>>246>That is only half true. During the period of social democracy capitalism was indeed less harmful to human beings and interfered less with social life.Dude, people got hitched at near 100% levels back in the Victorian era. The collapse of post WWII social democracy has nothing to do with why there's more incels now.
>The hundreds of years of capitalism prior to that, were more similar to today than you might think.NO THEY WERE NOT>I don't really understand what you mean with the bimbo vs androgynous dichotomy. I thought that bimbo meant using lots of product like hairspray and make up. How is it related to Sexual dimorphism ?Bimbo, at least as the subculture is now, isn't simply a woman that applies too much makeup or wears clothes that are too revealing. It's a woman that solely focuses on being sexually attractive to men, often forgoing what's fashionable and socially acceptable to other women and society at large.
Since feminism posits that men are inherently oppressive of women via patriarchy androgyny, homosexuality and erotophobia are huge themes in this ideology and have since become fixtures in the cultural zeitgeist.
Bimbos are a loud rejection of all that. From their thick dick sucking lips, blonde teased hair, thin waists and big boobs, they are among the most extreme expressions of binary gender conformity.
The aesthetic is maximizing sexual attraction (often to a comical degree) for CIS Men. The garish look is repellent to lesbians and straight women since it's has zero subtlety. It completely demystifies female sexuality and makes it as base as a males, at least to a feminist's eyes. Something men appreciate and women see as being to their determent.
Obviously it's also the real or implied promiscuity of bimbos that anger feminists as well. You see, it's not that bimbos simply having a lot of partners, most modern feminist women also have body counts that are deep into double digit territory. It's that bimbos will sleep with ANY man. Their entire demeanor is again the antithesis of a feminist's. They're passive, speak softly, and are "dumb" or at least faint it and therefore are not challenging to a male's ego. They're also flirty, and submissive as to make it easy as possible for a male andy male to know that all he has to do to get sex is to ask. A bimbo does not make a male "work for it", or expect their male partner to first meet some sort of standard before considering him for a sexual tryst.
Bimbos in the past used to be reviled because they undermined women's ability to get commitment. "Why buy the cow if the milk is free" as they say, or why would the average Joe court and plain Jane when a bimbo will give him sexual gratification now. But that was women would wed early and often would have a partner count that could fit on a single hand.
Now a days they are hated because they undermine women's monopoly on sexual gratification for men. Access to sex is the greatest tool women in the West use to control men in and outside of relationships. This is why prostitution was banned, why homosexuality is promoted, and why there's endless moral panic about pornography and sex robots from the women's liberation movement.
So as you can see, bimbos are very loaded paradigm in the puritanical feminist US. So it's very interesting that they seem to be making a comeback, and it's very very significant politically.