>>635I have to be honest i don't know how to evaluate that evidence. The EM interference with technology is indeed very strange.
But consider the ramifications, the US would have been in possession of an extremely powerful directed energy weapon for over 2 decades, and seemly not use it to fight wars.
This would make for a very effective anti missile shield as well. How do you explain the US foregoing such a strategic advantage ?
By the way i want to point out that "radiation" doesn't just refer to radioactive rays. It also refers to radio-waves, microwaves, infrared/radiant-heat and visible light.
>>636I'm not very good with symbolism, why are vertical search lights associated with the Nazis ? What is the symbolic meaning of the number 88 ?