaying of workers as anti revolutionary and the domain of annoying purple hair college students.
You argue that the ending of the brutal neo Jim Crow divides the proletariat because… well you actually never really articulate that just some vague notion of some "worker solidarity" spooks, which always requires POC's to fall on the sword of the state while white workers comfortable look on from a far from their suburbs.
You think that if you put on an Obama aire of civility no one will see through your campaign to frustrate the workers outcry for justice against the inhumanity they suffer daily.
But the cat's out of the bag, and it will no longer work, people like myself aren't interested in maintaining any type diplomatic relations with well poisoners like you .
A movement like "Land Back" would have been a pipe dream even a few years ago, and now it seems to be on the lips of every worker. This change is what you really seek to end.
>When one has relatively limited resources, the choice is of how to allocate them to have greatest effect vis-a-vis your goal.There's limited resources because the legions of white workers that could not have cared less about their colonized brethren do nothing.
When you have limited resources you unshackle yourself the quite literal chains that bind you. You take care of yourself first.
>A marxist project/endgoal is clear focused on economic questions and class antagonism (at the globalle el). So while a person like the poster I referred to may deem as a more important racial issues, such an approach is simply a foundational difference in values and/or priorities with Marxism.Marxism is critique of capitalism, not a totalizing philosophy of all social relations everywhere for all time. Marx himself spoke out against the chattel slavery in the US in his own time and didn't scold abolitionists for "wasting limited resources".
Protecting the proletariat from harm, even if it lacks a Marxist is character is not counter revolutionary, indeed it is in fact quite the opposite.
Picrel it's you.
>Second, the focus on minority issues even when economic and class based in nature (and not pure culture war or idpol) may yet still be an ineffective means to address those issues: But it has been extremely effective, way more so than these nebulous "Marxist Movements" that you constantly refer to as superior but never actually explicitly name, have gained nothing material for workers.
While "idpol" movement (really a misnomer because real idpol is backed by state violence) have gone on to grab tremendous gains for workers from the Civil Rights Movement in the US, to ending apartheid in South Africa, to even now with the BSD movement against Israel's ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.
Besides whining about idpol dividing the working class with absolutely no fucking proof, the only material critique you could muster of idpol movements was some fringe case in Africa.
Touch grass, have sex, seek help, dialate, but above all, stop pretending you are a socialist online. Your type are thick here but literally exist no where else. In the real world workers have categorically rejected your bad faith critique and gone on to get material gains for themselves.
Lastly, there absolutely positively nothing stopping supposed anti-idpol Marxists from getting out there and educating, agitating and organizing. But I suspect I'll still find you back here sitting on your hands in the the future.