[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble

| Catalog | Home

 No.7076[Reply]

female celibacy thread

https://www.bostonherald.com/2024/07/18/dear-abby-hubbys-been-saying-not-tonight-for-years/
Dear Abby: Hubby's been saying 'not tonight' for years
28 posts and 9 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11415

>>11343
This.
I swear to God, people nowadays exaggerate dating woes too much.
A man could breathe or move his mouth the wrong way and women will feel threatened.
A woman could have a few tattoos and men act like she’s living a gutter.

People nowadays have far less sex and romance nowadays and are all awkward and afraid.

People either need to shut the fuck up or get some sex dolls.
Or better yet, indulge in fanfiction or roleplay videos.

Sex and romance are not essential for living. They’re privileges.
>>

 No.11507

File: 1784792177943.jpg ( 59.51 KB , 720x1140 , 1782972672271021.jpg )

>>

 No.11508

>>11507
lol fuck this stupid bitch. Even if I didn't inherently find teenage girls more attractive I'd still pursue them just to shit on cunts like this for exactly the reasons the guy on the bottom said. Fucking teenage girls as an unc is part of our revenge on them.
>>

 No.11540

>>11507
Why are women not allowed to have and enjoy sex?
>>

 No.11541

>>11540
>Why do you believe this thing you never said?
Ebin


File: 1782689407746.jpeg ( 111.29 KB , 1200x1200 , IMG_6452.jpeg )

 No.11329[Reply]

I have looked through some posts about incels here. How do you even come up with such ideas? Does the world really looks like this to you? All hostile and greedy evil women who want to manage sex market? They don't give us sex so they shut our mouths?

How many layers of irony I'm losing here? Is it what not having sex does to a man?

I would be happy to listen your thoughts on this.
23 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11385

>>11376
I've already put up with obnoxious people my entire life. I'm quoting an obnoxious person's post now.
>>

 No.11411

>>11379
>>11385
T. Whiny ass post-pubescent male wasting away his cognitive faculties over getting lucky with a nubile virginal female
>>

 No.11412

>>11374
> By using logic and facts.

You know this is how a lot of delusional people think? That their reasoning is based on “facts and logic”?

> This is why we need meninism. They shouldn't be allowed to do that.


And this is why I cannot respect you.
“Meninism”? You mean masculinism.

<Being poor is a choice, not an economic class. You just haven't worked hard enough.

>That's you. That's what you sound like

False equivalency. Although, poverty can be a choice.
But, celibacy is almost always a choice. You have the choice to fuck women but you choose not to because most of the ones “available to you” are “washed up bags”.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11536

bump
>>

 No.11539



File: 1775938701898.jpeg ( 48.97 KB , 640x480 , images.jpeg )

 No.10358[Reply]

Post eugenic and or genetic stories here.
58 posts and 6 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11439

>>11438
>Death toll from USAID cuts
Afaik there is no actual count for this one. It's purely estimates based on speculative models - it would be interesting to see if there is a body count, but so far I'm not aware of the massive increases in death projected by these models coming to pass. USAID itself is a US intelligence cutout (which also does aid work, but primarily exists to be used for US soft power and intelligence operations), which makes me more skeptical, admittedly, but it would be interesting for someone to count documented fatalities to connect to these models to see if they are accurate.
>>

 No.11447

Is Less Really More? Comparing the Climate and Productivity Impacts of a Shrinking Population

https://www.nber.org/papers/w33932
>>

 No.11477

Is the iPhone Birth Control? Causal Evidence from AT&T’s 2007–2011 Carrier Monopoly
https://www.nber.org/papers/w35310
>>

 No.11499

The political polarization of health outcomes in the USA
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-026-02474-9
>TL;DR MAGA conservatives are dying sooner than liberals
>>

 No.11538

Chilling Warning For Parents As MRI Scans Show Phones Are Damaging Kids' Brains | 10 News+


 No.5139[Reply]

Here's the killshot, single mothers predict how bad crime is in an area NOT POVERTY!
>The proportion of single-parent households in a community predicts its rate of violent crime and burglary, but the community’s poverty level does not. Source: D.A. Smith and G.R. Jarjoura, “Social Structure and Criminal Victimization,” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 25. 1988.”
This alone should repudiate feminism in the minds of anyone, left or right. And the high single motherhood rate is the direct result of feminists' sexual revolution that encourages women to be promiscuous which inevitably leads to bastards.
Anyone that's traveled outside of the US can attest to this finding. While no poor area of a city or town is safe. They are not these Falluja style war zones that say Baltimore is.
Eliminating single mothers goes a long long way to eliminating poverty for workers. And it's in the best interest of children, which feminists and women pretend to care about.
These studies were aggregated on https://www.fixfamilycourts.com/single-mother-home-statistics. Here are a few other highlights
>“After controlling for single motherhood, the difference between black and white crime rates disappeared.” Progressive Policy Institute, 1990, quoted by David Blankenhorn, “Fatherless America: Confronting Our Most Urgent Social Problem,” New York, Harper Perennial, 1996, p.31
>Effects of Fatherlessness – Teenage Statistics
>63% of all youth suicides,
>70% of all teen pregnancies,
>71% of all adolescent chemical/substance abusers,
>80% of all prison inmates, and
>90% of all homeless and runaway children, came from single mother homes.
>Bob Ray Sanders, “Hey Y’all, Let’s Fill The Hall (Of Fame), Ft. Worth Star Telegram, Oct.28,2007
>Mona Charen, “More Good News Than Bad?”, Washington Times, Mar.16, 2001 (citing Bill Bennett, “The Index of Leading Cultural Indicators: American society at the end of the 20th Century., New York, Broadway Books, 1994)
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
57 posts and 8 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.10243

>>10237
Are you the one making posts like this:>>10234?
>>

 No.10244

>>

 No.11230

Y'all say you're materialist but stay silent on the endemic abuse wrought by single mothers. And no, it's not a function of poverty, there's countries even poorer that don't see these levels of single mothers.
>>

 No.11231

>>11230
The main problem with single moms is the smothering
>>

 No.11537

Tankies still refuse to remark on this systemic abuse of children, this assembly line of stunted children that become easily exploited adults. Tankies talk tough but won't even stand up to foids. You're all failures that kneel before cunt but expect us to believe you can bring revolution.


 No.11513[Reply]

Anybody else a darkcel that terrorizes small animals?
>>

 No.11535

Fuck no ya psycho.


File: 1752904618347.jpg ( 198.15 KB , 1175x1763 , Bodies_Bodies_Bodies_poste….jpg )

 No.8908[Reply]

Should a woman's body count not matter to man? Why do so many women insist it shouldn't matter? Are men just insecure as women claim? Or do men have a legitimate reason to worry about marrying women that has a slutty past?
Women who have had more partners do tend to have higher divorce rates. Should it even matter what the reason men have for avoiding promiscuous women if it's their life, or do men have some kind of obligation or social contract to push aside their reservations? If so do women have any obligations to men.
What is a high body count to you. For me, anymore than 20 would be a red flag.
>>

 No.9234

File: 1759608699553.jpg ( 30.29 KB , 504x568 , trad wife single mom onlyf….jpg )

ot's over..
>>

 No.11531

High body count = daddy issues.
>>

 No.11532

>>11531
Irony is, there’s more low body-count women with daddy issues than with high body-count

These days, they’re all writing fanfiction and making sexual roleplay videos
>>

 No.11534

>>11532
>Irony is, there’s more low body-count women with daddy issues than with high body-count
Cope white knight. The only low body count women out there are women that got married young. Having Daddy issues makes you promiscuous


File: 1709532052634.mp4 ( 3.69 MB , 480x854 , RDT_20240303_225035.mp4 )

 No.5119[Reply]

How pervasive do you think it is? Estimates put it anywhere from 3%-30%. 30% may sound ridiculous but it's extrapolated from the fact that half of all fathers that seek a paternity test find out their child is not biologically theirs.
My guess is that it's around 10%. Not some huge plurality but a lot more common then we think now.
If this is true it's among the greatest oppressions perpetrated on prole men. It's 18 years of fraud and debt peonage. What should the left's stand be on this issue. Should the left be more vocal about support for anti paternity fraud policies like mandatory DNA testing at birth?
7 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.5186

>>5180
Idk man. Some may be real but I gaurantee alot of it is fake.
>>

 No.5190

This is why single childless men have the last laugh
>>

 No.5191

>>5186
Most of the stories got way too many details and western roasties are dumb as shit. At the very least they're telling someone else's story
>>

 No.5211

>>5191
Stories can be embellished
>>

 No.11533

>>5180
You’re thinking of getting doxxed


File: 1744851587832.jpeg ( 96.11 KB , 749x857 , 1.jpeg )

 No.8208[Reply]

Modern women are different than the women you grew up with 50 years ago. Modern society has warped their minds, and their sole reason to exist is to make men miserable and take everything they can for themselves.

The typical white knight response is to blame the man who calls out women's narcissism and abuse. But all the research data shows that women commit the majority of domestic violence, child abuse, and false accusations. It also shows that they initiate the vast majority of divorces, do the most cheating, have way more casual sex hookups, exhibit way higher rates of STDs, and suffer much higher rates of mental illness. So your one anecdote about a middle-aged woman who "isn't like that" means nothing in the face of all the evidence that women are the problem.

I've been in multiple long-term relationships and was horribly mistreated for no reason every time. You can name one woman who's the supposed exception, but every woman I have ever met has been a narcissistic, self-serving whore who relentlessly abuses men for no rational reason. And it's not just in relationships—female coworkers, female acquaintances, random women on the street—they're all the same. Always causing drama and problems, always trying to sabotage you if you're a white male who doesn't capitulate to their insanity.

Why do mainstream media and governments ignore the data proving women are the primary perpetrators of domestic violence and false allegations?Is the mental health epidemic in women actually a result of their own toxic behavior being socially encouraged rather than condemned?
6 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.8217

>>8216
You don't understand, white people are oppressed. Nick Fuentes said so. 🙃
>>

 No.8223

>>8215
How in the fuck can you be an anti idpol feminist. I swear to god tankies get dumber every year.
>>

 No.8225

>>8223
>How in the fuck can you be an anti idpol feminist.
It's perfectly fine to oppose modern identity politics while critiquing patriarchy and being for gender equality.
>tankies
You just assumed I'm a tankie?
>>

 No.11528

>>8223
Not all feminism is the radlib white yuppie type of shit.
Also what are tankies and what’s so bad about them
>>

 No.11530

>>8208
>I've been in multiple long-term relationships and was horribly mistreated for no reason every time.
This is what happens when one 'ascends'. It's over…


 No.5780[Reply]

its over for autistic males
28 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11003

>>10934
The insecurity is showing. You're mad that teens who are adult for their age are going for adults? It's none of your business and frankly, says a lot about you.
>>

 No.11005

>>11003
Did you read that post at all?
>>

 No.11515

>>10868
https://leftychan.net/R9K/res/4421.html#11397
In linked post, you can see a normie getting with a 16 year old as if it's normal.
>>

 No.11526

>>11515
It is normal but not seen as okay in NA and western Europe.
Most places worldlwide have teens interacting with adults in less than platonic matters
>>

 No.11529

>>10881
Autism is a neurocognitice disability that affects executive function

It affects your fine motor skills.


File: 1701275633156.jpg ( 49.03 KB , 640x590 , 1701275055345131.jpg )

 No.4421[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

In most countries it's 16 which I think is good. I'd say there needs to be some "Romeo and Juliet" exceptions added. No reason to have a 17 year old go to jail for dating a 15 year old.
15 is a just a little too young for the age of consent. What is hilarious is that burgers think just big age gaps are pedophilia while the average roastie in America becomes sexually active at 13, and often even younger.
358 posts and 29 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11522

>>11492
Why are you being obscurantist and dancing around the stance of whether 13 year olds should become mothers and fathers?
>>

 No.11523

>>11519
This.
“Pedophilia” is just a morality slur that’s thrown around to discredit your opponent.
No different from “nazi” “commie” “narcissist” “psychopath” etc
>>

 No.11524

>>11519
"Pedophile" basically just means "any guy who's into non-expired females". It never had a concrete meaning.
>>

 No.11525

>>11524
Pedophilia used to mean “being sexually aroused by prepubescent humans”.

Now it’s expanded to include epi-pubescent or early post-pubescent humans
>>

 No.11527

>>11522
I never said that they should.
Why do uyghas on here always wanna jump to conclusions.

She’s a minor but not a toddler
Referring to teens as little kids is ironically low key creepy.

It encourages infantilism which ironically leads to them being taken advantage of

You know that in ultra conservative communities, teens are treated like infants and they’re sexually abused a lot because of that.

It’s especially sad that secular society is falling for the same things that ultra conservatives want


Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
Previous [ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 / 34 / 35 / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home