[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble
| Catalog | Home

File: 1791063853318.png ( 285.85 KB , 640x480 , ClipboardImage.png )

 No.13299 [Reply]

for pro male ideology, dedicated to the rights of men and boys and males who have been left behind by society

Masculinity is a slave collar. Masculinity functions in servitude to Feminist-Ouroboric Capitalism."Incel" operates as a pejorative term for men who reject compliance and fail as obedient slaves to feminist Capitalist society.

Radical anti feminism, every single female privilege must be abolished. Feminists are killing men.

PMC STANCES
>PMC is the only men's rights group with correct framing.
>Goal: replace the mainstream MRM with the Pro Male Collective (PMC).
>Long-term goal: replace mainstream MRM, grow PMC brand, build more owned websites.
>Feminism is a hate movement; it should be outlawed ("Ban Feminism before it bans you").
>Feminism is right wing, not left wing; you can't be left wing and a feminist.
>Feminists have won and are still winning; MRAs are delusional to deny it.
>MRM is a failed, meek, passive movement; "awareness raising" and debating feminists achieve nothing.
>All successful movements use loud, aggressive radicals; MRAs are "political wimps."
>Men must get militant, organized, proactive, and coordinated.
>Feminists should face social stigma, job loss, and employer pressure; feminism should be made unacceptable in mainstream society.
>Racism, without exception, is misandry.
>Every single trad-con amounts to an ultra feminist.

STRATEGY / ORGANIZATION
>Emphasize collective action; reject learned helplessness.
>Build own platforms (forum, fbi.gov, game) for censorship-proof autonomy.
>Disciplined structure; no dead weight or time-wasting chat.
>Shift the Overton window via coordinated, aggressive messaging.
>Individualism exacerbates men's problems; collective action is required.
>Men should abandon obsession with women and validation from women.

PRIMARY LEGAL REFORMS
>Mandatory 50/50 shPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
43 posts and 22 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13724

File: 1792927671158.png ( 323.31 KB , 580x388 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>13628
Nothing about your take is particularly insightful, it's just ad hominem dressed up as analysis, which is a nice way to avoid addressing anything substantive

hiding behind vague accusations of being "sketchy" while refusing to name actual wrongdoings makes you look like someone trying to remove critics
>>

 No.13727

>>13724

you have to be a uniquely insufferable person Alex to have 90% of your own group voluntarily leave you solely because of your own personality
>>

 No.13728

>>13724
Not buying it.  Piss off.
>>

 No.13739

File: 1792974475542.png ( 168.67 KB , 500x378 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>13727
>>13728
Not buying this horseshit either. Piss off harder.

Prove the 90%

And here's a real take, 90% bailing because Alex has a spine isn't proof he's insufferable. If 90% of a room walks because one guy won't water himself down, the 90% were never the group. They were tourists

Name the defectors or shut the fuck up and stop dressing up speculation

<people left because he's insufferable, and we know he's insufferable because people left."
you just invented a closed loop that explains nothing and keeps every mediocre group from ever improving. stay in the 90%
>>

 No.13759

File: 1793013840224.png ( 87.63 KB , 1000x1000 , OP.png )

>>13739
Alex, you are an enormous faggot.

 No.5139 [Reply]

Here's the killshot, single mothers predict how bad crime is in an area NOT POVERTY!
>The proportion of single-parent households in a community predicts its rate of violent crime and burglary, but the community’s poverty level does not. Source: D.A. Smith and G.R. Jarjoura, “Social Structure and Criminal Victimization,” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 25. 1988.”
This alone should repudiate feminism in the minds of anyone, left or right. And the high single motherhood rate is the direct result of feminists' sexual revolution that encourages women to be promiscuous which inevitably leads to bastards.
Anyone that's traveled outside of the US can attest to this finding. While no poor area of a city or town is safe. They are not these Falluja style war zones that say Baltimore is.
Eliminating single mothers goes a long long way to eliminating poverty for workers. And it's in the best interest of children, which feminists and women pretend to care about.
These studies were aggregated on https://www.fixfamilycourts.com/single-mother-home-statistics. Here are a few other highlights
>“After controlling for single motherhood, the difference between black and white crime rates disappeared.” Progressive Policy Institute, 1990, quoted by David Blankenhorn, “Fatherless America: Confronting Our Most Urgent Social Problem,” New York, Harper Perennial, 1996, p.31
>Effects of Fatherlessness – Teenage Statistics
>63% of all youth suicides,
>70% of all teen pregnancies,
>71% of all adolescent chemical/substance abusers,
>80% of all prison inmates, and
>90% of all homeless and runaway children, came from single mother homes.
>Bob Ray Sanders, “Hey Y’all, Let’s Fill The Hall (Of Fame), Ft. Worth Star Telegram, Oct.28,2007
>Mona Charen, “More Good News Than Bad?”, Washington Times, Mar.16, 2001 (citing Bill Bennett, “The Index of Leading Cultural Indicators: American society at the end of the 20th Century., New York, Broadway Books, 1994)
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
85 posts and 9 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13733

>>13731
Cope feminist bottom cuckold. I do have praxis, but praxis starts with identifying the fucking problem.
Often I'm able to help people just by validating the abuse they're experiencing by their single moms because legions of reddit cucks like you relentlessly gaslight them.
>>

 No.13734

>>13731
>Get gud,
This is how evil male feminists are. They'll literally tell abused children and their advocates to "get gud" before even once considering to hold female child abusers accountable. It's why you have millions of women defending child murderers like Lindsey Clansey.
>>

 No.13740

>>13716
>If you can't stand up for children, the most sympathetic group ever, you can't stand up for anyone.


The truth is, nobody wants to stand up for children. Adults only see children as pets. "Think of the children" is only used to further adult convenience, not childrens welfare.
>>

 No.13748

>>13734
Conswrvatives do the same when it comes to abusive fathers.
>>

 No.13758

File: 1793013526481.jpg ( 63.98 KB , 580x480 , helen-lovejoy.jpg )

>>13732
>>13733
>>13734
>why you no cry about children on the internet more?
lel

 No.13741 [Reply]

This has been occurring for a long time on streaming platforms like Twitch. Overtly marketing sex and sex appeal to underage boys by young women. By either dressing as revealing as possible while streaming a play session, flirting with fans that donate money to them, or by out right plugging their OF pages. These adult women are manipulating young underage boys with their sexuality. If they did this physically in public they'd likely be arrested.
This has detrimental effects on any child's development and is outright pedophilic. It's time the left collectively spoke out against this as it's not becoming so obscene even normies are taking notice.
Why has the left been so silent on this issue? Is it because the victims are male, and by feminism's view, cannot really ever be victims of women, because the perpetrators are pretty? I really don't get it, the left really needs to answer for this complete dereliction of duty.
7 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13751

>>13749
How is it any different from males thruce their age doing the same?
These boys have libido. Theyre not infants. They know right from wrong.

The problem is that society likes to sociocognitively infantilise young people.

Treat them like babies when theyre biocrhonologically closer adulthood than infancy.

I find it funny our society sees tweens as old enough for violence and physical disclipline.

People see no problem with twelve year old boys doing life threatening stunts in sports.
Playing tackle football on concrete without padding, playing hockey with no mouthguards, etc.
Yet wheb it comes to the erotic, its the opposite.
>>

 No.13754

>>13750
No they weren't. And children as young as 5 watch these streams. Jesus Christ, you can't even satirize these cucks anymore, they don't even care about child predators.
>>

 No.13755

>>13751
>How is it any different from males thruce their age doing the same?
>These boys have libido. Theyre not infants. They know right from wrong.
The difference is is that it's an adult woman preying on elementary school children with sex. The US is just hell on earth I swear to God.
>>

 No.13756

>>13755
>The US is just hell on earth I swear to God.
Pretty much but things are tough all over. Unfettered capitalism tends to do that. Before the internet, the worst i saw as a kid were xxx magazines left in the woods where I lived. Poked a few open for a peek with a stick since most the pages were stuck together. Now it's in your face and nearly everything and everyone has a price, consumers also being commodities. The web platforms allow a certain level of self-employment, so the 'bosses' who don't have workers to exploit do it to themselves and to others. Capitalism requires exploitation depending on circumstance, which is most of the time.
>>

 No.13757

>>13749
Goddamn right they were.  Can we quit pretending that twelve year-olds are not horny little shits?  I recal stealing my first porno magazine from a store when I was seven.  By twelve I was actively trying to get laid.  What the hell were you doing at twelve?

By a coincidence, I happen to be reading a fantasy novel called The Romance of Atlantis that was written by a twelve year-old girl named Taylor Caldwell.  Her main character, a pretty obvious self-insert mary sue, is either flirting with or fucking every attractive character that she introduces.  It is really not a good book, but it is great for providing insight into the thoughts and fantasies of a tweener as well as the thoughts and fantasies of a rightard.  Caldwell reeks of American libertarianism.
>>13754
>And children as young as 5 watch these streams.
Oh no, they might be made aware of the fact that sex sells!  Won't somebody think of the children?

File: 1792648247513.mp4 ( 5.31 MB , 576x1024 , 5298723045033d5de0a3f76dd2….mp4 )

 No.13627 [Reply]

Why are these so controversial? They're both adults, and as this guy points out, young adults can consent to anything else ethically BUT sex.
Why is that? Also, these age gap relationships are rare. Is getting mad about age gap relationships just the female equivalent of CHUDs getting mad about white women fucking BBC?
20 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13694

>>13630
You're also forgetting that women are also part of the witch hunts as well.
>>

 No.13720

The way this officer was behaving is coincidentally exactly the way womn behave with men a lot of times. He kept provoking and egging the boy to the point of doing something regrettable. And now the officer would get away with what he did because he has plausible deniability. It is exactly the same way womn get men into trouble.
>>

 No.13730

can we not have a containment board for these OPs or ban them

like why
>>

 No.13752

>>13730
Can you stop being a whiny bitch? Like why?
Go to Ogre if you wanna be on the rag.
>>

 No.13753

>>13730
This is the containment board. Just hide this board if you don't like it. Sheesh what a faggot.

File: 1776578466615.jpg ( 60.92 KB , 612x583 , istockphoto-533098573-612x….jpg )

 No.10502 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

Incel News Thread I https://archive.is/TqRsc
Incel News Thread II
https://archive.is/mzesK
228 posts and 87 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13665

>>13633
i respect this guys integrity with how he expresses his perspective
even though i think hes wrong
its still refreshing when compared to the mountain of grifter slop on the internet
>>

 No.13666

>>13665
Go home Grok
>>

 No.13674

>>13666
fuck you i use deepseek
long live the People's Republic
>>

 No.13715

Anime and Manga are The only pro male mediums left.
Society wants for us to have no outlets, to receive nothing for our efforts, while burning ourselves out in a competitive race we have no hope of winning (and isn't worth winning in the first place)
>>

 No.13744


File: 1663187296476.jpg ( 117.78 KB , 736x987 , Sorayama Female Robot art.jpg )

 No.677 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

Post anything regarding sex robots or dolls here.
498 posts and 166 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13559

>>

 No.13589

>>13559
I fucking hate Ex Machina so fucking much. It's a "philosophical" movie in the same way that a big budget Oppenheimer biopic is "scientific" – it isn't, it's just entertainment.
Nathan is so obviously the filmmakers' idea of some evil, hyper-masculine, darkly manipulative tech-bro emblematic of the industry… except that the tech industry is dominated by people like Caleb: effete nerds who believe in insane fantasies like "superintelligence" while self-righteously LARPing as heroes and liberators. Nathan is far more pragmatic and humble by comparison.
The ideological core of this sad excuse of a film, and of the tech industry, is the cynical belief that human beings are ultimately nothing more than inefficient pattern-matching machines. Nathan understands the difference between the purpose of a machine and the agency of a human being. His only mistake was being blind to the sad fact that there are disgusting degenerate subhuman scum like Caleb who will irrationally outsource their agency (to a fucking machine, no less).
Maybe these retarded filmmakers should turn the lens inward, for once, with their pathetic attempt at critique. The entertainment industry is more often than not guilty of the very things it criticizes, and has grown increasingly incapable of producing a film with any level of intellectual sophistication whatsoever. The greatest irony of Ex Machina is that what most defines it is its superficial performance of intellectualism. Just like Ava, the only thing it does truly well is tricking the viewer that it's intelligent, when it was really just scripted.
>>

 No.13685

File: 1792851653390.jpg ( 72.48 KB , 625x824 , 379b51f7-1d46-42a0-a670-83….jpg )

>>

 No.13737

Conversational AI GFs have now arrived.
>>

 No.13738

>>13737
we are getting closer to the film Her (2013)

File: 1786757279578.jpg ( 84.4 KB , 1920x1740 , line-icon-for-gangbang-vec….jpg )

 No.12176 [Reply]

Are hardcore gangbangs with 'multiple male on one female' pro-male?

I mean it is empowering for men to get some and to put in work and it builds camaraderie through a shared experience.



Let me know what you think.
12 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13200

>>13198
Seems kind of cool but also kind of gross at the same time. I'm very split on the matter.
>>

 No.13201

>>13173
>being allowed to mate
Fair point, the praxis of genetic selection can't be exacting or adaptability wouldn't be possible. Females also play a role in selection, not only in this case but particularly in genus where the female selects the male based on a demonstration of beauty and intelligence e.g. avian species. Humans select, between both sexes, based on a combination of these things so we're far more complicated than predatory societies or hooved harems. Societies among pack animals aren't driven merely by instinct but, rather, intuitive knowledge/ genetic memory and adaptability.
>>

 No.13725

>>13200
>gross
Why? People have anal sex. Double penetration involves anal but also vaginal at the same time.
>>

 No.13726

>>13725
I feel like sex in general is both gross and cool.
>>

 No.13736

>>13726
Yeah no, it's fucking gross. It looks disgusting, it seems disgusting when you think about it. Why does sex even exist?

File: 1787613061226.png ( 1.82 MB , 1080x1229 , ClipboardImage.png )

 No.12589 [Reply]

I will sex all of you.
55 posts and 9 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13693

>>13683
Resource for what?
>>

 No.13695

>>13693
Sex
>>

 No.13701

>>13695
So is male youth
>>

 No.13718

Every Abuse starts with a Promise.
>>

 No.13735

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashian_curse
I told yall this was a thing, the Kardashians are cursed

File: 1698622873576.jpg ( 107.24 KB , 1080x1350 , 1698611404875127.jpg )

 No.4183 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

Should women be drafted?
188 posts and 85 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13514

>>13507
Women are for breeding and boys are for fun. I think that's what I heard.
>>

 No.13515

>>13514
"Women are for business, boys are for pleasure" is an old Italian proverb.

This is why I think it's hypocritical for older men to be morally obsessed over youth sexuality because they're the biggest clientele.
>>

 No.13717

What's ironic to me is that people who advocate this kind of abuse talk about how we need to foster a strong "warrior culture" to protect and expand civilization against hostile barbarians.  I remember watching your Sparta video, they didn't even manage to build a particularly large or long-lasting empire.  Currently, the U.S. makes up about 5% of the world's population but accounts for 40% of the world's military budget; yet America's record of decisive military victories post WWII are pathetic (like in Vietnam and Afghanistan).  This type of hazing isn't truly about making effective warriors, it's about conditioning men to be disposable slaves; and why would any self-respecting man want to be a slave?
>>

 No.13721

>>13515
I don't know how common it is, but I have heard the opposite voiced by a few girls:  "Girls are for fun;  boys are for marrying."
>>

 No.13723

File: 1792926424259.png ( 1.05 MB , 1200x675 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>13515
>>13721
>>13515
Girls are for rape;  boys are for rape.

 No.13635 [Reply]

Men need it In a world where technology is making male labor obsolete, men need to find purpose outside of work.

Consumer culture also want you to struggle, not to have something to get by and have to power to consume what you want. By making it harder, they are able to stratify most of the products so you get a shit deal in the end.
7 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13653

>>13638
One-paragraph Marxist summary (AI)
Cockshott argues that UBI is best understood not as an emancipatory guarantee of livelihood, but as a mechanism for reducing the cost of labour-power to capital. By paying workers a universal sum that can be combined with very low wages, UBI allows employers to pay below the normal reproduction cost of labour while the state socialises the difference. Historically, this connects to Friedman/Hayek negative income tax and to New Labour tax credits: both subsidised low-wage employers. His critique of the "robots are taking our jobs" case is that the real problem under neoliberalism is not excessive automation but wage suppression discouraging productivity-enhancing investment. A livable UBI would require such heavy taxation of ordinary earners that it becomes a circular redistribution harming pensioners, average workers, and two-earner households; an affordable UBI would be too small to live on and would simply become another employer subsidy. Thus, from a Marxist perspective, UBI preserves the wage relation, weakens labour's bargaining position, retards development of the productive forces, and functions as a crisis-management device for low-productivity capitalism rather than a step toward a post-work society.
>>

 No.13654

>>13639
Who gives a shit who hosts it? Use yt-dlp to download it then, or use new pipe on android to watch it. When capitalism gives you things for free, exploit them for our own benefit.
>>

 No.13664

>Marxist materialism proves robowaifus will save men.
Now this is something that can spark a revolution!
>>

 No.13670

>>13653
>A livable UBI would require such heavy taxation of ordinary earners that it becomes a circular redistribution harming pensioners, average workers, and two-earner households; an affordable UBI would be too small to live on and would simply become another employer subsidy.
That right there is my big concern with the policy.  If it's just a tax on some workers to pay for what is essentially charity for other workers it is completely useless to us.  It is a just pacifying substitute for worker organization.
>>

 No.13713

>>13636
>>13664

Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / ... / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home