>>455660I don't know about technical details of control but yes in general, bourgeois democracy is very unlikely to let a representative of the proletarian class take state power willingly. That is what Marx meant with that it's always a dictatorship of one class or another.
I don't know if the group your call the tech-fascists are in control or not, but even without/before that the electoral system has always had a very strong tendency towards plutocracy, because it takes so much resources to run an election campaign. The plutocrats have deep pockets and can finance more electoralism.
About the communications interference, that didn't start in 1996, the ruling classes always made sure that their ideology was imposed on the population they rule over. None of this is really new.
It has been a civilizational battle to make reliable communication for millennia. We build something to transmit information and those that seek to manipulate perception try to interfere with it. It's not just the scammers it's also the ruling classes them self that tamper with communication.
Take a deep breath, this is a marathon. We have been at this for thousands of years. We want to document objective material reality and we want to transmit it as information to other people who are separated by time and space from that documented reality. And we want the information to contain an accurate reflection of reality. Our opponents want to insert bias and lies that serve their interests. Making up Bullshit is always faster than finding out the truth, but the truth has much greater staying-power, therefor we have to play the long game. Eventually we will be able to build systems that are resilient enough to counter all their Bullshit. But we have to be methodical, patient and relentless. It might take decades or even centuries but the General Intellect will eventually be free.