/b/ - Siberia

Is ADHD and ADD real?

What if it's over-diagnosed? What if it's a ploy by big pharma to get kids hooked on stimulants?

All these soyjaks, pepes, and other memes are made specifically to instill right-wing views in children and to remove the stigma around violence. They’re drawn cartoon characters, often looking cute, kind or cool — perfect for attracting teenagers or even kids.
First they joke about trans people committing suicide because it’s “funny”, then it turns into their actual views, and they go vote for Trump just to make things worse for those “transhumanists.”
The same goes for TND, Hyperborea, and other Nazi-related memes.

It's never bothered me before but I've been thinking about it more and more recently, and it's affecting my mental health.

Genuinely guys, i love you. You're chill :)

It's nice to have a reprieve among everything else focused on raids or how to become the biggest asshole with the spiciest images. Thank you and have a nice day!

Should gambling be illegal? Will gambling be legal under socialism? Do you gamble?

Think about it:

>Both Epstein and Columbus were merchants
>Both had papal approval to do whatever they did
>Both served the Trump of their times
>Both ran child sex slave rings in some island in the Caribbean
>Both are darlings of the ChudIntern

Coincidence? I. Think. Not!

For those who don't know this, an "incel" (Alana, 1997) is someone who does not want to be celibate but is anyway, so involuntarily celibate, "incel". Later this was taken over by men and shifted to "crab" by 2000s.

The media use of the term has now come to mean anyone who sees the world through an "crab" pov of people who can get sex vs. people who cannot. So now there are two definitions.

I hate this word so much now that people have started to refer to it IRL. Even the people who can barely speak English have picked up on it.

It is such a female centric word and places all male value on their relationship status and their perceived relationship with female as a whole. It's erased all of the non-sex oriented men's subcultures and communities like nerds, geeks and wizards. The split definition "people who cannot get sex" vs. "subculture of people who believe in incel" now includes every male only community.

I hate erasure and fucking fake stories. I don't care about doing performative shit for "normies". I work, that's fucking enough, leave me alone!

Just think about it for a moment
>viewed as a normative form of attraction throughout history before feminism; boys are pretty and lack adult male features which are repellent, therefore it isn't gay, and is perfectly masculine behaviour
>it isn't gay from the boy's perspective, because they have a higher sex drive and are more prone to sexual experimentation
>celebrated as a superlative form of relationship by the Greeks; considered instrumental in the healthy development of boys personalities
>creates strong, masculine bonds between males which can not be broken; see the Sacred Band of Thebes
>devalues women by providing an alternative to the roastie paradigm, invalidating their holes, which weakens women's pernicious influence on society
>the theory that it causes psychological harm to the younger participant is debunked pseudoscience (read Rind et al. and Newgon); negative effects primarily occur due to harsh cultural opposition to the practice, resulting in unnecessary criminal and psychiatric proceedings
>most harsh opposition traditionally comes from judaism (via Christianity) and feminism; virtually all pre-Christian European societies partook in the practice of pederasty
>allows boys to socialize with adults and connect with the adult world in an intimate way
>provides men with a powerful incentive to direct attention towards younger generations
>Goethe, Schopenhauer, and Voltaire all said it was natural

Well? Why are jews and feminists so staunchly opposed to the love which dare not speak its name?

Can anyone in Israel be considered innocent?

First of all I don't believe that any workers in Israel is unaware of the genocide.

Second, workers over there morally support having an ethnostate even if they're against the violence.

And lastly, by virtue of going to work for the regime, by helping perpetuate the regime, with the exception of people also actively organizing against said regime, they are still funding and making the genocide possible. If you hit someone with your car and maim them because you weren't paying attention and ran a red light, it's still your fault regardless of intent. So I think just because of this everyone that has gotten up in the morning and went to work for the occupation regime known as Israel should at some point be held accountable.

wikipedia banned me for a year for "vandalism" because of a conversation I had on a TALK page. previously I had only created a couple of pages for left wing books about reconstruction. I was trying to point out that certain artificial sweeteners in diet sodas were carcinogenic, but only after they pass through the digestive system and produce formaldehyde. I had talked about the conflict of interest between the corporations that invented them and the FDA. I talked about how the reagan administration brought in donald rumsfeld to accelerate the approval after it had been deadlocked for 16 years. I provided citations at every single step. all of this was on a talk page. I was not being argumentative. I was not editing the page. I merely pointed out that a lot of this information was absent from the article and drafted a proposal for possibly adding it in the future. I followed all the rules. Some fucking artificial sweetener industry shill policing the article got my ass banned. we used to have a glowiepedia thread on here showing power mods and power editors who edit impossible numbers of articles per year. People who are obviously paid by imperial core intelligence agencies to be full time wikipedia police. the bitch of the thing is they even scrubbed the talk page after banning me so I had no evidence. it was fucked. You go to pages like "historicity of jesus" and the corresponding talk pages have shit flinging back and forth between atheists and theists for years because it is of little political consequence for capitalists or imperialists. but you say an artificial sweetener is carcinogenic and suddenly you're a "vandal" and industry shills ban you. the rules are absolutely enforced differently from one article to the next and you see hired freaks lay control of articles relevant to industrial monopoly interests or imperialist interests .

and then you have reactionaries like musk come out and say "actually wikipedia is commiepedia and we need to make it even more right wing"