>>11551>criminalizing teen sexualityare you talking about sexuality between teens? if so then im not sure what you mean unless youre using the term criminalize as a metaphor
if youre talking about sexuality between teenagers and adults, thats a different matter
youth are human of course but they lack the capacities to fully embody the human experience until they reach adulthood, they are humans in the process of becoming
(unless you think that fetuses are exactly the same as an adult?)
we can debate just what kind of restrictions are or are not acceptable and i do believe that youth are horribly mistreated on this basis, but they still need to be treated differently than adults because they literally are different and in ways that matter
there are good reasons to not allow contracts to be binding on anyone below a certain age
>If you think sex and romance are not “privileges” but “rights” <okay sure sex and love shouldnt be rights eitheri explicitly said that it should be viewed as neither a privilege nor a right
>Even if there was no state to enforce worthiness of sex and love, people will still not gravitate towards losers1. ive personally known plenty of losers whove been in relationships, though it usually doesnt last long or end well (often due to mental illness or poverty stressors)
2. what do you think a loser is? its a socioeconomic condition, there isnt a loser gene
>incels of today are in a far better position to get laid than back thenPost too long. Click here to view the full text.