R: 28 / I: 4
Why are some leftists so opposed to travelmnaxxing?
It literally enrages them to a level usually only reserved for nazis.
Why are some leftists so opposed to travelmnaxxing?
It literally enrages them to a level usually only reserved for nazis.
R: 45 / I: 20
Sex Robot General
Post anything regarding sex robots or dolls here.
R: 416 / I: 184
Incel humor thread.
Incel humor thread.
R: 22 / I: 26
Porn Thread?
Oh yeah, porn thread.
R: 107 / I: 14
How do I stop myself wanting a gf so badly that it hurts?
How do I stop myself wanting a gf so badly that it hurts?
R: 449 / I: 137
Incel News Thread
Incel News Thread
R: 10 / I: 0
What do you think is in Audrey Hale's manifesto?
What could have motivated a femcel to do such unspeakable acts against children?
R: 3 / I: 10
Post thinspiration, restrictive diets, what you eat in a day, extreme workouts, etc.
The following links may be outdated:
FAQ:
http://pastebin.com/raw/jvUjw16e
Low Calorie Food & Drinks List:
http://pastebin.com/raw/93cLG9jj
thinspo, pro-ana, pro-mia thread
Talk about how to live with anorexia/bulimia and make people not notice.Post thinspiration, restrictive diets, what you eat in a day, extreme workouts, etc.
The following links may be outdated:
FAQ:
http://pastebin.com/raw/jvUjw16e
Low Calorie Food & Drinks List:
http://pastebin.com/raw/93cLG9jj
R: 17 / I: 6
Why are women aging so fast suddenly?
Why are women aging so fast suddenly?
R: 57 / I: 7
No bully
also feel free to share your feels in the /leftcel/ thread at https://9chan.tw/leftcel/thread/2696
Feels Thread
Share you feels here.No bully
also feel free to share your feels in the /leftcel/ thread at https://9chan.tw/leftcel/thread/2696
R: 6 / I: 1
What are the political implications of letting social-media addicted women vote?
Good thing voting doesn't actually matter, right
What are the political implications of letting social-media addicted women vote?
Good thing voting doesn't actually matter, right
R: 4 / I: 0
just got banned (again) from my main forum of the last few months..
tips? and share ban stories, maybe
just got banned (again) from my main forum of the last few months..
tips? and share ban stories, maybe
R: 57 / I: 22
NEETS thread
im a comfy NEET, do you like to be A neet anon?
R: 110 / I: 46
An effective contraceptive pill for men has just been released. What are the political implications?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/apr/19/contraceptive-pill-men-side-effects-women-pregnancy
https://web.archive.org/web/20230419191319/https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/apr/19/contraceptive-pill-men-side-effects-women-pregnancy
An effective contraceptive pill for men has just been released. What are the political implications?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/apr/19/contraceptive-pill-men-side-effects-women-pregnancy
https://web.archive.org/web/20230419191319/https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/apr/19/contraceptive-pill-men-side-effects-women-pregnancy
R: 8 / I: 0
Will this be the new norm?
Will this be the new norm?
R: 85 / I: 26
Well Gentlemen?
Well Gentlemen?
R: 13 / I: 0
Circumcision is a Fraud is Hosting a Web Page with FOIA Documents on Circumcision
https://www.circumcisionisafraud.com/foia
Also, circumcision general thread. I think it's male genital mutilation.
Circumcision is a Fraud is Hosting a Web Page with FOIA Documents on Circumcision
https://www.circumcisionisafraud.com/foia
Also, circumcision general thread. I think it's male genital mutilation.
R: 15 / I: 7
As we grow up, I think that society and the media feed us this idea that many of us just don't think to question. I don't smoke, I don't drink. But life isn't like those movies. More than five years ago, I started giving up entirely on being in the kind of relationship that I dreamed of for years. It was a humble, clean dream of togetherness, symbiosis and trust that I realized will never come true, and made me so depressed that I crippled my future over it. I failed completely. Nothing is right. How can I ever trust any woman? I am jealous as to how easy most people start a romantic or sexual relationship. I seem to find no other way to let go from being obsessed with girls without feeling resentment. It's an inescapable catch-22. Women want men that are desired, and if you can't find a woman that finds you desirable, than no other woman will. It's a very lonely miserable existence. I don't know what to do anymore. Is it worth it to change myself and become a better person? Basically what I'm asking is how do I un-blackpill myself?
How do I un-blackpill myself?
I'm a few years from reaching thirty, currently have no friends and never had sex or even kissed a girl. But lately it has been driving home a lot harder. The blackpill reminds me of how worthless my shitty existence is. I'm posting here out of despair. Women have high physical standards. Women (especially physically unfit women) want men more physically fit than them, and physically inferior men have it hard. Women are having a ton of sex with a different attractive man each week while I'm sitting here all alone. The blackpill made me realize how much of a worthless reject I am to society. I am nothing. No women I've ever met wanted to befriend/get into a relationship with me. I'll never breed because I'm unattractive, introvert and physically unfit, I hate myself with a burning passion. Why did I have to be cursed with being a repulsive low value male?As we grow up, I think that society and the media feed us this idea that many of us just don't think to question. I don't smoke, I don't drink. But life isn't like those movies. More than five years ago, I started giving up entirely on being in the kind of relationship that I dreamed of for years. It was a humble, clean dream of togetherness, symbiosis and trust that I realized will never come true, and made me so depressed that I crippled my future over it. I failed completely. Nothing is right. How can I ever trust any woman? I am jealous as to how easy most people start a romantic or sexual relationship. I seem to find no other way to let go from being obsessed with girls without feeling resentment. It's an inescapable catch-22. Women want men that are desired, and if you can't find a woman that finds you desirable, than no other woman will. It's a very lonely miserable existence. I don't know what to do anymore. Is it worth it to change myself and become a better person? Basically what I'm asking is how do I un-blackpill myself?
R: 99 / I: 17
am i winning?
anons... i made a girl friend
its the fist time ive made a friend who's a girl (female) in my 19 years of age, turns out it wasnt that hard. Im still afraid of women thougham i winning?
R: 55 / I: 13
This guy learned the hard way
>What women think or say they want and what they actually respond to are two very different things
This guy learned the hard way
>What women think or say they want and what they actually respond to are two very different things
R: 10 / I: 1
What is the explanation for this data?
Many of you were teenagers yourselves during this period, what made life so good back then?
Between the years 1995 and 2000 there was a significant decline in the suicide rate of teenagers
The decline was almost entirely driven by teen boys killing themselves at a significantly lower rate.What is the explanation for this data?
Many of you were teenagers yourselves during this period, what made life so good back then?
R: 6 / I: 0
Why are millennials and especially zoomers so obsessed with gender?
Why are millennials and especially zoomers so obsessed with gender?
R: 44 / I: 7
>revolutionary defeatism with incel characteristics
It's happening bros
>revolutionary defeatism with incel characteristics
It's happening bros
R: 135 / I: 19
Should prostition be illegal?
I don't even think it should be illegal for any moral reason, or, because I think it is degenerate. I think it is bullshit women get to get by only on their looks and their pussies. They should get a job like the rest of us.
R: 2 / I: 0
Are women actually more misanthropic then men?
It sure seems like it.
R: 11 / I: 1
ve been doing this for several years but we have not noticed it because we do not pay attention to the details.
Now, just imagine, if this is the case with Balenciaga and Adidas, do you think there are more brands in other markets that do this kind of thing?
I would like to know opinions and/or thoughts, as this is a topic that is very recent and is of international interest.
Balenciaga's case, what do u think?
I would like to know what you think about the Balenciaga case. In my opinion, I think that all these brands conspire to send subliminal messages and unfortunately, they have been doing this for several years but we have not noticed it because we do not pay attention to the details.
Now, just imagine, if this is the case with Balenciaga and Adidas, do you think there are more brands in other markets that do this kind of thing?
I would like to know opinions and/or thoughts, as this is a topic that is very recent and is of international interest.
R: 11 / I: 1
Is the friendzone really just a social construct. Is it really a simp's fault or do women have some sort of responsibility to let men they know are courting them that they're not interested?
Is the friendzone really just a social construct. Is it really a simp's fault or do women have some sort of responsibility to let men they know are courting them that they're not interested?
R: 19 / I: 3
Anon, would you have sex with the Wagner Group e-girl?
Anon, would you have sex with the Wagner Group e-girl?
R: 49 / I: 7
>Infanticide
<Male infanticide was wasteful only of the motherâs nine-month investment. By eliminating unpromising male infants, the community was not obliged to pay the costs of rearing a boy who would not, as Plutarch puts it, be of use to himself or to the state. The decision ostensibly satisfied eugenic considerations. The infant who failed the initial inspection was eliminated before he could produce children who were likely to inherit his undesirable characteristics.
<A question that is often raised is whether at Sparta girls as well as boys,were vulnerable to infanticide. Nowadays few scholars doubt that girls were regularly exposed in Athens.8 The need to furnish a dowry at, or even before, puberty, and the general devaluation of women, were probably among the reasons why a father might choose not to raise a daughter. Was Sparta the antithesis of Athens? Did Sparta expose all boys who did not appear to have the potential for becoming excellent soldiers, but raise all girls â except, one would suspect, those with obvious and debilitating physical abnormalities?9
<We may deduce from Plutarchâs description that at birth girls were simply handed over to the women. This conclusion is ex silentio; on the other hand, it can be argued that Plutarch was unusually scrupulous among Greek authors in remembering to mention women where it was appropriate. It seems that girls were not subjected to official scrutiny as were Spartan boys, nor, apparently, did fathers make a determination about rearing or exposing them, as they did in Athens. The women would test the babies for epilepsy or sickliness by seeing if a bath in undiluted wine would throw them into convulsions. Plutarch does not state whether the immersion ordeal was part of the official evaluation process, nor does he indicate the fate of the infants, presumably both male and female, who failed the wine-immersion test. He does not tell us whether the women took any action in the case of infants who had failed the test, but if they did not, then what was the point? If the decision to expose apparent weaklings was up to the women, they would have exercised a power usually reserved for men in the Greco-Roman world.
<There probably was change over time, with private citizens taking upon themselves the right to judge the male infantâs viability that had previously been a monopoly of the community.10 Such changes were correlated with the right to dower and to alienate and bequeath property. The individual fatherâs decision may have followed the verdict of the tribal elders, or the former supplanted the latter totally.At any rate, there is no indication of systematic female infanticide or neglect of girls at Sparta, nor is there any indirect evidence, such as skewed sex ratios. It seems likely that because in Sparta there was no money and women could own land, they could more easily be given a dowry.11 At Athens, where women could not own land, a father would have to furnish cash or movables, and this obligation might well be a deterrent to rearing girls.
<Eugenic principles, such as existed in that era, underlie much of Spartan demographic engineering. The Spartans were celebrated for breeding fine hounds and racehorses, so it is not surprising to see them transfer these notions to human beings. By eliminating weak male infants, they tried to give natural evolution a boost, and through the subsequent rigorous training of boys, they assured the survival of the fittest and future reproduction by them. A mistake might be made, and a man might prove to be a coward. Such tremblers were most likely to be younger men facing their first real conflict, rather than hardened veterans. Anecdotes about Spartan mothers show that they are concerned lest their sons prove to be cowards (see chap.). In any case, cowards did not reproduce, for they were socially ostracized, and neither they nor their sisters (presumably young and not married) could find spouses (Xen. Lac. Pol. ï¹.ïµ). Eugenic motivations may also be detected in the choices made in wife-sharing or husband-doubling arrangements (see below). Plutarch (Lyc. ï±ïµ.ï·) agrees with Xenophon that a man could ask a husband if he might plant his seed in a wife who had already produced children, but he also attributes the initiative to the husband. For example an elderly man with a young wife might offer her a handsome, noble young man, and then adopt the children born of this union (Plut. Lyc. ï±ïµ.ï±ï²). Daniel Ogden has speculated that Spartans believed that in the process of wife-lending, male sperm could mingle and produce offspring who were thought to have descended from two male parents. 12 Though the male contribution to the embryo was usually thought to dominate, it is also necessary to pay sufficient attention to the female contribution. The rejection of cowardsâ sisters and of some wives in favor of married women who were euteknos (âblessed with good childrenâ) and gennaia (âwell bornâ) reveals a belief that the mother was more than merely a fertile field for the fatherâs seed, and that each woman continued to make her own particular contribution to the offspring. Indeed, in Plutarchâs Sayings of Spartan Women (e.g., ï²ï´ï°e, ï²ï´ï±d), the mothers take all the credit for the way their sons turn out. Of course this is an exaggeration that results from the authorâs effort to prove that Sparta was very different in this respect from other Greek cities where mothers had little to do with the rearing of sons after the age of seven. Xenophon (Lac. Pol. ï¶.ï²) reports that at Sparta fathers were involved in their childrenâs upbringing. Nevertheless, Plutarchâs view on the strong influence of mothers is corroborated by other sources (see chap. ï³).
Eugenics-kun, your opinion?
Sparta eugenic feminist anti-incel totalitarianism?
What's an incel verdict on Sparta?>Infanticide
<Male infanticide was wasteful only of the motherâs nine-month investment. By eliminating unpromising male infants, the community was not obliged to pay the costs of rearing a boy who would not, as Plutarch puts it, be of use to himself or to the state. The decision ostensibly satisfied eugenic considerations. The infant who failed the initial inspection was eliminated before he could produce children who were likely to inherit his undesirable characteristics.
<A question that is often raised is whether at Sparta girls as well as boys,were vulnerable to infanticide. Nowadays few scholars doubt that girls were regularly exposed in Athens.8 The need to furnish a dowry at, or even before, puberty, and the general devaluation of women, were probably among the reasons why a father might choose not to raise a daughter. Was Sparta the antithesis of Athens? Did Sparta expose all boys who did not appear to have the potential for becoming excellent soldiers, but raise all girls â except, one would suspect, those with obvious and debilitating physical abnormalities?9
<We may deduce from Plutarchâs description that at birth girls were simply handed over to the women. This conclusion is ex silentio; on the other hand, it can be argued that Plutarch was unusually scrupulous among Greek authors in remembering to mention women where it was appropriate. It seems that girls were not subjected to official scrutiny as were Spartan boys, nor, apparently, did fathers make a determination about rearing or exposing them, as they did in Athens. The women would test the babies for epilepsy or sickliness by seeing if a bath in undiluted wine would throw them into convulsions. Plutarch does not state whether the immersion ordeal was part of the official evaluation process, nor does he indicate the fate of the infants, presumably both male and female, who failed the wine-immersion test. He does not tell us whether the women took any action in the case of infants who had failed the test, but if they did not, then what was the point? If the decision to expose apparent weaklings was up to the women, they would have exercised a power usually reserved for men in the Greco-Roman world.
<There probably was change over time, with private citizens taking upon themselves the right to judge the male infantâs viability that had previously been a monopoly of the community.10 Such changes were correlated with the right to dower and to alienate and bequeath property. The individual fatherâs decision may have followed the verdict of the tribal elders, or the former supplanted the latter totally.At any rate, there is no indication of systematic female infanticide or neglect of girls at Sparta, nor is there any indirect evidence, such as skewed sex ratios. It seems likely that because in Sparta there was no money and women could own land, they could more easily be given a dowry.11 At Athens, where women could not own land, a father would have to furnish cash or movables, and this obligation might well be a deterrent to rearing girls.
<Eugenic principles, such as existed in that era, underlie much of Spartan demographic engineering. The Spartans were celebrated for breeding fine hounds and racehorses, so it is not surprising to see them transfer these notions to human beings. By eliminating weak male infants, they tried to give natural evolution a boost, and through the subsequent rigorous training of boys, they assured the survival of the fittest and future reproduction by them. A mistake might be made, and a man might prove to be a coward. Such tremblers were most likely to be younger men facing their first real conflict, rather than hardened veterans. Anecdotes about Spartan mothers show that they are concerned lest their sons prove to be cowards (see chap.). In any case, cowards did not reproduce, for they were socially ostracized, and neither they nor their sisters (presumably young and not married) could find spouses (Xen. Lac. Pol. ï¹.ïµ). Eugenic motivations may also be detected in the choices made in wife-sharing or husband-doubling arrangements (see below). Plutarch (Lyc. ï±ïµ.ï·) agrees with Xenophon that a man could ask a husband if he might plant his seed in a wife who had already produced children, but he also attributes the initiative to the husband. For example an elderly man with a young wife might offer her a handsome, noble young man, and then adopt the children born of this union (Plut. Lyc. ï±ïµ.ï±ï²). Daniel Ogden has speculated that Spartans believed that in the process of wife-lending, male sperm could mingle and produce offspring who were thought to have descended from two male parents. 12 Though the male contribution to the embryo was usually thought to dominate, it is also necessary to pay sufficient attention to the female contribution. The rejection of cowardsâ sisters and of some wives in favor of married women who were euteknos (âblessed with good childrenâ) and gennaia (âwell bornâ) reveals a belief that the mother was more than merely a fertile field for the fatherâs seed, and that each woman continued to make her own particular contribution to the offspring. Indeed, in Plutarchâs Sayings of Spartan Women (e.g., ï²ï´ï°e, ï²ï´ï±d), the mothers take all the credit for the way their sons turn out. Of course this is an exaggeration that results from the authorâs effort to prove that Sparta was very different in this respect from other Greek cities where mothers had little to do with the rearing of sons after the age of seven. Xenophon (Lac. Pol. ï¶.ï²) reports that at Sparta fathers were involved in their childrenâs upbringing. Nevertheless, Plutarchâs view on the strong influence of mothers is corroborated by other sources (see chap. ï³).
Eugenics-kun, your opinion?
R: 6 / I: 0
First is an economic argument - the obvious preferred solution should be the corresponding increase in productivity to outset the declining population, and not more surplus extraction out of the subset of the population to stimulate higher birth rates.
Second is a moral argument stemming out of the concept of "justice" - people should not be punished for what they have no control over. To hold that men control the means of reproduction and can voluntary decide when to have kids and when not to is to be ignorant of the evidence to the contrary.
Cockshott brings an example of the Soviet Union right after WW2 when the similar policy was implemented. But he fails to understand the specific conditions at the time - a massive disbalance of the male and female populations and a large number of single mothers. To implement the same policy in the conditions of gender balance is unjustifiable - you don't tax paralyzed cripples for not contributing to the reproduction of labor either, do you? Well, some men are the same even if they can walk.
So if you're still gonna tackle the problem of a declining population with more taxes, then the tax should be levied on the general population as do all other taxes that go to the societal needs, or even a higher income section of the population according to the principle of progressive taxation.
Cockshott and the sexual selection in technological human populations
In one of his vids Cockshott proposed a tax on childless males because they don't contribute to the reproduction of the labor power of society. There is much wrong with this proposition.First is an economic argument - the obvious preferred solution should be the corresponding increase in productivity to outset the declining population, and not more surplus extraction out of the subset of the population to stimulate higher birth rates.
Second is a moral argument stemming out of the concept of "justice" - people should not be punished for what they have no control over. To hold that men control the means of reproduction and can voluntary decide when to have kids and when not to is to be ignorant of the evidence to the contrary.
Cockshott brings an example of the Soviet Union right after WW2 when the similar policy was implemented. But he fails to understand the specific conditions at the time - a massive disbalance of the male and female populations and a large number of single mothers. To implement the same policy in the conditions of gender balance is unjustifiable - you don't tax paralyzed cripples for not contributing to the reproduction of labor either, do you? Well, some men are the same even if they can walk.
So if you're still gonna tackle the problem of a declining population with more taxes, then the tax should be levied on the general population as do all other taxes that go to the societal needs, or even a higher income section of the population according to the principle of progressive taxation.
R: 3 / I: 1
In an unsurprising turn of events, affording women unlimited rights while demanding 0 responsibility (i.e., catering to their demands) hasn't made them happier or improved their well being
Political implications?
In an unsurprising turn of events, affording women unlimited rights while demanding 0 responsibility (i.e., catering to their demands) hasn't made them happier or improved their well being
Political implications?
R: 7 / I: 0
It's that day again
Whatcha doing this val's?
R: 5 / I: 1
Valentine's Day Reading:
>The 16 commandments of poon
https://theredarchive.com/blog/Heartiste/the-sixteen-commandments-of-poon.11857
Valentine's Day Reading:
>The 16 commandments of poon
https://theredarchive.com/blog/Heartiste/the-sixteen-commandments-of-poon.11857
R: 3 / I: 1
>bare minimum requirements to have a gf in 2022
>bare minimum requirements to have a gf in 2022
R: 7 / I: 0
I know so many men who have had their life ruined by false rape accusations. People believe them out of the gate with out any real reason to, either.
Just because bitch…women, decide one day they regret they sex they ADMITTEDLY agreed too doesn't make what they did rape and frankly the women coming out right now come off as people who want nothing more than to chase clout off this mans success.
So why, though, like, are women really this fickle? It's fucked up. What is to be done?
Why do they do it /r9k/?
Why do women lie about this shit?I know so many men who have had their life ruined by false rape accusations. People believe them out of the gate with out any real reason to, either.
Just because bitch…women, decide one day they regret they sex they ADMITTEDLY agreed too doesn't make what they did rape and frankly the women coming out right now come off as people who want nothing more than to chase clout off this mans success.
So why, though, like, are women really this fickle? It's fucked up. What is to be done?
R: 22 / I: 0
What are the political implications of the black and red pill hitting the mainstream?
Andrew Tate is was the most googled name in 2022
>Andrew Tate, a notorious red pill speaker, was brought onto Pierce Morgan's show to discuss his exploding popularity as the number one person searched for in Google this year.What are the political implications of the black and red pill hitting the mainstream?
R: 23 / I: 7
>Do the masses reject Marxism and leftism because we aren't chad?
We can know that women don't really want to fuck anyone but chad, but sometimes they'll settle. Is it like that with the masses as well. For example, the won't put they're neck on the line to organize and fight for revolution unless there is a chad leader (think Mao or Fidel)?
>Do the masses reject Marxism and leftism because we aren't chad?
We can know that women don't really want to fuck anyone but chad, but sometimes they'll settle. Is it like that with the masses as well. For example, the won't put they're neck on the line to organize and fight for revolution unless there is a chad leader (think Mao or Fidel)?
R: 1 / I: 0
>Roasties fend for Chad's seed so bad they're literally resurrecting it from the dead.
It's over.
>Roasties fend for Chad's seed so bad they're literally resurrecting it from the dead.
It's over.
R: 14 / I: 1
One prominent bimbo tiktoker describes the bimbo lifestyle as an "ego death". Where women stop trying to foster masculine traits in themselves and instead cultivate their natural vulnerability, gentleness, and hunger for the sexual desire of men. Bimbos claim these innate traits of most straight women have wrongly been maligned by feminist as naivete, weakness, and subjugation by the patriarchy.
I think women gravitating to the antithesis of feminism is primarily due to the deteriorating economy, having a committed husband or boyfriend is quickly becoming a necessity as it has been throughout most of captialism. And bimbos encapsulate in a extreme manner, the things women have always known men want. I think there's also other converging trends at work.
Millennial women are now hitting middle age in earnest, and zoomer generations are seeing the poisoned harvest of feminism. Many millennial women are alone and miserable as either single mothers, divorcees, or spinsters that were never wed and face a future devoid of companionship.
Women have also gotten to experience capitalist alienation first hand for 60 years and are realizing that as much as a eunuch a housewife can be, it's still far better than being a prole. Zoomer women are realizing what men have always known, that only a small percentage of workers ever find a fulfilling career, everyone else just works to make money until they die.
I think this bimbo trend is the beginning of a wider revolt among zoomer women against feminism. Feminism can no longer hide its failures, and zoomer women cannot be spooked by horror stories of past female oppression like not being able to open checking accounts, since they have no living memory of it. And even if rights like abortion are taken away, modern technology, like the nearly dozen birth control methods that are available now, will mitigate much of the harm and keep zoomer women from reradicalizing. What do you guys think?
Bimboification and Divine Feminism
Is the bottom finally starting to fall out from 3rd and 4th wave feminism? Right now bimbos are trending on tik tok and the fully embracing the male gaze growing popular among zoomer women. Along with divine feminism, which is almost an anti-feminism ideology that encourages women to become stay-at-home moms and obedient housewives if they wish to, and assuages their fears about it being demeaning to themselves and women as 3rd and 4th wave feminists are so keen on proselytizing.One prominent bimbo tiktoker describes the bimbo lifestyle as an "ego death". Where women stop trying to foster masculine traits in themselves and instead cultivate their natural vulnerability, gentleness, and hunger for the sexual desire of men. Bimbos claim these innate traits of most straight women have wrongly been maligned by feminist as naivete, weakness, and subjugation by the patriarchy.
I think women gravitating to the antithesis of feminism is primarily due to the deteriorating economy, having a committed husband or boyfriend is quickly becoming a necessity as it has been throughout most of captialism. And bimbos encapsulate in a extreme manner, the things women have always known men want. I think there's also other converging trends at work.
Millennial women are now hitting middle age in earnest, and zoomer generations are seeing the poisoned harvest of feminism. Many millennial women are alone and miserable as either single mothers, divorcees, or spinsters that were never wed and face a future devoid of companionship.
Women have also gotten to experience capitalist alienation first hand for 60 years and are realizing that as much as a eunuch a housewife can be, it's still far better than being a prole. Zoomer women are realizing what men have always known, that only a small percentage of workers ever find a fulfilling career, everyone else just works to make money until they die.
I think this bimbo trend is the beginning of a wider revolt among zoomer women against feminism. Feminism can no longer hide its failures, and zoomer women cannot be spooked by horror stories of past female oppression like not being able to open checking accounts, since they have no living memory of it. And even if rights like abortion are taken away, modern technology, like the nearly dozen birth control methods that are available now, will mitigate much of the harm and keep zoomer women from reradicalizing. What do you guys think?
R: 4 / I: 0
A popular british soap opera has recently introduced an incel storyline and it's the funniest shit I have seen in a while.
Is this seriously what normies think incels and the 'community' are like lmao
A popular british soap opera has recently introduced an incel storyline and it's the funniest shit I have seen in a while.
Is this seriously what normies think incels and the 'community' are like lmao
R: 71 / I: 6
Here's what I mean. Banging a few chicks isn't very impressive. It's a rather low bar. But what does that say about a guy who can't even do that? It means they are a low quality man.
It's like being able to do one pull up. It's not very impressive. But if you can't do that, it means you are weak and have neglected to train your body.
A lot of incels run their mouths, thinking that they're offering insightful knowledge.
<You're not.
Listening to an incel talk about women is like listening to a homeless person talk about financial planning, or listening to a guy who can't do a pull up talk about fitness. In short, you have absolutely no clue what you're talking about, but have convinced yourself you do as some ghey coping mechanism.
Obviously, there is a grain of truth to incel screeds, in a hermetic philosophical sense. The problem is, it's the most disempowering truth available, framed in the worst way possible.
'Girls don't fuck average guys,' you say.
Ok, don't be average. Find a way to leverage aspects yourself to rise above your own stale faggotry. It's not that hard. And if it is too hard for you, then I guess you get exactly what you deserve considering you claim to know the consequences of being average.
>In short, anyone with the attitude and mindset of an incel would fail with women.
Here's two pieces of advice, beyond the obvious (be clean, fit, and most importantly, fun).
>First: girls already have a pussy. The last thing they want or need is another pussy - you.
This has practical applications. When you're with a chick, for example, try to do the most ballsy thing you think you can get away with.
>Second, it's far far easier to attract multiple women than it is to attract just one woman and one woman only. Pre-selection is real. Women like who other women like. You can easily use this to your advantage.
If you can't figure this shit out, you're the only one to blame. People have tried to help you, but you've rejected such advice to feed the short term ego rush of feeling right. In reality, you're the Dalit of the dating market. And you deserve to be treated as such due to your own proven insufficiency. Actually you're worse than a Dalit. They were born with that status. You developed it.
Enough with the incel shit
Incels don't deserve rights.Here's what I mean. Banging a few chicks isn't very impressive. It's a rather low bar. But what does that say about a guy who can't even do that? It means they are a low quality man.
It's like being able to do one pull up. It's not very impressive. But if you can't do that, it means you are weak and have neglected to train your body.
A lot of incels run their mouths, thinking that they're offering insightful knowledge.
<You're not.
Listening to an incel talk about women is like listening to a homeless person talk about financial planning, or listening to a guy who can't do a pull up talk about fitness. In short, you have absolutely no clue what you're talking about, but have convinced yourself you do as some ghey coping mechanism.
Obviously, there is a grain of truth to incel screeds, in a hermetic philosophical sense. The problem is, it's the most disempowering truth available, framed in the worst way possible.
'Girls don't fuck average guys,' you say.
Ok, don't be average. Find a way to leverage aspects yourself to rise above your own stale faggotry. It's not that hard. And if it is too hard for you, then I guess you get exactly what you deserve considering you claim to know the consequences of being average.
>In short, anyone with the attitude and mindset of an incel would fail with women.
Here's two pieces of advice, beyond the obvious (be clean, fit, and most importantly, fun).
>First: girls already have a pussy. The last thing they want or need is another pussy - you.
This has practical applications. When you're with a chick, for example, try to do the most ballsy thing you think you can get away with.
>Second, it's far far easier to attract multiple women than it is to attract just one woman and one woman only. Pre-selection is real. Women like who other women like. You can easily use this to your advantage.
If you can't figure this shit out, you're the only one to blame. People have tried to help you, but you've rejected such advice to feed the short term ego rush of feeling right. In reality, you're the Dalit of the dating market. And you deserve to be treated as such due to your own proven insufficiency. Actually you're worse than a Dalit. They were born with that status. You developed it.
R: 13 / I: 5
Fuck rosties.
That is all.
Fuck rosties.
That is all.
R: 48 / I: 8
I think we need some female tripfags to orbit
4chan /r9k/ is full of them, why don't we have any?
R: 187 / I: 25
-Girls would ooh and ahh when I walked past, some pinched me trying to get my attention
-girls would 'sneakily' follow me everywhere and try to catch a glimpse of me
-one girl would pretend to use a makeup mirror to spy on me
-Girls would approach me and try to start conversations even though I was an introvert and had nothing to say
-Neighbor used to invite me out to hang out with her and would rub my hair
-girls would giggle around me in class and try to rub my hair
-Female hs teachers gave me better grades and tried to hangout with me after class
-girls would openly compliment me call me sexy in class etc
-if I went to my friends house his sister would try flirting with me, laugh at my jokes even if I made none, always try to hover around me
All that shit is gone now, women now will just ignore me/act like I dont exist at parties. Will not bother talking to me or taking any interest, never find my jokes funny or compliment me etc.
The cold reality is if you're not a chad women dont really have any reason to give a fuck about you and you will always be friendzoned at best. They don't really give a shit about your personality, it's all a halo effect from your attractiveness. No amount of hairstyles, confidence, style etc will change anything unless your face is attractive. And if you do somehow score a gf, she will hop branches, never have true sexual attraction towards you, sex will be lame etc. There is no 'type,' only a singular hot chad and if you were in the 5% you would.
People will always be a slave to their biology, anything else is cope.
Uglycels are worthless in society
Reminder if you are not a chad women will not take any interest in anything you say or do, no matter how remarkable it is. How do I know? I used to be 'the hot kid' for a year or two in my teens and became average after I grew older. Though I never scored with a chick because I was an autist, here's the kind of shit that used to happen.-Girls would ooh and ahh when I walked past, some pinched me trying to get my attention
-girls would 'sneakily' follow me everywhere and try to catch a glimpse of me
-one girl would pretend to use a makeup mirror to spy on me
-Girls would approach me and try to start conversations even though I was an introvert and had nothing to say
-Neighbor used to invite me out to hang out with her and would rub my hair
-girls would giggle around me in class and try to rub my hair
-Female hs teachers gave me better grades and tried to hangout with me after class
-girls would openly compliment me call me sexy in class etc
-if I went to my friends house his sister would try flirting with me, laugh at my jokes even if I made none, always try to hover around me
All that shit is gone now, women now will just ignore me/act like I dont exist at parties. Will not bother talking to me or taking any interest, never find my jokes funny or compliment me etc.
The cold reality is if you're not a chad women dont really have any reason to give a fuck about you and you will always be friendzoned at best. They don't really give a shit about your personality, it's all a halo effect from your attractiveness. No amount of hairstyles, confidence, style etc will change anything unless your face is attractive. And if you do somehow score a gf, she will hop branches, never have true sexual attraction towards you, sex will be lame etc. There is no 'type,' only a singular hot chad and if you were in the 5% you would.
People will always be a slave to their biology, anything else is cope.
R: 24 / I: 4
Whatcha' watchin'
Whatcha' playin'
It's Friday Night Boyos.
Whatcha' eatin'Whatcha' watchin'
Whatcha' playin'
R: 26 / I: 6
I've noticed normies are talking about how much of an evil misogynist he is and keep giving him free publicity, hell even my sister was asking me what I think of him. Is he just another clout chasing grifter taking advantage of desperate incels or does he make some good points?
Andrew Tate
What's the deal with this guy and why am I seeing his name everywhere?I've noticed normies are talking about how much of an evil misogynist he is and keep giving him free publicity, hell even my sister was asking me what I think of him. Is he just another clout chasing grifter taking advantage of desperate incels or does he make some good points?
R: 12 / I: 5
The way I see it both sides seem to be benefitting, but at what point is one partner taking advantage of the other? Some would argue that this the next stage of economic imperialism from racially european men, as poor asian women are pressured into relationships for a chance to get a visa and a new life in the richer west. But if that's the case why does the trend continue for the richer asian diaspora living in the west? Or is the whole thing is based upon outdated racial stereotypes, which can be very damaging to the psyche of asian men (looking at you /r/aznidentity).
Or maybe white men and asian women just made for each other, and it's all harmless.
Discuss.
Mutual racial fetishization (aka WMAF)
What do you think leftychan, is it based or cringe?The way I see it both sides seem to be benefitting, but at what point is one partner taking advantage of the other? Some would argue that this the next stage of economic imperialism from racially european men, as poor asian women are pressured into relationships for a chance to get a visa and a new life in the richer west. But if that's the case why does the trend continue for the richer asian diaspora living in the west? Or is the whole thing is based upon outdated racial stereotypes, which can be very damaging to the psyche of asian men (looking at you /r/aznidentity).
Or maybe white men and asian women just made for each other, and it's all harmless.
Discuss.
R: 3 / I: 2
Wtf bros women have feelings too, why has nobody told me this?
Wtf bros women have feelings too, why has nobody told me this?
R: 11 / I: 4
Namely that women and love are commodities that must be purchased on the open market for its correct price evaluation. Human interaction under capitalism is reduced to a market relationship and the idea of a monogamous relationship between a man and a woman play into the exploitative nature of capitalism ideally as well as the need for people, namely men, not to feel lonely is an easy target for control by the capitalist system.
We need to change our conception of romance and of love. Love shouldn't be some magical fetishized ideal to be obtained on the market. Love is an objective and active force moving through us. Love should be appreciated for what it is and was. I feel like a lot of us could benefit from this reexamination.
Our concept of romance is fucked up
Our concept of romance revolves around the monogamous ownership of another individual. This conception of Monogamy os seated in the same ideological framework of The capitalist system at large.Namely that women and love are commodities that must be purchased on the open market for its correct price evaluation. Human interaction under capitalism is reduced to a market relationship and the idea of a monogamous relationship between a man and a woman play into the exploitative nature of capitalism ideally as well as the need for people, namely men, not to feel lonely is an easy target for control by the capitalist system.
We need to change our conception of romance and of love. Love shouldn't be some magical fetishized ideal to be obtained on the market. Love is an objective and active force moving through us. Love should be appreciated for what it is and was. I feel like a lot of us could benefit from this reexamination.
R: 4 / I: 0
jesus
jesus
R: 29 / I: 3
reminder that if your penis isn't 6 inches (15 cm) long at the absolute least you're a waste of meat in the eyes of a woman. don't even bother
reminder that if your penis isn't 6 inches (15 cm) long at the absolute least you're a waste of meat in the eyes of a woman. don't even bother
R: 10 / I: 0
>bodycount of 40 at 18 yo
Do zoomer women really?
>bodycount of 40 at 18 yo
Do zoomer women really?
R: 4 / I: 1
kek
kek
R: 9 / I: 0
What happened to 9chan /leftcel/?
Is it kill for good or just temporarily?
R: 9 / I: 0
Research highlights experiences of general and mental ill-health in sexual and ethnic minority individuals
>LGBTQ+ individuals continue to experience high rates of general- and mental ill-health, and report greater rates of adverse health-related behaviours.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220903234830/https://www.kcl.ac.uk/news/research-highlights-experiences-of-general-and-mental-ill-health-in-sexual-and-ethnic-minority-individuals
This was obvious to anyone that's had to deal with LGBTQ people that don't have any social capital.
Research highlights experiences of general and mental ill-health in sexual and ethnic minority individuals
>LGBTQ+ individuals continue to experience high rates of general- and mental ill-health, and report greater rates of adverse health-related behaviours.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220903234830/https://www.kcl.ac.uk/news/research-highlights-experiences-of-general-and-mental-ill-health-in-sexual-and-ethnic-minority-individuals
This was obvious to anyone that's had to deal with LGBTQ people that don't have any social capital.
R: 2 / I: 0
uhhh, medbros?
uhhh, medbros?
R: 12 / I: 3
Have we just witnessed the first act of militant leftcelism?
Have we just witnessed the first act of militant leftcelism?
R: 2 / I: 0
Even travelmaxing is compromised now fuck this
Even travelmaxing is compromised now fuck this
R: 19 / I: 1
During these 50 years feminists were far more interested in chasing idealists ghosts like male gaze which lead to cultural wars over pornography, prostitution, and even silly things like bikini clad female characters in videogames.
More destructive was their successful passage of female supremacist laws that made men guilty until proven innocent of any sexual assault allegations with cancel culture or of domestic violence accusations because of the Duluth model. Made men personal debt serfs to their children's mother via brutal child support laws. They also tirelessly attacked their masculinity and very being with the weaponization of the LGBT rights movement which frames all men and masculinity as wrong and harmful to women and society and upholds androgyny and male homosexuality as the only "safe" way a male can be a sexual being. And finally made males forfeit half their property and future with no-fault-divorce even, as the name implies, when they've done nothing wrong.
This has gone on to completely destroy gender relations as evidenced by the consistently declining marriage rate, the growing number of sexless men and the explosion of incels in the west.
Which has alienated men from women and their struggles, which is why the groundswell against the end of Roe v Wade has been about as impactful as a wet fart. Men do not care about women, and in fact cannot care about women because feminism has made doing so be to their own determent.
With abortion being banned, there is literally no point in feminism. It is an ideology with nothing to offer materially, and is little different than a religion or Marvel Movie fandom, and this all due to feminists hatred of men.
Feminism now shuffles off into the dustbin of history, whatever ideology replaces it will have to offer liberation for BOTH genders because it will generations before people forget about the damage a female only gender movement caused.
Roe No More and Feminism's Demise
Feminism has failed to defend one of it's core tenants, the right to abortions. This shows what leftcels and some non-spooked Marxists have always said about feminism, that it is the ideology of the bourgeois. Feminists had 50 years since the Roe vs Wade ruling to codify the right to abortions into law but were unwilling to pay the political price for such self-assertion and passed on the burden to future feminists year after year until we come to now, where Republicans are now on the cusp of passing an official federal abortion ban with the "heartbeat bill".During these 50 years feminists were far more interested in chasing idealists ghosts like male gaze which lead to cultural wars over pornography, prostitution, and even silly things like bikini clad female characters in videogames.
More destructive was their successful passage of female supremacist laws that made men guilty until proven innocent of any sexual assault allegations with cancel culture or of domestic violence accusations because of the Duluth model. Made men personal debt serfs to their children's mother via brutal child support laws. They also tirelessly attacked their masculinity and very being with the weaponization of the LGBT rights movement which frames all men and masculinity as wrong and harmful to women and society and upholds androgyny and male homosexuality as the only "safe" way a male can be a sexual being. And finally made males forfeit half their property and future with no-fault-divorce even, as the name implies, when they've done nothing wrong.
This has gone on to completely destroy gender relations as evidenced by the consistently declining marriage rate, the growing number of sexless men and the explosion of incels in the west.
Which has alienated men from women and their struggles, which is why the groundswell against the end of Roe v Wade has been about as impactful as a wet fart. Men do not care about women, and in fact cannot care about women because feminism has made doing so be to their own determent.
With abortion being banned, there is literally no point in feminism. It is an ideology with nothing to offer materially, and is little different than a religion or Marvel Movie fandom, and this all due to feminists hatred of men.
Feminism now shuffles off into the dustbin of history, whatever ideology replaces it will have to offer liberation for BOTH genders because it will generations before people forget about the damage a female only gender movement caused.
R: 3 / I: 0
While on her way to push biden left by voting to send heavy artillery to Nazi paramilitaries in Ukraine, our socilaist qveen was ambushed with a barrage of hate speech by an assumed white supremacist incel. Just when the savior of the american left was finally recovering from the trauma of being involved in the january 6th riots (she watched them on TV) another case of entitled white male anti-establishment protest struck.
When will brocialists and class-reductionist chuds finally take the oppression faced by our female elected officials seriously?
AOC #bootygate
I regret to inform you all that our favorite Israel supporting social-fascist has become the victim of a prolonged misogynistic verbal attack right outside the center of US democracy.While on her way to push biden left by voting to send heavy artillery to Nazi paramilitaries in Ukraine, our socilaist qveen was ambushed with a barrage of hate speech by an assumed white supremacist incel. Just when the savior of the american left was finally recovering from the trauma of being involved in the january 6th riots (she watched them on TV) another case of entitled white male anti-establishment protest struck.
When will brocialists and class-reductionist chuds finally take the oppression faced by our female elected officials seriously?
R: 9 / I: 2
That women have a SMV (Sexual Market Value) that declines as they age and or have children, that there are winners and losers in this market (Chads and Betas) and the 80/20 rule, 80% of women are going after the top 20% of men.
I've been seeing more mainstream incel sympathizing, or manosphere channels popping up on YouTube. Which is interesting because around 2014-2015 YouTube waged a fatwa on such content and killed all the traffic and success that early Manosphere content creators were enjoying at the time like Sandman who had something like 100k+ subscribers before the YouTube incel purge.
And you can't ignore that this woman is really attractive, which makes it a lot harder to dismiss her critique as sour grapes. Regardless, such an attractive women publicly espousing Red Pill/Incel ideology would have been unheard of even a few years ago, and now there's an entire echo system .
To be fair to King, she would say that her views of women are informed by her religion, and not incels.
Have you all seen more incel sympathizing median in the mainstream or near mainstream.
I think incels and men's grievance with feminism over all are becoming to big to ignore and are beginning to reach critical mass.
Here's a link to her channel, it's quite well established.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRZAEjMsDpiuVWQk8-OIf9A
Return of the Mansophere
This is Melanie King, a Youtuber that gives dating advice to women. While not obstinately red pilled, her critiques of modern women closely follow those of incel ideology.That women have a SMV (Sexual Market Value) that declines as they age and or have children, that there are winners and losers in this market (Chads and Betas) and the 80/20 rule, 80% of women are going after the top 20% of men.
I've been seeing more mainstream incel sympathizing, or manosphere channels popping up on YouTube. Which is interesting because around 2014-2015 YouTube waged a fatwa on such content and killed all the traffic and success that early Manosphere content creators were enjoying at the time like Sandman who had something like 100k+ subscribers before the YouTube incel purge.
And you can't ignore that this woman is really attractive, which makes it a lot harder to dismiss her critique as sour grapes. Regardless, such an attractive women publicly espousing Red Pill/Incel ideology would have been unheard of even a few years ago, and now there's an entire echo system .
To be fair to King, she would say that her views of women are informed by her religion, and not incels.
Have you all seen more incel sympathizing median in the mainstream or near mainstream.
I think incels and men's grievance with feminism over all are becoming to big to ignore and are beginning to reach critical mass.
Here's a link to her channel, it's quite well established.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRZAEjMsDpiuVWQk8-OIf9A
R: 12 / I: 2
Psychopathic personality traits in adolescents are associated with delinquency and delinquency can contribute to future dating success for boys, according to new research
https://www.psypost.org/2022/04/secondary-psychopathy-in-high-school-boys-positively-predicts-future-dating-involvement-study-finds-62988
Psychopathic personality traits in adolescents are associated with delinquency and delinquency can contribute to future dating success for boys, according to new research
https://www.psypost.org/2022/04/secondary-psychopathy-in-high-school-boys-positively-predicts-future-dating-involvement-study-finds-62988
R: 35 / I: 7
Supreme Court has voted to overturn abortion rights, draft opinion shows
https://web.archive.org/web/20220508014151/https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02/supreme-court-abortion-draft-opinion-00029473
ROASTIES BTFO’d
Supreme Court has voted to overturn abortion rights, draft opinion shows
https://web.archive.org/web/20220508014151/https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02/supreme-court-abortion-draft-opinion-00029473
ROASTIES BTFO’d
R: 0 / I: 0
Y'all better not be doing this.
Y'all better not be doing this.
R: 22 / I: 6
>The buffalo shooter was a /pol/tard and an incel.
Thoughts? /pol/ is freaking out about getting shut down now. I….can’t see this happening because 4chan is too big, maybe just /pol/ will be deleted?
>The buffalo shooter was a /pol/tard and an incel.
Thoughts? /pol/ is freaking out about getting shut down now. I….can’t see this happening because 4chan is too big, maybe just /pol/ will be deleted?
R: 15 / I: 3
Interesting video on people falling in love with Replika, an A.I. girlfriend. I think this will be the future for many incels, and many near-cels i.e. men that occasionally get sex and affirmations from the opposite sex.
It really seems like it's ready for prime time now. Where someone can and has convincingly fallen in love with a computer program.
It's going to be funny to see the simp market crash and all these thots suddenly with not betas to fall back on when Chad inevitably dumps them when they hit the wall.
https://odysee.com/@Coldfusion:f/a.i.-companions-for-a-lonely-society:2
Interesting video on people falling in love with Replika, an A.I. girlfriend. I think this will be the future for many incels, and many near-cels i.e. men that occasionally get sex and affirmations from the opposite sex.
It really seems like it's ready for prime time now. Where someone can and has convincingly fallen in love with a computer program.
It's going to be funny to see the simp market crash and all these thots suddenly with not betas to fall back on when Chad inevitably dumps them when they hit the wall.
https://odysee.com/@Coldfusion:f/a.i.-companions-for-a-lonely-society:2
R: 4 / I: 0
How South Korea’s Yoon Suk-yeol Capitalized on Anti-Feminist Backlash to Win the Presidency
https://web.archive.org/web/20220323190835/https://time.com/6156537/south-korea-president-yoon-suk-yeol-sexism/
The fire rises.
How South Korea’s Yoon Suk-yeol Capitalized on Anti-Feminist Backlash to Win the Presidency
https://web.archive.org/web/20220323190835/https://time.com/6156537/south-korea-president-yoon-suk-yeol-sexism/
The fire rises.
R: 6 / I: 2
Leftychan /r9k/ should now be here to stay permanently, and hopefully we can get it back to how it was on the /777/ board. I've missed you guys.
We're back
After the failure of the first vote for the creation of an /r9k/ board back in January, the second vote (after the 2 month cool down period) has passed.Leftychan /r9k/ should now be here to stay permanently, and hopefully we can get it back to how it was on the /777/ board. I've missed you guys.