/meta/ - Ruthless criticism of all that exists (in leftychan.net)

We can answer them jannies won’t let us

>>7756
Idk, I was reading that thread and was utterly disappointed to see that Eugene was the only person that took the OP seriously and responded in good faith

>>7755
>So just to be clear, the jannies deleted a thread simply asking Marxists how they know they aren’t wrong and what would they do were they wrong solely because the denizens of leftypol genuinely can’t answer those questions? And the only person who can is Eugene because he’s at least thought to questions these things?

Basically. Most people aren't thinkers. Only cut out to be foot soldiers at best.

Next time don't posit your OP from the angle of a wondering poltard.

>>7759
I didn’t make the thread you deleted jantard, I was just disgusted by the fact that literally none of you could actually defend an empirically correct theory and even more disgusted that the jannies treat this shit like a fucking religion that shouldn’t even have to be defended so you just delete any critic.

>>7760
>>7760
I can and will defend Dialectical Materialism and Marxism as a concept. I am just doing my job and cleaning up the Pol autism that plagues the site at night. If OP was worth having then OP would have presented his argument in a way that would have been less conflated with pol spam. The deletion of the thread is not indicative of any one treating Marxism like a religion. It's just normal procedure. Lurk more.

>>7762
Mate, what was wrong with that person’s questions? I’ve at least been using leftypol since it was still on 8chan, that thread OP looked fine to me, the problem is that everyone memed instead of using a serious rebuttal. For instance, why is it not a fair and good faith criticism to call Marxism neo-Ricardian and promote marginalism? You may not agree with these criticism, but they are still criticisms of theory itself and thus offered in good faith. That’s why I say only Eugene responded seriously, because he rebutted the notion that marginalism is anything other than nonsense. This is my problem, the things OP said were not nonsensical nor impossible to respond to, they were actually debate worthy questions.

>>7764
I don’t mean that thread, I was talking about the one by Antifa flag that was asking why the people here are marxists

>>7765
That thread was clearly spam and the IP's that preceded it where posting more pol spam. It was just bad faith pol spam, anon.

>>7759
>>7762
die in a fire you /r/socialism refugee