[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ][Options]

/gulag/ - gulag

trash can / purgatory for deleted threads
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Select/drop/paste files here
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble

| Catalog | Home

File (hide): 1730035691181.jpg ( 9.46 KB , 230x305 , photo.jpg )

[–]

 No.725[Reply]

KimDongWan

megastudy khsil88 kdw060316@
riotgames khsil88 khsil77?@
google khsil77dongwan@gmail.com khsil77?@
fbi.gov khsil77dongwan@gmail.com khsil77?@
steampowered 0kimdongwan0 khsil77?@
hypixel.net HomewardTiara50 khsil77?@
battlenet khsil77dongwan@gmail.com kdw060316
microsoft khsil77dongwan@gmail.com kdw060316@
cultureland khsil88 AAAAA00
naver khsil88 khsil77?@
porn3dx 1sw TqzeYVpS9qCmhUP
rockstargames khsil77dongwan@gmail.com Khsil77?@
netflix khsil77@naver.com 9651105KHS


File (hide): 1728485084044.jpg ( 269.93 KB , 942x1920 , Alfred_Rethel_002.jpg )

[–]

 No.718[Reply]>>720>>721

This will serve as a platform to dedicated to civil discussion between Globalist left and Nationalist Right.

Ask me anything, I will answer to the best of my ability.

I am a proud believer in NatSoc, I believe it can solve many ethnic issues, both sides should try to understand each other and develop our debating skills, hopefully this thread will facilitate further discussions.

What Nazism or National Socialism is at it's core a hyper nationalist ideology centered around a blood first mentality.
NatSoc supporters are typically white supremacists however NatSoc isn't strictly limited to Europeans, it is compatible with any race one could argue Israel is technically Jewish NatSoc or even modern day "communist" China.
>>

 No.719

Pride is for fags.
Go ask Eugene in his thread what he thinks. That will be a much more worthwhile conversation.

When it comes to Germans I am a proud racist. I guess there's that.
>>

 No.720

>>718
I have objections to your framing, it's very confusing.

There is Internationalism, which has been the political cause of social democrats, socialists and communists. It's basically 2 things:
1 Peace treaties backed up by arms-control and neutral ground buffer-zones, (the military is the guarantor for diplomacy not the replacement of diplomacy)
2 Trade agreements designed to exchange commodities freely but avoid transfer of capital or labor.

People who have called them selves the left have traditionally supported Internationalism. I'm not sure if what you call left is those kinds of people. So maybe avoid ambiguous labels.

I have no idea what you mean with Globalism, there's like a 100 mutually exclusive definitions. The opposing force to Internationalism is Trans-nationalism/multi-nationalism. It's massive corporations operating in many countries, their goal is to shuffle capital and labor around the world in ways that exclusively serves their interests. They're trying gain enough power to be like their own states in world affairs. They want to reduce national governments into Prison guards that hold down the work-force.

I'm also not sure what you mean with nationalist right ?
Do you mean the political configuration that support the economic interests of small and medium capitalists. Not everything that calls it self the right at present is representing those interests.
>>

 No.721

>>718
>I am a proud believer in NatSoc, I believe it can solve many ethnic issues
I'm not sure what you want to get out of "ethnic-pride".

If you want to be allowed to only interact with people that look similar to you, that is acceptable and we can accommodate. We can organize new ways to make that work without trampling or inconveniencing others. However if your conception entertains any kind of hierarchy that ranks ethnic identities, or battles between ethnic identities, that's a hard nope.

>What Nazism or National Socialism is at it's core a hyper nationalist ideology centered around a blood first mentality.

Nazim as in German fascism during the 20th century was national suicide on behalf of imperial finance capital that wanted to ram Germany into the Soviet-block because the Soviets wouldn't submit to imperial rule. They trick people into believing they become "the master-race" if they fight for imperial-rule. In reality it's just sacrificing people.

The Nazis weren't a type of socialist, they were a type of fascism.
China is not a type of fascism.
The Zionists in Israel have crossed over into fascism over the last year. So you are correct on that one.

But the Zionists aren't really Jewish anymore. It's difficult to define Jewishness, but Jews tend to live in a diaspora, they tend to value intellectual achievement, and adaptation to local cultural norms. Jews also invented the kibbutz, and socialists really like that. Zionists celebrate stupidity and value blunt violence, they confuse recklessness with chutzpah.


File (hide): 1728430250654.webm ( 2.74 MB , 1276x720 , rude_china_gas_station.webm ) [play once] [loop]

[–]

 No.722[Reply]>>724

Your anti-idpol bullshit is simply intellectualized bigotry. You are no better than any other right winger who flips out about brown people in video games. When socialism comes women, minorities and homosexuals will hold hands and sing in unisons under a rainbow while selfish white men who can’t think beyond themselves will be hanging from trees.
>>

 No.723

>women, minorities
Yes
>and homosexuals
no
>>

 No.724

>>722
>Your anti-idpol bullshit is simply intellectualized bigotry
Racism is idpol, dumbass.
Hating minorities, gays, women, etc. isn't "anti-idpol." Hope this helps.


File (hide): 1728309564961.png ( 9.05 KB , 1920x1200 , the_eternal_castle_remaste….png )

[–]

 No.717[Reply]

If gender is a social construct, how can gender dysphoria truly exist


File (hide): 1728259492213.mp4 ( 1021.04 KB , 640x360 , riley marks.mp4 ) [play once] [loop]

[–]

 No.715[Reply]

sex workers are not proletarian because they are not producing members of society, meaning producing something that sustains society. Pronography is a redundant luxury good. Many are self-employed people are similar to petit bourgoise. Finally, how much money you make does have an impact on whether or not you have an urge to overturn the current mode of production. Wealthy working class people and poor working class people are not equivalent just because both sell their labour.

It is bourgeois because it produces no value and consumes greatly, making it an exploiter. It can only be proletariat if it produces surplus-value—it produces no value.


File (hide): 1728253770015.mp4 ( 1021.04 KB , 640x360 , riley marks.mp4 ) [play once] [loop]

[–]

 No.713[Reply]

sex workers are not proletarian because they are not producing members of society, meaning producing something that sustains society. Pronography is a redundant luxury good. Many are self-employed people are similar to petit bourgoise. Finally, how much money you make does have an impact on whether or not you have an urge to overturn the current mode of production. Wealthy working class people and poor working class people are not equivalent just because both sell their labour.


File (hide): 1728248214851.png ( 715.18 KB , 1280x720 , 8.png )

[–]

 No.714[Reply]

Yeah, child rearing has never been something only handled by two fucking people u too recently. Children need a community to develop into normal people. Otherwise, perfectly healthy children will end up with shitloads of problems with hygiene, social skills, and or self management as adults for basically no fucking reason.

I think most adults view kids as potential alter egos of their elders.
Most adults have an empathetic deficit towards kids.
They think childhood is supposed to be some universal cultural experiemce, that fashion, media, etc is supposed to remain the same as back in the old days.

I'm not a parent but I think it's important to be careful in taking too much credence in all the parenting fads. The "correct way" to raise a child is changing all the time and everyone has their own opinion about it.

My opinion is that just focusing on the obvious ones is already doing quite a lot:
>nutrition, make sure they're getting a varied nutrition and enough protein
>exercise. Any type is OK. Helps to have them try different sports and see what they like. Sometimes it's the people they don't like. Swimming, bouldering, gymnastics, there's tons of sports, don't just force your kid to like whatever the dominant sport is. If they're old enough, the gym is great for a bunch of reasons as a supplement to some sport.
>education. Getting them quality education is good. Also getting your kid to bump shoulders with richer kids can be good for long term prospects but the wealth disparity can cause trauma. So just beware. You can also supplement education by providing your kid with things they like to do.
>sleep hygiene. Very important. It's also good to explain these things to your kid. Giving them autonomy and shit.
>basic skills like cooking and cleaning. Chores fucking suck but if done together they can become a way to feel useful in the family and bring people together.
>socializing. Super important to socialize a lot during all stages in life. We live in a society. Beware that socializing has become less and less common nowadays. people are more shut in and paranoid of each other. Also online gaming is pretty big which isn't really proper socializing. A LAN party would be though, for example.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.


File (hide): 1728230386121.jpg ( 68.55 KB , 452x381 , karl-marx.jpg )

[–]

 No.712[Reply]

In this post, I would like to talk about Marxism. I would like to express my thoughts on one of the biggest influential ideologies ever to have come to humanity.

************

What I find interesting about Marxism is its
scientific approach in regard to oppressed peoples and the freedom of those oppressed peoples.

It is interesting to see how "capital" is one of the biggest exploitive systems.

People work, and get paid little–the lower class people–unable to afford basic necessities on their own.

Can anyone else elaborate their thoughts on the peasantry and their experience with exploitation?

These are just one of my thoughts on the interesting ideology of Marxism.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.


File (hide): 1728161869306.png ( 9.05 KB , 1920x1200 , the_eternal_castle_remaste….png )

[–]

 No.711[Reply]

How much longer till we can gulag all the christfags? It wont be long until we're all living in a worldwide christian theocracy because we keep letting these freaks have a say.(Reposting content from other websites verbatim may result in a ban.)


File (hide): 1728134591183.jpg ( 606.1 KB , 1840x1088 , 0.jpg )

[–]

 No.708[Reply]

There are four classifications of women that are far more psycho than [the rest]. They are:

1. Woman with a criminal record (number one in the psycho classification)

2. Any woman who uses drugs of any type. Warning, this includes pot.

3. Any woman who works in any capacity in the sex for money industry……prostitute, phone sex, porno, stripper, nude pictures, hooters girl, shot girl, any job selling alcohol where looks are a factor (ie almost any job serving alcohol, except as a bartender/waitress in the most classy establishments).

4. Any woman that has been in a lesbian relationship. By that, I don’t necessarily include bi/curious girls (lol, all women are bi/curious, despite what they may say). No, I mean any woman that has had a woman as sole-sexual partner on a regular basis.
>>

 No.709

More coal
>>

 No.710

Im gonns have exclude the corollary on number two.

Also number four is also iffy


Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 ]
| Catalog | Home