[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble
| Catalog | Home

 No.5139 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

Here's the killshot, single mothers predict how bad crime is in an area NOT POVERTY!
>The proportion of single-parent households in a community predicts its rate of violent crime and burglary, but the community’s poverty level does not. Source: D.A. Smith and G.R. Jarjoura, “Social Structure and Criminal Victimization,” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 25. 1988.”
This alone should repudiate feminism in the minds of anyone, left or right. And the high single motherhood rate is the direct result of feminists' sexual revolution that encourages women to be promiscuous which inevitably leads to bastards.
Anyone that's traveled outside of the US can attest to this finding. While no poor area of a city or town is safe. They are not these Falluja style war zones that say Baltimore is.
Eliminating single mothers goes a long long way to eliminating poverty for workers. And it's in the best interest of children, which feminists and women pretend to care about.
These studies were aggregated on https://www.fixfamilycourts.com/single-mother-home-statistics. Here are a few other highlights
>“After controlling for single motherhood, the difference between black and white crime rates disappeared.” Progressive Policy Institute, 1990, quoted by David Blankenhorn, “Fatherless America: Confronting Our Most Urgent Social Problem,” New York, Harper Perennial, 1996, p.31
>Effects of Fatherlessness – Teenage Statistics
>63% of all youth suicides,
>70% of all teen pregnancies,
>71% of all adolescent chemical/substance abusers,
>80% of all prison inmates, and
>90% of all homeless and runaway children, came from single mother homes.
>Bob Ray Sanders, “Hey Y’all, Let’s Fill The Hall (Of Fame), Ft. Worth Star Telegram, Oct.28,2007
>Mona Charen, “More Good News Than Bad?”, Washington Times, Mar.16, 2001 (citing Bill Bennett, “The Index of Leading Cultural Indicators: American society at the end of the 20th Century., New York, Broadway Books, 1994)
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
159 posts and 22 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13932

>>13926
> Looks, yes, but more importantly eloquence.  If you are eloquent, instructors will bend over backwards for you.

"Lookism" is just a colloquial term for polite skills in this case.

>It is academically en vogue to pretend that vulgar speech should not be a handicap, particularly when it is associated with an ethnic vernacular, but the reality is that a student who has spent his childhood reading books and thus commands an extensive vocabulary is at a colossal advantage over a student who learned to read and write on the internet.  And if that book-learner also uses proper diction during his oral presentations, he is going to be carried to his degree on a litter.  Even the instructors who like to bemoan that reality practice it.


Irony is, medium doesn't really dictate the eloquence as much as you think. Most people talk and wrote vernacular for centuries long before the Internet.

This is another problem I notice: people think preference of media solely determines your lexical complexity.

In the twenty-first century Anon Domini, books are seen as the traditional medium of modest verbal expression.

Yet, back in the first century in the Mesopotamian realm, books were seen as newfangled vulgar nonsense. Polite skills were determined solely by oratory.

When papyrus and stylus was first promoted towards students in the ancient times, the elders went apeshit about it. Just the same way adults went apeshit over computers being the new traditional medium in the 2000s/10s.

Also another irony is this: formal speech is demanded of students as a metric of moral fiber.
Yet in the working world, formal wording is seen as a sign of unworldlyness and pretentiousnesses.

Formal speech is only respected as a discliplinary tool for kids. It's not respected/appreciated within itself amongst adults.

It's only respected IN adults BY  fellow adults if said adult is a success story.
>>

 No.13933

>>13926
> Same.  I have long disliked that tendency of art critics to care very much about what the artist intended.  It really does not matter.  What matters is what the person who consumes it takes from it.  As I see it, the author and the consumer create the message of art in concert, and only the consumer is privy to it.

Art is subjective not objective. The thing that people forget about is that it's all emotions, not logic. Philosophizing art has been an unfortunate benchmark of academic skills for too long.

And the funny thing is? All that ruminating over whatever sentiments the author/artist was trying to make is just waste. The author probably wouldn't want everyone trying to "figure them out".

The fact that people think philosophizing about art is the spark of intellect is a sign that people are cognitively lazy.

These same people couldn't be bothered to learn/discuss any physical science

In fact, I have yet to meet anyone outside of science nerd circles whose idea of intellectual discourse doesn't revolve around conspiracy theories, politics, or philosophizing art.
>>

 No.13937

>>13926
> I have heard that one as well.  It is like the poverty theory of crime with an unnecessary extra step added to it.

>Every liberal stripe has a thoeory about what causes crime.  For example, dipshit OP thinks it's single moms because he saw some stats on a think tank's website.  The reality is that crime is definitively caused by one thing and one thing only:  the law.  The law defines crime.  It takes an activity that people were already performing and says, "stop doing that or I will have armed thugs beat you, throw you in a box, and ruin your life."  Thus that activity that was not crime before is crime now.  The more an activity is performed by people, the more crime there is when the law declares that activity to be illegal.  The law is not some force of nature that is inherently violated by certain behaviors, which is what the people who propose theories as to the cause of crime seem to believe.  It is entirely the definitive creation of a given state entity.

This is why I'm leery of behavioral science articles. Most of the time, they seem more similar to superstition and religion than any genuine scientific inquiry.

This is especially true whenever the behavioral science articles in question focus on gender relations

Virtually all gender-relation discourse always wanna pathologize men.

There's articles saying that handsome men are more likely to abuse women than ugly men.
Yet these same people will
Then say that ugly men need to step up their game.

Yet, if men were to self-beautify, behavioral science declares them as "low T" or "over-familiarizing their feminine side".
>>

 No.13938

>>13937
In this vein, behavioral science is just as shallow as philosophizing art. In fact, even more abysmal because it projects ones selfish sociosexual biases onto real people. At least philosophizing art keeps the abstract in the abstract
>>

 No.13939

>>13931
>Anon, I'm starting to think that you're the one with mommy issues.
>What's this REALLY about.
Oh boy, this old liberal canard. Someone that just won't hold child abusers accountable just because they resemble their mother is the one with mommy issues.
I have a problem with child abuse and neglect.
And because there's so many victims of child abuse by single mothers, discourse always gets derailed because betas with mother wounds come out of the wood work to censor the discourse. IT HAPPENS EVERYTIME.
You're not alone anon, but the abuse ends now. You're going to have to stop enabling child abuse, me and my fellow comrades won't allow it anymore.

File: 1679422406753.jpg ( 240.43 KB , 1080x357 , 1679119419064709.jpg )

 No.1983 [Reply]

This guy learned the hard way
>What women think or say they want and what they actually respond to are two very different things
64 posts and 14 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13927

>>13924
>Wahhh!  I'm a victim!  Pity me!  Do things for me!
>>

 No.13929

File: 1793244614708.jpg ( 50.97 KB , 400x384 , White_Feather_Distribution.jpg )

>>13927
>Waaahh I'm a victim, you stupid fucking moid! Go die in a war for me while I fuck Chad!
>>

 No.13934

>>13924
>posting some headline of a pop-psychology article about gender relations to rationalize their point

< What's wrong with having a persecution complex if you actually are persecuted?

< source: your crack pipe

Man, these incels really are stewing in projection today.
>>

 No.13935

>>13916
> It is true. I was actually friends with a Chad for a long time.

Ah yes.
The "but-it's-true-bro-trust-me" defense

Also, a lot of people had Chad friends and they would still be annoyed with your obnoxious perpetual self-induced victimhood

> Not really, because they see the same behavior. Women don't realize they're treating men with different LMS differently, but Chads and incels are living it.

Women say the same thing about men. Your struggle isn't special. Get over yourself and maybe find a lower-status girl that will hop on your dick as gratitude for giving them attention.
>>

 No.13936

>>13924
> source: your crack pipe

Do you suffer from any facial assymetry?
Do you have any ugly dermatological spots?
Do you lack a chin?
Do you lack leanness with decent muscle?
Do you lack proper height?
Is your hair all frayed?

Are you suffering from dexteral deficiency?
Are you incapable of walking/running without any accommodated devices?
Do you suffer from severe limb pain?

Are you incapable of following a conversation?
Do you have trouble reading any situational phenomenon?
Do you lack any knowledge or verbal prowess of topical subjects?

File: 1747524079558.webm ( 2.97 MB , 598x334 , cute giraffe Lyudmila Tit….webm )

 No.8482 [Reply]

Please step on me.
6 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.8491

>>8487
If it had been three tall dudes, he would have been cooked. It wouldn't have mattered if those guys knew how to fight or not.
>>

 No.8915

File: 1752939672315.mp4 ( 1.06 MB , 540x480 , RDT_20250719_083948.mp4 )

Mao Zedong gets shocked by the height of Henry Kissinger's wife.
>>

 No.8968

>>8491
Not really.
What if those three tall girls were UFC fighters?
>>

 No.13910

File: 1793198173562.png ( 536.55 KB , 756x746 , putin african.png )

MOGGED
>>

 No.13913

>>13910
African Chapo mogs Mexican Chapo. Is Chapo Guzman taller than Putin?

File: 1750535122176-0.jpg ( 143.39 KB , 712x978 , state-issued girlfriends.jpg )

File: 1750535122177-1.png ( 292.31 KB , 816x846 , 67ggpbiuk1591.png )

File: 1750535122177-2.jpg ( 37.46 KB , 304x304 , Gf compass PoliticalCompas….jpg )

File: 1750535122177-3.jpg ( 194.89 KB , 1080x977 , State issued rule_-_4eFJA0….jpg )

File: 1750535122177-4.jpg ( 405.84 KB , 2048x1534 , 2021-11-09_mulch_tv_145792….jpg )

 No.8759 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

State-issued girlfriend program thread


Alternate titles for this program/policy/initiative/plan:
state-assigned
state-issued
state-mandated
state-appointed
state-ordered
state-mediated
state-arranged

government-assigned
government-issued
government-mandated
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
173 posts and 102 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13810

File: 1793055723195-0.png ( 29.43 KB , 3128x102 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055723195-1.png ( 37.62 KB , 1918x355 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055723195-2.png ( 8.4 KB , 600x78 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055723195-3.png ( 10.09 KB , 614x102 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055723195-4.png ( 42.49 KB , 2929x278 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.13840

File: 1793066235419-0.png ( 879.5 KB , 2064x512 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793066235419-1.png ( 640.45 KB , 1408x768 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793066235419-2.png ( 862.92 KB , 2064x512 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793066235419-3.png ( 194 KB , 1024x1024 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793066235419-4.png ( 23.11 KB , 428x36 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.13841

File: 1793066433965.png ( 982.44 KB , 1187x1325 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.13911

File: 1793200886229.png ( 997.19 KB , 790x715 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.13912

File: 1793201236256-0.png ( 2.49 MB , 1320x1191 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793201236256-1.png ( 1017.47 KB , 788x716 , ClipboardImage.png )


File: 1792648247513.mp4 ( 5.31 MB , 576x1024 , 5298723045033d5de0a3f76dd2….mp4 )

 No.13627 [Reply]

Why are these so controversial? They're both adults, and as this guy points out, young adults can consent to anything else ethically BUT sex.
Why is that? Also, these age gap relationships are rare. Is getting mad about age gap relationships just the female equivalent of CHUDs getting mad about white women fucking BBC?
21 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13720

The way this officer was behaving is coincidentally exactly the way womn behave with men a lot of times. He kept provoking and egging the boy to the point of doing something regrettable. And now the officer would get away with what he did because he has plausible deniability. It is exactly the same way womn get men into trouble.
>>

 No.13730

can we not have a containment board for these OPs or ban them

like why
>>

 No.13752

>>13730
Can you stop being a whiny bitch? Like why?
Go to Ogre if you wanna be on the rag.
>>

 No.13753

>>13730
This is the containment board. Just hide this board if you don't like it. Sheesh what a faggot.
>>

 No.13908

>>13730
roastie melty

File: 1678326363930-0.png ( 1008.38 KB , 1208x912 , 1678261930176750.png )

File: 1678326363930-1.webm ( 1.83 MB , 720x1280 , 1678263631940761.webm )

 No.1762 [Reply]

Why are women aging so fast suddenly?
38 posts and 12 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13871

>>13860
Back in the good old days, people drank fermented water, smoked like the Dickens, didn't have AC, used strong chemicals for manufacturing, ate cholesterol like it was candy, etc.
>>

 No.13877

File: 1793117018076.jpg ( 135.75 KB , 576x1024 , remy lacroix watch gangban….jpg )

>>13848
Sad day. I heard she went to med school to become a nurse, I don't know why she came back to porn.
>>

 No.13878

>>13848
>>13877
>coffee and weed
>whiskey for dinner
Don't drink and don't do drugs, everyone.
>>

 No.13883

>>13877
Ugh, her ass is gigantic, and not in a good way. Her butt got bigger going up to her back instead of out. Her ass looks like to giant chicken thighs.
>>

 No.13906

>>13883
At least her ass is bigger than her stomach.

Just glaze her hindquarters in baby oil and marinate your dinner sausage on it.

File: 1791063853318.png ( 285.85 KB , 640x480 , ClipboardImage.png )

 No.13299 [Reply]

for pro male ideology, dedicated to the rights of men and boys and males who have been left behind by society

Masculinity is a slave collar. Masculinity functions in servitude to Feminist-Ouroboric Capitalism."Incel" operates as a pejorative term for men who reject compliance and fail as obedient slaves to feminist Capitalist society.

Radical anti feminism, every single female privilege must be abolished. Feminists are killing men.

PMC STANCES
>PMC is the only men's rights group with correct framing.
>Goal: replace the mainstream MRM with the Pro Male Collective (PMC).
>Long-term goal: replace mainstream MRM, grow PMC brand, build more owned websites.
>Feminism is a hate movement; it should be outlawed ("Ban Feminism before it bans you").
>Feminism is right wing, not left wing; you can't be left wing and a feminist.
>Feminists have won and are still winning; MRAs are delusional to deny it.
>MRM is a failed, meek, passive movement; "awareness raising" and debating feminists achieve nothing.
>All successful movements use loud, aggressive radicals; MRAs are "political wimps."
>Men must get militant, organized, proactive, and coordinated.
>Feminists should face social stigma, job loss, and employer pressure; feminism should be made unacceptable in mainstream society.
>Racism, without exception, is misandry.
>Every single trad-con amounts to an ultra feminist.

STRATEGY / ORGANIZATION
>Emphasize collective action; reject learned helplessness.
>Build own platforms (forum, fbi.gov, game) for censorship-proof autonomy.
>Disciplined structure; no dead weight or time-wasting chat.
>Shift the Overton window via coordinated, aggressive messaging.
>Individualism exacerbates men's problems; collective action is required.
>Men should abandon obsession with women and validation from women.

PRIMARY LEGAL REFORMS
>Mandatory 50/50 shPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
54 posts and 28 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13873

>>13830
>unfortunately
>podcast bro circuit

WTF does this mean and why is it a bad thing? Podcasts are just talk radio for Internet. Every demographic has podcasts
>>

 No.13880

>>13873
>Podcasts are just talk radio
I think you just answered your own question.
>>

 No.13885

File: 1793127318236.png ( 1.74 MB , 1024x1024 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>13880
>>

 No.13889

File: 1793130403507.jpeg ( 137.61 KB , 1314x1197 , Duck-ai-image-2026-10-24-….jpeg )

>>

 No.13902

File: 1793153911445-0.png ( 167 KB , 460x215 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793153911445-1.png ( 857.92 KB , 2206x1380 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793153911445-2.png ( 387.31 KB , 536x800 , ClipboardImage.png )

Our new website for saving and logging all the offenses of feminism into gaming.

https://gatekeepourgames.com/#/

This is a game about an assassin who kills men. A lot of blood. A lot of language. While there are implications of sex, the act is not depicted.

We need to spread more awareness about gate keeping male spaces. Specially now that laws to make them illegal are being pushed hard right now.

 No.13741 [Reply]

This has been occurring for a long time on streaming platforms like Twitch. Overtly marketing sex and sex appeal to underage boys by young women. By either dressing as revealing as possible while streaming a play session, flirting with fans that donate money to them, or by out right plugging their OF pages. These adult women are manipulating young underage boys with their sexuality. If they did this physically in public they'd likely be arrested.
This has detrimental effects on any child's development and is outright pedophilic. It's time the left collectively spoke out against this as it's not becoming so obscene even normies are taking notice.
Why has the left been so silent on this issue? Is it because the victims are male, and by feminism's view, cannot really ever be victims of women, because the perpetrators are pretty? I really don't get it, the left really needs to answer for this complete dereliction of duty.
54 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13859

>>13816
>an adult female showing pubescent me her boobs is abuse

I remember when abuse used to mean actual direct harm to someone. Now it means "raunchy thing I don't like"

By your logic, teasing is higher on the scale of abuse

Kids bullying and teasing their peers is more abusive than some boys ogling some boobs
>>

 No.13863

File: 1793078879900.epub ( 732.97 KB , Ashford, Daisy - The Youn….epub )

>>13842
>Also again, Gen X did procreate.
I mean, some of them must have.  At least I assume so.  The only ones I know of were a couple teen pregnant girls at school back in the early nineties.  I'm not kidding–siblings, cousins, friends, neighbors, coworkers, nobody I knew personally ever had kids, and there were a whole hell of a lot of us.  In fact, I rememeber back in the nineties one of the big panics was that the world was facing imminent overpopulation (there was projected to be a ten-billion global population by 2010) and a resulting lack of available resources like in Soylent Green.  Then Gen-X just did not reproduce, and all the population projections collapsed at the turn of the century.  That became another panic, because ZOMG we will not have enough workers to keep the economy growing.
>Millennials weren't terminally online. They were terminally watching TV just like their elders did.
The Golden Age of the Internet was drivien largely by Millennials.  There were quite a few Gen-Xers in on it as well, but the Millennials were the most common until the end of that beautiful era.
>>13845
>I guarantee you you could find erotic fanfiction authors around the same age range that would write similar prose.
Similar to Daisy Ashford?  I doubt that.  I have never seen anything like her book before, and I doubt that such a thing could ever be written again in any future epoch.  What she wrote is not erotica like what fanfiction authors write.  It is old school romance from the perspective of a prepubescent girl.  If you mean Caldwell, her prose is fairly typical of genre writing with adult authors.  As much as I dislike her characters, her book is well-structured enough to be of a quality that is out of reach of most fanfic authors.
>Because the nine-year old is not allowed to be explicit or passionate in her description?
No, because… you know what?  I am just going to attach the book in epub.  You'll see what I mean.  There is no describing The Young Visiters; it must be experienced.
>I feel adolescent Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.13882

Predatory tiddy streamers opened the door for mega corps to start marketing alcohol to children.
>>

 No.13891

>>13882
This must be another outlier phenomenon that's exaggerated as a general thing.

No different from the urban myth about GTA inciting juvenile delinquency.
>>

 No.13895

>>13882
>Big Alcohol shills are shitting up .net
We've arrived boyos.

File: 1786757279578.jpg ( 84.4 KB , 1920x1740 , line-icon-for-gangbang-vec….jpg )

 No.12176 [Reply]

Are hardcore gangbangs with 'multiple male on one female' pro-male?

I mean it is empowering for men to get some and to put in work and it builds camaraderie through a shared experience.



Let me know what you think.
17 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13801

>>13736
On the one hand, I kinda agree. However, knowing the personality types that make up this board, I cannot help but feel your sentiment is just sour grapes.
>>

 No.13847

>>13736
>Why does sex even exist?
The noun "sex" used to exist to differentiate between male and female. Entertainment industry made it a verb mid 20th century since "intercourse" and "copulation" were too difficult for whatever reasons. The fluids and smells can be gross and the act can cause discomfort, but it's necessary for the propagation of any species. Just take a shower first, it's not so bad if you know what ur doing and avoid nasty skanks..
>>

 No.13854

>>13847
To be honest, all bodily functions are gross. Sex ironically is the least gross.
Eating, urination, and defecation are more gross.

Sleeping is also gross due to snoring and nightly sweats.

Sweating is gross.
>>

 No.13862

>>13854
>Sweating is gross.
Maybe, but it cleanses toxins from the body and maintains core temp. I don't know what I'd do without it.
>>

 No.13870

>>13862
I would rather that all toxin disposal went towards urination. Take away shitting and reduce sweating.

File: 1663187296476.jpg ( 117.78 KB , 736x987 , Sorayama Female Robot art.jpg )

 No.677 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

Post anything regarding sex robots or dolls here.
499 posts and 166 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13589

>>13559
I fucking hate Ex Machina so fucking much. It's a "philosophical" movie in the same way that a big budget Oppenheimer biopic is "scientific" – it isn't, it's just entertainment.
Nathan is so obviously the filmmakers' idea of some evil, hyper-masculine, darkly manipulative tech-bro emblematic of the industry… except that the tech industry is dominated by people like Caleb: effete nerds who believe in insane fantasies like "superintelligence" while self-righteously LARPing as heroes and liberators. Nathan is far more pragmatic and humble by comparison.
The ideological core of this sad excuse of a film, and of the tech industry, is the cynical belief that human beings are ultimately nothing more than inefficient pattern-matching machines. Nathan understands the difference between the purpose of a machine and the agency of a human being. His only mistake was being blind to the sad fact that there are disgusting degenerate subhuman scum like Caleb who will irrationally outsource their agency (to a fucking machine, no less).
Maybe these retarded filmmakers should turn the lens inward, for once, with their pathetic attempt at critique. The entertainment industry is more often than not guilty of the very things it criticizes, and has grown increasingly incapable of producing a film with any level of intellectual sophistication whatsoever. The greatest irony of Ex Machina is that what most defines it is its superficial performance of intellectualism. Just like Ava, the only thing it does truly well is tricking the viewer that it's intelligent, when it was really just scripted.
>>

 No.13685

File: 1792851653390.jpg ( 72.48 KB , 625x824 , 379b51f7-1d46-42a0-a670-83….jpg )

>>

 No.13737

Conversational AI GFs have now arrived.
>>

 No.13738

>>13737
we are getting closer to the film Her (2013)
>>

 No.13855

This guy made a tool that let's you track the supply chain from the mine to a finished robot part. Pretty tremendous tool for dealienating people.

Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / ... / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home