[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ent / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix

Pleroma

Mumble

Discord



File: 1655854016805.jpg (119.76 KB, 1280x720, bimbotiktok.jpg)

 No.240

Is the bottom finally starting to fall out from 3rd and 4th wave feminism? Right now bimbos are trending on tik tok and the fully embracing the male gaze growing popular among zoomer women. Along with divine feminism, which is almost an anti-feminism ideology that encourages women to become stay-at-home moms and obedient housewives if they wish to, and assuages their fears about it being demeaning to themselves and women as 3rd and 4th wave feminists are so keen on proselytizing.

One prominent bimbo tiktoker describes the bimbo lifestyle as an "ego death". Where women stop trying to foster masculine traits in themselves and instead cultivate their natural vulnerability, gentleness, and hunger for the sexual desire of men. Bimbos claim these innate traits of most straight women have wrongly been maligned by feminist as naivete, weakness, and subjugation by the patriarchy.

I think women gravitating to the antithesis of feminism is primarily due to the deteriorating economy, having a committed husband or boyfriend is quickly becoming a necessity as it has been throughout most of captialism. And bimbos encapsulate in a extreme manner, the things women have always known men want. I think there's also other converging trends at work.

Millennial women are now hitting middle age in earnest, and zoomer generations are seeing the poisoned harvest of feminism. Many millennial women are alone and miserable as either single mothers, divorcees, or spinsters that were never wed and face a future devoid of companionship.

Women have also gotten to experience capitalist alienation first hand for 60 years and are realizing that as much as a eunuch a housewife can be, it's still far better than being a prole. Zoomer women are realizing what men have always known, that only a small percentage of workers ever find a fulfilling career, everyone else just works to make money until they die.

I think this bimbo trend is the beginning of a wider revolt among zoomer women against feminism. Feminism can no longer hide its failures, and zoomer women cannot be spooked by horror stories of past female oppression like not being able to open checking accounts, since they have no living memory of it. And even if rights like abortion are taken away, modern technology, like the nearly dozen birth control methods that are available now, will mitigate much of the harm and keep zoomer women from reradicalizing. What do you guys think?
>>

 No.241

>>240
*and fully embracing the male gaze is growing popular among zoomer women.
>>

 No.242

>>240
This feels like a pretty bad attempt at ideological subversion
capitalism won't give you a girl-friend or a wife. Capitalism worsens the material conditions and that makes it harder for people to pursue romance or start a family.

Also please don't use social media to find out about sociological trends, these things use algorithms to show you tailored content to make you engage more with the platform, it's not representative of society.
>>

 No.243

>>242
People didn't have issues finding partners under capitalism until as late as the 1990's. And this bimbo trend is being reported in places like "The Rolling Stone" and Buzzfeed so it's not just a case of an algorithm showing me what I want to see.

It's just hard to accept how much social media, which was a big proponent of femibism, has warped society. The current pro LGBT androgynous milieu goes so much against how people naturally are it could only held up by expolisive economic growth. Now that social media and the economy in general are in decline you're starting to see the booj's 2010's social engineering project crumble.
>>

 No.244

>>242
>Also please don't use social media to find out about sociological trends, these things use algorithms to show you tailored content to make you engage more with the platform, it's not representative of society.
Social media is very much representative of youth culture, like who do you think is making apps like TikTok the most used apps of all time.
>>

 No.245

in short they're coping hard, women are fascist, they will be completely subservient to the status quo as long as they can keep their womb safe short-term which is what their whole existence boils down to

dicks are the wheel of history
>>

 No.246

>>243
>People didn't have issues finding partners under capitalism until as late as the 1990's
That is only half true. During the period of social democracy capitalism was indeed less harmful to human beings and interfered less with social life. But the way it is today is basically just capitalism returning to the mean. The socdem period was the exception. The hundreds of years of capitalism prior to that, were more similar to today than you might think.

The rest of your post is difficult for me to understand. I don't really understand what you mean with the bimbo vs androgynous dichotomy. I thought that bimbo meant using lots of product like hairspray and make up. How is it related to Sexual dimorphism ?
>>

 No.248

>>245
based
>>

 No.249

File: 1655973659674.jpg (147.53 KB, 600x850, cherry.jpg)

>>246
>That is only half true. During the period of social democracy capitalism was indeed less harmful to human beings and interfered less with social life.
Dude, people got hitched at near 100% levels back in the Victorian era. The collapse of post WWII social democracy has nothing to do with why there's more incels now.
>The hundreds of years of capitalism prior to that, were more similar to today than you might think.
NO THEY WERE NOT
>I don't really understand what you mean with the bimbo vs androgynous dichotomy. I thought that bimbo meant using lots of product like hairspray and make up. How is it related to Sexual dimorphism ?
Bimbo, at least as the subculture is now, isn't simply a woman that applies too much makeup or wears clothes that are too revealing. It's a woman that solely focuses on being sexually attractive to men, often forgoing what's fashionable and socially acceptable to other women and society at large.

Since feminism posits that men are inherently oppressive of women via patriarchy androgyny, homosexuality and erotophobia are huge themes in this ideology and have since become fixtures in the cultural zeitgeist.

Bimbos are a loud rejection of all that. From their thick dick sucking lips, blonde teased hair, thin waists and big boobs, they are among the most extreme expressions of binary gender conformity.

The aesthetic is maximizing sexual attraction (often to a comical degree) for CIS Men. The garish look is repellent to lesbians and straight women since it's has zero subtlety. It completely demystifies female sexuality and makes it as base as a males, at least to a feminist's eyes. Something men appreciate and women see as being to their determent.

Obviously it's also the real or implied promiscuity of bimbos that anger feminists as well. You see, it's not that bimbos simply having a lot of partners, most modern feminist women also have body counts that are deep into double digit territory. It's that bimbos will sleep with ANY man. Their entire demeanor is again the antithesis of a feminist's. They're passive, speak softly, and are "dumb" or at least faint it and therefore are not challenging to a male's ego. They're also flirty, and submissive as to make it easy as possible for a male andy male to know that all he has to do to get sex is to ask. A bimbo does not make a male "work for it", or expect their male partner to first meet some sort of standard before considering him for a sexual tryst.

Bimbos in the past used to be reviled because they undermined women's ability to get commitment. "Why buy the cow if the milk is free" as they say, or why would the average Joe court and plain Jane when a bimbo will give him sexual gratification now. But that was women would wed early and often would have a partner count that could fit on a single hand.

Now a days they are hated because they undermine women's monopoly on sexual gratification for men. Access to sex is the greatest tool women in the West use to control men in and outside of relationships. This is why prostitution was banned, why homosexuality is promoted, and why there's endless moral panic about pornography and sex robots from the women's liberation movement.

So as you can see, bimbos are very loaded paradigm in the puritanical feminist US. So it's very interesting that they seem to be making a comeback, and it's very very significant politically.
>>

 No.250

>>248
i'd unironically be pro-feminist if it wasn't led by women. they are the very thing that needs to be fixed and you can't expect them to act abstractly so we get in these loopholes
>>

 No.260

>>249
>Dude, people got hitched at near 100% levels back in the Victorian era.
What makes you think that ?
In the victorian era most people couldn't even afford to rent more than a single room. How could they possibly afford raising a family. Also many people died very young, before they raised a family. You may have a very distorted view of how capitalism was before social democracy. It was truly awful. Neo-liberalism is a path back to that very shitty past.

>Since feminism posits that men are inherently oppressive of women

That's just sexism. Rich Bourgeois women hating on poor working class men. It's just class hatred behind a veil. People like that are really shit, you can go after them specifically, without making it into a conflict between all men and all women. Capitalism ruins everything by changing things into bourgeois versions, that reflect bourgeois class interests. If you look at early socialist feminism, they were just trying to establish man and women as equals, there was no beating each other down. A socialist lady from the early 20th centry called Rosa Luxemburg wrote a long rant about bourgeois feminism, maybe read that.

I'm not going to comment on things i consider sexual preference, that's just a recipe for creating unnecessary conflict.
I will say that strange stuff is going on, like some people appear to be implying that sexual dimorphism is bad for some reason. Maybe we should push back on that a little, because that seems reactionary.

You also have to beware of those that turn filth into theory.
Politics is exclusively about economics, if anybody tries to make politics about sex, they are most likely class traitors that are trying to distract you with sex from their reactionary politics. I think that somebody is trying to trick you to hand over your surplus to capitalists. They are just pretending you'll get a nicer girlfriend that way, but they won't deliver, Capitalism wants to make people atomized so they can turn social relations into commodities, they want to be middlemen for intimacy.
>>

 No.1153

himbos are where it's at

Unique IPs: 7

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ent / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]