[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ][Options]

/777/ - Weapons and War

"An oppressed class which does not strive to learn to use arms, to acquire arms, only deserves to be treated like slaves" - V. I. Lenin
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Select/drop/paste files here
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble

| Catalog | Home

File (hide): 1706825348683.png ( 856.14 KB , 1320x862 , 871c2e71cded7486aaacdbea18….png )

[–]

 No.1431[Reply]

It has been decided that the new theme for this board will be the discussion of weapons, warfare and military history.
As ever, we ask you to stick to the rules, including remembering to clearly mark any posts generated by AI as being so. Enjoy!


File (hide): 1749151255895.gif ( 2.86 MB , 326x184 , UpshotKnotholeGrable.gif )

[–]

 No.1531[Reply]>>1533

I had seen a video online showing a fricking artillery cannon shooting a shell that was a nuke. Looking up some information, I learned the artillery cannon is named the M65, also called the "atomic annie", which was designed to shoot nuclear shells, such as the W9. (Fun fact, the M65 was part of Upshot–Knothole Grable nuclear test in 1953 at area 5 nevada test site)

The artillery shells for me was a whole other rabbit hole for me,and it made me wonder: Would it be hypothetically possible to have smaller types of shells that can be shot from a gun? Realistically, no, and even if it was hypothetically or scientifically possible, nuclear rounds would be absolutely illegal.
>>

 No.1532

File (hide): 1749160324358.png ( 471.36 KB , 800x640 , ClipboardImage.png )

>shells that can be shot from a gun

Smallest possible yield of PU-239 is 10Kg. You can maybe reduce that with an explosive lens that compresses the bomb, or a reflector. Both increase the number of chain reactions and decrease the amount you need for it to go supercritical.

So maybe you can have an RPG kind of thing. Something that would send the bomb far enough away that you can still use it without killing yourself, but without so much recoil that you can still fire it.

Seems like for it to be man-portable it would have to be rocket powered. Wait a minute didn't they make that already? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_Crockett_(nuclear_device)
>>

 No.1533

>>1531
>Would it be hypothetically possible to have smaller types of shells that can be shot from a gun? Realistically
Yes, there is a element that has the physical properties that gets you down to about the size of a marble for spicy fun with fission.

The element isn't naturally occurring, but it is not that hard to bread it artificially.

The downside is that this stuff emits a lot of heat, constantly, because it's got a relatively short half life and you have to store your spicy bullets in a powerful refrigeration unit, or you'll have an extremely bad time.

Remember nukes make plasma, they're not actually explosives, the enormous shock-waves from the big boy nukes are from thermal expansion of heated air. The stuff i'm talking about mainly emits ionizing radiation, powerful enough to melt a tank, but it would not make a big boom. So if you want a radio-active puddle of liquid metal, this is it.

If you are wondering why i'm being a little bit coy about some of the details, that's because there is a somewhat cost effective path to mass-production. There's already places on earth that are contaminated because some people thought depleted uranium munitions were a good idea. This would be a thousand times worse.

If we are talking scifi, you can make a fusion bomb the size of a rice corn, assuming you have anti-mater as the "ignition source". Hardly any contamination, even compared to conventional chemical based weapons. 30 soldiers could raze an entire city. In the long run we'll have to get better at peace or we'll extinct our selves.


File (hide): 1745694902851.jpg ( 133.11 KB , 925x616 , Ukraine_Russia_Lagoda_vehi….jpg )

[–]

 No.1526[Reply]

Like one that was used in the Chernobyl accident investigation.
>>

 No.1527

What about it?
>>

 No.1528>>1529

Why tf do people make threads like this and then just never fucking follow up?
>>

 No.1529

>>1528
Maybe his mom took away his internet for not doing homework?


File (hide): 1744934937161.png ( 873.16 KB , 612x766 , 1.png )

[–]

 No.1520[Reply]>>1521>>1523>>1524

Read about what the IRA and Spear of the Nation did in their homelands. Read about the Viet Minh and how they were formed. Read Clausewitz and Diem.

You have to start somewhere. Never forget, Castro had 60 fighters on the Granma. Spear of the Nation was five people at first. The Viet Minh had fewer than 500 members for years. The IRA probably never had more than 1000 at a time.

Shit is only going to change if you MAKE it change.
>>

 No.1521>>1522

>>1520
You're not wrong but Cuba and Vietnam only survived because the Soviets helped them. And well, Ireland sort of wasn't really entirely liberated. Arguably Cuba is still under the thumb because of the US's blockade. Vietnam did pretty well all things considered.

The point being, shit like this don't work unless there's a big power putting the thumb on the scale.
>>

 No.1522

>>1521
China’s gonna start writing checks to whoever soon enough even your favorite ‘anti-establishment’ grifters.
>>

 No.1523

File (hide): 1744955801616.jpg ( 35.27 KB , 500x500 , 26ff49ac-7412-44e8-8045-b1….jpg )

>>1520
I thought the guy on the right is the dungeon master from Gachimuchi for a split second.
>>

 No.1524

>>1520
>Read about what the IRA and Spear of the Nation
Ok, give me something to read about it. Gimme some texts I can go through.
>Read about the Viet Minh and how they were formed.
Same with this. What do I read?


File (hide): 1743097993318.png ( 70.37 KB , 300x200 , ClipboardImage.png )

[–]

 No.1517[Reply]>>1518

I love flankers. Post sexy planes so I can jerk off.
>>

 No.1518

>>1517
Yeah it's probably the last one of the truly good looking jets.

if you look at the R&D prototypes it appears that what comes after is increasingly going towards featureless flying wings.
>>

 No.1519

I'm so hard right now post more planes plz


File (hide): 1742657783563.jpeg ( 108.17 KB , 735x1003 , 1727873227341.jpeg )

[–]

 No.1512[Reply]

Low-risk activities are great to know because they can be used in a mass movement filled with people who are (understandably) timid and scared. And once there are enough people on board, then there's the safety in numbers that are needed to build confidence for more extreme actions.

Perhaps more self-sabotage than worker sabotage, but I remember in the US post-pandemic strike wave, John Deere hired scabs and one crashed a tractor before the strike even began.

Speaking of scabs and low-risk tactics, Kellogg's also hired scabs that year and the /r/antiwork community raided them with fake job applications. It's a nice example of external sabotage, where sometimes even international comrades can help in their spare time.
>>

 No.1514

aye yo bro fuck tesla.
>>

 No.1515

Fuck Elon Musk
>>

 No.1516

I've got some perfectly good plans to start work on, but I have no idea how to finance said work.


File (hide): 1740812263695.jpg ( 36.1 KB , 987x551 , semi auto shotgun.jpg )

[–]

 No.1506[Reply]

Semi-automatic shotguns - what's the verdict? Are they good? Which ones are the best?
>>

 No.1507>>1508

In video games the old-timey double-barrel shotgun is usually the best.

Can you explain what a semi-auto shotgun is for ?
Usually people use shotguns for hunting, so is this for mowing down an entire flock of birds or decimating an entire pack of wild bore ?
>>

 No.1508>>1510

>>1507
>Can you explain what a semi-auto shotgun is for ?
>Usually people use shotguns for hunting, so is this for mowing down an entire flock of birds or decimating an entire pack of wild bore ?
Say you're beset upon by a squadron of rhinoceri or something like that. You want more than just a couple shots, and the high caliber slugs of a shotgun will enable you to better break through the thick hides. Alternating between slugs and buckshot could also be useful for rapidly hitting many targets.
>>

 No.1509

Anyone have any recs?
>>

 No.1510>>1511

>>1508
>Say you're beset upon by a squadron of rhinoceri
Yes, the good ol rhino squadron.
>the thick hides
A shotgun prolly just piss off a rhino.
>>

 No.1511

>>1510
>A shotgun prolly just piss off a rhino.
Nah, a 12 gauge slug will probably penetrate 'em.


File (hide): 1735115701582-0.png ( 3.36 MB , 1190x1555 , Black Book Volume 3.png )

File (hide): 1735115701582-1.pdf ( 714.51 KB , 67x118 , Cobalt-60 - Wikipedia.pdf )

[–]

 No.1504[Reply]

Cobalt-60 could be made by irradiating a regular cobalt with an alpha neutron source, possibly?


File (hide): 1707331984839.png ( 784.64 KB , 960x615 , benelli-m4-18076.png )

[–]

 No.1457[Reply]

How overrated is this shotgun, if at all?
12 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click to expand.
>>

 No.1482>>1483>>1484>>1485

>>1478
Can shotguns shoot nets? Nets would probably be better at taking down a drone
>>

 No.1483

>>1482
how would you set up a net if you're mobile? they have their place for stuff like a window but you can always be canvassed in a giant net
>>

 No.1484>>1485

>>1482
oh you mean can shotguns shoot nets out of the barrel: no. Net guns exist but they're only good out to a few yards. I don't think a net shotgun is possible due to drag limitations and ability to actually deploy the net instead of it being a flaccid tail behind some shot. The shells would also have to be ludicrous in size. Not worth the effort just destroy the drone or begin the difficult task of developing an illegal signal jammer.
>>

 No.1485

>>1482
>>1484
If you can make a shotgun shell that operates like a flakcannon round with a proximity fuse, that deploys the net when it senses it's near a drone, that might work.

Since the net isn't deployed right away there would be no problems with drag. And it would retain useful range and accuracy.

I wonder if it's possible to modify the formula for silly-string to give it better tensile strength and use that as the "net".
>>

 No.1498

The benellis are absurdly reliable, the marines are known for breaking a lot of stuff, but even they can't make one of these stop running. But it's more expensive than they should, and if aren't LE/Military they come as barebones as it gets, the mossberg 940 is also very reliable and costs half


File (hide): 1723561780469.jpg ( 200.64 KB , 800x965 , Golde33443.jpg )

[–]

 No.1496[Reply]

>>

 No.1497

Moved to >>>/b/154890.


Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
Previous [ 1 / 2 ]
| Catalog | Home