[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/b/ - Siberia

"We need an imageboard of action to fight for OC making posters."
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble
ReturnCatalogBottom

File: 1722482273592.jpg ( 741.44 KB , 2560x2054 , 1614843471619280.jpg )

 No.154725

You cannot simply buy the majority of women. Which should be a relief to some of you.

So yeah maybe 1 out 3 women are gold diggers or whores, but that means 2 out of 3 aernt.

In other words nice girls outnumber whores and gold diggers 2 to 1.

And no matter how much money exists, womens sex drive is really amazing at sniffing out good genes it's very primal. Looks actually matter to women way more than men think.
>>

 No.154727

>>154725
foid
>>

 No.154729

okay? then what

tf
>>

 No.154733

>>154725
>but that means 2 out of 3 aernt.
Aren't yet. Learn how to productively control your sexuality sweetie, it's very liberating, I promise.
>>

 No.154734

>>154725
I wish this was really a femcel poster but we all know it's just a baiting wristcel with a humiliation fetish. Sage.
>>

 No.154735

I'm not sure where you get this statistic it seems to me that any particular woman might at one point be compelled to be a gold digger dependant on circumstance like how much money were talking about and life events like financing college. in any case this needs to be zero though and dotp will get us there by smashing the face of the bourgeois leeches
>>154734
post diameter faggo
>>

 No.154741

>>154735
>post diameter faggo
Cock or wrist? - not like there's much difference
>>

 No.154742

>So yeah maybe 1 out 3 women are gold diggers or whores, but that means 2 out of 3 aernt.
>>

 No.154743

Rapemaxx is the only way.
>>

 No.154744

File: 1722529441845.gif ( 3.32 MB , 480x270 , anigif_sub-buzz-11000-1547….gif )

>>154743
no rape
>>

 No.155421

>>154735
faggot talks like a faggot.
>>

 No.157999

Can someone do some Gimping
>>

 No.158005

>>154725
Women are human beings, so there are as many nice women as there are nice human beings. That is, not that many.

With that said, I'd still bash the misogynists' skulls just because they're very, very fucking dumb.
>>

 No.158006

>>154743
>Rapemaxx is the only way.
Yes. I think we should start with you first.
>>

 No.158007

I mean, I have yet to meet a woman that wasn't a selfish gold digging whore.
>>

 No.158009

>>158007
I mean, I have yet to meet a man that wasn't a selfish reactionary moron.
>>

 No.158011

>>158009
Yeah you are lying, though. I have met plenty of men who were intelligent and actually aware of what is going on and had a good balanced ethical and moral system and political system. Literally NEVER have met a woman that is the same way. You're deff lying.
>>

 No.158013

>>158011
>Yeah you are lying, though.
I'm definitely telling the truth.
>I have met plenty of men who were intelligent and actually aware of what is going on and had a good balanced ethical and moral system and political system
You're either delusional and biased to your gender or you're just as dumb as they are, in which case I want nothing to do with you either.
>Literally NEVER have met a woman that is the same way.
I've seen enough intelligent women to confidently say that most people are selfish, petty and stupid regardless of gender and anyone who says otherwise is either naive or selfish, petty and stupid themselves.
>>

 No.158017

>>158013
You definitely aren't. I'm jut telling you in my personal experience every single woman I've ever met has been the mot simple-minded consumeridip shit I have ever had the displeasure of meeting. I'll give you tha it into jut confined to when specifically but I a jut telling you in my personal experience this is wa I have seen. I ma really you ca trave this back to capitalism and the comodification of women under it but none the less. I think women revel in it, tbf.
>>

 No.158054

>>158017
>You definitely aren't
>in my personal experience
That's a funny game you're playing, positing your experience as an objective fact while invalidating mine. I have just as much desire to take your experience into consideration as you did: zero. It's childish. Which only reenforces my assumption about misogynists.
>I ma really you ca trave this back to capitalism and the comodification of women under it
As if women are the only ones commodified by capitalism. As if women can only exist under capitalism as commodities instead of actual people.
>>

 No.158055

>>158054
At no point did I say that mine was an objective fact. Perhaps you are projecting because you sure seem so full of yourself that you cannot accept the fact that your personal bias's are not objective fact. It probably has more to do with location, but, I have been to Seattle and many leftist cities and even then it's still far and few in between.
>>

 No.158059

>>158055
>At no point did I say that mine was an objective fact.
Yet you act like it is.
>you sure seem so full of yourself
See? You're deflecting again. Which IS your attempt to present your point of view as more valid.
>I have been to Seattle and many leftist cities and even then it's still far and few in between
You see, I have this experience with BOTH genders. Either you are biased or your standards of individual worth are something I would disagree with.
>>

 No.158060

>>158059
That's, like, your opinion, man.
The fact you feel that way says more about you than it does me.
>See? You're deflecting again. Which IS your attempt to present your point of view as more valid.

My view is as "valid" as yours is. It's my own subjective opinion of what I have personally see. Cope with that however you like.

>You see, I have this experience with BOTH genders. Either you are biased or your standards of individual worth are something I would disagree with.

Sure, you say that, and I don't. So what am I supposed to think?
>>

 No.158061

>>158060
>The fact you feel that way says more about you than it does me.
Why are you shifting the blame again?

I say you resent women because you resent your mother or your father has ingrained these views in you since you seem to religiously believe in the idea that women are worse than men.
>>

 No.158062

>>158061
Shifting what blame and for what?
I guess you are just to stupid to understand objectivity?

I had a really good relationship with my mom, actually and I never met my father, either. So, nope. This is personal experience. I understand that people who don't follow common narratives in our little left wing bubble can be jaring to normies; Maybe go to a rest and lay down, or, something.
>>

 No.158063

>>158062
>I guess you are just to stupid to understand objectivity?
No, I understand objectivity. What I'm saying is that the moment I said that your comments reenforce my beliefs about misogynists you tried to spin it like I'm a bad person for thinking that. As if your behavior is perfectly fine compared to mine.
>people who don't follow common narratives in our little left wing bubble
Stop acting like a special snowflake getting burned at the stake, man. You got called out on your reactionary beliefs and now you're just having a meltdown.
>>

 No.158064

>>158062
When did you start being a misogynist then?

Also, another easy explanation can be your hatred of femininity in general. What's your opinion on feminine and gay men?
>>

 No.158065

>>158064
After my last break up. I got a divorce after 14 years of marriage.
That would be the time I became a misogynist.

>I'm saying is that the moment I said that your comments reenforce my beliefs about misogynists you tried to spin it like I'm a bad person for thinking that.

I know and I am saying that you are hallucinating for thinking that. I don't really care what you think about me, or, as incorrect as you are. You are allowed to be that way and we can have differences of opinion and ideology on this website. You are mistaking me making fun of you for actual intent.

>Stop acting like a special snowflake getting burned at the stake, man

Another communist is trying to act like they aren't an ultrea leftist today and it's hilarious.
I don't think I am special at all. You probably do, but, I understand my place in nature and reality.

>You got called out on your reactionary beliefs!!!!

Just because you don't like my beliefs doesn't make them reactionary. Just because you don't like something doesn't make it reactionary. You are exactly why the left is dead.
>>

 No.158068

>>158065
>After my last break up. I got a divorce after 14 years of marriage.
Ah. That explains it.
>as incorrect as you are
How can you claim I'm incorrect if it's just your personal experience?
>You are mistaking me making fun of you for actual intent.
Well, I am…
>Another communist is trying to act like they aren't an ultrea leftist
What does ultra-leftism have to do with this? And what's wrong with ultra-leftism exactly? It's not the same as wokeness or ultraprogressivism.
>I don't think I am special at all.
That's not what I meant. You say I'm a normie who's bullying you for saying the "truth" but I'm far from a normie and even a broken clock can be right twice a day. Uncritically rejecting every normie take is not critical thinking, it's very simple-minded. One must critically examine every normie take in order to form a complete understanding of the real world, if I didn't do that then I wouldn't be here. After all, anti-communism and wokeism are also normie ideologies.
>>

 No.158069

File: 1747667408291.png ( 4.94 KB , 351x951 , Internetfunnyman1000-iswhe….png )

>>158065
>Just because you don't like my beliefs doesn't make them reactionary.
That's not what I meant. Misogyny is a remnant of the patriarchal order in which a woman is treated as a man's property which lead to a lack of education and a forbiddance for women to be engaged in man's affairs which lead to the perception of women as inferior to men. It has no place under a classless society free from alienation and exploitation of human by human. Otherwise it'll be a gendered form of neo-feudalism.
>>

 No.158073

>>158069
Sure but that isn't what I want. I don't really care what women do. I am just telling you what I see personally in my daily life. I prefer a monogomous relationship, for example, but, what other people do I Don't really care. I am just saying, currently, right now, women are not exactly revolutionary minded. At least in my experience. You're loosing the plot here.
>>

 No.158074

A lot of chicks still think of money as an innately good quality that people have and thus help reproduce the capitalist system.

Hell 'successful' careerist women think that about themselves and always bitch that nobody wants them when they're old but wealthy.
>>

 No.158075

>>158073
>I am just telling you what I see personally in my daily life.
Anon, even if it's personal experience that doesn't mean it isn't influenced by ideology. Although in your case it's probably just grief.
>women are not exactly revolutionary minded
I don't think anyone is exactly revolutionary-minded. Everyone likes being a happy slave.
<"Who has not heard this litany before? Who does not know this never-varying refrain of all politicians? That the mass bleeds, that it is being robbed and exploited, I know as well as our vote-baiters. But I insist that not the handful of parasites, but the mass itself is responsible for this horrible state of affairs. It clings to its masters, loves the whip, and is the first to cry Crucify! the moment a protesting voice is raised against the sacredness of capitalistic authority or any other decayed institution. Yet how long would authority and private property exist, if not for the willingness of the mass to become soldiers, policemen, jailers, and hangmen. The Socialist demagogues know that as well as I, but they maintain the myth of the virtues of the majority, because their very scheme of life means the perpetuation of power. And how could the latter be acquired without numbers? Yes, authority, coercion. and dependence rest on the mass, but never freedom or the free unfoldment of the individual, never the birth of a free society," – Emma Goldman
>>

 No.158090

>>158075
>>158073
>>158011
Only men who think themselves as smarter than they are would think this.
>>

 No.158091

>>158075
I'm sure my disposition to women is a form of grief, but, no, I am telling you exactly what I have seen in my life. Women are stupid and relish in that.
>>

 No.158109

>>158091
Men are the same way.
The difference is women aren't really allowed to degenerate or evolve of their own social will.

Men infantilise women too much

Unique IPs: 14
[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome