/b/ - Siberia

Did he actually say this?
And why did the Dems run Joe Biden, are they sadists?

(Bars)

>>154383
Every take I'm hearing makes Biden's nomination sound like a DNC conspiracy.

But no such conspiracy occured. The primary voters overwhelmingly preferred Biden to Dean or Williamson.

Most voters, including Dem primary voters are extremely ignorant about candidates. That anyone was shocked about Biden's debate perforance shows how little people paid attention to Biden. It's apathy and selfishness killing the Dems chances, not any conspiracy.

>>154384
that said I"m still voting for Biden in the 30% chance he wins, because a 30% chance of Trump going to jail is too fun an offer to turn down.

>>154384
Marianne Williamson? That would've been evil because things wouldn't change except the reasoning/optics like the Obama era.

>>154385
Really?

Unrelated but Does anyone have the cool image of stalin shooting the statue of liberty please?

It's from the Eric Andre Show

>>154386
Yea, Trump would benefit from jail therapy.

>>154384
I mean, the DNC (by way of Obama iirc) did conspire to get Biden the nomination in 2020, and they did oppose any challengers in the primary this year. The system with super delegates makes any challenge to the DNC's favorite very difficult - Trump won in a much more fair contest, which is part of why there was a brief moment where DeSantis was treated as though he had a real shot… he didn't and he never would, he's an annoying little midget, but he was at least given a fair shot. The DNC is much less open, which is why the biggest tangible Biden opposition was "undecided."

>>154383
Biden exists to be a foil for Trump.
That's it.
Trump was supposed to lose and do a clownish, failed coup in 2020, too. The idea was to set a precedent for suspension and disregard of the democratic process if Trump ran again in 2024, which is also why the powers-that-be have done nothing to actually stop him from doing so despite him getting caught trying to cheat the last time. People who have studied history have done their best to arrange political conditions which resemble both the 1968 election & the rise of Hitler, all condensed into a much shorter span of time, with certain steps (like privatization, AKA the removal of organs of state from democratic accountability) taking place in advance.

The same interests (particularly AIPAC and the MIC, but also landlords, a group of whom Trump is a member) are funding both the DNC & GOP, and effectively dictating a great deal of their actions. This has been a long game, and AIPAC, which represents a fascist* ethnostate which would genuinely get more out of the US as a full-on puppet dictatorship, a project which elements in the MIC are also keen on because this project is very good for selling munitions. Studies have shown that money, whose flow to politics has been practically limitless since "Citizens United," effectively dictates outcomes of elections, meaning that AIPAC and similar lobbying groups have, over the years, bought the jobs of most of congress for them, selecting right-wing candidates and pushing America's elections to yield results which are to the right of the electorate by running unadulterated propaganda and ops to suppress or increase turnout among target demographics. Biden's political trajectory is suicidal - in backing genocide, he's doing just about the only thing which can ensure he loses to Trump. Him being clearly senile doesn't help either, but both of these things are completely fine with his backers in AIPAC, who represent an Israeli government which is eager for Trump.

If the Democrats wanted to win, they'd cross AIPAC. They'd run a more popular candidate. They'd follow US laws about not giving weapons to countries committing war crimes. Biden being senile technically makes his being president illegal - he can be removed from office on account of mental instability, constitutionally, and he should be. Doubling down on him was already suicidal months ago and it's even worse now. It's a guaranteed loss, they know it's a guaranteed loss, they stand to profit. Sadists or not, they're definitely evil.

*see Einstein's thoughts on Begin circa 1948, or Begin-era Israel's assessment of Avraham Stern, or Begin's Likud party today, etc.

>>154394
> I mean, the DNC (by way of Obama iirc) did conspire to get Biden the nomination in 2020, and they did oppose any challengers in the primary this year. The system with super delegates makes any challenge to the DNC's favorite very difficult - Trump won in a much more fair contest, which is part of why there was a brief moment where DeSantis was treated as though he had a real shot… he didn't and he never would, he's an annoying little midget, but he was at least given a fair shot. The DNC is much less open, which is why the biggest tangible Biden opposition was "undecided."

After the DNC rules change diminishing superdelegate influence, blaming "muh DNC" for how shit left candidates in the Dem Party are is a major cope. Dems preferred Clinton and Biden to Sanders both times. Was generous of them to even allow Sanders to run in their party. Almost no small party with a national structure allows semi-hostile infiltrators like that.

>>154395
>Dems preferred Clinton to Sanders
Get the fuck out of here with this revisionism.

>>154395
>cites a rule change from 2018 (which didn't eliminate super delegates) as proof that Clinton won fair-and-square in 2016
You see, folks?
This is called a bad faith argument.

And yeah, the DNC does, clearly, actively sabotage and undermine any candidate who attempts to run from the left - this I won't contest. See Bowman, recently - great example. Ultimately, Hillary Clinton endorsing ol' lazy eye probably did relatively little compared to the insane amount of money spent, but it was still quite clear which horse the DNC was getting behind, and it wasn't the incumbent. When you win an election and your own party is going around calling you an anti-semite, that's not great!
It's not that I particularly like any of these guys who try to make this pact with the DNC, but nobody can claim they aren't absolutely ratfucking the vast majority of 'progressive' candidates to appease their donor base. If they thought that doing this stuff did nothing, they wouldn't bother doing it. It doesn't matter even if you're a loyal Dem who's just left of Reagan, they'll treat you like a traitor.

>>154397
keep whining, there was more than enough room for anyone to get enough binding delegates to take the nomination away from Biden this year. I'm sorry if there were no options on your ballot, but both Williamson and Dean were on the majority of state ballots and either could have accumulated enough binding delegates. After securing enough binding delegates, it's over and you win.