No.480826
The Nazis themselves admit that the people are against war, but that this was irrelevant. It was not them saying that they "fooled" people into anything. Once the Nazis seized the state, they can unilaterally declare war and a state of emergency, and then the people have no choice. The war would already start, and they only live here. No one put war up to a democratic vote or anything suggesting that public opinion had anything to do with the decision. Similarly, Americans would never be "fooled" to support any clear war of aggression. The war with Japan came because Japan attacked first, thinking that the US was internally divided and wouldn't hit back, and Germany followed through because they always intended to wage war against anything nominally democratic. Of course, the Germans are the shittiest allies ever, and the Americans are not internally divided where it mattered. Japan was hoping the Krauts would be worth something for once in their sorry existence, and they learned as Europeans always knew that Krauts Always Lie.
Anyway, casual racism aside, the only way to generate any public "support" for war is to convince the people they're under attack, and that the enemy is too scary to contemplate, so the men with the iron fist will make the Bad Man go away. That's always been the story to get the slaves to shut up and go back to work. For a mass army, where the citizens must be motivated to actually fight for this, the propaganda is different, but in all cases, the army needs to believe there is some stake to defend, whereas the propaganda of warrior aristocracies is always fake and gay because aristocracies are always fake and gay. But, the constant is that the only real interest the people have in war is defending their homes. Glory is all faggotry, by fags, of fags, for fags. There are fags who will join for such stories, and those are the most insufferable poison of any nation. Anyone who actually has to die for this shit will quickly see that the fags should have been ignored, but once fags get their way, they have a way of sneaking off and getting the honest to suffer for this faggotry. That's what the Nazis were, and there was certainly a lot of faggotry in their party.
The important thing here is that the decision to initiate war is made in a place far removed from public opinion, and "selling the war" was never necessary. The only thing that has to be sold is the idea that the rulers are invincible. Wars are never popular, and starting a war does not unite a country in the way aristocratic narratives believe. As soon as Germany hit an opponent who would shoot back, they were rolled up like the fags they were, and rolled up they were when the Red Army showed what an actually competent war machine does. War is almost immediately corrosive to all of these efforts to plan the war immaculately. This is what happened to Germany in 1914. When "the big plan", the thing the German general staff spent years preparing and drilling for, failed, the general in charge told the Kaiser that the war was lost then and there, because he knew how this shit really went. Rather than learn from this lesson, the Kraut ideology told them that this general wasn't warlike enough and didn't have the true warrior feel, and so more faggotry would be engineered by the same assholes who instigated the first go-around. Typical.
If you really want peace, there is an obvious but bloody solution - wholesale elimination of aristocracy and its vestiges. After this, the remaining great powers of the world get together, observe correctly that hitherto known human history has been entirely bullshit, and we can finally do something else. But, that would be too decent. That should have happened before 1914 was allowed to happen, but eugenics wanted that war, and so, we have been condemned to this ever since.