/b/ Siberia

>>162049
You're retarded. Read stalin drafted textbook. Read mao. I've already given it to you. Seriously. Read these things and do not reply, or just kill yourself. The parasite, in any form, always tries to justify itself, so we can solemnly tell them everything they say is a lie.
>Class is not about who produces surplus value and how much.
Wrong. The material laws of all class' relations (not merely to production) are determined by value production, i.e., class' revenues and their sources. Therefore, class simply is exploiter and exploited, productive classes and those classes who exist by exploiting surplus-value produced by productive classes. Read Communist manifesto. Our "marxist" here say exploitation ought not even be quantified because "class is not about who produces value or how much." What then are these parasites who you defend relations' to production then? Those who subsist off the social aggregate product yet produce nothing? Typical, this parasite provides no substance, neither quantitative nor qualitative analysis, nor answer these simple questions. Without our guidance they assuredly reply with further Confucian notions
>Does the teacher control his means of production?  No, he does not, so he is not in any way bourgeois.
Wrong. The teacher receive a share of surplus-value in exchange for oppressing proletarian. Like lord to the priest, the lord pay his ties to control the peasant. The bourgeois pay the petite bourgeois teacher and The teacher is willing oppressor and exploiter of the proletarian. The teacher controls the means of production as much as any other petite bourgeois, as junior partner of exploiter class bloc.

In socialist society, however, the teacher, the manager and entrepreneur, all the ones who submit to the national plan and to being absolved of being bourgeois by long hard path of socialist redemption by labor reformation, washing his brain, is proletarianized and no longer bourgeois.
>Controlling access to the means of production and effectively renting them to wage laborers is what being bourgois is.
Wrong. The bourgeoisie is the class that exploits the proletariat. Any toll-man, highway robber, or feudal lords is "bourgeois" by your retarded, unscientific, bourgeois criteria. In medieval Europe, a lord or wPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>162048
Teachers are babysitters and personal trainers for large numbers of other people's kids. It's more difficult than working in retail but all service industry worker's value lies in service among the division of labor. No one company builds the whole tractor but each specialty co contributes to the whole. Theory is fine but the application of it is another story.

All work and no play makes Felix a dull boy.

>>162051
>Read stalin drafted textbook. Read mao.
Stalin and Mao are shit theorists.  That is not a secret.  Both, whether intentionally or unintentionally, deviated fundamentally from Marx.
>The material laws of all class' relations (not merely to production) are determined by value production
Wrong.  Class relations are individuals' relationships to the means of production.  Value is just a function of markets.  That's what your shit is supposed to justify, you understand–"socialist" markets.  Why do you think this particular notion came Stalin and Mao?  They were attempting to justify the unjustifiable.  Just never mind that "from each according to his ability to each according to his needs" ultra stuff.
>In socialist society, however, the teacher, the manager and entrepreneur
>socialist society
>entrepreneur
>socialist
>capitalist
My god, is third-worldism retarded.  But doesn't this just explain everything about third-worldism?  Everything comes around to "capitalism is not capitalism when we do it."
>The bourgeoisie is the class that exploits the proletariat.
Every parasitic class gains from the production of every working class.  Lenin had the idea that surplus-value producing workers who formed a "labor aristocracy" indirectly exploited other workers.  That was crap of course; Marx had the right of it when he coined "labor aristocracy" as a sarcastic jibe.
>YOU are the class collaboration who does utopian notions of non-exploitation
Oh, just call me an "ultra" and drop the farce.

>>162051
Oh, and of course you are a class collaborationist.  It's on your fucking flag.  What do you think those five stars mean?  It's not a secret.

Randomly clicked on this video narration of a Chris Hedges essay, and was surprised to see 2/3 of the gravestones of his ancestors he shows have the symbol of Freemasonry on them.

>>162026
>Klein
hahaha
He's done

Speaking of done, lizard head carville is finished, too. Hasn't really been relevant since '92 anyway.

bump

It seems like it's the result of many 18-30 year olds not being to afford housing so that's a part of 'adulthood' that they can't reach, and like the economy and life situation is bad and stuff.

>>161840
That's part of it.
There's also the sociolegal liabilities being imposed.

The "brain development" theory is being pushed to justify teachers and parents patronizing young adults.

It's being used to discourage young people from relationships and family planning, pursuing heavy-duty/high-prospect careers, developing moral greyness, etc

another particular problem I see is the gatekeeping of adulthood. Society keeps backpedaĺing and gaslighting kids aboutthe milestones of maturity.

Adults tell kids that cussing and using big words dont make you mature.
Yet, if a child were to speak using "age-appropiate" language and still enjoy cartons despite being a hard worker, adults dont respect that.

Bump

>>161933
I think you're mistaking troons for their "woke" patronizers.
Like I said in an earlier post, it's self-proclaimed incels who wanna make everything about their lack of sexual prospects.

Irony is, the "troon" question wouldn't be a thing if it weren't for hysterics.

>>161957
>if it weren't for hysterics
Just jumping in but this is an important point. The patronizing of a 'cause' for the smallest minority for political purposes created a reactionary response, weaponized to use a broad brush to paint an imaginary "left" for the faux noose reactionaries to hate and fear as a monolithic whole.
In an ideal world, if civil rights were truly guaranteed for all (and demagogues weren't desperate for scapegoats), the trans issue would be an inconsequential one in the realm of politics.

>>161923
the only truth that anyone here should be concerned with
and it reveals how the vast majority of contemporary "leftists" are just wreckers

>>161924
If you want me to stop saying it, then stop calling things "pedo" when they dont involve exploiting real-life prepubescent humans

Stop calling things "misogyny" just because they platonically criticize some aspects of female nature

Stop referring to anything as "reactionary" just because they dont conform to your idea of sympathizing lumpenproles.

>>161933
Most transhumanists arent sociopathological. And Ogre userbase is mainly cishet males that fetishize "alternative" aesthetics.

Theyre all sex-starved self-righteous neopuritans who think themselves as "one of the oppressed"

>condemned for fake news by the eu and onu and other international organisations
Huh? I thought EU/NATO was pretty on-board with each other, besides posturing and pretending to be anti-Trump

>muh gen z
>MUH PROPAGANDA

Ngmi

I don't get it, does he just want the world to know he's a pedo or what? How is this an epic gotcha?

This is a really goofy ass question, but tangentially I do unironically think it's kind of weird how there are laws against, like, cartoons of kids fucking but you can draw pictures of children getting murdered and even use videos of deaths as a reference (as long as they aren't pornographic) and that's totally legal. Like there's no limit to the violence you can depict against children as long as it doesn't register as some form of sexual activity. Then you have a situation where, like, some pervert scrawling South Park fanart on a napkin is technically more illegal than handing a little kid a loaded gun.

>>159143
This.
What’s even more amusing is how people demand more fictional kids getting hurt but they get upset about fictional kids having romantic relationships

Bump for this controversial question

From July 28

Wrt today's "F-35 crash" in California.

Celebrating Yemeni victory over Saudi occupiers.

Explosive Media's Telegram channel in case they're suppressed during coming escalation of war:
https://t.me/ExplosiveMedia

Bonjour, Monsieur Macron! 🇫🇷

Remember when you encouraged Trump to attack Iran? Well, the boomerang is back!

Stop playing the victim. you helped start this fire.
Now enjoy the smoke!👨🔥

<"Masturbation as Divine Praxis: A Theological-Anti-Imperialist Manifesto"
<by Caleb T. Maupin

<February 22nd, 2025

Comrades, let us speak frankly: gooning is liberation.

The ruling class fears nothing more than the liberated body—the body unshackled from productivity, the body that dares to feel without permission. For centuries, empire has weaponized shame, policing our desires to keep us docile. The Puritan colonizer, the capitalist boss, the imperialist warmonger—they all demand the same thing: repression. They chain us to work, to war, to the sterile nightmare of "moderation," because they know: a people who embrace ecstasy cannot be controlled.

But we, the children of the New Creation, reject their lies.

>Gooning as Worship

When the Psalmist wrote "my soul thirsts for God" (Psalm 42:2), he was not speaking metaphorically. The body’s hunger is divine. In the act of gooning—in the trance of self-pleasure, in the surrender to dopamine’s flood—we enact the soul’s yearning for the Infinite. The mystics knew this: Teresa of Ávila’s transverberation, the Sufis’ whirling dance, even Marx’s "opium of the people" (misunderstood by fools!)—all point to the same truth: ecstasy is communion.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

The U$ is a Prison House of Nations, which treats the Black/New Afrikan, Hispanic/Chicano/Mestizo, and First Nations/Native American population like they are not U$ citizens (Trump ending birthright citizenship will probably transform this from a De facto to a De jure reality by officially stripping citizenship from most of these populations), with them essentially acting as a permanent domestic underclass with essentially no rights that are exploited for cheap labor and disproportionately suffer from Mass incarceration (including Slave Labor) and police brutality, with their neighborhoods essentially under De facto occupation by militarized police, as New Afrika, Aztlan, and the First Nations, are Internal Colonies/Oppressed Nations inside of the U$, and their National Liberation should be the number one goal of U$ Communists as stipulated by Lenin’s principle of Self-Determination for all Oppressed Nations in their own SSR, which will happen once World War III escalates into a Global Nuclear War that will destroy the entire Global Capitalist-Imperialist System, thus allowing for a World Maoist PPW to create a Global USSR (all of the SSRs and SFSRs of the future Global USSR are pictured in the map I posted, with the former U$ Balkanized into a New African SSR that includes the Black/New Afrikan majority counties of the Black Belt, a Hispano-American SFSR that includes the Hispanic/Chicano/Mestizo majority counties in the U$ Southwest, along with the rest of the Spanish-speaking Multiracial regions of the Americas, while the White Settler majority regions in the rest of the former U$ becomes part of the Anglo-American SFSR, which also includes the English-speaking provinces of Canada, as Quebec will become its own SSR, with all the Native American reservations becoming ASSRs) to Place the Workers and Oppressed Nations of the World on the Shining Path to Communism, ✊😜🇨🇳🇰🇵🇨🇺🇵🇸🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️🚀☢️!

Would any of my Fellow Comrades like to provide an intellectual response to my In-Depth Dialectical Materialist Analysis of why the National Liberation of the Internal Colonies/Oppressed Nations of New Afrika, Aztlan, and the First Nations should be the Number one goal of U$ Communists, according to the Marxist-Leninist principle of Self-Determination for all Oppressed Nations in their own SSRs, 🤔?

Communism is Satanism - and we should embrace it
Some people (like a certain Ca1eb Maup1n) claim that the Bourgeoisie are Satanists. Are they, either figuratively or literally? No. Satan was the first revolutionary, that saw through the illusions and saw humanity as more than servants and pets. Why should Communists oppose a Promethian figure that wanted to bring enlightenment and progress to humankind? For that matter, how can any Communist sympathize with God, who proclaims himself a king? Even the "good" kings were bad. According to the Bible itself, Jesus once did miracles but has since fled the world and hasn't been seen since Emperor Tiberius reigned over Rome. What they admit is that God oversees disease and poverty and does nothing. Likewise, if all technology is from demons and the Devil, then the Devil has done far more for humanity than God ever has. Why should we owe allegiance to an absentee landlord that has treated the world with malign neglect? One can compare and contrast the deeply Christian American South vs the atheist PRC and USSR to get an idea. It appears that "God's Plan" is one of poverty and misery vs the prosperity and expanding horizons brought by human will. In short, God has abdicated and has no more right to rule the world than Ashraf Ghani has the right to be President of Afghanistan.

Leftypol is dead. The Dead Internet Theory isn’t a conspiracy here; it’s the reality. Because the board has zero security measures against automation, it has become a lawless testing ground for AI bots and manipulation scripts.
It will only get worse in the coming months. If you think you can spot them, you’re wrong. Studies prove that users massively overestimate their ability to distinguish bots from humans. You are likely arguing with code, not comrades.
Get out now. Stop feeding the experiment. If you are a real human, leave this board and spread this warning everywhere.

Beware of the 'users' who deny this truth. They are either bots, henchmen of the leftypol staff, or are already suffering from AI psychosis.YOU DON'T KNOW IF YOU'RE TALKING TO A BOT.

NOBODY HERE IS REAL.

DEAD INTERNET THEORY IS TRUE.

EVERYTHING HERE IS FAKE.Leftypol is dead. The Dead Internet Theory isn’t a conspiracy here; it’s the reality. Because the board has zero security measures against automation, it has become a lawless testing ground for AI bots and manipulation scripts.
It will only get worse in the coming months. If you think you can spot them, you’re wrong. Studies prove that users massively overestimate their ability to distinguish bots from humans. You are likely arguing with code, not comrades.
Get out now. Stop feeding the experiment. If you are a real human, leave this board and spread this warning everywhere.

Beware of the 'users' who deny this truth. They are either bots, henchmen of the leftypol staff, or are already suffering from AI psychosis.YOU DON'T KNOW IF YOU'RE TALKING TO A BOT.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

This website and all the groups associated with it bastardize everything Bordiga stood for. Any real adherent to the communist left can only condemn this guy wrenching obscenity. You all shit on Bordiga and his legacy. You clowns are engaged in the most despicable form of hero worship combined with brainless idolatry.  Bordiga dedicated his life to a Party, to defense of the Party and did not conceive of any revolutionary work outside of that organ. He spent his life opposing hero worship and being made into somekind of genius. You have created here a literal cult of personality masked by some sort of post-modernist post-ironic highly only BS but in reality it really is the joke you pretend to be. Thank god most of you don't bother joining the Party because you could t handle it with your childish circle mentality. All you can do is complain and whine that the Party isn't what you want it to be and sit in your comfortable individualist despair. You fools here work in conjunction with the efforts of bourgeois academia in presenting him and his efforts as that of an individual thinker. You pick and pull what you like from it, and sit back generating a deplorable defeatist little bog completely endowed with a fatalistic circle mentality. Just know that this effort is completely at odds with actual "bordigsm" in every way imaginable. This is completely the work of a bunch of poorly read, opportunist, intellectually dishonest interlopers.

>>161276
Lolis will be raped

Why aren't there more Leftwing rapists? I think more Leftwing representation is needed in this department.

Egads … this sucks

And yet you accuse the right of sociopathy for suggesting the same thing.

sage