>>2603>People who marry foreign nationals ate not booj
I don't know why you interpreted it that way. The bourgeoisie causes poverty on purpose, mostly for economic reasons but some of the motivation is because they want to make their riches give them an advantage in dating.
>Yeah your nonsense is just pure colonialist racism. Not every 3rd world county is a famine stricken sub Sahara collapsed state.<when nobody said nor implied that.
The chaos in Haiti was because Haiti is a pseudo colony of the US.
>Even if everything you said was true, so what. It's their decision to sacrifice some of their autonomy if they think it's worth it.
This sounds like you are talking about how people cope with living under capitalism, right ? Why would you ever grant capitalism that ideological concession ? Precarious living conditions are a form of mass violence and mass murder. There is a form of barbaric political extremism that tries to justify the existence of poverty and economic precarity.
>But of course if you just chatted with some foreign national couples you'll find that they did fall in love.
I really don't care about nationalities of couples, you're the one that's trying to bring this up. I think the only real dimension in politics and societal conflict is class struggle, everything else is just a side effect of that.
>You're really just a liberal trying to keep 3rd world women locked i n poverty.
If you think that poverty in the 3rd world can be solved via mail-order brides, instead of ending imperialism and implementing comprehensive regional industrial development, you're the one with the liberal ideology glasses.
Maybe you are misunderstanding my motives, i'm really only interested in fighting against the cultural aspect that benefits wealthy capitalists. I really don't mind if you personally have a mail-order-bride, you have my blessing on the off chance you are seeking that. Politics is structural and it's never personal.