[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble

| Catalog | Home

File: 1746734067915.jpg ( 46.09 KB , 398x577 , if she hit me it's for my ….jpg )

 No.8412[Reply]

Would you date an abusive female?
12 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11826

>>11825
>random white women hate
Lol found you https://lolcow.farm/snow/res/2108700.html
>>

 No.11827

>>11826
why would a nazi be casually posting here.

also that's a super gross forum
>>

 No.11829

>>11827
Because some autistic no-lifer with an unhealthy manner of spending their convenient amount of free time, has an agenda and specifically wants to push white women hate.
>>

 No.11830

>>11826
i said i don't date attractive white women

not that i love azns

cut off the lolcow stuff it's not even productive unless they have some kind of power or influence
>>

 No.11904

>an abusive female has more social clout than you
it's over for femcels…


File: 1693590623252.jpg ( 58.07 KB , 931x706 , f19dc1dd1e527d1c44640252e4….jpg )

 No.3464[Reply]

Are fictional women still based (as in positive opinion) if they are based off of real life women?

If we assume real life women existed before imaginary women did, then don't traces of real life women exist within the concepts of fictional women? Thoughts?
27 posts and 8 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11054

>>10138
Cope. Betabux backup when f*males are in their decline doesn't count.
>>

 No.11058

>>11054
Then what does?
Because “chudsexual” women are an outlier.
>>

 No.11065

>>11058
https://www.instagram.com/male.beauty/
Where's the ugly/fat/skinny men posts?
>>

 No.11077

>>11065
>confusing “chUd” for “chAd” in my previous post
>>

 No.11903

>>3672
Bump for this question.


File: 1710603807032-0.jpg ( 229.8 KB , 1459x785 , imaginary gf waifu It work….jpg )

File: 1710603807032-1.jpg ( 107.72 KB , 716x472 , live meticulously crafted ….jpg )

File: 1710603807032-2.png ( 130.92 KB , 2034x310 , lit gf imaginary delusion ….png )

File: 1710603807032-3.jpg ( 119.02 KB , 690x727 , lonely just talk to myself.jpg )

File: 1710603807032-4.jpg ( 93.33 KB , 909x481 , Me on the left.jpg )

 No.5239[Reply]

Post and discuss using your imagination/delusion/fantasy.
44 posts and 32 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.10857

>be unproductive
<just imagine myself being productive
>>

 No.10886

File: 1780085642327.jpg ( 16.12 KB , 636x151 , Fanfiction is better censo….jpg )

>>

 No.10890

>>

 No.11804

>☀️ ⛱️ 🌊 Intimate & Relaxing Eye Gazing on the Beach

using this video for imagination fantasy
>>

 No.11902

>>10511
Physical contact would be closer to simping. No contact is further away from simping.


 No.11280[Reply]

Post anything about traveling abroad dating, sex or marriage in this thread.
10 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11787

https://lolcow.farm/snow/res/2108700.html
This is what y'all look like
>>

 No.11791

>>11787
We're anti-captialist though
>>

 No.11792

>>11791
>We're anti-captialist
What does that even mean? What, like you're too broke to buy things so sour grapes, so you act like you didn't even want it anyway.
>>

 No.11794

>>11792
>What, like you're too broke to buy things so sour grapes,
Well it's not just that, but we blame capitalism for not getting what we want.
>so you act like you didn't even want it anyway.
Haha no liberals do that, we very much act like we want it.
>>

 No.11901

File: 1786226047036.mp4 ( 9 MB , 720x1280 , 1785101021886207.mp4 )

>>11712
> Understand the dowry system (sin sod) before proposing


File: 1659390981508.png ( 8.72 KB , 645x773 , feels.png )

 No.468[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

Share you feels here.
No bully
also feel free to share your feels in the /leftcel/ thread at https://9chan.tw/leftcel/thread/2696
508 posts and 102 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11852

>>11506
There isn’t a real “loneliness” epidemic, male or female

It’s just people having an obnoxiously romanticized view of relationships.
All the people who complain about loneliness have friends and family they talk to.
They just choose to not cherish them because they’re not glamourised nuanced individuals of wit
>>

 No.11897

How do I stop feeling bad about not accomplishing anything in life?
>>

 No.11898

File: 1786223790385.png ( 1.04 MB , 1000x457 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>11897
By accepting and enjoying all is dust, my King of Kings
>>

 No.11899

>>11898
Don't fall for this dumb nihilist lib shit. I don't know what's wrong with you but talking to a pro can help. Just look up how to screen therapists because there's a lot of bad ones out there.
>>

 No.11900

File: 1786224720607.jpg ( 38.28 KB , 564x570 , dummy.jpg )

>>11899
>therapists
>talking


File: 1750535122176-0.jpg ( 143.39 KB , 712x978 , state-issued girlfriends.jpg )

File: 1750535122177-1.png ( 292.31 KB , 816x846 , 67ggpbiuk1591.png )

File: 1750535122177-3.jpg ( 194.89 KB , 1080x977 , State issued rule_-_4eFJA0….jpg )

File: 1750535122177-4.jpg ( 405.84 KB , 2048x1534 , 2021-11-09_mulch_tv_145792….jpg )

 No.8759[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

State-issued girlfriend program thread


Alternate titles for this program/policy/initiative/plan:
state-assigned
state-issued
state-mandated
state-appointed
state-ordered
state-mediated
state-arranged

government-assigned
government-issued
government-mandated
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
120 posts and 21 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11861

>>11858
Maybe I ought to clarify what I meant then. I’m saying that it’s easier for adults to abuse/patronize kids without getting much immediate consequence compared to if you do it to women.
>>

 No.11872

>>10532
>gooner

They’re not gooners
They look down on gooners as cucks. These entitled men wouldn’t be satisfied with mere porn alone.
>>

 No.11873

>>10576
This vision of liberation you have is more applicable for young people.
Our liberal-capitalist regime is infantilizing young people, increasing the age of dependency.
>>

 No.11895

in a centrally planned socialist society i would support a state matchmaking service if it was also paired with a bachelor tax
>>

 No.11896

>>8831
Do you grow your own food? Do you sow your own clothes? Farm your own animals? Typical commune-fetishizing anarcho-primitivists.


File: 1750369520353.jpg ( 520.82 KB , 1360x1200 , race bait choose poison.jpg )

 No.8735[Reply]

What's worse? Black culture that promotes things that destroy the black community or harem anime/tranime?
13 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11890

>>11888
Lupe Fiasco - Mural
Killah Priest - Heavy Mental
Del Tha Funkee Homosapien - Cyberpunks
>>

 No.11891

>>8735
As a black man, I would choose the harem anime route

The hip-hop culture has been bastardized by gangster elements so much. And it’s far too common for rappers to end up broke or in beefs with people.
And the backstabbing.

Look what happened to Tupac. That man was talented. He was a promising actor and a rapper. He got involved with the wrong crowd and ended up falsely accused of murder.
And it was due to his newfound drug lord friends who showered him with jewelry and dapper clothes.

And they left him to rot. And when he spoke out against him, they mugged him in the recording studio.
>>

 No.11892

>>11890
Are those artists still active and/or widely discussed in the greater hip hop community?
>>

 No.11893

>>11892
Sounds like moving goalposts but Lupe Fiasco definitely is still active and has a fandom.

And they all still tour from time to time.

>still active and/or widely discussed

Why does something need to be active or widely discussed if the content is good?



Furthermore if you listen to Lupe Fiasco's Mural, he says:
"So what powers cowards to get them to the top
Just to fall asleep listening to Bach?"
>>

 No.11894

Why is rap looked down upon while pop, rock, and electronic music is normalized and hegemonic?


File: 1752904618347.jpg ( 198.15 KB , 1175x1763 , Bodies_Bodies_Bodies_poste….jpg )

 No.8908[Reply]

Should a woman's body count not matter to man? Why do so many women insist it shouldn't matter? Are men just insecure as women claim? Or do men have a legitimate reason to worry about marrying women that has a slutty past?
Women who have had more partners do tend to have higher divorce rates. Should it even matter what the reason men have for avoiding promiscuous women if it's their life, or do men have some kind of obligation or social contract to push aside their reservations? If so do women have any obligations to men.
What is a high body count to you. For me, anymore than 20 would be a red flag.
56 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11814

>>11798
> C-U-C-K-O-L-D

I guess not being an obnoxious horndog means I’m a cuck. Women aren’t gonna like flirting unless you’re suave and gorgeous

> Yes, why not?


I mean ALL kinds of women, not merely the young slender docile beauties. That means it includes the grannies and boisterous butch ones as well.

>No, sex is needed no matter leads it to a birth or not. And not only with your wife, actually the more females you fuck the better for you.


Then why do you call homosexuality a mental illness? If heterosexual intercourse shouldn’t have to be procreation, there is no moral mandate for anal sex to be pathologized.

>Yes, I have. And I've also considered another fact - that sex and getting a young wife were much more available back then. So we have the first option - men in the past desperately wanted to fuck other men in the ass, but couldn't do it due to the culture or law reasons and the real percentage of gay was roughly the same as now. And the second option - today sex and relationship with young women are so unavailable for men and the gay propaganda is so ruthless, that some of men give up and start to date other men, which leads to higher gay percentage. The principle of Okkam's razor states that you should choose the more likely option between two. Which is clearly the second one.


Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11821

>>11814

> Women aren’t gonna like flirting unless you’re suave and gorgeous


In you previous posts you denied that women want chads. Now you are confirming that they don't like flirting with a man who is not a chad (suave and gorgeous). You are so bad at debating that you don't even remember what you have said, lol.

> I guess not being an obnoxious horndog means I’m a cuck.


You care more about what women like than what about men need. That's why you are a cuck.

> I mean ALL kinds of women, not merely the young slender docile beauties. That means it includes the grannies and boisterous butch ones as well.


I don't get erection to grannies, lol. But still don't mind their right to flirt with me, if it's required to get sex with the young ones.

> Then why do you call homosexuality a mental illness? If heterosexual intercourse shouldn’t have to be procreation, there is no moral mandate for anal sex to be pathologized.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11885

>>11821
>I don't get erection to grannies, lol. But still don't mind their right to flirt with me, if it's required to get sex with the young ones

What if it doesn’t get you any attention from younger women?

>In the eyes of gay activists, cucks and feminists - definitely.


So then, I guess I can say there’s no “redpill agenda” in the eyes of redpillers

>homosexuals work against men, because they legitimate the false idea that women are not required for sex. Instead of fighting for the male right to have sex with women.


This is some serious persecution complex.
Homosexual males aren’t trying to discourage you from fucking women.
You’re projecting your bias onto them.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11886

>I sent you to google, but it seems your brain is so small that you don't even know how to use it.

You are making some extraordinary claims. That requires extraordinary evidence
Merely saying “just Google it” ain’t gonna cut it. Provide links of studies that has convinced you.
>>

 No.11887

>>11821
>There's nothing to respond there. I'm not interesting in discussing your fantasies about my psychology or about me in general. I'm discussing the problem of involuntary celibacy, one of the main social problems in the modern neoliberal capitalist world.

You’re the one spamming your fantastical theories.


 No.11509[Reply]

>Example of Severely-Autistic Behavior

Source:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jrqpn60d4A

A good looking mentally disabled guy. It's over…
2 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11644

>>11638
What’s even more discomforting is the fact that physically/cognitively disabled male youths still have the drive for sex and romance
>>

 No.11645

>>11638
>mentally younger

Wtfdtm

Mental disability isn’t having a “younger” mind

Like, a mentally well teen isn’t the same as a mentally disabled adult
>>

 No.11646

>>11638
They’re more okay with mentally disabled women wanting sex/romance
>>

 No.11880

>>11645
>a mentally well teen isn’t the same as a mentally disabled adult
Can you expand on this? I can't wrap my head around it
>>

 No.11882

>>11880
Age numbers aren’t personality traits.

Putting a disabled adult on the same cognitive level as neurotypical teen is insulting if not incorrect.

Kids aren’t “disabled” by default.
“Brain development” is mainly used for sociological context but often mistaken for direct neurophysiology.

Teen behavior is mainly socially conditioned anyway by parents and teachers.

A mentally disabled adult is socially infantilised like teens are which may make it seem like they’re neurocognitvely replicate of a neurotypical teen but they’re not the same

Do you consider traps to be the same as ciswomen?
No, even if their physique and mannerisms APPEAR like women, they aren’t biogenetically women.


File: 1775938701898.jpeg ( 48.97 KB , 640x480 , images.jpeg )

 No.10358[Reply]

Post eugenic and or genetic stories here.
74 posts and 6 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11786

>>11781
The real reason: it hurts capitalism.
The reason they say is it's because pension systems will collapse.
>>

 No.11805

Eli Lilly is treating nearly 10% of US obesity population with GLP-1s: CFO
https://finance.yahoo.com/video/eli-lilly-treating-nearly-10-150223508.html
>>

 No.11810

https://www.independentliving.org/docs5/sterilization.html
Eradication of "deviants": the dark side of the Swedish Model." | Independent Living Institute

The world was shocked by the recent news of a skeleton in Sweden’s closet, the country’s forced sterilization policy of disabled people and others who were not found to be worthy to have children. The facts are clear, there is no reason to question the authencity of the sterilization records. Sources other than Dagens Nyheter, the nation’s largest daily newspaper that recently started the sterilization discussion, as well as researchers are confirming the facts. Also, Sweden is famous for its comprehensive statistics. Thus, all sterilizations records and "patient" journals are archived and available to researcchers and journalists. Persons who were sterilized against their will have come out of their silence and appeared in the media. The sterilizations were fully legal according to the laws of the time. There were well-developed and state-regulated routines with medical experts at the local and national level, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, with a panel of highly placed representatives of political parties (mainly female Social Democrats including an ambassador to the United Nations) who signed the decisions that would deprive tens of thousands of persons of one of the most basic human rights, the right to have children.



https://muse.jhu.edu/book/40871
Project MUSE - Eugenics and the Welfare State
https://www.euronews.com/2023/06/08/how-did-sweden-sterilise-up-to-30000-people-against-their-will-in-the-cause-of-eugenics
Why did Sweden sterilise up to 30,000 people against their will in the cause of eugenics? | Euronews

Sweden set up a eugenics plan, grounded in the science of racial biology, between 1934 and 1976. “They wanted to get rid of a certain type of people: The weaker ones”.

Kjell Sundstedt’s family had never talked about the darkest moment in their history.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11812

>>11810
Wow, Sweden's eugenics program ran all the way until 1976!?
>>

 No.11878

File: 1786204510094.mp4 ( 2.05 MB , 576x1024 , 52119e74a81563e1e2d74caccf….mp4 )



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
Previous [ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 / 34 / 35 / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home