Which will come first: complete environmental collapse or socialism?

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name	34523
Email
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

>>

Anonymous 2022-02-22 (Tue) 16:08:32 No.522

My money is on the former as well sadly. If the last 7 years have taught me anything it's that American proles are fucking retards and thoroughly indoctrinated.

>>

Anonymous 2022-02-23 (Wed) 02:00:01 No.523

God that webm was so fucking on point. More like that please, OP. Shit. I'm gonna go cry now…

>>

sage Anonymous 2022-02-23 (Wed) 03:46:26 No.524

/pol/

>>

Anonymous 2022-02-23 (Wed) 04:49:57 No.525

>>524

How is this pol?

>>

Anonymous 2022-02-23 (Wed) 13:30:10 No.526

>>525
>homophobia
>mocking leftism

>>

Anonymous 2022-02-23 (Wed) 19:08:45 No.527

>>521
>Which will come first: complete environmental collapse or socialism?
Both.

The magic of capitalism is that as resources get scarcer the price goes up and people are forced to find a sustainable alternative.

>>

Anonymous 2022-02-24 (Thu) 11:44:17 No.528

File: 1645703056825.jpg ( 80.46 KB , 561x928 , 1640829135269.jpg )

>>527
Socialism most likely isn't going to be a possibility at this point. If anyone goes and actually reads Marx it becomes apperent that Marx and Engles we're pretty exclusively speaking about the industrial politariat exclusively as being the masters not the destiny. Now this doesn't inherently become true cause Marx said so but he did have a point.

Industrial society brought people together en mass with a common and shared interest in over throwing capital. That is no longer the case people are more alienated than ever and most jobs in the US are just service industry jobs. The prolotarate has been thoroughly deradicalized.

We missed the boat.

>>

Anonymous 2022-02-28 (Mon) 15:18:50 No.529

File: 1646061530327.jpg ( 66.33 KB , 805x371 , political economy of labou….jpg )

>>528
>We missed the boat.
We missed a boat, capitalism can't resolve it's contradictions, the next boat is coming right up

>>

Anonymous 2022-03-07 (Mon) 17:31:38 No.530

>>528
>Socialism most likely isn't going to be a possibility at this point.
Socialism is when government does stuff.

>>

Anonymous 2022-03-07 (Mon) 21:56:53 No.531

File: 1646690213106.jpeg ( 16.76 KB , 299x562 , 1645790205996.jpeg )

>>530
>Socialism isn't when the government does stuff.

>>

Anonymous 2022-03-08 (Tue) 10:58:04 No.532

>>531
>Socialism isn't when the government does stuff.
If you want to steal the means of production away from the people who built it and give it to your buddies then you need a monopoly on violence i.e. a government.

>>

Anonymous 2022-03-08 (Tue) 11:31:49 No.533

>>532
Ok this is getting confusing; What do you think socialism is and why are you so angry?

>>

Anonymous 2022-03-08 (Tue) 15:21:27 No.534

>>533
>What do you think socialism is
<when you want to steal the means of production away from the people who built it and give it to your buddies

>>

Anonymous 2022-03-08 (Tue) 16:13:34 No.535

>>534
Is that what you think it is cause that's fucking retarded.

>>

Anonymous 2022-03-08 (Tue) 16:31:27 No.536

>>535
>[_] Propose an updated definition and continue the discussion
>[X] Throw ad hominems and act like a child
You have selected poorly.

>>

Anonymous 2022-03-08 (Tue) 19:03:17 No.537

>>536
Your strawman isn't an argument dumb ass.

>>

Anonymous 2022-03-08 (Tue) 21:06:55 No.538

>>537
Where is your argument?

>>

Anonymous 2022-03-08 (Tue) 21:49:39 No.539

>>538
>Posits argument in the form of a strawman

<WELL WHERE'S YOURE ARGUMENT BUCKO?

>>

Anonymous 2022-03-09 (Wed) 09:01:09 No.540

>>539
Jesus Christ this is like talking to a fucking toddler.
Let me help you out. I wrote this:
>when you want to steal the means of production away from the people who built it and give it to your buddies
Now use your cool green arrow thing to quote the part you disagree with and give a factual/logical argument for why you think it is wrong and what you think it should say instead.

>>

Anonymous 2022-03-09 (Wed) 12:26:18 No.541

>>540
It's all dumb my guy. You have to be a lolberts or some other retarded right wing political deviant because no one with any sense could make a claim so profoundly stupid. Saying that communists want to "steal" production is retarded. Productive forces were stolen by the expansion of capital through out history. Workers built it with their hands money doesn't generate capital it requires labor to transform itself into profit.

>>

Anonymous 2022-03-09 (Wed) 12:35:22 No.542

>>541
>blah blah blah personal attacks
Follow these very simple instructions:
<use your cool green arrow thing to quote the part you disagree with and give a factual/logical argument for why you think it is wrong and what you think it should say instead.

>>

Anonymous 2022-03-09 (Wed) 16:07:39 No.543

>>542
Ok

>No argument what so ever and is nothing but a midwit troll.

>>

Anonymous 2022-03-09 (Wed) 16:16:40 No.544

>>543
My argument:
<Socialism is when you want to steal the means of production away from the people who built it and give it to your buddies.
Your argument:
<???

>>

Anonymous 2022-03-09 (Wed) 18:09:10 No.545

ITT: People who think the answer to the negative effects of industrial civilization is more of the same

>>

Anonymous 2022-03-09 (Wed) 19:08:17 No.546

>>544
I have you an argument

>>

Anonymous 2022-03-10 (Thu) 08:32:08 No.547

>>546
>I have you an argument
If that's true then it should be no problem for you to copy and paste it into the ??? part below.

My argument:
<Socialism is when you want to steal the means of production away from the people who built it and give it to your buddies.
Your argument:
<???