/b/ - Siberia

Faggot, take your fantasy to >>>/lgbt/

shardee lost
shemmee lost
swinny lost
frogcacas lost
soysphere retards lost
i am fucking the alunya btw if that matters
(btw havent visited leftysphere since leftypol got rulecucked in the paleolitic period or some shit, can i post lowlies on this website?)

>>160673
>can i post lowlies on this website?
No.

>>158869
Go back.
>>158915
>take your fantasy to >>>/lgbt/
Keep that degen chud shit out of there.

>>160676
Tbh the absolute obsession with no loli content on this site is insane.

>>160585
Doesn’t negate my point

>>160596
Well, it's dialectical. Just because the people are toxic doesn't mean it's not the platform's fault for amplifying their voices instead of promoting something genuinely intellectually stimulating.

Basically, fuck both of them at the same time.

>>160597
Fair point.
But we do have intellectual videos that get lots of views as well

https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1995/06/22/ur-fascism/

"Mein Kampf is a manifesto of a complete political program. Nazism had a theory of racism and of the Aryan chosen people, a precise notion of degenerate art, entartete Kunst, a philosophy of the will to power and of the Ubermensch. Nazism was decidedly anti-Christian and neo-pagan, while Stalin’s Diamat (the official version of Soviet Marxism) was blatantly materialistic and atheistic. If by totalitarianism one means a regime that subordinates every act of the individual to the state and to its ideology, then both Nazism and Stalinism were true totalitarian regimes."

"There was only a single Nazi architecture and a single Nazi art. If the Nazi architect was Albert Speer, there was no more room for Mies van der Rohe. Similarly, under Stalin’s rule, if Lamarck was right there was no room for Darwin. In Italy there were certainly fascist architects but close to their pseudo-Coliseums were many new buildings inspired by the modern rationalism of Gropius."



"The message on the front celebrated the end of the dictatorship and the return of freedom: freedom of speech, of press, of political association. These words, “freedom,” “dictatorship,” “liberty,”—I now read them for the first time in my life. I was reborn as a free Western man by virtue of these new words."


"Franklin Roosevelt’s words of November 4, 1938, are worth recalling: “I venture the challenging statement that if American democracy ceases to move forward as a living force, seeking day and night by peaceful means to better the lot of our citizens, fascism will grow in strength in our land.” Freedom and liberation are an unending task."

>>160648
>Nazism was decidedly anti-Christian and neo-pagan,
This is such a crazy line for a respected Fascism scholar to write lol. Most Nazis were Christians, and the political tendency of Nazism was to counter Soviet atheism by encouraging Christianity in territories it took over. Himmler, the most famous Nazi neo-pagan official, even required that all members of the SS believe in "a higher power," which demographically automatically meant that the majority of the SS was Christian since there was no specific requirement that they adhere to neo-paganism (which was fringe outside of the Nazi inner circles, where it was not the majority but was less fringe than it was among the general public).

>>160637
>Every platform (…) made to promote the ideas of the epstein regime
>the discrepancy between what people think IRL and what "people" "think" online becomes palpable.
Yet I'm an online person and IRL I knew a Western European news watching black Christian Zionist who looked down social media while hypocritically watching TV for hours.

Why is online social media looked down upon while Western TV is actively watched for hours?

I've got to say, I think it's really fucking unfortunate that people seem to have un-learned exploring the internet, and never re-learned that even now. Small independent forums could easily flourish again with what's going on, but that's not what's happened - instead, we've got a situation where even sites like this have, quite frankly, a disproportionate amount of JIDF and fed op posters and no real increase in usership to make up for it. A lot of the people who still regularly use interactive sites are still hooked up to Twitter, Instagram, fbi.gov, etc. … because those sites are still more active and they, unfortunately, seem to not have the willpower to go somewhere else.

What's more, sites like this, because of the persistent (even if very small compared to twitter) zio/glowops posting can turn a lot of potential users off. I remember, unfortunately, hesitating to join .net during its best years because, on .org, people would always post screenshots of the catalog with a bunch of Nazi & reactionary shit in it. It was misleading as to the real nature of this site, but also… you, know, I kind of wonder sometimes if we don't have a problem with a bunch of Nazi/eugenics/pedo shitposters whose entire purpose is to shit up the catalog and make us look bad to people who come here from other sites. I personally believe the Bunkerchan coup which created .org as we know it today was a trick by feds, not that I can prove it… but shit like that did happen with 8ch and 4chan, so maybe!

There was also this, frankly, very strange thing that happened around 2015-2016 where leftist and left-leaning online communities just started suiciding for no apparent reason. The most prominent example was RevLeft - really fucking absurd how that happened. Other boards closed, too, using a lot of, in retrospect very fucking obviously astroturfed, talking points about how too much free speech was bad, which inevitably only benefitted reactionary propaganda when this whole fake-ass talking point was pretty much exclusively peddled by lapsed liberals masquerading as leftists and contrasting themselves with communities like 4Chan (where the right-wing turn was itself astroturfed in the 2010s, in significant part by rich pedophiles). It's really fucking contemptible the level of idiocy displayed by the fucking fools (if they didn't know what they were doing) in the early-to-mid 2010s, tPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>160637
>This certainly leaves a gap for smaller more underground networks to fill, but I don't know what that will look like.
Sir, you're in an underground network.

>>160638
That's actually wild

>>160145
Ritual occultism actually reflects a lot of Jungian shadow work.

>>160146
Elaborate!

>>160146
You're never going to elaborate are you. =[

>>160147
that it's all bullshit

>>160607
1. I didn't ask you, fool.
2. You clearly have no idea what the conversation is even about. Go read about something that actually interests you, you clearly aren't into this.

>>160591
nothin

Who dis

>>160486
Anthropic?

the company is on fire rn, is there any chance for me to work at your company. I'm pursuing bachelors in Computer Science

20 years gone, yet not forgotten.

This is a garbage rationalization for solipsism. The weight is measurable.

Do a bunch of acid. Do enough that you have undeniable hallucinations, but not enough that they're completely totalizing - you should see manifestations, mandalas, etc. but still be able to tell what room you're in. Depending on your weight and drug habits, 3 hits should do it - 2 could do it even. Dosage of tabs varies wildly, though, so do research - Psychonaut, Erowid, etc. can help. Put on black metal or The Cure or Xenomorph or something like that. THEN formulate an argument for the reality of subjective experience, and factor death into it too. Weight is not subjective, your current argument is bad.

bump for this genius philosophy

Like the other feller said, a rock can be weighted.
You can do better than that. You could mention how our life experiences and what we're exposed to affect how we see the world in subtle ways, like how you interpret events and perhaps even omens if you're into that.

Who decides what stuff you see means? What is reading? It's just shapes.

Why are letters letters and why do letters make words?

>>158590
>the world can't exist outside of the human experience of it
It's called subjective idealism and it does not follow from your previous arguments. You only prove that reality is up to one's interpretation.

>>160111
What is cybernetics? I just discovered this field. I have been programming most of my life at this point and I have no idea about this. redpill me on it

I did all of these, now what?

>>160548
Now your organs will collapse into each other and you'll drop on the floor while screaming in pain and then you die.