[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/b/ - Siberia

"We need an imageboard of action to fight for OC making posters."
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble
ReturnCatalogBottom

 No.157284

Conservatards be like: "Muh gays!! Muh gays!!" Yet the furry community is verifiably freakier than the queer community. Gay people get all the shit for just kissing in public while furfags walk around in fursuits, have orgies in them and are the kinkiest and the most porn-addicted people online by far. Like, how do (non-woke) queer people even come close to this?

I'm not saying we should bully furfags (especially for their sexual preferences if they enjoy them in private) but furfags clearly deserve more mockery than queers.

In conclusion: homophobes are stupid and furfags are cringe. The end.
>>

 No.157289

Idk man the gay parade in my city is way more degenerate than anything furries have ever done. I wouldn't really care about the gays but they've got their cocks out swinging in front of kids, I definitely draw a line there.
>>

 No.157291

>>157289
>Idk man the gay parade in my city is way more degenerate than anything furries have ever done.
You're overexaggerating. You have no idea what the furfags are capable of.
>>

 No.157751

File: 1746119375825.png ( 4.79 KB , 430x410 , Anti_furry_nat.png )

Someone at PCBA has apparently made a hypothetical anti-furry progressive ideology:
https://polcompballanarchy.miraheze.org/wiki/Anti-Furry_Progressivism
<GET OUT FROM LGBT COMMUNITY! WEARING A DOG SUIT IS NOT A GENDER!
That's funny 'cause there is apparently a "furry gender." Gender is a set of social customs associated with biological sex, the fuck is the "furry gender" supposed to mean?
>>

 No.157752

File: 1746119606026.jpg ( 1.73 MB , 1080x1280 , 1399zrtj9zs91.jpg )

Why is the Western furry fandom so cringe? Why are furfags so intolerant of criticism of their fandom? And why do they buy these expensive fursuits if they look ugly, have poor ventillation and are hard to breathe in?

Also, what do you guys think of the scalie fandom? Is it somewhat independent from the furry community? Does it have its own conventions? Are the costumes better?
>>

 No.157775

File: 1746268357573.jpg ( 1.91 MB , 2480x3508 , 560c47670e1b7d7f95922d0996….jpg )

…the Chinese do make furries look hotter for some reason. Maybe it's a difference between the American and Chinese fandoms?
>>

 No.157786

>>157289
moralist scum
>>157284
furries aren't real, just a series of vapidly discrete popculture tropes.
a side effect of the decrease in bullying globally.
>>

 No.157788

>>157786
>a side effect of the decrease in bullying globally
It's not just bullying. Simply criticizing certain furry trends is anathema.
>>

 No.157789

>>157786
>a side effect of the decrease in bullying globally
<"bring back bullying"
>also: "nooo not another mass shooting!!!"
>>

 No.157810

>>157786
>a side effect of the decrease in bullying globally.

It never ceases to amaze me that people will glorify bullying but get offended by romantic affectations.

Bullying is too often downplayed by pop culture as harmless slapstick. It isn't. Bullying is what brings about reactionary sentiment and even sexual assault.

People like you who think bullying acts as a social pesticide against degeneracy will be the first to go postal when it's your kid whose being crucified for being the slightest bit awkward/unworldly.
>>

 No.157811

>>157788
Wrong.
Furry fandom has been crucified for years.
>>

 No.157812

>>157811
>Furry fandom has been crucified for years.
Reactionaries crucify anyone who's outside their definition of "normal" tbh. They don't count.
>>

 No.157817

>>157812
Well then, everyone is discounted then. Because even non-reactionaries whine about "muh joos"
>>

 No.157818

>>157817
>Because even non-reactionaries whine about "muh joos"
NazBols are reactionaries too. And anti-Zionism is not Jew-hatred.
>>

 No.157823

>>157818
I'm talking about even the average centrist
>>

 No.157900

File: 1747069826172.jpg ( 88.87 KB , 1170x656 , 1530623894259961856.jpg )

Shame.
>>

 No.157902

>>157901
Zoophilia…
>>

 No.157903

>>157900
Furfags are cringe but I think those furfags who unironically want to bang animals are a minority within the furry fandom since humanoid animals still have human bodies, the furry fandom just lacks self-awareness. To me this Twitter user is the same kind of a Twitter progressive who defends "MAPs," they just happen to infiltrate the furry community also.
>>

 No.157904

>>157903 (me)
Then again, there's something very zoophilic about those who are into "ferals."
>>

 No.158286

File: 1749325084493-0.png ( 1.02 MB , 1366x768 , photo-64.png )

File: 1749325084493-1.png ( 1.04 MB , 1366x768 , photo-65-1.png )

File: 1749325084493-2.jpg ( 4.49 MB , 3456x4608 , photo-39.jpg )

File: 1749325084493-3.jpg ( 3.34 MB , 3456x4608 , photo-60.jpg )

What if fursuits with airco systems and such are actually useful invention-wise?

https://anthrocore.wordpress.com/2020/12/28/fursuit-cooling-ventilator-system/
>>

 No.158289

>>158286
>fursuits with airco systems
>>

 No.158471

whatever happened to the yugoslav fursuit autist
>>

 No.158514

>>157284
Furries are degenerates, anyone who says otherwise is terminally online.

Furry fandom is to zoophilia what loli is to pedophilia. Prove me wrong.

And zoomers have been groomed by grown degenerate men into this "furry catboy femboy/trans fandom" lifestyle through careful manipulation of social-media culture that is popular in and between children.

These degenerates are camping on the meme hashtags literally grooming kids.
>>

 No.158516

>>158514
Furries arent zoophiles and neither are lolis being pedophilws

Also, zoomers are not being groomed as a majority into these cults of degeneracy.

At least no more than millennials were.


Alot of these "unfortunate" you g souls who get caught up in grooming willfully chose it because they weren't getting enough attention at home or school.

Alot of grooming occurs more in academic and religious settings

And social media is overblamed.

We had way more molestation in the "good old days"
>>

 No.158517

>>158514
You claiming that people who don't agree that furries aren't degenerate is terminally online is paradoxical


Terminally online people are the ones who call anything "degenerate".
>>

 No.158527

Ummmm… based
>>

 No.158691

>>157903
I was friends with a random furfag before he told me he was a zooey. Needless to say, I blocked him. Seems like the stereotype is true
>>

 No.158703

Troon
>>

 No.160256

>>158514
>>158516
Both of you are wrong. Some furfags are more zoophilic than others. I'd say anthro fans aren't zoophilic, while ponyfuckers and feralfags are concerning. And I think there are also some pedophilic undertones in lolicon, though lolifags may not necessarilly act on their urges irl.
>>158527
Thank you.
>>158691
Damn, man, that's messed up. So sorry for you.
>>

 No.160261

>>160256
> And I think there are also some pedophilic undertones in lolicon, though lolifags may not necessarilly act on their urges irl.

How is it pedophilic?
If it invites sexual attraction to real life kids than ok yes it could be. Otherwise you may as well say that violent movies are gore-philic
>>

 No.160263

>>160261
>If it invites sexual attraction to real life kids than ok yes it could be.
Well, I dunno. Maybe they're just able to keep their sex drive in check, I'm not a sexologist.
>Otherwise you may as well say that violent movies are gore-philic
People don't literally jerk off to gore, and neither is gore the most important aspect of the movies. It's shock content and is here to make the violence appear more brutal. People flock to anything disturbing and controversial.
>>

 No.160265

>>160263
> People don't literally jerk off to gore, and neither is gore the most important aspect of the movies. It's shock content and is here to make the violence appear more brutal. People flock to anything disturbing and controversial.

Yet, people get pissy about furry and loli/shota. Or anything remotely sexual.
Violence is allowed and encouraged as entertainment
>>

 No.160268

>>160263
> Well, I dunno. Maybe they're just able to keep their sex drive in check, I'm not a sexologist.

Or maybe it’s purely fictional so shota loli fans have no problem?

There’s a lot of things people are attracted to in cartoon form but not real life form
>>

 No.160270

>>160265
>Yet, people get pissy about furry and loli/shota.
I honestly don't care. I'm just saying that there are more reasons to believe that loli and shota are pedophilic than thinking that furry is zoophilic, I don't really understand that view. Yeah, it's weird. But so is any other paraphilia really, not sure how it makes it different from, say, jerking off to women in horse masks.
>Or anything remotely sexual.
I actually enjoy fanservice in anime and games like The Witcher, God of War, Nier Automata, DOA and Stellar Blade so it pisses me off too.
>Violence is allowed and encouraged as entertainment
Westerners have a history with bloodsports ever since colliseum was a thing or even earlier so we're kinda desensitized to violence in general. Well, except for Christian fundamentalists ofc. And Americans are (or used to be) the edgiest nation in the world. And Germany, Sweden and Netherlands have Neue Deutsch Harte, melodeath and gabber, go figure.
>>160268
>There’s a lot of things people are attracted to in cartoon form but not real life form
I think it's not the cartoon form that makes a difference. Rather, it's the idea that these NPCs you slaughter are "not real." It's only reinforced by the games: MK games justify the violence due to you being gladiators in a bloodsport and GTA justifies it by filtering the world through a misanthropic lens where everyone is a giant asshole (just like in real life but people don't want to admit it for some reason).
>>

 No.160336

>>160270 (me)
You know what's funny? GTA has adult humans, pets and wild animals but CHILDREN IS WHERE THEY DRAW THE LINE. THINK OF THE NPC CHILDREN EVERYONE!!

They could have just portrayed children as ugly, nasty bullies. Just like real children. Also Carmageddon did it WAY earlier and even let you run over pregnant women. Take that, Rockstar cowards!
>>

 No.160337

>>160336
RP: During the development, did you generate any ideas that were deemed too crazy even for Carmageddon?

PB: Pregnant pedestrians were vetoed by one artist’s wife. I wanted the foetus to fly out, get stuck on your windscreen and then bungie off because the umbilical was still attached to the mother’s corpse…


WTF…


Source: https://riotpixels.com/carmageddon-reincarnation-interview-original/
>>

 No.160338

>>160337
You probably shouldn't see The Hive level from Duke Nukem Forever then.
>>

 No.160339

>desperately begging conservatives to pick another scapegoat instead of both of you
haha liberal
>>

 No.160341

>>160339
>desperately begging
As if conservatards deserve to have their asses kissed in the first place. I was calling out their obsession over bs rather than seeking their approval.
>>

 No.160352

>>160336
> They could have just portrayed children as ugly, nasty bullies. Just like real children.

Why do people always have to resort to misopedia when explaining behavioral realism in children?
Yea, children can be cruel, but so are adults. In fact, adults always outperform children in cruelty. It’s not because children are innocent but rather because children have no power.
In fact, adults want children to be innocent for moral convenience.
Innocence is more a liability than a virtue.

>Also Carmageddon did it WAY earlier and even let you run over pregnant women. Take that, Rockstar cowards!

Didn’t Rockstar make “Manhunt”?
Also, I find it surprising that people have no problems with gore/snuff but get offended with sexual scenes.
People get offended at watching young adult female virgins offering their virginity to worldly men or vice versa
>>

 No.160354

>>160352
>Yea, children can be cruel, but so are adults.
I mean, that's my point. Adults are just overgrown children.
>Didn’t Rockstar make “Manhunt”?
Yeah, but it's not about running over pedestrians with a car. It's arguably even more graphic than Carma or 3D Mortal Kombat.
>>

 No.160356

At least furries have sex, unlike most of the posters on this site.
>>

 No.160358

>>160356
Gays also have sex, opinion invalid.
>>

 No.160359

File: 1776272117821.jpg ( 37.8 KB , 400x400 , DrBones_OleBonsey.jpg )

Let's be real: not even anarcho-egoists like furfags, furfags are so cringe not even hyperindividualism and moral nihilism will prevent you from feeling second-hand embarassment.

Bet if Stirner was alive he would be wondering wtf is going on in this subculture. Same for Marx. Especially for Marx, knowing the slanderous letter he wrote about Bakunin.
>>

 No.160360

Why do furries prefer to dress up as human-like animals instead of just being a human?
>>

 No.160361

>>160359 (me)
No, I'm not spooked, I'm just a based sigma anarchad with egocel characteristics.
>>

 No.160362

>>160360
>Why do furries prefer to dress up as human-like animals instead of just being a human?
Escapism probably.

Unique IPs: 15
[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome