/b/ - Siberia

>>158705
Jesus christ, what the fuck? Are you then advocating for just letting all these "good" homeless junkies take what they want (which makes everything more expensive for those of us living within the rules of society) as "reparations" or something?
I don't know why you're so offended by my post. I'd certainly consider myself a liberal, but that doesn't mean I'm going to stand by and assume it's the "Evil System" that put these people where they are. I used to be tangentially connected to that world. I smoked heroin and ran around with these scummy people and watched them shoplift and scam whoever they could for enough cash to get their next fix. Luckily I'm not retarded, so when it looked like I was going to have to graduate to the needle and start living like these people, I checked into rehab and got my shit together. As SOON as it became "get act together" or "live on the streets with your addiction", the choice was clear.

I wish I could better understand where you're coming from and what you think the solution would be. I don't advocate rounding up the homeless and moving them past the city limits exactly, but I also don't like them camped out around downtown businesses panhandling and smoking and letting their dogs shit and bark at people trying to engage in commerce.

I know we need to just fix everything so this doesn't happen, but what's the solution? The 1% just keep taking and taking and leaving us less. I've seen situations where homes are provided to these people and I've seen them not even be able to keep their FREE fucking room together. They live in filth and cause drunken fires and shit. They end up being too wild for their government-given surroundings.

I'm saying the difference is that I was on that road to ruin and I did the hard thing and lived in a shelter and pissed in a cup and made curfew until I could wrangle a place of my own for a new start. There are resources to help you save money and get back on your feet. I used those resources. And when I've suggested such places to beggars on the street they start in about the rules and how they like their drink and their drugs.

Some of these places are hardcore religious and I don't believe you should have to hear a sermon for your dinner, but still it's better than the streets.

I don't think all these people are bad. I just can't see your Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>158709
>I'd certainly consider myself a liberal,
Ok, that explains it somehow.

>>158711
Explains what? That you don't have any response because you don't know anything about who you're responding to?
You don't have any issue with my opinions after all. That's what I thought.

>>158712
"Liberal" is a slur around these parts here

That anon doesn't like you because you don't automatically sympathise with junkies to the point of becoming a door mat.
Alot of LeftyPol users are pro -NEETs and glorify the lumpenproletariat

>>158743
>"Liberal" is a slur around these parts here
Yes, and he helpfully self-identified.

>That anon doesn't like you because you don't automatically sympathise with junkies to the point of becoming a door mat.
No.

I went into my position here: >>158705
I am clear and unambiguous. My position has fuck all to do with how "sympathetic" I personally find junkies. It also has nothing to do with whether any given individuals are "good homeless" or "bad homeless," that entire framing is retarded. It's a systemic problem, and the things which would benefit the homeless broadly will benefit all of them and will benefit me. That's not conditional on what interpersonal beef I do or don't have with some individual guy, that shit is irrelevant.

>Alot of LeftyPol users are pro -NEETs and glorify the lumpenproletariat
I'm not glorifying anything. I am a lumpenprole. Nothing I say has anything to do with "glorification," and I've explained this to you, specifically, before in other threads where you've made the same misrepresentation of others' positions. I'm not sure if you're really this dense or if you're just trolling or something worse. I don't romanticize or glorify anyone, get it through yr skull that the existence of the lowest rungs of the working class is not conditional on your approval, we are literally just people who have had shit opportunities for 'mainstream' work, an extraordinarily common thing since the capitalist economy keeps shitting the bed. There are millions of us, and the only people who don't interact with us regularly are the richest capitalists, we're not some alien thing which anybody in this milieu is "glorifying."

<>>158109
>women aren't really allowed to
Fucking lmao. The sheer fucking cuntitlement in this sliced-up nazi.

>>158075
People don't want freedom.
They want favor from the in-group


>>154725
>And no matter how much money exists, womens sex drive is really amazing at sniffing out good genes it's very primal. Looks actually matter to women way more than men think.

Wrong on both.

Women aren't good at "sniffing out good genes".
Also lookism is part of equation.

It's not 1 out of three it's like 3 out of 4. Only some delusional female would ever say that.

>>158687
reactionary

>>158688
>hurrr durrr reactionary

If you can't summarize something in one singular word, or, 50 words or less then you can't understand it, right?

>>158735
>For those who don't know this, an "incel"
Holy shit is this a copypaste of a thread from like 2015 wtf is this

>The split definition "people who cannot get sex" vs. "subculture of people who believe in incel" now includes every male only community.
No it fucking doesn't lmao

bump

>>152695
The quality of discourse on the rest of the web isn't much better. Enjoy your hug box.

>>158707
I mean it fucking used to be.

As a devoted user of this site, I admittedly find it frustrating. Not that .org is better - .org is unusable, the mods of .org are weird sadists who hate /leftypol/ culture, ban people for undeclared reasons, and delete stuff which doesn't break any rules. .org has also, accordingly, been a serious step down from the educational & memetic exchange atmosphere of old /leftypol/ and Bunkerchan; it was a major downgrade even before it became unusable. It frustrates me that it seems like the more time and thought I put into posting here, the deader and more vapid this site becomes. I don't begrudge the incels as posters (unlike the OP), I like that they're here, but what frustrates me is that casual attention to anything else seems to have declined so damn steeply.

You know, our /b/ is very free, our /leftypol/ is not censor-happy, our /edu/ was once full of users posting useful pdfs. There's a TON of stuff going on in the world right now which is insanely fucking interesting, but it seems like I'm 99% of the posts about it.

>>152838
Leave your faggot question marks for questions. That's clearly a statement.

>>158708
I literally don't get what you retards are seeing. Like this board is faster than it has ever been but I guess glow uyghurs like >>158704
>>156261 are gonna same fag no mmatter what.

What's everyone else doing with their Sunday night?

Not clicking that.

>>158715
Why not? Are you fucking retarded and think just by visiting a web address you're not familiar with you're going to get your computer HACKED?
lololol
Okay, schizo. You stay "safe".

A 1994 website is certainly dangerous to your vulnerable system.

No pizza for you.

I got pizzas and Quik on this pizza.

>>158514
Furries arent zoophiles and neither are lolis being pedophilws

Also, zoomers are not being groomed as a majority into these cults of degeneracy.

At least no more than millennials were.


Alot of these "unfortunate" you g souls who get caught up in grooming willfully chose it because they weren't getting enough attention at home or school.

Alot of grooming occurs more in academic and religious settings

And social media is overblamed.

We had way more molestation in the "good old days"

>>158514
You claiming that people who don't agree that furries aren't degenerate is terminally online is paradoxical


Terminally online people are the ones who call anything "degenerate".

Ummmm… based

>>157903
I was friends with a random furfag before he told me he was a zooey. Needless to say, I blocked him. Seems like the stereotype is true

Troon

>>158684
And here we are sitting on our screens in our irrelevant bubbles doing fuck all.

>>158683
This website has a cytube channel but it doesn't work?

Not getting the best first impression of this place.

Now I'm emailing the guy. I've concluded he's German, though he seems to be heavily into Asian stuff. Americans are so isolated in our own culture. At least I am. I like a few foreign movies and don't mind reading subtitles, but I just can't relate to a lot of it. Especially anime and RPGs all that stuff. But this guy likes cars and animals and karate and all sorts of sports from various european nations. The movies are all mainstream American stuff.
I doubt he still checks his email addresses for his 2006 webpage. This is what I'm doing. I'm trying to make a german pen pal with someone I have nothing in common with.
I'd legit be an actual pen pal and send mail to some other country with flyers and local stuff in it. How can I get that going?

I just took the poll. I wonder when the last time someone else did. I'm guessing over 15 years.

Why is there no weed flag here?

Is that something you didn't like about the old website you seceded from? lol, there's probably all sorts of shit like that here, huh?

>>158699
And it's official. He's actually SHUT DOWN his email address. Is that fucked up or what?
Would yahoo deactivate an address just because someone hasn't used it in a while? Is that a thing?
To think I planned on checking the mail on my 8 or 9 lost addresses once I find the passwords.
Anyway, it's sad that this eXtremeweb kid isn't around tending to his website. He's probably 50 years old now.

>>158624
Have you ever lived through a revolution?

>>158627
No but I have lived through the fall of the USSR

>>158639
Damn, no wonder you want revolution to be fun.
But still, you ought to know better.

>>158624
>"You hate fun"?
No.
Revolution is not the same as having a party.

And revolution is not easy nor harmonious.

>>158643
People glorify war and revolution when they never experience it firsthand.

Those that do are often damaged in the head.