No.159135[Reply]
The idea that financial incentives solves birth rates is silly. If you make men foot the bills, do the work, ask everyone out, and risk punishments for doing so, the reward better be good. Instead, it's some awful, ungrateful cunt. Honestly, these stupid whores think having families is asking too much from them anyway.
The men lack a position of wealth and status, so they can't cajole women into making families. The women are just these spiritually dead creatures of vile toxicity that can't stop doing literally everything wrong by compulsion now. There's no amount of money you can throw to someone married to get them to have more kids; if they're married, it's a rich guy and, by consequence, a rich woman now anyway.
Financially, single men are already taxed at higher rates than married couples. Also, the money in society is concentrated at the top 1%, who use legal loopholes to avoid tax. Career women over 30 have much more money than single men of the same age now. Women in general make more money than men, but the problem is they spend it all; their priorities are all fucked up. Furthermore, so-called incels are just single men below 30 now, and they have basically no money as is.
Women control reproduction. If a woman is 40 and still hasn't managed to get a boyfriend, husband, and get pregnant, that is because she has made decisions that led to that scenario. Even if she "couldn't get a man," it's almost certainly because she's extremely overweight or has an extremely unpleasant personality, and both of those things could be controlled by her.
the belongings of those who die single and childless are turned over to the state. It won't make up for them not having kids, but it's as much as they have to offer in recompense. Also, this is engagement bait.