[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/b/ - Siberia

"We need an imageboard of action to fight for OC making posters."
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble


File: 1756470878544.jpg ( 609.45 KB , 2048x1356 , 1748190813145952.jpg )

 No.158873

Science and scientific ecidence appears to tell us that all humans came and decendade from a common ancestor that came somewhere out of the African Content. Due to evolutionary pressures human ancestors learned to walk up right after coming down from the trees after millions of years of evo0lution. I think this is true, mind you, but I am curious; There are people that do not.
Assuming this is not true and white and black people are from totally different lineages. Where would Europeans naturally come from? Like I am trying to play devils advocate here. I mean really even if Black and white people didn't descend from the same place at some point they would have to have a common ancestor. the fact black and white people can breed proves that we have a common ancestors somewhere down the line.
>>

 No.158874

I used to think of this as a kid, except specifically with regards to Asians. I had a short-lived hypothesis that east Asians (Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, Thai, Cambodian, Mongolian, Laosian, etc.) evolved separately, at least partially, from some species of ape native to eastern Asia.

By my reckoning at the time, 'white' Europeans and 'black' Africans were similar enough to have both come out of Africa - so where your question specifically is regarded, Europeans would still have come out of Africa. I later found out (some time in the '00s) that there was, in fact, an "out of Asia" hypothesis expounded by Ernst Haeckel which had competed with Darwin's "out of Africa": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_Haeckel#Asia_hypothesis
… Although this simply places the origin of humanity in general in Asia, but uses a similar rationale to my baseless youthful thought that Asians could have been partly derived from separate primates.

Anyway, I don't really particularly care about this topic now, so I'm just going to refer you to Wiki:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiregional_origin_of_modern_humans

I consider the matter long-settled (it's "Out of Africa"), but if you want to read some about existing speculation along the lines you've described, that last article is, I think, the appropriate one.
>>

 No.158877

>>158874
This is not really a bad hypothesis.
Maybe humans do have a common ancestor but they split up and mated with differing evolutionary cousins.

Or maybe we all the same genetics but differing phenotypes.

Unique IPs: 3

[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome