>>14137>Why does war exist? Because there is ecenomic incentive to send armies into other places to steal their shit. What, did you think it was hate and intollerance?Its all these things. Motive for money and justification for racism.
All the things we accuse children of portraying.
>No it's not. The coldest response it receives is something to the effect of, "You really shouldn't say that."Now youre fibbing. Theres constant articles crying over discrimination against elderly, lumpens, and mentally ill.
Not so much for children.
>Okay, you are not even worth talking to on the subject of children. All you do is ignore what anyone else says and feed your own vicarious persecution complex.Ive not ignored what youve said. Youre just rationalising your vicarious contempt for children. Again if I complained about women, ethnics, mentally ill, lumpens, etc, you would check me constantly.
>If done for laughs, I can see how that might be entertaining.Where? Its mostly serious.
>100% sure. There is no time to mull over counterpoints and re-analyze a subject based on a new perspective when doing oration. An orator has a performance to put on.And you think books dont do this either? Orators can and do mull over subjects and offer counterpoints. Its not all about blabbing on showing off how good your voice sounds
>I would, and I doubt they would disagree.You sure about that? Reddit patrons rationalise oratory as essential for academic performance.
They have a pathological aversion to technical skills being incorporated in curriculum.
Theres people on Reddit who unironically say "School osnt about teaching you life skills, its about teaching you soft skills to figure things out for yourself"
Also your pic is an old overused strawmen. Bullying, smothering, lack of survival skills is a real thing kids have to face.
You forget this due to pop culture comicalizing kids so much that adults are incapable of viewing them as actual persons rather than flesh-and-blood cartoon characters