>>7069> It's basically the difference between young and mature Marx in his analysis.
You're saying I'm a young Marx? Not bad.
It was still a thread made purely for discussion. Still can't see how the rules could justify an anchor.>>7070>Stupid waste of internet space
Thanks for contributing and elevating the discourse.>>7071>Given that there are quotes around the word, I don't think the mods are literally saying that the topic related to actual class discussion, but rather the topic was class essentialist and/or workerist, making analysis that of class itself, but of the superficial qualities of those in a class, or that of certain theorists inherently being bunk because of being of a certain class or not having been proles.
Then why not elaborate on that in the rules? Also how cowardly. Why not just argue that in that thread than anchor it within five minutes of it being posted? You know 100% this isn't the way any other fucking ridiculous thread about colored people and IQs ad all sorts of bullshit goes.