[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/b/ - Siberia

"We need an imageboard of action to fight for OC making posters."
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble
ReturnCatalogBottom

File: 1787560238876.png ( 513.75 KB , 1242x2208 , PNG image.png )

 No.161523

Leftypol has gone to shit for real. Every post on there promotes automisandry, anti-porn/anti-erotica, hebephobia, and “inceldom”.

That site is more 4chan than this site which is quite a feat
>>

 No.161524

Some men feel genuine guilt just for being born male and it's ridiculous and unproductive.
>>

 No.161526

>>161524
It's more "I'm not like other guys" rather than any sincere guilt for being born cishet male
>>

 No.161535

How much of a simp do you have to be to not realize that you're female "friend" is just as reactionary as her CHUD boyfriends. That she didn't GAF about his hateful politics and only cares now because it's impacting her.
I guarantee he was raised by a single mom.
>>

 No.161580

>>161535
Leftypol admits that women can be reactionary. But their realization is only from bitterness from not getting gratification for simping.

>I guarantee he was raised by a single mom.

“Fatherlessness” is an overused strawman for male faux pas.
Especially when it comes to simping. A lot of these guys grew up with their dads.
The problem is that a lot of dads don’t engage with their sons nor appreciate them the same way they do for their daughters.
>>

 No.161581

>>161580
What's wrong with simping?
>>

 No.161597

>>161581
It’s degrading to both the observer, the object of adoration and the actor in question.

Simping is just groveling for women just because they’re young and pretty to the point of excusing them from work or rightful punishment. It sabotages/neglects fellow gender-mates.

Simps don’t get respect from their object of adoration anyways.
>>

 No.161598

>>161524
It’s because they’re so agoraphobic and that they internalize gender stereotypes to justify their self-hatred.

They also secretly hate “chads” or whatever.

For all the talk about “spooks” and “empathy” and “logic” they’re the most spooked, the least empathetic, and the least logical.

Ogre is just a landfill ablazed.

They’re just a more dark woke form of doomerism.
I just cannot with these guys.
And they wanna talk about getting fresh blood into their ranks
>>

 No.161600

>>161580
>The problem is that a lot of dads don’t engage with their sons nor appreciate them the same way they do for their daughters.
Because they're mothers are domineering He-Bitches that drag their husbands around by their nose. In these families it's almost worse than having an absentee dad, because all the abuse it enabled by another person you innately trust. It's even harder to see the truth.
>>

 No.161601

.org became completely unusable years and years ago because of completely arbitrary random bans and censorship and weird, sadistic mods who actively antagonized and harassed users.

If you're going there now and getting put off by ""hebephobia"" then I find you and your priorities baffling.
>>

 No.161603

That place is actually nothing like 4chan.
That place is more like reddit.
>>

 No.161606

>>161603
Cope .ogre
>>

 No.161607

>>161606
>being so clueless that you think this is a compliment to .org
>>

 No.161608

>>161601
>If you're going there now and getting put off by ""hebephobia"" then I find you and your priorities baffling.

I’m talking about their contempt/fear against younger people.
The constant whining about younger generations having differing aesthetics than them, accusing them of “fascism”.

>>161603
If we can be fair, 4chan shares the same politically correct spooks as Reddit tbh.
They use the same buzzwords, same aesthetic biases.
Difference is, their political orientations.

But I’m gonna go out on a limb and say that Reddit has more civil discourse than Leftypol.
I don’t see any obnoxious gynophilic-automisandrist platitudes on Reddit.
>>

 No.161609

>>161600
Doubt.jpg
Even in households where the moms aren’t domineering, a lot of dads are somewhat dismissive of their sons.
Fathers are fickle life teachers. A lot of boys have to learn more about manhood from coworkers, coaches, neighbors or even strangers than their own dads.
>>

 No.161614

nuff said … hit the streets … hit the forest/jungle/swamp … talk to randos … beware invisible gnostic death loops?
>>

 No.161624

Go outside man baby
>>

 No.161630

>>161624
seething .ogre
>>

 No.161632

>>161630
Rotting . net
>>

 No.161634

>>161632
We literally get more users everyday, lol
>>

 No.161677

>>161634
More weenies everyday, certainly
>>

 No.161685

No surprise. Inceldom is the main problem of the 21 century along with capitalism. Men and women are actually two different classes nowadays. Women and capitalists opress men, turning them into slaves, that shouldn't even have sex and family. Incels are those who oppose the oppresion. That's why this topic will be discussed everywhere, despite largest capitalist resources' attempts to prevent it. Because most of men do not have sex, while the need to have it, and most of women do not want to have sex with these men. This is a pure class war.
>>

 No.161686

File: 1788476901063.jpg ( 131.5 KB , 1242x1387 , 490.jpg )

>>161523
>be me
>some random anon
>go to leftypol.org
>barely active in europe/asia timezone
>in comparison to 2024/2023
>no replies for several hours
>untill it's morning in US timezones
>coming back later
>finally seeing some activity
>activity drops when they go to sleep
It never recovered from that hard disk failure, didn't it?
>>

 No.161687

>>161685
>Ummmm actually it’s because men are being opppressed by women

JFC can you guys shut up about sex for one second?

Please go back to Ogre with this shit.

No, men aren’t being oppressed by women

Women aren’t being oppressed by men either

Men and women are both being socially abused by stranger danger and groomer hysteria.

Also, incels are men who suffer from any sort of bodily disability that makes them unable to get laid

If you don’t have autism, cancer, sickle cell, facial assymetry, etc there’s nothing preventing you from getting laid fundamentally
>>

 No.161688

File: 1788511674871.jpg ( 896.15 KB , 712x1000 , dreamworksface.jpg )

>>161687
>facial assymetry
Then why is Dreamworks so successful?
>>

 No.161689

>>161688
Those faces aren’t assymetrical, plus they’re drawn with cutesy shapes. Lots of ovalur heads and cute circles for eyes.
Foreheads are smooth slopes.
>>

 No.161690

>>161687

> can you guys shut up about sex for one second?

Of course, just after sex will be provided to us on a regular basis.

> No, men aren’t being oppressed by women

They are. And not only because women deprive men of sex, but also because they make money on it in all possible ways (prostitution, porn, webcam and so on).

> Women aren’t being oppressed by men either

Of course, how can opressors be oppressed?

> Men and women are both being socially abused by stranger danger and groomer hysteria.

No, men only. And first of all I'm talking about sexual economy interactions between men and women, culture is substructure in terms of Marxism.

> Also, incels are men who suffer from any sort of bodily disability that makes them unable to get laid

No, incels are all men who want sex and cannot get laid, regardless of reasons. A chad in a jail is an incel, because he cannot get sex with women there. Even the term itself - involuntary celibate - only explains the state of not having sex, not bodily disabilities. Learn the terms.

> If you don’t have autism, cancer, sickle cell, facial assymetry, etc there’s nothing preventing you from getting laid fundamentally

I don't have any of these and I haven't had sex for years. This problem is much deeper than just looking bad or having autism.
>>

 No.161691

File: 1788567783486-0.jpg ( 50.15 KB , 713x299 , axial-twist.jpg )

File: 1788567783486-1.jpg ( 47.36 KB , 746x222 , axial-twist-embrace-bias.jpg )

>>161687
>>161688
Fun fact: the majority of vertebrates have some degree of facial assymmetry due to something called the axial twist which happens early in fetal development. There are selective pressures to "correct" it, but there are also countervailing selective pressures to not notice it. Your brain is trained not to notice it, but everyone has it.

It also explains why there is a strong bias towards hugging and kissing people from one side over the other. It explains it better than handedness.
>>

 No.161692

>>161691
> Fun fact: the majority of vertebrates have some degree of facial assymmetry due to something called the axial twist which happens early in fetal development

Why am I not surprised?
Of course symmetry in absolution doesn’t exist in nature, or if it does, in outliers

However, the common degree of facial assymetry is usually negligible.
Its only useful when it comes to forensics

Unique IPs: 17
[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome