>>149515>You literally have yet to actually define what you mean by "sex" even though I keep repeatedly asking you to do so.The fact that gametes exist in sexed species and are markedly different. That's what it means for sex to exist. We've gone over this. You're just massively illiterate.
>Yes that is exactly what I said.To what? You're not quoting anymore.
>>Nothing exists outside the mindNever said that. Who are you quoting?
>Prove the objectivity of Sex as a concept.That was never my argument. I said sex exists as a phenomenon independent of the concept. This is why it's real. You can't read, dumb bitch.
>Wow you mean exactly like we did with all terminology, specifically, terminology revolving around sex?Nope. The system of mathematics itself is invented entirely by the human mind. We also know that it's imperfect, as it is both incomplete and inconsistent.
>I am deff being trolled at this point; Chromosomes exist with out your mind. The concept of those chromosomes applying to "sex" does not.I haven't mentioned chromosomes. You're just really that stupid, aren't you? Sex as in a sexed species is the fact that there are pairs of gametes one small and one big. That's what sex is.
>Sex does not mean "penis or vagina"You're right. It doesn't
just mean that. It also means that we find dimorphic gametes. We call this phenomenon "sex."
>Literally sub autism score retard levels here.I noticed you didn't give it a try. Probably because you're not as dumb as you appear, or maybe you're both stupid and lazy.
>Unless there are specific localities that we do not know about as far as we can tell the 4 fundamental laws of physics are universal.Not that we know. The math tends to break down at different scales and masses. It's not as clear-cut, and yet, these are all real things. Sex is a much simpler concept.
>As far as we can tell these fields are universal.Nope. We don't know that either. We don't know that because the math just doesn't add up in all circumstances, making them not consistent.
>Do you even know all 4 laws of psychics?I do, and I learned it by taking courses in modern physics and getting an actual degree. They cannot be said to be universal.
>Sex exists because these two cells existWell, you can call them something else, but the phenomenon we call sex will continue to exist by another name.
>You're not explaining how we go from Sperm and Egg cells to sex being objective.Sex is the fact that there are differences between an egg and a sperm and that both are needed for reproduction. That's what it means to have a sexed species.
>"It's real because it exists as a physical reality,">"Objectively sexed species produce different sex cells, which are both required for reproduction. Therefore sex is real."Neither of those talk about definitions, but the fact that a phenomenon exists. You can't read. I'm sorry to have to break it to you like this.
>I could dig out more from your pathetic ideological fagotry, but, I am feeling to lazyIt's "too lazy." I guess you can't write either.
> I don't see why you are even bothering lyingWell, the simple fact is that I didn't lie. You just can't read, mostly because you're really stupid.
>it's all public for the whole board to see how stupid you are. Especially all the old fags who recognize your obvious posting style.Another anon already called you out as retarded. Don't get your hopes up, dumbass. I will also point out that you aren't responding to arguments anymore, but simply venting in your post. Very peak philosopher.
>Again you stupid faggot what do you mean by sex then specifically answer the question. Define your terms.I've already told you, several times. Sex is a quality of an organism such that there are specialized cells used for reproduction that are dimorphic. This is what it means to have a sexed species.
>Sex is not real cope.You already admitted that it's real. You just didn't understand that you did that, again, because you're very stupid.
>Meaningless psychobabble.I'm not trying to diagnose you. I already know you're a mentally ill troon. I'm just calling you fucking stupid and high off your own farts.
>so what is it?>Sex is the trait that determines whether a sexually reproducing organism produces male or female gametes.[1][2] Male organisms produce small mobile gametes (spermatozoa, sperm, pollen), while female organisms produce larger, non-mobile gametes (ova, often called egg cells).[3]Had already posted it, but I'll post it again. I know you're a little slow.
>If this is true then why do you insist so heavily on using it as termonolgy and not simply just identifying people by the chromosomes? Or why do you invest so much inventory into seething over transhumanists and hons? Because that's what it's called. If I was discussing iron, I might call it Fe, and I would use the terminology attached to it. I'm not insisting on it as much as simply calling things what they are commonly called. What's wrong with you?
>What defines these organs as male?>What defines these organs as female?Nothing, which is why I said we could call them female if we wanted to. Here's the thing, though, they would still be related to sex, because the phenomenon continues to occur even if we call them something else.
>you mean the reproductive systems of humans right?No, just literally the organ that makes the cells.
>it's >reproductive organs -> sex terminology not >sex termonology -> reproductive organsAnd can you tell me why it's objectively this way?
>You're even dumber than I thought previously which was already possibly one of the lowest bars I have ever encountered.Again, not an argument, just more venting from an angry idiot.
>NoI know, that you actually can't. That's why I asked.
>This is all completely besides the pointNo. It's not. This is how sex is defined. It's the whole point.
>That's really funny from a guy who can't seem to actually grow a spine and stand on a definition of something he knows full wellI've given it to you several times. You just refused to accept the definition because it doesn't fit into your retarded dialogue tree.
>99% of the population uses and he himself used until it was proven to be inconvenient for his ideology.I'm just quoting you what the actual definition is. This isn't ideological. You're just really fucking stupid.
>Also, stop cherry picking my argument why don't you and actually address everything I said in full and kind? You''re literally pulling everything I said apart mid sentence.You haven't said anything worthy of note. You write like an angry schizophrenic troon, and your level of argumentation is worse than a child's. I can't really talk to you like a person, because you're just that dumb.