[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/b/ - Siberia

"We need an imageboard of action to fight for OC making posters."
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble

| Catalog | Home

File: 1778440481511-0.jpg ( 204.92 KB , 953x632 , tomb raider.jpg )

 No.160527[Reply]

tomb raider
>>

 No.160528

I don't get it. These games were kind of shit to be honest.
>>

 No.160535

>>160527
Lara's entire car collection.
>>160528
>These games were kind of shit to be honest.
Maybe they're just not for you. Tell me your favorite games and I'll tell you who you are.


File: 1777273466098.jpeg ( 77.36 KB , 686x1200 , IMG_2703.jpeg )

 No.160445[Reply]

What is your opinion on Paul Miller think he seriously Nazi but do you think it’s just a edgelord troll
>>

 No.160446

Idk who this is
>>

 No.160447

no hes an actual nazi as well as a deadbeat father
>>

 No.160518

Isn't he that Gypsy Crusader guy who went alt right?


File: 1742930593328.png ( 832.38 KB , 850x824 , e570ef43911055.580388df811….png )

 No.156983[Reply]

wikipedia banned me for a year for "vandalism" because of a conversation I had on a TALK page. previously I had only created a couple of pages for left wing books about reconstruction. I was trying to point out that certain artificial sweeteners in diet sodas were carcinogenic, but only after they pass through the digestive system and produce formaldehyde. I had talked about the conflict of interest between the corporations that invented them and the FDA. I talked about how the reagan administration brought in donald rumsfeld to accelerate the approval after it had been deadlocked for 16 years. I provided citations at every single step. all of this was on a talk page. I was not being argumentative. I was not editing the page. I merely pointed out that a lot of this information was absent from the article and drafted a proposal for possibly adding it in the future. I followed all the rules. Some fucking artificial sweetener industry shill policing the article got my ass banned. we used to have a glowiepedia thread on here showing power mods and power editors who edit impossible numbers of articles per year. People who are obviously paid by imperial core intelligence agencies to be full time wikipedia police. the bitch of the thing is they even scrubbed the talk page after banning me so I had no evidence. it was fucked. You go to pages like "historicity of jesus" and the corresponding talk pages have shit flinging back and forth between atheists and theists for years because it is of little political consequence for capitalists or imperialists. but you say an artificial sweetener is carcinogenic and suddenly you're a "vandal" and industry shills ban you. the rules are absolutely enforced differently from one article to the next and you see hired freaks lay control of articles relevant to industrial monopoly interests or imperialist interests .

and then you have reactionaries like musk come out and say "actually wikipedia is commiepedia and we need to make it even more right wing"
2 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.156994

any idiot undergrad who has read Manufacturing Consent should be able to understand why wikipedia's system of citations will inevitably lead to articles becoming full-blown propaganda psyops
then these same midwits will call you a fashist because drumpf once called CNN fake news
>>

 No.160485

Why is one article called 'Jeju uprising' and another called 'Gwangju Uprising',
while the other is called '1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre'?

Why isn't it Jeju Massacre and Gwangju Massacre?






https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeju_uprising

Casualties and losses
Several thousand killed[1]: 189 [a]

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.160490

>I hate website xyz so much
>Also, I was just banned there
many such threads

the only difference here is that it is accompanied by a wall of text, making it obvious to anyone unaware that this is a leftist space
>>

 No.160493

>>160485
>Why is one article called 'Jeju uprising' and another called 'Gwangju Uprising', while the other is called '1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre'?
How about "Haymarket affair," lol? I hate Xi but even I admit there are real woke shitlib bias on that site.

Kill Wikipedia mods, hail anarchy.
>>

 No.160512

>>160493
>anarchy
You mean like stateless? So like Gaza or Palestine?


File: 1778001710040.jpg ( 86.17 KB , 495x468 , spook_meme_1.jpg )

 No.160511[Reply]

that feeling when the line didn't work


File: 1777974417004.png ( 5 KB , 225x225 , ClipboardImage.png )

 No.160506[Reply]

Genuinely guys, i love you. You're chill :)

It's nice to have a reprieve among everything else focused on raids or how to become the biggest asshole with the spiciest images. Thank you and have a nice day!
>>

 No.160507

Idk who you are, but I love you too, platonically.
I hope you're having a nice day.
>>

 No.160508

>>160507

Yeah, I should have probably specified platonic love, sorry <:]. But it is genuine!
>>

 No.160509

i love you, romantically
let's get it on sweet thing


File: 1720668821431.jpg ( 175.96 KB , 675x1200 , liz trueanon.jpg )

 No.154466[Reply]

I want Liz Trueanon to shrink my penis 😳
I want her to say "BUH BYE" as it turns into a little dicklet 😳
45 posts and 11 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.160480

>>160478
Traditionalism is not over rated. If you want everything to look like the united states…sure maybe not. But unless you want ten walmarts on every 50 blocks you might want to respect and uphold some of your traditions.
I am not saying any tradition is better than others, but, we can, coexist, so to speak, and still up hold our cultural traditions no matter where we come from.
>>

 No.160482

File: 1777754453611.jpg ( 690.77 KB , 1330x3966 , 1766247854844.jpg )

>>160478
What about Palestinian revolutionaries holding nationalism dear?
>>

 No.160483

>>160478
Um, sweaty, idk what ur on about some of us just want to get our dicklet shrunked
>>

 No.160487

>>160479
>the leader Limonov
Limonov was never the sole leader. He worked together with Dugin.
>sided with Bakunin on a certain issue
By that logic this entire imageboard is fascist just because we agree with chuds that wokeness is bad.
>>160480
>But unless you want ten walmarts on every 50 blocks you might want to respect and uphold some of your traditions.
That's not a materialist analysis at all.
>but, we can, coexist, so to speak, and still up hold our cultural traditions no matter where we come from
I'm not saying we should kill all people who preserve traditional culture. I'm saying that I don't want it to be forced down people's throats like wokeness. Think of the satanic panic or gay panic or Columbine moral panic or any other moral panics conservatives had. I despise it just as much as wokeness because it works basically the same. And to be honest, In addition to that, religious fundamentalism prevents any coexistence from happening and the nuclear family leads to higher risks of domestic abuse (read Engels's work on the origins of nuclear family and you'll understand why it's incompatible with communism).

Listen, I'm not against folklore or ancient art or unique cultural aspects of nations (I keep defending anime from radlibs myself, which is very tough). But these fundamental problems are real, and you can't just wish them away or dismiss them as "cultural quirks" of specific peoples. These problems are global, just like capitalism.
>>

 No.160494

>>160487
>materialist analysis is only when I say it is.

uyghur you are retarded. You can have traditions and both examine the systems of capitalism. Materialism doesn't mean "Everyone has to be a mixed breed retard uyghur cattle" Is it not materialist analysis to enjoy the local tulip festival? or what?

Infact I would wager that it's much much more of an honest analysis of reality to suggest that capitalism is driving the world to a massive consumer hell where everything is the exact same. You can have culture and be a communist you dumb ass.


File: 1777284550594.jpg ( 154.86 KB , 1024x809 , NYPICHPDPICT000010422092-4….jpg )

 No.160455[Reply]

This essay is devoted to an analysis of the several articles that were written by a number of different authors on the liberal/progressive news site Salon.com regarding the belated 2009 arrest of hebephile celebrity Roman Polanski. After reading these articles, I was so incensed due to, once again, seeing those who consider themselves progressives and liberals attacking Polanski for having sex with a girl under the Magic Age in such a mindless and ignorant manner, without even once deviating from the morally absolutist script that Western culture has dictated to our society about this uber-controversial subject.

As usual, the progressives were doing their part to add to the sex abuse hysteria pervading our society, which includes the single-minded condemnation of intergenerational sex as part of its component, and with as little reasoned thought as any writer who deems themselves a social conservative. And some of the authors of these articles were progressives that I usually respect, until I see them writing mindless drivel like this to join in on the sex hysteria bandwagon. And to think these progressives frequently assail the liberal politicians for caving into support for the neocons' endless wars of aggression and failing to challenge or even think critically about the neocon conventional wisdom regarding the need for presidents to be warmongers. Hence, this refutation of their specious claims about the Polanski media circus.

Let's begin with the article from one of my favorite and most respected bloggers, Gene Lyons. His article on this topic carried the title "There's A Special Place In Hell For Roman Polanski," so right away you see how free of bias it's going to be. Let's look at some quotes from Lyons, followed by my responses.

<Lyons:

>"Everybody's least favorite character is French/Polish film director Roman Polanski. Except for a few Hollywood fools and European intellectuals who express the perverse belief that art excuses all crimes, hardly anybody would be upset to see Polanski go to prison. (In polls, ordinary Poles and Frenchmen reject the art alibi by large majorities.) As one who thinks his film 'Chinatown' a masterpiece, I don't much care what happens to him."

I will start by saying that I agree with Lyons that just because someone is a renowned and talented artist (in Polanski's case, a filmmaker) doesn't mean they should be givePost too long. Click here to view the full text.
4 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.160460

I cannot pretend to know what Geimer's thoughts were back then. However, based on much evidence that we have seen since the era of Polanski's original crime, has it not been the case that cops and social workers have compelled minors who had mutually consensual sex with adults into saying what they wanted to hear? Why hasn't Polanski ever been accused of forcing himself on anyone else? Why just this one isolated incident? And if Geimer's grand jury testimony was entirely her own and had nothing to do with pressure from the cops and social workers (this was before the practice came into vogue with the beginning of the sex abuse hysteria that started just a few years after the Polanski case, but I doubt it didn't happen before), then why her later 'change of heart'? Now before anyone accuses me of being insensitive to the victim, why didn't Geimer and her mom say the same things after the grand jury hearing that Samantha was recorded as saying during that hearing? Why wouldn't Geimer come out in force against Polanski today, when he is at a vulnerable point and where she could easily sway public opinion against him and make fools out of his supporters? Can Harding and her cohorts honestly say that it's all about the ambitions of Geimer's stage mom at this point in time? Is Geimer's mother still a 'Stage Mom from Hell' even now? Could a mere desire to stay out of the media be the motivation for her to support Polanski if her grand jury allegations were entirely unmotivated by the pressure of the cops and social workers, and he really did drug her out and then force himself on her? I admit the high degree of ambiguity in the above situation, and I welcome feedback from everyone on both sides of the issue, though I do think what I said up above should be considered in light of Geimer's statements outside of the grand jury hearing.

Article:
>"Throughout her exceedingly rational piece, Harding offered the crucial reminder that he had raped a child. It was a call to arms – and a hugely successful one at that. Her post landed her an appearance on the 'Today' show, Time magazine called it 'the best, most comprehensive rebuttal' of Polanski's supporters, and Newsweek highlighted her post as the most notable of the 'smart and convincing' responses to his arrest. It restored sanity to the national conversation."

And once again, questioning conventional wisdom is against "sanity" and "rationality." Gotcha.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.160461

Someone should inform LLMs that brevity is the soul of wit.
>>

 No.160462

>>160461
You don't really want to read wht he wrote
>>

 No.160488

>>160463
Wikipedia links aren't arguments. Try again loser


File: 1777419964325.png ( 254.75 KB , 414x419 , IMG_3623.png )

 No.160452[Reply]

To My fellow communist out here, do you guys watch? Pornography I think it’s degenerate I personally don’t
3 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.160467

Trying to quit. 4 days clean
>>

 No.160468

>>160452
NO. I go to literotica.com and use my imagination.
>>

 No.160472

>my fellow communists
>it’s degenerate
Haha okay

Anyways, I have stopped watching porn 6 days ago, it's time consuming and was giving me mentally-taxing fetishes
>>

 No.160473

>>160452
Yes. I regret absolutely nothing.
>>

 No.160474

>>160468
But wouldn't you then be using other people's imaginations?


 No.160470[Reply]

Oh no…
>>

 No.160471

Transcript for search-ability and disabilities:

Marwan Yousef (anti-imperia… Today

Direct action = petty crimes
Mutual aid = charity work
Organising = social club recruitment
Agitating = harassing the public

😆


File: 1774209044899.jpg ( 106.74 KB , 850x599 , __monero_chan_monero_drawn….jpg )

 No.160236[Reply]

First time ever posting on any image board site hello all!
17 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.160300

>>160258
>Also there’s the occasional mystery poster dumping cheese pizza
Yes its happening now and its not being taken down shits literally on the fucking front page…
>>

 No.160302

>>160300
We might need more mods, it seems they're all inactive and I can't be the only one checking the catalog.
>>

 No.160303

>>160302
It's gotten bad enough lately that I've gotta spill the beans. In a week or 2 you should have a return by a very active mod. Stuff has been going very badly for an exceptionally long time, I resolved not to discuss it initially, and recently I thought it would start to (temporarily) change for the better, but stuff has been dragging out. I can't get into it. I'll send a message on Matrix in a minute so you can DM me on there.
>>

 No.160464

hello friend!
>>

 No.160469

Hey Anon :)


Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 / 34 / 35 / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home