>>147372Doesn't understand how ratios work
<200 vs 9.5 millionI'd actually agree with you. Competence and excellence are paramount - not bare numbers.
But let's be honest. Competence and excellence don't describe the left in the slightest - at least outside of a few historical examples of leftist parties which actually demanded such of their members (the Bolsheviks, the CCP, etc)
Instead, we have fags, incels, anime fans, reddit tier history dorks, and stoners here in Leftychad.
Let's compare some things you've said:
>>147374>Politics is a struggle for power. This sums up the history of politics ever since the dawn of civilization, no?… Politics still exists, we just don't call it politics anymore.Vs.
>>147353>There is no political opposition, because there is no politics. What we call politics is merely an industry of moralization.Like I said - constant faggy hand waving. No wonder you've never been successful at much, including political organizing. Even leftychan is hilariously just a platform to make fun of people like you. It's growth over the past few months as correlated with it's growth as a platform to make fun of the muhleft. You're literally not even competent at popularizing leftychan as a serious leftist website. (And for good reason. R/communism and leftypol already have the market cornered on hyperghey moralfagging sectarianism.)
>Finally, I never said that everything is political, so I don't know what you're talking about.>Why do you keep misrepresenting my position? Do you enjoy arguing against strawmen, anon? Because it certainly seems like it.I'm a different vein, I apologize. I didn't mean to imply that you said 'everything is politics.' I meant to imply that 'politics is struggle for power' (what you said) and 'everything is politics'(what you didn't say) can both be true.
This all said, you're not entirely wrong. Tucker very well could be a sort of release valve - a sort of smoke and mirrors of fake opposition. But that position is also a sort of ghey purity posturing - not too far removed from poltards who seethe and denounce him because he won't 'name the jew' or say uyghur.
If you can point to something in the real world which is building public opinion in opposition to ruling institutions more effectively, I'd love to hear your opinion. Personally, I'd assume one of the reasons he is so successful is because he dumbs down his message into a narrative of good vs. evil. People in groups are actually pretty dumb. Trying to appeal solely on rationality will
In conclusion, reddit tier sophistry about how 'muh no one is doing politics, including me' is just the moral preening of an ineffective faggot who feels the need to diminish people with far more influence than almost anyone on the muhleft.