>>4801>Haha you're clearly someone that's never been married. Marriage and children are a lot of work.Well, most people are still deluded by the prospect of marriage and childreaing as some vanity project.
When they do get married and procreate, they immediately get slammed with bills amd pediatric diagnoses and just die inside.
>And yes sexual relationships are a need not a want. Then tell the Anglo Protestant global nanny state to stop criminalising youth sexuality.
Bring in courting classes.
Mandatory sex education.
And offer tax-free hysetrectomy to adolescent schoolgirls.
>There's equal numbers of men and women so there's no material reason why everyone shouldn't have a good faith chance at romance.Youre forgetting that genotypes and phenotypes differ.
Some people are fat, thin, hairy, musky, top-heavy, bottom-heavy, tall, short, unibrow, chinless, pimpled, skintags, etc.
And people have preferences which means the equal number of men and women will become unequal.
>>4809Because you got butthurt about my suggestion that romance and sex are not owed to you inherently.
You accuse me of being "liberal chauvinist".
Youre no different from the right wing ones whom accuse me of being "neo-Marxist".