/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

>over sexualisation of young people

Where? Young people are pathologized for sexuality
There’s more brutalization of young people via bullying and domestic abuse

Also, sex is stigmatized in this culture. Even the accepted kinks.
It’s only accepted as aesthetics for erotica and even then.

People like you who morally obsess over sexuality are a problem

>>12026

> like yeah your "culture" revolving around sex is disgusting and needs to be rejected

There is no culture revolving around sex today, it's not 1960s', it's 2026 when even rich men get cancelled for having sex.

> over sexualization of young people

Young people are much more sexual than old people, nothing strange here.

> normalization of kinks like bdsm

BDSM is not necessary for sexual life, but not a huge problem either.

> regularity of hookups and sleeping around

Humans need sex regularly, that's our nature.

> surveillance state under the dotp is necessary to stop hypergamy and whores

How will it stop hypergamy and whores? There is only one way to stop hypergamy - to cancel women's right to choose who to have sex with.

You're proposing to cure the headache with cutting the head off. The real solution is to make sex free, available and guaranteed on a regular basis for all men.

>>12302
>cancelled for having sex
Tell me you're a 'victim' of MeToo without telling me

>>12302
You can deny everything but that doesn't make reality false you promiscuous freak

It will also cancels mans right to choose if you care that much about individual rights

>You're proposing to cure the headache with cutting the head off.

emergency giga i need a giga

>>12315

> You can deny everything but that doesn't make reality false you promiscuous freak

The reality is that both men and women want to fuck many partners, not just one wife of husband for their whole life. Otherwise there wouldn't be so much cheating.

> It will also cancels mans right to choose if you care that much about individual rights

I care about class rights of men and workers, not about some abstract individual rights. What men's right to choose are you talking about? Today most men don't choose at all, they are incels. And if sex was available, there's no need to choose - fuck every woman you want and be happy.

>>12359
>The reality is that both men and women want to fuck many partners, not just one wife of husband for their whole life. Otherwise there wouldn't be so much cheating.

liberal degeneracy isn't inherent to anyone

>I care about class rights of men and workers, not about some abstract individual rights. What men's right to choose are you talking about?

i don't care about any rights uygha i am a materialist

>>12315
You’re being obtuse. There’s no sex positivity culture.

Young people are pathologised for wanting to do the deed.
They’re only allowed to express libido in porn and role playing

>>12381

> liberal degeneracy isn't inherent to anyone
> i don't care about any rights uygha i am a materialist

Explains human sexual behavior with "liberal degeneracy", despite that humans had sex with different partners even thousands of years ago.
Calls himself a materialist.

LOL.

>>12388
HateGramSci is just a revisionist. He either is a willful ignoramus or a perfect troll.

I’m more willing to bet my money on the former.

>>12390

> HateGramSci is just a revisionist. He either is a willful ignoramus or a perfect troll.

I have a crazy guess that he's a bot or some weirdo ex alt-right. Anyway, he's a funny motherfucker.

>>12388
>despite that humans had sex with different partners even thousands of years ago.

just because the 'primitive communists' did it doesn't mean we will

>>12394

you're all just wrong