[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/b/ - Siberia

"We need an imageboard of action to fight for OC making posters."
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble


File: 1742930593328.png ( 832.38 KB , 850x824 , e570ef43911055.580388df811….png )

 No.156983

wikipedia banned me for a year for "vandalism" because of a conversation I had on a TALK page. previously I had only created a couple of pages for left wing books about reconstruction. I was trying to point out that certain artificial sweeteners in diet sodas were carcinogenic, but only after they pass through the digestive system and produce formaldehyde. I had talked about the conflict of interest between the corporations that invented them and the FDA. I talked about how the reagan administration brought in donald rumsfeld to accelerate the approval after it had been deadlocked for 16 years. I provided citations at every single step. all of this was on a talk page. I was not being argumentative. I was not editing the page. I merely pointed out that a lot of this information was absent from the article and drafted a proposal for possibly adding it in the future. I followed all the rules. Some fucking artificial sweetener industry shill policing the article got my ass banned. we used to have a glowiepedia thread on here showing power mods and power editors who edit impossible numbers of articles per year. People who are obviously paid by imperial core intelligence agencies to be full time wikipedia police. the bitch of the thing is they even scrubbed the talk page after banning me so I had no evidence. it was fucked. You go to pages like "historicity of jesus" and the corresponding talk pages have shit flinging back and forth between atheists and theists for years because it is of little political consequence for capitalists or imperialists. but you say an artificial sweetener is carcinogenic and suddenly you're a "vandal" and industry shills ban you. the rules are absolutely enforced differently from one article to the next and you see hired freaks lay control of articles relevant to industrial monopoly interests or imperialist interests .

and then you have reactionaries like musk come out and say "actually wikipedia is commiepedia and we need to make it even more right wing"
>>

 No.156984

Gonna be honest with ya anon, I really wish you'd have actually gotten pics of it.
>>

 No.156993

What is the name of the Article?
>>

 No.156994

any idiot undergrad who has read Manufacturing Consent should be able to understand why wikipedia's system of citations will inevitably lead to articles becoming full-blown propaganda psyops
then these same midwits will call you a fashist because drumpf once called CNN fake news
>>

 No.160485

Why is one article called 'Jeju uprising' and another called 'Gwangju Uprising',
while the other is called '1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre'?

Why isn't it Jeju Massacre and Gwangju Massacre?






https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeju_uprising

Casualties and losses
Several thousand killed[1]: 189 [a]

162 soldiers killed
289 policemen killed
640 paramilitaries killed

Total:
1,091 killed
14,373 civilians killed (86% by security forces and 14% by insurgents)
30,000 total dead including combatants[2]
Other estimates reach as high as 80,000[3][4]



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gwangju_Uprising

Casualties and losses

22 soldiers killed
(including 13 by friendly fire)
4 policemen killed
(several more killed by the army after the uprising ended)
109 soldiers wounded
144 policemen wounded
Total:
26 killed
253 wounded

165 killed (confirmed casualties only)
76 missing (presumed dead)
3,515 wounded
1,394 arrested

Up to 600–2,300 killed; see casualties section.

"There is no universally accepted death toll for the Gwangju Massacre. Records of death for the city in May 1980 were an estimated 2,300 above the historical averages[45] and the death toll has been estimated to be anywhere between 1,000 and 2,000 people.[46][47] Estimates for the number of civilians wounded also vary heavily, including figures anywhere from 1,800 to 3,500 people.[48]"



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre

Casualties
Deaths
Official CCP Tally: 241 dead[a]
Independent Estimates: 300 to 2,700 dead
Modern Scholarship: 700 to 2,600 dead[b]
>>

 No.160490

>I hate website xyz so much
>Also, I was just banned there
many such threads

the only difference here is that it is accompanied by a wall of text, making it obvious to anyone unaware that this is a leftist space
>>

 No.160493

>>160485
>Why is one article called 'Jeju uprising' and another called 'Gwangju Uprising', while the other is called '1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre'?
How about "Haymarket affair," lol? I hate Xi but even I admit there are real woke shitlib bias on that site.

Kill Wikipedia mods, hail anarchy.
>>

 No.160512

>>160493
>anarchy
You mean like stateless? So like Gaza or Palestine?

Unique IPs: 6

[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome