[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble

| Catalog | Home

File: 1752904618347.jpg ( 198.15 KB , 1175x1763 , Bodies_Bodies_Bodies_poste….jpg )

 No.8908[Reply]

Should a woman's body count not matter to man? Why do so many women insist it shouldn't matter? Are men just insecure as women claim? Or do men have a legitimate reason to worry about marrying women that has a slutty past?
Women who have had more partners do tend to have higher divorce rates. Should it even matter what the reason men have for avoiding promiscuous women if it's their life, or do men have some kind of obligation or social contract to push aside their reservations? If so do women have any obligations to men.
What is a high body count to you. For me, anymore than 20 would be a red flag.
67 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11923

>>11909
> If you really want to find the truth, go and google, find the article. That's quite simple even for such a dumb person like you. If you are not willing to know the truth and you are just doing gaslighting and trolling, convincing incels that all surrounding women only want and wait to be fucked by the incels, I don't wanna even spend time to seek for the article myself.

>the “sexlessness” articles also say that young women are having less sex.


> What exactly is redpill agenda?


Andrew Tate and his ilk are preying on sore losers like you whom are suffering from FOMO and cannot grow out of it.
>>

 No.11932

>>11922

> Feminists don’t even talk about homosexuality at all nor promote it to cishet males.


They do. Go to feminist chats pretending you are an incel, and the first and probably last advice you get before getting banned will be "go find some gay to fuck with, fuck off from women". They consider any heterosexual sex as violence and domination towards a woman.

> Andrew Tate and his ilk are preying on sore losers like you whom are suffering from FOMO and cannot grow out of it.


I don't support Andrew Tate, Nick Fuentes and other right-wing male activists. Because they are only talking that women are bullshit today, but don't say the most important thing - that sex must be equally available for all men. That's why I consider them as those who work for their personal popularity and benefits, not as those who fight for male rights. The most importance male right is the right to have sex. That's what must be said today.
>>

 No.11936

>>11932
>They do. Go to feminist chats pretending you are an incel, and the first and probably last advice you get before getting banned will be "go find some gay to fuck with, fuck off from women". They consider any heterosexual sex as violence and domination towards a woman.

The male equivalent is men telling ugly women to get a dildo or find another uggo to fuck.
That’s not the same as indoctrinating average cishet males into homosexuality

They’re saying this because they’re tired of a subgenre of whiny men suffering a typical dry spell taking out their frustration on women
>>

 No.11946

>>11936
>a typical dry spell is multiple decades long
>>

 No.11951

>>11946
>Anon has never talked with married couples or single people over thirty.


 No.7428[Reply]

A thread for all of your politically incorrect whining and complaining that wouldn't be allowed in leftypol-ORG or left-wing/progressive organizations irl.
27 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11927

>>7429
>women, men, good-looking people, celebrities, and rich and influential people
the six genders
>>

 No.11931

>>11925

>I’m saying that prioritizing sex, especially non-procreative sex, as an automatic entitlement without requirements is not mature


Prioritizing sex is the way for men to get rid of exploitation by women and capitalists.

> By your logic, all women whom are ugly, older, chubby, husky, boisterous, etc should be pampered


No, I'm talking about men. Men are sexually poor, not women. To equalize men and women here is the same as saying "you know, the rich also cry".
>>

 No.11937

>>11931
>No, I'm talking about men. Men are sexually poor, not women. To equalize men and women here is the same as saying "you know, the rich also cry".

You’re assuming that all women are physiognomically the same. You’re making the mistake of not factoring in that most women aren’t pretty, slim, docile, nor fair-skinned

>Prioritizing sex is the way for men to get rid of exploitation by women and capitalists


Wrong. Prioritizing sex will make men even more exploited than they already are. In fact, the moral obsession over “muh gooners” and calling for bans of AI robotic sex dolls due to “muh dehumanization” is exploitation.

>>11927
Wrong.

Theres fifty-four genders:
>Masculine, feminine, androgynous
>Male, female, intersex
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11948

>>11937

> most women aren’t pretty, slim, docile, nor fair-skinned


So what? How do you propose to solve the inceldom problem?

> Wrong. Prioritizing sex will make men even more exploited than they already are


In what way? I suggest to create a social system when all men have a guaranteed opportunity to have sex with young females. How does it make men exploitable?

> In fact, the moral obsession over “muh gooners” and calling for bans of AI robotic sex dolls due to “muh dehumanization” is exploitation.


AI robots are not the solution, the solution is available sex. Real sex, not dolls or robots.
>>

 No.11950

>>11948
> So what? How do you propose to solve the inceldom problem?

Cosmetic surgery and selective service for sex work. Applies for both men and women
And it need not be domestic it can be overseas.

>In what way? I suggest to create a social system when all men have a guaranteed opportunity to have sex with young females. How does it make men exploitable?


You’re forgetting about personal choice. And that not all men are gonna be up to par in hygiene, looks, manners, talent for female preference

Likewise the same for women.
Not all women are gonna be up to par in looks, hygiene, manners, talents, etc

And physiognomical preferences of individuals of both genders.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.


 No.11280[Reply]

Post anything about traveling abroad dating, sex or marriage in this thread.
21 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11935

>>11930
>>11934
>noooo don’t kill my idealized impression of third-world women

Cope and seethe.

>>11933
This
>>

 No.11938

>>11935
>>noooo don’t kill my idealized impression of third-world women
>N-n-n-no one's ever traveled regularly or lived abroad. They're all trapped in some backwater village like me.
Cope townie.
>>

 No.11941

>>11938
Explain how I’m wrong.
Yea there’s men who lived happily ever after with their third world brides but there’s also a lot of men whom aren’t so lucky

You assuming that second/third world women are more virtuous just because they don’t have 1:1 amenities like first world women do is naive projection.

In the third world, local men are plagued by the same patriarchal standards as in the west.

A first world male loser getting validation from third world women is mainly because of the exotica
>>

 No.11947

>>11941
>>11933
personally i think if you meet your wife anywhere outside of your mudhut village it's sexpat behavior. everyone should stay exactly where they were born and marry their cousin otherwise they're sexpat rootless cosmopolitan scabs.
>>

 No.11949

>>11947
Nice strawman but be serious. Do you really think that an awkward physiognomically challenged male with mediocre talents and finances will secure a third world woman over a good looking talented rich guy?


File: 1658609814628.jpg ( 125.2 KB , 1526x531 , heartbeat.jpg )

 No.451[Reply]

Feminism has failed to defend one of it's core tenants, the right to abortions. This shows what leftcels and some non-spooked Marxists have always said about feminism, that it is the ideology of the bourgeois. Feminists had 50 years since the Roe vs Wade ruling to codify the right to abortions into law but were unwilling to pay the political price for such self-assertion and passed on the burden to future feminists year after year until we come to now, where Republicans are now on the cusp of passing an official federal abortion ban with the "heartbeat bill".
During these 50 years feminists were far more interested in chasing idealists ghosts like male gaze which lead to cultural wars over pornography, prostitution, and even silly things like bikini clad female characters in videogames.
More destructive was their successful passage of female supremacist laws that made men guilty until proven innocent of any sexual assault allegations with cancel culture or of domestic violence accusations because of the Duluth model. Made men personal debt serfs to their children's mother via brutal child support laws. They also tirelessly attacked their masculinity and very being with the weaponization of the LGBT rights movement which frames all men and masculinity as wrong and harmful to women and society and upholds androgyny and male homosexuality as the only "safe" way a male can be a sexual being. And finally made males forfeit half their property and future with no-fault-divorce even, as the name implies, when they've done nothing wrong.
This has gone on to completely destroy gender relations as evidenced by the consistently declining marriage rate, the growing number of sexless men and the explosion of incels in the west.
Which has alienated men from women and their struggles, which is why the groundswell against the end of Roe v Wade has been about as impactful as a wet fart. Men do not care about women, and in fact cannot care about women because feminism has made doing so be to their own determent.
With abortion being banned, there is literally no point in feminism. It is an ideology with nothing to offer materially, and is little different than a religion or Marvel Movie fandom, and this all due to feminists hatred of men.
Feminism now shuffles off into the dustbin of history, whatever ideology replaces it will have to offer liberation for BOTH genders because it will generations before people forget about the damage a female only gendePost too long. Click here to view the full text.
21 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.4544

>>455
>The bourgeois feminists got exactly what they wanted,
Nah the booj feminists definitely wanted abortion access. You can make up conspiracy theories about how they'll be able to get secret abortions regardless but this has becomes a fault time between booj men and women and booj men would love to see women ejected from the ruling class because they can't plan their parenthood.
>>

 No.5122

File: 1709538440477.jpg ( 695.52 KB , 1080x1015 , RDT_20240303_2321056261700….jpg )

Looks like they are going hardcore on toasties that won't make babies. Will women have to actually have kids with men that will raise them now?
>>

 No.5135

test
>>

 No.10653

‘Chaos’ followed ruling on abortion drug access, and providers say more uncertainty lies ahead
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/05/06/health/abortion-providers-mifepristone-chaos-court
>>

 No.11945

File: 1786305850423.mp4 ( 9.15 MB , 576x1024 , 309ea108da24e34e7b91c287aa….mp4 )



File: 1776578466615.jpg ( 60.92 KB , 612x583 , istockphoto-533098573-612x….jpg )

 No.10502[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

Incel News Thread I https://archive.is/TqRsc
Incel News Thread II
https://archive.is/mzesK
130 posts and 41 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11682

>>11400
Why is there no implication that the women did anything wrong?
>>

 No.11740

>>

 No.11742

>>11433
NTA but can you provide evidence of what you’re saying?
>>

 No.11760

More prosecution of men
>>

 No.11944

File: 1786301378808.png ( 1.96 MB , 1079x2124 , ClipboardImage.png )



File: 1782240612918-0.png ( 62.6 KB , 140x249 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1782240612918-1.png ( 2.31 MB , 1440x1800 , ClipboardImage.png )

 No.11289[Reply]

>oooh Anon, you were never supposed to figure it out
>you are too smart for your own good
>I rove you
>goodbye!
God I want this
Why cant China just go imperialist already and state-issue CCP certified wives after genociding the beckies and stacies?
>>

 No.11943

File: 1786299285190.png ( 2.29 MB , 1080x1390 , ClipboardImage.png )

crumb bump


File: 1659390981508.png ( 8.72 KB , 645x773 , feels.png )

 No.468[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

Share you feels here.
No bully
also feel free to share your feels in the /leftcel/ thread at https://9chan.tw/leftcel/thread/2696
509 posts and 102 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11897

How do I stop feeling bad about not accomplishing anything in life?
>>

 No.11898

File: 1786223790385.png ( 1.04 MB , 1000x457 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>11897
By accepting and enjoying all is dust, my King of Kings
>>

 No.11899

>>11898
Don't fall for this dumb nihilist lib shit. I don't know what's wrong with you but talking to a pro can help. Just look up how to screen therapists because there's a lot of bad ones out there.
>>

 No.11900

File: 1786224720607.jpg ( 38.28 KB , 564x570 , dummy.jpg )

>>11899
>therapists
>talking
>>

 No.11942

>>11899
>nooo you cannot just see things as for that they are


File: 1710603807032-0.jpg ( 229.8 KB , 1459x785 , imaginary gf waifu It work….jpg )

File: 1710603807032-1.jpg ( 107.72 KB , 716x472 , live meticulously crafted ….jpg )

File: 1710603807032-2.png ( 130.92 KB , 2034x310 , lit gf imaginary delusion ….png )

File: 1710603807032-3.jpg ( 119.02 KB , 690x727 , lonely just talk to myself.jpg )

File: 1710603807032-4.jpg ( 93.33 KB , 909x481 , Me on the left.jpg )

 No.5239[Reply]

Post and discuss using your imagination/delusion/fantasy.
46 posts and 33 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.10890

>>

 No.11804

>☀️ ⛱️ 🌊 Intimate & Relaxing Eye Gazing on the Beach

using this video for imagination fantasy
>>

 No.11902

>>10511
Physical contact would be closer to simping. No contact is further away from simping.
>>

 No.11929

>>11804
>tattoos
eergh brother
>>

 No.11940

>>11902
Wrong.
Mystification of women is simping.
Also there tends to be a reflexive misogynistic streak in simping


File: 1693590623252.jpg ( 58.07 KB , 931x706 , f19dc1dd1e527d1c44640252e4….jpg )

 No.3464[Reply]

Are fictional women still based (as in positive opinion) if they are based off of real life women?

If we assume real life women existed before imaginary women did, then don't traces of real life women exist within the concepts of fictional women? Thoughts?
28 posts and 8 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11058

>>11054
Then what does?
Because “chudsexual” women are an outlier.
>>

 No.11065

>>11058
https://www.instagram.com/male.beauty/
Where's the ugly/fat/skinny men posts?
>>

 No.11077

>>11065
>confusing “chUd” for “chAd” in my previous post
>>

 No.11903

>>3672
Bump for this question.
>>

 No.11939

>>3649
One thing I hate about 2D fetishizers is how they always wanna make the men fat and ugly otakus.


File: 1775938701898.jpeg ( 48.97 KB , 640x480 , images.jpeg )

 No.10358[Reply]

Post eugenic and or genetic stories here.
75 posts and 6 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11805

Eli Lilly is treating nearly 10% of US obesity population with GLP-1s: CFO
https://finance.yahoo.com/video/eli-lilly-treating-nearly-10-150223508.html
>>

 No.11810

https://www.independentliving.org/docs5/sterilization.html
Eradication of "deviants": the dark side of the Swedish Model." | Independent Living Institute

The world was shocked by the recent news of a skeleton in Sweden’s closet, the country’s forced sterilization policy of disabled people and others who were not found to be worthy to have children. The facts are clear, there is no reason to question the authencity of the sterilization records. Sources other than Dagens Nyheter, the nation’s largest daily newspaper that recently started the sterilization discussion, as well as researchers are confirming the facts. Also, Sweden is famous for its comprehensive statistics. Thus, all sterilizations records and "patient" journals are archived and available to researcchers and journalists. Persons who were sterilized against their will have come out of their silence and appeared in the media. The sterilizations were fully legal according to the laws of the time. There were well-developed and state-regulated routines with medical experts at the local and national level, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, with a panel of highly placed representatives of political parties (mainly female Social Democrats including an ambassador to the United Nations) who signed the decisions that would deprive tens of thousands of persons of one of the most basic human rights, the right to have children.



https://muse.jhu.edu/book/40871
Project MUSE - Eugenics and the Welfare State
https://www.euronews.com/2023/06/08/how-did-sweden-sterilise-up-to-30000-people-against-their-will-in-the-cause-of-eugenics
Why did Sweden sterilise up to 30,000 people against their will in the cause of eugenics? | Euronews

Sweden set up a eugenics plan, grounded in the science of racial biology, between 1934 and 1976. “They wanted to get rid of a certain type of people: The weaker ones”.

Kjell Sundstedt’s family had never talked about the darkest moment in their history.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11812

>>11810
Wow, Sweden's eugenics program ran all the way until 1976!?
>>

 No.11878

File: 1786204510094.mp4 ( 2.05 MB , 576x1024 , 52119e74a81563e1e2d74caccf….mp4 )

>>

 No.11928

>>11781
because it should be 0 kids


Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
Previous [ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 / 34 / 35 / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home