>>11463>>11463>calling somebody the T-slur is an argument
it's not, calling others names, isn't the same as arguing a point
Great job arguing with yourself, dipshit. Unfortunately, I never said that. Next time you tey to lecture someone on argumentation, try not to use a blatant straw man. >This is an argument from authority fallacy.
Wrong again, faggot. A fallacious argument from authority would be to say that the President told me so. It is not fallacious to quote a subject-matter expert on his field of expertise. Do you ask your doctor to present arguments for his diagnosis? You're an absolute dumbfuck, you know that? >The reason not to mix antifreeze and engine oil is because
Assuming you didn't know that, are you going to have an argument with a mechanic? The answer is no, because you don't know shit. >Not because St.Mechanicus said so. You seem to lack any concept for the possibility that phenomena can be explained and understood.
Oh, but I do. The problem is that people like you do not know anything about what you argue, and it's quite obvious. >You can either explain the weird shit that people have documented or admit that you can't just dismiss this out of hand.
There's nothing weird about it. You don't understand how fires work. That's the simplest explanation.
Vid related. It's what you look like.