/b/ - Siberia

In 2024, American Communist Party (ACP) top figure Haz Al-Din made the point that a man was being raped by a trans woman if the latter didn’t disclose their gender transition status beforehand, which some leftists found to be controversial: https://xcancel.com/secondbyfarce/status/1852772181073445357

Some here may find Haz’s position to be disconcerting and triggering, but within the context of consent in sexual intimacy, he is right since he is merely applying the logic of rape-as-lack-of-consent to its logical conclusion.

Because let’s face it: Consent, as pointed out by figures such as Harry Hay and Michel Foucault, is just liberal contract theory as applied to sex, and a contract is made void if you enter under it under false pretenses, and let’s not pretend that contracts are made in a vacuum, as whether a contract is or isn’t valid isn’t a neutral judgement made by an impartial figure, as much as being done by the powers that be (e.g., the state) under dominant or bourgeois cultural diktats.

So unless you think consent shouldn’t be absolute when it comes to sexual relations, then a trans woman having sex with a cishet man without disclosing “her” pre-transition gender is rape as much as sex by deception is rape, and neither are criminalised even in the most feminist countries like Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Denmark, the USA, Canada, Australia, the UK, and France. So what does it say about consent theory if not even the most feminist countries on Earth criminalised sex by deception as rape?

Then of course, there’s the issue of the AoC, a draconian and absolutist bourgeois piece of legislation used by the capitalist bourgeoisie to morally discipline the working class into anti-proletarian bourgeois morality since the days of William T Stead’s infamous yellow press journalism. In this case, a person under the magic age line cannot (legally) consent to sex with someone above the magic age line. Common idealist talking points often allude to an inconsistent and arbitrary notion of “mental maturity” that is heavily subjective depending on who uses it, whilst obfuscating the meat of the issue: It’s not that people below the magic age line are incapable of being willing sexual and/or romantic partners, it’s just that the state decided that the magic age line makes the willingness of the person below the magic age line (Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

Umberto Eco, writer of the Fascism checklist, did the following:
Eco criticized social networks, saying for example that "Social media gives legions of idiots the right to speak when they once only spoke at a bar after a glass of wine, without harming the community … but now they have the same right to speak as a Nobel Prize winner. It's the invasion of the idiots."

Yikes… He sounds kinda fascist, doesn't he?

What is up with society wanting to extend childhood nowadays?

18-24 are being treated as 13-17.

Is it millennials and zoomers wanting to save face for delayed maturation?

There’s an undercurrent of fear and disgust towards young people showing any interest or prowess in worldly affairs

There’s a lot of people saying “enjoy your youth” to entail “please remain awkward and mediocre until you’re thirty”

Tech giants consolidated the internet into their social media platforms, and then, predictably, made them shittier until people started quitting.

Social media peaked in 2022. Every platform is censored, zogged, botted, astroturfed, propagandized and algorithmically made to promote the ideas of the epstein regime to such an extent that when using them for a prolonged amount of time the discrepancy between what people think IRL and what "people" "think" online becomes palpable.

This certainly leaves a gap for smaller more underground networks to fill, but I don't know what that will look like.

ITT: Let's discuss the implications of the downfall of mainstream american internet websites, the future of social media and propaganda in general.

They all act like you just took a shit on their mom's face or shot the goddamn pope.

/posad/ is so slow I am making this here.
Post your occult rituals, practices, and outcomes here.

Post monsters.
Das it.

sup uyghurs

Just think about it for a moment
>viewed as a normative form of attraction throughout history before feminism; boys are pretty and lack adult male features which are repellent, therefore it isn't gay, and is perfectly masculine behaviour
>it isn't gay from the boy's perspective, because they have a higher sex drive and are more prone to sexual experimentation
>celebrated as a superlative form of relationship by the Greeks; considered instrumental in the healthy development of boys personalities
>creates strong, masculine bonds between males which can not be broken; see the Sacred Band of Thebes
>devalues women by providing an alternative to the roastie paradigm, invalidating their holes, which weakens women's pernicious influence on society
>the theory that it causes psychological harm to the younger participant is debunked pseudoscience (read Rind et al. and Newgon); negative effects primarily occur due to harsh cultural opposition to the practice, resulting in unnecessary criminal and psychiatric proceedings
>most harsh opposition traditionally comes from judaism (via Christianity) and feminism; virtually all pre-Christian European societies partook in the practice of pederasty
>allows boys to socialize with adults and connect with the adult world in an intimate way
>provides men with a powerful incentive to direct attention towards younger generations
>Goethe, Schopenhauer, and Voltaire all said it was natural

Well? Why are jews and feminists so staunchly opposed to the love which dare not speak its name?

I paid a graphic designer $10,000 to make a logo which combines a magen david with a Nazi black sun for my tech company. Guess which company!