[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble
| Catalog | Home

 No.13741 [Reply]

This has been occurring for a long time on streaming platforms like Twitch. Overtly marketing sex and sex appeal to underage boys by young women. By either dressing as revealing as possible while streaming a play session, flirting with fans that donate money to them, or by out right plugging their OF pages. These adult women are manipulating young underage boys with their sexuality. If they did this physically in public they'd likely be arrested.
This has detrimental effects on any child's development and is outright pedophilic. It's time the left collectively spoke out against this as it's not becoming so obscene even normies are taking notice.
Why has the left been so silent on this issue? Is it because the victims are male, and by feminism's view, cannot really ever be victims of women, because the perpetrators are pretty? I really don't get it, the left really needs to answer for this complete dereliction of duty.
44 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13822

>>13820
Millennials and zoomers are ironically promoting child-free zones for both cyberspace and meatspace "for their protection"
>>

 No.13823

>>13819
Ok now you're being semantic.
Pedophilia is active sexual pursuit of prepubescent humans.
What you're describing isn't pedophilia. Exploitation? Yes.
Also, grooming is making kids into the perfect sex toy.
That isn't grooming.
>>

 No.13827

>>13814
>"Pedophilia" has become a nebulous term where youth has any indirect semi-erotic exposure in a platonic setting.
More like it has become a nonsense word that describes something of a sexual nature that is a threat to children in some unclear way.  I mean, look at the replies in this thread.  Nobody is talking about the same thing when they use the word.
>>13818
>Actually, if I can be honest, this neopuritanism towards sex may have began with Gen X; the latter-born ones. Ya know, Xennials (born 1975 thru 1985).
And let's not forget that the parents of Gen Z are latter-born Gen X.
I am a bit confused about the timeline here.  If Gen-X stopped being born in 1985, then the Milennials would have been born in the 1985-2005 window, right?  So the oldest of the Zoomers are just now turning twenty.  You think Gen-X has been having kids after 2005 in their forties?  To me it seems more like this:

Boomers (born 1945-1965) sired Gen-X (1965-1985).  Gen-X sired absolutely nobody because they actually used those condoms and birth control pills that were ignored by previous generations.  Then the crazy old Boomers never stopped fucking without protection and also sired the Milennials (1985-2005), many of whom came out with autism as a result of having old-ass parents.  Since autism doesn't keep girls from getting laid, the Milennials sired the Zoomers (2005-2025) despite being broke as a joke and raised them as they themselves were raised–terminally online and with a host of sexual fetishes that one can only indulge in fantasy thus creating a miserable detachment from other humans.  At least that is what it looks like from way back here.
>Nine and twelve aren't that much different. A nine year old can be just as explicit as someone older if they wanted to. It's just not allowed.
>Nothing much to do with biochronology directly.
It's not so much about explicitness as it is about the nature of sexuality.  Yeah, three years hardly seems like much, but, again, just going off of what the two authors I have been talking about wrote, there is a qualitative distinction between the perspePost too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.13828

>>13821
>Keep up the strawmen. Childhood me never donated any money to any whores. Why would I do that when there's free porn?
It's not strawman, it's classic Stockholm syndrome. These women used your still developing sexuality to bond you to them and their abuse. You'll defend them no matter what and they know it. That's why we don't let adults talk sexually to children in public. But since society sees all males, even pre pubescent boys, as dangerous oppressors, it's permitted on Twitch.
>>

 No.13829

>>13828
>It's not strawman, it's classic Stockholm syndrome.
Not what Stockholm Syndrome is.

File: 1791063853318.png ( 285.85 KB , 640x480 , ClipboardImage.png )

 No.13299 [Reply]

for pro male ideology, dedicated to the rights of men and boys and males who have been left behind by society

Masculinity is a slave collar. Masculinity functions in servitude to Feminist-Ouroboric Capitalism."Incel" operates as a pejorative term for men who reject compliance and fail as obedient slaves to feminist Capitalist society.

Radical anti feminism, every single female privilege must be abolished. Feminists are killing men.

PMC STANCES
>PMC is the only men's rights group with correct framing.
>Goal: replace the mainstream MRM with the Pro Male Collective (PMC).
>Long-term goal: replace mainstream MRM, grow PMC brand, build more owned websites.
>Feminism is a hate movement; it should be outlawed ("Ban Feminism before it bans you").
>Feminism is right wing, not left wing; you can't be left wing and a feminist.
>Feminists have won and are still winning; MRAs are delusional to deny it.
>MRM is a failed, meek, passive movement; "awareness raising" and debating feminists achieve nothing.
>All successful movements use loud, aggressive radicals; MRAs are "political wimps."
>Men must get militant, organized, proactive, and coordinated.
>Feminists should face social stigma, job loss, and employer pressure; feminism should be made unacceptable in mainstream society.
>Racism, without exception, is misandry.
>Every single trad-con amounts to an ultra feminist.

STRATEGY / ORGANIZATION
>Emphasize collective action; reject learned helplessness.
>Build own platforms (forum, fbi.gov, game) for censorship-proof autonomy.
>Disciplined structure; no dead weight or time-wasting chat.
>Shift the Overton window via coordinated, aggressive messaging.
>Individualism exacerbates men's problems; collective action is required.
>Men should abandon obsession with women and validation from women.

PRIMARY LEGAL REFORMS
>Mandatory 50/50 shPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
46 posts and 23 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13739

File: 1792974475542.png ( 168.67 KB , 500x378 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>13727
>>13728
Not buying this horseshit either. Piss off harder.

Prove the 90%

And here's a real take, 90% bailing because Alex has a spine isn't proof he's insufferable. If 90% of a room walks because one guy won't water himself down, the 90% were never the group. They were tourists

Name the defectors or shut the fuck up and stop dressing up speculation

<people left because he's insufferable, and we know he's insufferable because people left."
you just invented a closed loop that explains nothing and keeps every mediocre group from ever improving. stay in the 90%
>>

 No.13759

File: 1793013840224.png ( 87.63 KB , 1000x1000 , OP.png )

>>13739
Alex, you are an enormous faggot.
>>

 No.13797

File: 1793050811094.png ( 398.53 KB , 561x561 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>13759
>>

 No.13825

>>13797
why do you have to be so sketchy?

I swear to god every person that "rallies for men" via social media nowadays are the sketchiest goddamn people, like Braden Peters, Andrew Tate


like why can't men have someone normal, why this garbage
>>

 No.13826

File: 1793059997299.png ( 1.41 MB , 1280x720 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>13825
>>13825

 No.5139 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

Here's the killshot, single mothers predict how bad crime is in an area NOT POVERTY!
>The proportion of single-parent households in a community predicts its rate of violent crime and burglary, but the community’s poverty level does not. Source: D.A. Smith and G.R. Jarjoura, “Social Structure and Criminal Victimization,” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 25. 1988.”
This alone should repudiate feminism in the minds of anyone, left or right. And the high single motherhood rate is the direct result of feminists' sexual revolution that encourages women to be promiscuous which inevitably leads to bastards.
Anyone that's traveled outside of the US can attest to this finding. While no poor area of a city or town is safe. They are not these Falluja style war zones that say Baltimore is.
Eliminating single mothers goes a long long way to eliminating poverty for workers. And it's in the best interest of children, which feminists and women pretend to care about.
These studies were aggregated on https://www.fixfamilycourts.com/single-mother-home-statistics. Here are a few other highlights
>“After controlling for single motherhood, the difference between black and white crime rates disappeared.” Progressive Policy Institute, 1990, quoted by David Blankenhorn, “Fatherless America: Confronting Our Most Urgent Social Problem,” New York, Harper Perennial, 1996, p.31
>Effects of Fatherlessness – Teenage Statistics
>63% of all youth suicides,
>70% of all teen pregnancies,
>71% of all adolescent chemical/substance abusers,
>80% of all prison inmates, and
>90% of all homeless and runaway children, came from single mother homes.
>Bob Ray Sanders, “Hey Y’all, Let’s Fill The Hall (Of Fame), Ft. Worth Star Telegram, Oct.28,2007
>Mona Charen, “More Good News Than Bad?”, Washington Times, Mar.16, 2001 (citing Bill Bennett, “The Index of Leading Cultural Indicators: American society at the end of the 20th Century., New York, Broadway Books, 1994)
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
101 posts and 13 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13800

>>13793
Don't sell yourself short, /pol/tard.  I'm sure you can be both.  How many Epsteine Islanders have you voted for?  That counts!
>>

 No.13802

>>13800
Pure projection beta cuck. I want women that abuse children to be held accountable. If Epstein had tits you'd be defending him too.
>>

 No.13807

>>13790
> It 100% is not, definitively so.  Even school is better than a shit job.

If you think school is better than a shit job, I have a bridge to sell you. Schooling is only good for teaching technical skills. By itself, schooling is no less enslavement than work.
In fact, I would argue that school has less freedom than work.

Schools don't allow kids to go off campus for lunch breaks.
They don't allow dating.
They don't allow covered canteens.
They do random drug testing.
Bullying goes unpunished.

The only reason why people think school is better than work is because of pop culture promoting school as a juvenile social club.

> Because absent that child workers get slaved to market forces.  Man, you need to read up on historical child labor.  In fact, Capital Vol. 1 has a chapter on it if I remember right.

If anything, abusive child labor is because of institutionalization of children, not the abscence of it.

> That average is deceiving.  If you actually visit a fast food joint, you see teenagers alright but also a bunch of thirty and forty-somethings.  Fast food is not only a first-and completely useless-job for teenagers; it is also the last stop for old proles who have either been to prison or who are trapped in suburban shitholes with no prospects.

The amount of teens working fast food work has been declining since the 2000s.
Especially since schools are promoting more extracurricular  activities.


> Popular opinion doesn't enter into it.  People don't do trades, because they require apprenticeships.  Usually trade apprenticeships are just doing all the shit work that the master does not want to do for years, which winds up meaning that most apprentices drop out as their patience wears thin at being taken advantage of.  Also, masters like to delay the actual training for as long as possible not only to keep getting undesirable work done for them for cheap but also to avoid putting too many potential competitors into the market.

Fair point. However, trades are still essential and are now being neglected. Most people are being sent off to college without much personal thought.
Colleges also seem to wanna drag on studPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.13813

>>13800
>Only the right wing criticizes women.
Sadly this child abuser apologist isn't wrong. This is the reputation the left has, it's it's a big reason why men on the left have this reputation for being Betas.
>Ib4 Hazan
Can you name some beside that that is at all masculine, but also not an unhinged crank?
>>

 No.13824

>>13813
Right wingers don't really criticize women. They just condemn patronize them.
If anything, right wingers are just as big simps for women as the left.

File: 1750535122176-0.jpg ( 143.39 KB , 712x978 , state-issued girlfriends.jpg )

File: 1750535122177-1.png ( 292.31 KB , 816x846 , 67ggpbiuk1591.png )

File: 1750535122177-2.jpg ( 37.46 KB , 304x304 , Gf compass PoliticalCompas….jpg )

File: 1750535122177-3.jpg ( 194.89 KB , 1080x977 , State issued rule_-_4eFJA0….jpg )

File: 1750535122177-4.jpg ( 405.84 KB , 2048x1534 , 2021-11-09_mulch_tv_145792….jpg )

 No.8759 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

State-issued girlfriend program thread


Alternate titles for this program/policy/initiative/plan:
state-assigned
state-issued
state-mandated
state-appointed
state-ordered
state-mediated
state-arranged

government-assigned
government-issued
government-mandated
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
169 posts and 86 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13803

File: 1793055255975-0.png ( 501.37 KB , 864x1821 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055255975-1.png ( 497.31 KB , 1374x1145 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055255975-2.png ( 862.92 KB , 2064x512 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055255975-3.png ( 1.1 MB , 2064x512 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055255975-4.png ( 1.09 MB , 2064x512 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>13788
>>

 No.13805

File: 1793055327640-0.png ( 727.14 KB , 1254x1254 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055327641-1.png ( 963.32 KB , 1983x793 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.13806

File: 1793055439219-0.png ( 1.35 MB , 1254x1254 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055439219-1.png ( 2.14 MB , 1044x1507 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055439219-2.png ( 36.5 KB , 2202x277 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055439219-3.png ( 23.78 KB , 1618x270 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055439219-4.png ( 25.95 KB , 2220x278 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.13808

File: 1793055529617-0.png ( 38.56 KB , 2629x270 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055529617-1.png ( 25.83 KB , 1463x278 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055529617-2.png ( 11.1 KB , 811x78 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055529617-3.png ( 28.06 KB , 1530x355 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>13806
>>

 No.13810

File: 1793055723195-0.png ( 29.43 KB , 3128x102 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055723195-1.png ( 37.62 KB , 1918x355 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055723195-2.png ( 8.4 KB , 600x78 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055723195-3.png ( 10.09 KB , 614x102 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055723195-4.png ( 42.49 KB , 2929x278 , ClipboardImage.png )


File: 1698622873576.jpg ( 107.24 KB , 1080x1350 , 1698611404875127.jpg )

 No.4183 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

Should women be drafted?
191 posts and 85 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13721

>>13515
I don't know how common it is, but I have heard the opposite voiced by a few girls:  "Girls are for fun;  boys are for marrying."
>>

 No.13723

File: 1792926424259.png ( 1.05 MB , 1200x675 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>13515
>>13721
>>13515
Girls are for rape;  boys are for rape.
>>

 No.13775

>>13721
It's the same principle with the genders inverted.
>>

 No.13777

>>13717
>This type of hazing isn't truly about making effective warriors, it's about conditioning men to be disposable slaves; and why would any self-respecting man want to be a slave?

It's funny how machismo preaches that men are to be conquerors but then tells them that they have to accept and even invite abuse, like they're captives.
>>

 No.13809

>>13717
If you're too valuable to the military, like doctors and lawyers, they don't make you go through basic training.
They know damn well someone with that level of education has options so they have a special program for them where they just attend a class at the university they're attending in lieu of Basic Training.
It just shows how superfluous that hazing is.  

File: 1786757279578.jpg ( 84.4 KB , 1920x1740 , line-icon-for-gangbang-vec….jpg )

 No.12176 [Reply]

Are hardcore gangbangs with 'multiple male on one female' pro-male?

I mean it is empowering for men to get some and to put in work and it builds camaraderie through a shared experience.



Let me know what you think.
13 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13201

>>13173
>being allowed to mate
Fair point, the praxis of genetic selection can't be exacting or adaptability wouldn't be possible. Females also play a role in selection, not only in this case but particularly in genus where the female selects the male based on a demonstration of beauty and intelligence e.g. avian species. Humans select, between both sexes, based on a combination of these things so we're far more complicated than predatory societies or hooved harems. Societies among pack animals aren't driven merely by instinct but, rather, intuitive knowledge/ genetic memory and adaptability.
>>

 No.13725

>>13200
>gross
Why? People have anal sex. Double penetration involves anal but also vaginal at the same time.
>>

 No.13726

>>13725
I feel like sex in general is both gross and cool.
>>

 No.13736

>>13726
Yeah no, it's fucking gross. It looks disgusting, it seems disgusting when you think about it. Why does sex even exist?
>>

 No.13801

>>13736
On the one hand, I kinda agree. However, knowing the personality types that make up this board, I cannot help but feel your sentiment is just sour grapes.

File: 1679422406753.jpg ( 240.43 KB , 1080x357 , 1679119419064709.jpg )

 No.1983 [Reply]

This guy learned the hard way
>What women think or say they want and what they actually respond to are two very different things
55 posts and 13 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.5603

>>2004
>is this a zoomer thing.


Once again, millennials cannot repress their generational supremacism despite having problems with "adulting".
>>

 No.5604

>>2067
>tfw seeing this video again
Just gonna cope and say that she was planning a surprise birthday party.

That's why she didn't wanna show her phone, because she worked really hard and it couldn't go to waste because of some Youtuber.
>>

 No.5655

>>2153
>>2155
>>2200
Gott, I really enjoy the fact that I learned not to care about "your" shitty "opinions" to such a degree that I don't even read them. Bet there's nothing in there but only more ideological cope & seething due to their picture of the world crumbling under contradictive data.
>>

 No.13768

>>1997
> I would say that she didn't want to have sex with him in the first place and was just looking for a excuse to tell him to fuck off

This is probably the most likely thing.
>>

 No.13769

So just grab her by the pussy. Got it.

File: 1792648247513.mp4 ( 5.31 MB , 576x1024 , 5298723045033d5de0a3f76dd2….mp4 )

 No.13627 [Reply]

Why are these so controversial? They're both adults, and as this guy points out, young adults can consent to anything else ethically BUT sex.
Why is that? Also, these age gap relationships are rare. Is getting mad about age gap relationships just the female equivalent of CHUDs getting mad about white women fucking BBC?
20 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13694

>>13630
You're also forgetting that women are also part of the witch hunts as well.
>>

 No.13720

The way this officer was behaving is coincidentally exactly the way womn behave with men a lot of times. He kept provoking and egging the boy to the point of doing something regrettable. And now the officer would get away with what he did because he has plausible deniability. It is exactly the same way womn get men into trouble.
>>

 No.13730

can we not have a containment board for these OPs or ban them

like why
>>

 No.13752

>>13730
Can you stop being a whiny bitch? Like why?
Go to Ogre if you wanna be on the rag.
>>

 No.13753

>>13730
This is the containment board. Just hide this board if you don't like it. Sheesh what a faggot.

File: 1776578466615.jpg ( 60.92 KB , 612x583 , istockphoto-533098573-612x….jpg )

 No.10502 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

Incel News Thread I https://archive.is/TqRsc
Incel News Thread II
https://archive.is/mzesK
228 posts and 87 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13665

>>13633
i respect this guys integrity with how he expresses his perspective
even though i think hes wrong
its still refreshing when compared to the mountain of grifter slop on the internet
>>

 No.13666

>>13665
Go home Grok
>>

 No.13674

>>13666
fuck you i use deepseek
long live the People's Republic
>>

 No.13715

Anime and Manga are The only pro male mediums left.
Society wants for us to have no outlets, to receive nothing for our efforts, while burning ourselves out in a competitive race we have no hope of winning (and isn't worth winning in the first place)
>>

 No.13744


File: 1663187296476.jpg ( 117.78 KB , 736x987 , Sorayama Female Robot art.jpg )

 No.677 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

Post anything regarding sex robots or dolls here.
498 posts and 166 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13559

>>

 No.13589

>>13559
I fucking hate Ex Machina so fucking much. It's a "philosophical" movie in the same way that a big budget Oppenheimer biopic is "scientific" – it isn't, it's just entertainment.
Nathan is so obviously the filmmakers' idea of some evil, hyper-masculine, darkly manipulative tech-bro emblematic of the industry… except that the tech industry is dominated by people like Caleb: effete nerds who believe in insane fantasies like "superintelligence" while self-righteously LARPing as heroes and liberators. Nathan is far more pragmatic and humble by comparison.
The ideological core of this sad excuse of a film, and of the tech industry, is the cynical belief that human beings are ultimately nothing more than inefficient pattern-matching machines. Nathan understands the difference between the purpose of a machine and the agency of a human being. His only mistake was being blind to the sad fact that there are disgusting degenerate subhuman scum like Caleb who will irrationally outsource their agency (to a fucking machine, no less).
Maybe these retarded filmmakers should turn the lens inward, for once, with their pathetic attempt at critique. The entertainment industry is more often than not guilty of the very things it criticizes, and has grown increasingly incapable of producing a film with any level of intellectual sophistication whatsoever. The greatest irony of Ex Machina is that what most defines it is its superficial performance of intellectualism. Just like Ava, the only thing it does truly well is tricking the viewer that it's intelligent, when it was really just scripted.
>>

 No.13685

File: 1792851653390.jpg ( 72.48 KB , 625x824 , 379b51f7-1d46-42a0-a670-83….jpg )

>>

 No.13737

Conversational AI GFs have now arrived.
>>

 No.13738

>>13737
we are getting closer to the film Her (2013)

Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / ... / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home