>>455738Nothing is more cringe than the term "terminally online." It's not even close to making an actual point. It's just a petty personal attack. For better or worse morality doesn't objectively exist. It isn't real. I'm sorry you cannot seem to grasp this concept. That doesn't mean that we can't be moral. It just begins with a simple understanding that morality is not objectively codified, but, based on opinion and we can choose and change how we think we should and should not behave in society. Thinking otherwise is a vestige of christian morality; To believe in objective morality is to cling to christian dogma of the past 8 centuries. Let it go. The world is ours for the taking.
>>455737To answer your question, of course, I would say yes because any revolutionary government or any freshly established and won over communist or socialist power will require a bill of rights for its citizens. This is the largest mistake the soviet union made time after time after time; Over stepping the rights of its citizenry.