[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble
| Catalog | Home

 No.5139 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

Here's the killshot, single mothers predict how bad crime is in an area NOT POVERTY!
>The proportion of single-parent households in a community predicts its rate of violent crime and burglary, but the community’s poverty level does not. Source: D.A. Smith and G.R. Jarjoura, “Social Structure and Criminal Victimization,” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 25. 1988.”
This alone should repudiate feminism in the minds of anyone, left or right. And the high single motherhood rate is the direct result of feminists' sexual revolution that encourages women to be promiscuous which inevitably leads to bastards.
Anyone that's traveled outside of the US can attest to this finding. While no poor area of a city or town is safe. They are not these Falluja style war zones that say Baltimore is.
Eliminating single mothers goes a long long way to eliminating poverty for workers. And it's in the best interest of children, which feminists and women pretend to care about.
These studies were aggregated on https://www.fixfamilycourts.com/single-mother-home-statistics. Here are a few other highlights
>“After controlling for single motherhood, the difference between black and white crime rates disappeared.” Progressive Policy Institute, 1990, quoted by David Blankenhorn, “Fatherless America: Confronting Our Most Urgent Social Problem,” New York, Harper Perennial, 1996, p.31
>Effects of Fatherlessness – Teenage Statistics
>63% of all youth suicides,
>70% of all teen pregnancies,
>71% of all adolescent chemical/substance abusers,
>80% of all prison inmates, and
>90% of all homeless and runaway children, came from single mother homes.
>Bob Ray Sanders, “Hey Y’all, Let’s Fill The Hall (Of Fame), Ft. Worth Star Telegram, Oct.28,2007
>Mona Charen, “More Good News Than Bad?”, Washington Times, Mar.16, 2001 (citing Bill Bennett, “The Index of Leading Cultural Indicators: American society at the end of the 20th Century., New York, Broadway Books, 1994)
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
122 posts and 14 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13867

>>13864
>Now he's equating defending children from abuse with Nazism.
No, stopping your queen from neglecting her own children is not fascism.
But you're doing an excellent job of making the left look like the submissive bottoms to feminists that they are.
>>

 No.13868

>>13858
>Because work fucking sucks.

So does school. I say school sucks even more. At least with work you get paid to suffer and you can change workplaces when things get too rough. Cannot do that with school. If you go to a hellhole of a school, you stay stuck there.
Schooling is only essential for making industrially competent people.
There's been this whole sentiment where education is about philosophizing and idealized, not enough technical skills.




>Man, you're trying to sell fake history to someone who was both there back in the day AND who went back to uni for more degrees in this century.  I don't know where you are getting that bullshit, but I can assure you that is not how things happend.  First off, high school hasn't been for "the best and the brightest" since the Boomers were little.  It was a general expectation by the mid-to-late twentieth century.  Then the only teenagers who didn't go to high school got GEDs and from there proceeded to clean up on Aisle 3.

Why then did so many bomers drop out of school by ninth grade and get full time work in trades? And make good money? By contrast, most people who went to college got jobs and salaries subpar to their degree.

>And younger folks get jack shit for acedemic instruction if the freshmen who I met are any indication.  In contrast, public schools that the Boomers and Gen-Xers attended were trying to teach them to be scientists to keep up with the Soviets, because that was still a thing.  The shit they learned in high school you have to go to colleges for now.  Academics in public schools have been getting progressively less investment since the space race officially ended.  Then there was that "No Child Left Behind" idiocy that just stalled every kid equally.  They don't even teach you things like logic or good research practices anymore, which is painfully apparant on the internet, but it is a real problem for the college freshmen who suddenly find that they need that at uni.

That may have been true for schools up north and the Midwest. But another thing you're forgetting is that most schools back then had workshops. Technical skills were prized.

Also, not everyone was put in AP classes. And not everyone made it to Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.13869

>>13858
>In contrast, public schools that the Boomers and Gen-Xers attended were trying to teach them to be scientists to keep up with the Soviets, because that was still a thing.  The shit they learned in high school you have to go to colleges for now.  Academics in public schools have been getting progressively less investment since the space race officially ended.

Why then are so many Boomers and Gen Xers dumbfounded by the curriculum of post-Cold War curriculum? Most Boomers and Gen Xers, if I asked them what they learned in school, they cannot remember.

Most are dumbstruck at algebra. They even admit that most of the stuff that post-1990s kids are expected to learn wasn't a thing back in their day
>>

 No.13874

>>13869
>>13868
>The anons went back to trying to bury the thread with long off topic posts.
Mmmmm hmmmmmm
>>

 No.13875

>>13869
>>13868
You two reddit cucks are butt mad that we're bringing serious criticisms to women and you're spamming both this thread and the predatory tiddy streamers thread with bullshit about Gen X and Boomers.
Y'all are trying to bury the threads. Any future off topic posts in these threads will be reported.

File: 1791063853318.png ( 285.85 KB , 640x480 , ClipboardImage.png )

 No.13299 [Reply]

for pro male ideology, dedicated to the rights of men and boys and males who have been left behind by society

Masculinity is a slave collar. Masculinity functions in servitude to Feminist-Ouroboric Capitalism."Incel" operates as a pejorative term for men who reject compliance and fail as obedient slaves to feminist Capitalist society.

Radical anti feminism, every single female privilege must be abolished. Feminists are killing men.

PMC STANCES
>PMC is the only men's rights group with correct framing.
>Goal: replace the mainstream MRM with the Pro Male Collective (PMC).
>Long-term goal: replace mainstream MRM, grow PMC brand, build more owned websites.
>Feminism is a hate movement; it should be outlawed ("Ban Feminism before it bans you").
>Feminism is right wing, not left wing; you can't be left wing and a feminist.
>Feminists have won and are still winning; MRAs are delusional to deny it.
>MRM is a failed, meek, passive movement; "awareness raising" and debating feminists achieve nothing.
>All successful movements use loud, aggressive radicals; MRAs are "political wimps."
>Men must get militant, organized, proactive, and coordinated.
>Feminists should face social stigma, job loss, and employer pressure; feminism should be made unacceptable in mainstream society.
>Racism, without exception, is misandry.
>Every single trad-con amounts to an ultra feminist.

STRATEGY / ORGANIZATION
>Emphasize collective action; reject learned helplessness.
>Build own platforms (forum, fbi.gov, game) for censorship-proof autonomy.
>Disciplined structure; no dead weight or time-wasting chat.
>Shift the Overton window via coordinated, aggressive messaging.
>Individualism exacerbates men's problems; collective action is required.
>Men should abandon obsession with women and validation from women.

PRIMARY LEGAL REFORMS
>Mandatory 50/50 shPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
50 posts and 26 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13826

File: 1793059997299.png ( 1.41 MB , 1280x720 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>13825
>>13825
>>

 No.13830

>>13825
actually there are ome normal men's advocates for once for the first time in years.  they're unfortunately in the podcast bro circuit but are largely apolitical
>>

 No.13865

File: 1793080444817.png ( 80.08 KB , 300x273 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>13825
>>

 No.13872

One way to show support for a healthy pro-male movement is to appreciate male beauty. It need not be sexual appreciation, it can be platonic.
>>

 No.13873

>>13830
>unfortunately
>podcast bro circuit

WTF does this mean and why is it a bad thing? Podcasts are just talk radio for Internet. Every demographic has podcasts

File: 1678326363930-0.png ( 1008.38 KB , 1208x912 , 1678261930176750.png )

File: 1678326363930-1.webm ( 1.83 MB , 720x1280 , 1678263631940761.webm )

 No.1762 [Reply]

Why are women aging so fast suddenly?
34 posts and 11 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.12427

>>12418
>anorexia/bulimia/eating disorder/drugs/mental illness/physical illness/medical condition
<LE WALLED ANYONE??!?
Shame on you.

I'm praying for her.
>>

 No.13848

File: 1793072061223.jpg ( 1.57 MB , 2000x2000 , stop porn.jpg )

DAMN
>>

 No.13853

>>1762
Idk how true that is. I'd say women aged faster in the past before modern amenities.
>>

 No.13860

>>13853
Yeah, the generation before boomers (whatever it's called) oxidized faster than later generations. The extreme cases today appear to be from glp-1 use destroying subcutaneous fat which is otherwise lost gradually with age, so a forty something ends up with a sixty something's skin. Just a guess.
>>

 No.13871

>>13860
Back in the good old days, people drank fermented water, smoked like the Dickens, didn't have AC, used strong chemicals for manufacturing, ate cholesterol like it was candy, etc.

File: 1786757279578.jpg ( 84.4 KB , 1920x1740 , line-icon-for-gangbang-vec….jpg )

 No.12176 [Reply]

Are hardcore gangbangs with 'multiple male on one female' pro-male?

I mean it is empowering for men to get some and to put in work and it builds camaraderie through a shared experience.



Let me know what you think.
17 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13801

>>13736
On the one hand, I kinda agree. However, knowing the personality types that make up this board, I cannot help but feel your sentiment is just sour grapes.
>>

 No.13847

>>13736
>Why does sex even exist?
The noun "sex" used to exist to differentiate between male and female. Entertainment industry made it a verb mid 20th century since "intercourse" and "copulation" were too difficult for whatever reasons. The fluids and smells can be gross and the act can cause discomfort, but it's necessary for the propagation of any species. Just take a shower first, it's not so bad if you know what ur doing and avoid nasty skanks..
>>

 No.13854

>>13847
To be honest, all bodily functions are gross. Sex ironically is the least gross.
Eating, urination, and defecation are more gross.

Sleeping is also gross due to snoring and nightly sweats.

Sweating is gross.
>>

 No.13862

>>13854
>Sweating is gross.
Maybe, but it cleanses toxins from the body and maintains core temp. I don't know what I'd do without it.
>>

 No.13870

>>13862
I would rather that all toxin disposal went towards urination. Take away shitting and reduce sweating.

 No.13741 [Reply]

This has been occurring for a long time on streaming platforms like Twitch. Overtly marketing sex and sex appeal to underage boys by young women. By either dressing as revealing as possible while streaming a play session, flirting with fans that donate money to them, or by out right plugging their OF pages. These adult women are manipulating young underage boys with their sexuality. If they did this physically in public they'd likely be arrested.
This has detrimental effects on any child's development and is outright pedophilic. It's time the left collectively spoke out against this as it's not becoming so obscene even normies are taking notice.
Why has the left been so silent on this issue? Is it because the victims are male, and by feminism's view, cannot really ever be victims of women, because the perpetrators are pretty? I really don't get it, the left really needs to answer for this complete dereliction of duty.
51 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13843

>>13839
>Bruh, you're still assuming strawmen. You're a schizo.
Nah bruh, you just don't realize how psychotic you sound so desperately defending child abusers.
That can only come from one place, you feel like attacking abusive women is akin to attacking your own abusive mother.
>>

 No.13844

>>13843
For one, I actually hate simps and I do hate sympathy for female abusers. However, this ain't it.
Female abusers are Lindsey Clancy, Casey Anthony, Andrea Yates, and the like.

Your hysteria seems to be driven more by something more akin to contempt for women.

Your petulance is boring me. Please go back to Ogre. They have the same shallow moral logic you have.
>>

 No.13845

>>13827
> It's not so much about explicitness as it is about the nature of sexuality.  Yeah, three years hardly seems like much, but, again, just going off of what the two authors I have been talking about wrote, there is a qualitative distinction between the perspective on sexuality expressed by the nine year-old and that expressed by the twelve year-old.  

That's just one example though. I guarantee you you could find erotic fanfiction authors around the same age range that would write similar prose.

>It is a sea change.  In a sense, the nine year-old had an almost post-adolescent view of sex, where it draws individuals together and serves a clear economic and social function.  That perspective provides some gut-busting laughs in the book.

Because the nine-year old is not allowed to be explicit or passionate in her description?

For the twelve year-old, sex is a power fantasy where desirable partners are won by virtue of physical properties combined with force of personality.  It is very much like what a typical (as far as such a thing can be said to exist) twenty-something thinks of sex.

That's how a lot of people think of sex in their twenties, thirties, and forties. Good  looks and greater wit. And it's because of moral allowance.


>There is something very distinct in adolescent sexuality, and it seems to run from Period One all the way to the end of one's sexual prime.  If there are some good studies on this that are not either intellectually dishonest feminist propaganda or early-twentieth century quackery, I would love to know about them.

I feel adolescent sexuality is influenced more by social treatment more than anything.

All the awkwardness and vulnerability that people assign to youth isn't biologically determined. It's sociologically determined.
>>

 No.13859

>>13816
>an adult female showing pubescent me her boobs is abuse

I remember when abuse used to mean actual direct harm to someone. Now it means "raunchy thing I don't like"

By your logic, teasing is higher on the scale of abuse

Kids bullying and teasing their peers is more abusive than some boys ogling some boobs
>>

 No.13863

File: 1793078879900.epub ( 732.97 KB , Ashford, Daisy - The Youn….epub )

>>13842
>Also again, Gen X did procreate.
I mean, some of them must have.  At least I assume so.  The only ones I know of were a couple teen pregnant girls at school back in the early nineties.  I'm not kidding–siblings, cousins, friends, neighbors, coworkers, nobody I knew personally ever had kids, and there were a whole hell of a lot of us.  In fact, I rememeber back in the nineties one of the big panics was that the world was facing imminent overpopulation (there was projected to be a ten-billion global population by 2010) and a resulting lack of available resources like in Soylent Green.  Then Gen-X just did not reproduce, and all the population projections collapsed at the turn of the century.  That became another panic, because ZOMG we will not have enough workers to keep the economy growing.
>Millennials weren't terminally online. They were terminally watching TV just like their elders did.
The Golden Age of the Internet was drivien largely by Millennials.  There were quite a few Gen-Xers in on it as well, but the Millennials were the most common until the end of that beautiful era.
>>13845
>I guarantee you you could find erotic fanfiction authors around the same age range that would write similar prose.
Similar to Daisy Ashford?  I doubt that.  I have never seen anything like her book before, and I doubt that such a thing could ever be written again in any future epoch.  What she wrote is not erotica like what fanfiction authors write.  It is old school romance from the perspective of a prepubescent girl.  If you mean Caldwell, her prose is fairly typical of genre writing with adult authors.  As much as I dislike her characters, her book is well-structured enough to be of a quality that is out of reach of most fanfic authors.
>Because the nine-year old is not allowed to be explicit or passionate in her description?
No, because… you know what?  I am just going to attach the book in epub.  You'll see what I mean.  There is no describing The Young Visiters; it must be experienced.
>I feel adolescent Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: 1663187296476.jpg ( 117.78 KB , 736x987 , Sorayama Female Robot art.jpg )

 No.677 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

Post anything regarding sex robots or dolls here.
499 posts and 166 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13589

>>13559
I fucking hate Ex Machina so fucking much. It's a "philosophical" movie in the same way that a big budget Oppenheimer biopic is "scientific" – it isn't, it's just entertainment.
Nathan is so obviously the filmmakers' idea of some evil, hyper-masculine, darkly manipulative tech-bro emblematic of the industry… except that the tech industry is dominated by people like Caleb: effete nerds who believe in insane fantasies like "superintelligence" while self-righteously LARPing as heroes and liberators. Nathan is far more pragmatic and humble by comparison.
The ideological core of this sad excuse of a film, and of the tech industry, is the cynical belief that human beings are ultimately nothing more than inefficient pattern-matching machines. Nathan understands the difference between the purpose of a machine and the agency of a human being. His only mistake was being blind to the sad fact that there are disgusting degenerate subhuman scum like Caleb who will irrationally outsource their agency (to a fucking machine, no less).
Maybe these retarded filmmakers should turn the lens inward, for once, with their pathetic attempt at critique. The entertainment industry is more often than not guilty of the very things it criticizes, and has grown increasingly incapable of producing a film with any level of intellectual sophistication whatsoever. The greatest irony of Ex Machina is that what most defines it is its superficial performance of intellectualism. Just like Ava, the only thing it does truly well is tricking the viewer that it's intelligent, when it was really just scripted.
>>

 No.13685

File: 1792851653390.jpg ( 72.48 KB , 625x824 , 379b51f7-1d46-42a0-a670-83….jpg )

>>

 No.13737

Conversational AI GFs have now arrived.
>>

 No.13738

>>13737
we are getting closer to the film Her (2013)
>>

 No.13855

This guy made a tool that let's you track the supply chain from the mine to a finished robot part. Pretty tremendous tool for dealienating people.

File: 1750535122176-0.jpg ( 143.39 KB , 712x978 , state-issued girlfriends.jpg )

File: 1750535122177-1.png ( 292.31 KB , 816x846 , 67ggpbiuk1591.png )

File: 1750535122177-2.jpg ( 37.46 KB , 304x304 , Gf compass PoliticalCompas….jpg )

File: 1750535122177-3.jpg ( 194.89 KB , 1080x977 , State issued rule_-_4eFJA0….jpg )

File: 1750535122177-4.jpg ( 405.84 KB , 2048x1534 , 2021-11-09_mulch_tv_145792….jpg )

 No.8759 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

State-issued girlfriend program thread


Alternate titles for this program/policy/initiative/plan:
state-assigned
state-issued
state-mandated
state-appointed
state-ordered
state-mediated
state-arranged

government-assigned
government-issued
government-mandated
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
171 posts and 93 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13806

File: 1793055439219-0.png ( 1.35 MB , 1254x1254 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055439219-1.png ( 2.14 MB , 1044x1507 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055439219-2.png ( 36.5 KB , 2202x277 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055439219-3.png ( 23.78 KB , 1618x270 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055439219-4.png ( 25.95 KB , 2220x278 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.13808

File: 1793055529617-0.png ( 38.56 KB , 2629x270 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055529617-1.png ( 25.83 KB , 1463x278 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055529617-2.png ( 11.1 KB , 811x78 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055529617-3.png ( 28.06 KB , 1530x355 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>13806
>>

 No.13810

File: 1793055723195-0.png ( 29.43 KB , 3128x102 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055723195-1.png ( 37.62 KB , 1918x355 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055723195-2.png ( 8.4 KB , 600x78 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055723195-3.png ( 10.09 KB , 614x102 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793055723195-4.png ( 42.49 KB , 2929x278 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.13840

File: 1793066235419-0.png ( 879.5 KB , 2064x512 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793066235419-1.png ( 640.45 KB , 1408x768 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793066235419-2.png ( 862.92 KB , 2064x512 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793066235419-3.png ( 194 KB , 1024x1024 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1793066235419-4.png ( 23.11 KB , 428x36 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.13841

File: 1793066433965.png ( 982.44 KB , 1187x1325 , ClipboardImage.png )


File: 1698622873576.jpg ( 107.24 KB , 1080x1350 , 1698611404875127.jpg )

 No.4183 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

Should women be drafted?
193 posts and 86 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13775

>>13721
It's the same principle with the genders inverted.
>>

 No.13777

>>13717
>This type of hazing isn't truly about making effective warriors, it's about conditioning men to be disposable slaves; and why would any self-respecting man want to be a slave?

It's funny how machismo preaches that men are to be conquerors but then tells them that they have to accept and even invite abuse, like they're captives.
>>

 No.13809

>>13717
If you're too valuable to the military, like doctors and lawyers, they don't make you go through basic training.
They know damn well someone with that level of education has options so they have a special program for them where they just attend a class at the university they're attending in lieu of Basic Training.
It just shows how superfluous that hazing is.  
>>

 No.13832

>>13809
Doctors and lawyers are commissioned officers.
>>

 No.13838

>>13832
Yes but Commissioned officers still have to go through some kind of training. Either ROTC, an academy, or OCS (Officer Candidate School).
Doctors and Lawyers go through a very truncated training called DCO (Direct Commissioned Officer). Which is far easier than the traditional paths to becoming a commissioned officer.

File: 1679422406753.jpg ( 240.43 KB , 1080x357 , 1679119419064709.jpg )

 No.1983 [Reply]

This guy learned the hard way
>What women think or say they want and what they actually respond to are two very different things
55 posts and 13 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.5603

>>2004
>is this a zoomer thing.


Once again, millennials cannot repress their generational supremacism despite having problems with "adulting".
>>

 No.5604

>>2067
>tfw seeing this video again
Just gonna cope and say that she was planning a surprise birthday party.

That's why she didn't wanna show her phone, because she worked really hard and it couldn't go to waste because of some Youtuber.
>>

 No.5655

>>2153
>>2155
>>2200
Gott, I really enjoy the fact that I learned not to care about "your" shitty "opinions" to such a degree that I don't even read them. Bet there's nothing in there but only more ideological cope & seething due to their picture of the world crumbling under contradictive data.
>>

 No.13768

>>1997
> I would say that she didn't want to have sex with him in the first place and was just looking for a excuse to tell him to fuck off

This is probably the most likely thing.
>>

 No.13769

So just grab her by the pussy. Got it.

File: 1792648247513.mp4 ( 5.31 MB , 576x1024 , 5298723045033d5de0a3f76dd2….mp4 )

 No.13627 [Reply]

Why are these so controversial? They're both adults, and as this guy points out, young adults can consent to anything else ethically BUT sex.
Why is that? Also, these age gap relationships are rare. Is getting mad about age gap relationships just the female equivalent of CHUDs getting mad about white women fucking BBC?
20 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13694

>>13630
You're also forgetting that women are also part of the witch hunts as well.
>>

 No.13720

The way this officer was behaving is coincidentally exactly the way womn behave with men a lot of times. He kept provoking and egging the boy to the point of doing something regrettable. And now the officer would get away with what he did because he has plausible deniability. It is exactly the same way womn get men into trouble.
>>

 No.13730

can we not have a containment board for these OPs or ban them

like why
>>

 No.13752

>>13730
Can you stop being a whiny bitch? Like why?
Go to Ogre if you wanna be on the rag.
>>

 No.13753

>>13730
This is the containment board. Just hide this board if you don't like it. Sheesh what a faggot.

Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / ... / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home