/b/ - Siberia

>>155765
Communism would be impossible in a nonwhite country

>>155864
Yeah, white people would come and fuck it up.

Idk about USA but right above in Canada I think there is very little revolutionary potential. Every protest *must* be non-violent even after they repeatedly demonstrate that these nonviolent protests do absolutely fuck-all.

But the protestors are actually based, let me tell you an anecdote about individualism, and you will see why given enough people like that you can't have any revolutionary potential in a country. Also I just want to vent.

My buddy was longboarding down a fairly busy sidewalk. Of course his #1 priority is to not hit anyone. Some guy sticks his elbow out on purpose instead of giving him room to pass, so as he gets swiped he gave him a weak tap to the face, definitely not enough to do any damage other than to a tit-for-tat swipe.

This guy starts following my buddy yelling about he just hit him. And as he's shouting he gets his phone out and says he's going to call the cops. At that point I catch up and ask the guy if he would like some more hits to his face, because I'm just going to side with my buddy without really knowing what's going on. I was actually about to smack the dudes phone out of his hands or smack him but my buddy was already busy leaving so I we just left. I was so angry at that type of person though: they are simultaneously putting their hands on someone (being violent), lying about what happened, and they're a coward because they immediately wanted to snitch to the cops.

I kind of regret not physically causing this man harm but I would have probably gotten in trouble at that point because there would be people with their phones out.

Still what does this have to do with revolutionary potential? This type of person that I described is the hyper-individualistic liberal. They genuinely think they are morally correct even when they start shit, or also commonly when they say something rude (usually to a minority), and when they get clapped back for it they start acting all offended: see they have zero regard for other people and if that other is a minority they aren't even a person to them, so they get offended when they get the same treatment back.

There is no hope for working with someone like this. They will never listen to reason because when you talk to them about socialism they will tell lies in order to win the argument.

There are enough people in Canada that are exactly like this, that in a crisis will be absolutely useless. And they outnumber people who actPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>155911
We have alot moreof thoe in America

>>155025
Yes. See Kanye West AKA Ye who is figuring out a way beyond the two-party system. Furthermore Jill Stein and other third party candidates and the lackluster/negative reception of the two-party candidates. Pre-1917 Russia wasn't perfext either.

Who said they get mad? We understand that. Right wingers are so dumb they always base everything of emotions

>>152413
No, NO, YOU do. Lefties are all feels over reals and that's why they don't believe in the truth of jesus and faith

>>152414
Ovious troll is obvious. SAGE

>>152421
Shut up faggot go pretend to be an sjw on 4chan

the reason why is because of Edward Said's Orientalism being programmed into the minds, the scary foreign Other

also read Foucault

>>155324
kys

>>155325
this thread post gets me a "kys", yet the certain other threads do not? why is that?

i jusr wnted to make fun post to have fun with ppl..

>>155372
The superhero dream Is essentially fascism. Fascism is that dog-eat-dog strength of the individual above all. So for those who dislike the trope of the übermensch, the trope of the superhero matches it a little too well.

>>155324
Matter and energy manipulation

1. big dick
2. money
3. white skin

Hulk "Sheman" Hogan

>>151644
that makes no fucking sense.

Cis is the birth setting.
Trans is the artificial

I would rather have a harem of anime girls.

if the masculine hunk-ladies in question look like these hotties, I would definitely smash

Bumplumpwumptrump

Bet how many hos did he assmog by th@ keku

>>155814
they're brazilian though

>>155861
why are cissoids like this?

>>155788
Based

All mainstream music is shit and Americans are the worst offenders

>>155828
Koreans are right behind them

>>155783
best thread on this site rn tbh

If South Korea is so bad, then how come
4딸라 ?

>>155881
a cyborg lenin attempt… I think i need to try a different model. this one sucks at prompt adherence.

>>155883
amazing!

>>155882
>admittedly I am not liking the visual style results I'm getting from this particular model. but commies' luddite reaction to AI art has been hilarious. suddenly they care so much about copyrights and job creation.
No. I just think it's soulless dogshit, and it's annoying sifting through all of this garbage when I'm looking for real art. I'd prefer even bad art to "AI" "art" the vast majority of the time. I find the concept offensive to the expressive character of the human soul.

You've got, you know, a bunch of real estate guys and copyright lawyers now just flooding the search engines with a million derivative pieces based on some classical work, but stripped of meaning and effort and life. It's like that old line, I think it was supposed to be from Gilgamesh or something… "then I will open the gates of Hell, and the dead will walk among the living, and the dead will outnumber the living." Very rapidly, this stuff, dull stuff, dead stuff, is obscuring the wealth of art which has been created by much more capable and creative human hands, and the motivation for pumping all of this out is capital accumulation… often just for clicks, IP, etc. so it's the same dumb-ass money-making-game house of cards as all the other, previous, glossy, vapid shit in our culture, but somehow even more shallow.

>AI art allows talentless hacks like me to generate images that nobody would otherwise take the time or effort to make.
See, this is just untrue. Back in the day, people drew, painted, etc. loads of crazy, random bullshit. Like, that was a bunch of what drawfag culture was, just drawing stupid insane shit that people requested. There's something really disheartening about seeing someone use a machine to do shit which 10 years ago someone would actually have made themselves, and it's even worse when people convince themselves that no one would ever possibly have done it. No, folks did it all the time, and it was much better.

>if an AI can replace you as an artist you were shit anyway.
It's not that it can replace anyone in terms of quality of output. It will be marketed as something which can do that whether or not it is actually capable of doing that, and businesspeople will resort to it even if it creates an inferior producPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>155886
>There's something really disheartening about seeing someone use a machine to do shit which 10 years ago someone would actually have made themselves, and it's even worse when people convince themselves that no one would ever possibly have done it. No, folks did it all the time, and it was much better.

Well, now its gonna be harder for young artists to prove that they really made intricate works of art.

>No. I just think it's soulless dogshit, and it's annoying sifting through all of this garbage when I'm looking for real art. I'd prefer even bad art to "AI" "art" the vast majority of the time. I find the concept offensive to the expressive character of the human soul.

ngmi

AI art isnt just pushing a few buttons

>>155882
>AI art allows talentless hacks like me to generate images that nobody would otherwise take the time or effort to make. but ultimately it will be a commonly used tool not much different from how synthesizers and mixers are used for music. artists who are bitching about it now will give up eventually. if an AI can replace you as an artist you were shit anyway.


Fucking this.
The whoke backlash agimainst AI generated content is just "new media os evil."

Remember when manual-digital art was considered not real art just because it was made with a touchpad hooked up to a desktop computer?

>>155887
TRUELY A MIRACLE OF GOD

>>155832
>being a NEET implies someone else covering your cost of living. Usually parents I guess?
And workers who have their surplus labor stolen by the state through taxes.

>>155833
Workers have their surplus stolen primarily and disproportionately by their employer.

Taxes aren't used to house people in North America so maybe that works in Europe, but I somehow doubt you can live rent-free in Europe.

>>155853
>Workers have their surplus stolen primarily and disproportionately by their employer.
Be self employed then. No employer, no stolen surplus. Taxes will always be stolen from you though.

>Taxes aren't used to house people in North America
What do you think Section 8 housing is.

>>155854
Don't you think it's naiive to think anyone can just be self employed when 99% of people work for someone else?

>>155856
this. You cannot be self employed without having others work for you.

self employed people need to rely in services of centralised labor to afford their freelancing style.