/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Femcels don't exist.

>>7078
It literally says right there that she has a kid. She's not celibate.

>>7076
It would never cease 2 amaze me how normiggers are pathologically uncapable of being in relationship with someone without routinely degenerating 2 animal behaviour. Unlimited AIDS on these petbourg ape faggots marxallah.

>Looked at my girl and cried
Moids can't help but expose their true rotten nature. Here we see a moid lamenting and revealing his want for monkey-branching to a 'higher' tier mate.

>>7622
>Hussain
Bitch you know you can't blame him. So racist of you smh ong bruh

Why are moids like this?

>moids bad
As if this board couldn't get any more sexist. Holy shit, terminally online zoom-zooms are incapable of understanding anyone who has a gender or a sexuality that's different from theirs.

>>8681
>Muh zoom zooms

Millennials cannot stop with genpol as usual. Despite creating the same terminally online culture war themselves

scientific blackpill confirming female celibates' plight, oppression, and struggle

>>9495
How?

>>9494
Why do bitches always revert to communicating in some fucking primordial cthulhoe tongue when they get a little bit sad? Did the scrot "empathy" (a chance to get their dick wet) override a need for clear exchange of information so much it could've never fucking developed or what?

>>9496
the video says science says big boobs good as opposed to smaller boobs

ill support femcels ass with my dick lmaoo

This is the unrealistic beauty standard the moidian patriarchy tries to enforce. Shameful.

>>10046
Shut the fuck up you moid straggot you probably get no hoes and that's because you're broke and ugly and annoying to be around and you got no friends and got a fat belly and pedo mustache musty smelly mom's dank basement ass crusty ass, the type to do his homework then shoot up his school ass, your views on women aren't based on data but personal rejection ass, straggot breeder but can't breed ass, the type to lose his virginity but get an STD in the process, the type to want a virgin while offering nothing in return, Rogaine Minoxidil Finasteride ass, cul-de-sac hair, horse dewormer taking ass, your shoes look like an elephant trampled it, they look like you soaked it in soup, mutant from X-Men wannabe looking ass but without no powers ass, thinks about starting a podcast but too scared to do it ass, Ronald McDonald in spirit ass, can't join the circus with no talent ass, committing bestiality with a donkey is the only time you eat ass, ass

>>10047
Gay misandrist is that you?
Just so you know your strawman does t hold water.

>>10047
I'm not reading all that but I obviously touched a nerve. Sorry but your boyish figure isn't the standard. Plenty of women have small waists and big tits, it's sad that this makes you so insecure.

>>11227
>Why men Chad doesn't see you as human.
He can't baby, not when you're the umpteenth woman throwing their panties at him.

i can't have sex because i'm scared i will get raped or abducted, will get aids. and everyone will blame ME if i go out and get raped!!!

i can be just walking/standing outside and a guy will try to coax me to have sex with him at his house. disgusting. especially scary when it happens near my house. happened a few times and i'm baffled by that boldness.

honestly it's my fault in some sence since i rejected some guys before, because i wasn't looking for anyone at that time. what a shame!

i should get buff and strong before installing tinder, so i can fight back.

also some guys with who i hooked up with are terrible sex havers or just rude. i hope i will get better luck next time. someone who sees me as a person firstly and then a hole, and is ready for relationship.

>>11228

then this brainrotted creature doesn't suit me. he can perish. i accept dignity and clarity in any relationship, let it be classic romantic or booty calls

>>11319
>>11320
women have put up with the incurable stupidity of certain men for thousands of years and vice-versa, there is nothing new here, your problems arent special or unique, if anything they are far less severe than what people in the past had to deal with
touch grass and try to build up a strong network of genuine friends of all genders and youll soon realize just how much of an retarded foid youre being
there are good people in this world and hopefully youre not too pozzed to find them the right way

>>11343
This.
I swear to God, people nowadays exaggerate dating woes too much.
A man could breathe or move his mouth the wrong way and women will feel threatened.
A woman could have a few tattoos and men act like she’s living a gutter.

People nowadays have far less sex and romance nowadays and are all awkward and afraid.

People either need to shut the fuck up or get some sex dolls.
Or better yet, indulge in fanfiction or roleplay videos.

Sex and romance are not essential for living. They’re privileges.

>>11507
lol fuck this stupid bitch. Even if I didn't inherently find teenage girls more attractive I'd still pursue them just to shit on cunts like this for exactly the reasons the guy on the bottom said. Fucking teenage girls as an unc is part of our revenge on them.

>>11507
Why are women not allowed to have and enjoy sex?

>>11540
>Why do you believe this thing you never said?
Ebin

>>11541
In the text in the picture it implies it's a negative thing for a woman to get creampied every night by a new guy. Do you even read your own posts?

>>11415
i want to push back on you a little bit, i do think that sex and romance are really really important and valuable parts of the human experience, not just on a stupid biological level (muh perpetuating the species) either
nearly every form of society tried to control/manage sex and love, i view that as a testament to how fundamentally human such things are… of course, things like violence are also very human and societies have tried to control it as well, but i dont think you can fairly equate the two
i mean, okay sure sex and love shouldnt be rights either, but i really dont want to live in a world where you have to fight like hell every day against a rigged system just to have a taste of something not only "natural" but also in many cases incredibly rewarding, and calling that a privilege gives off the impression that such a state of affairs is acceptable, which strikes me as a cruel
i want to get rid of the social, political and economic barriers to love; and yes, those things really do exist… people didnt magically become awkward moralizing prudes or hyper-judgmental jerks, we live in a society
the specific thing im taking issue with here is more with the expression of that discontent, precisely because it denies the existence of those causes
imo are incels are more aware of this, ironically though since they simultaneously obscure it with their ideology

>>11544
That's not what it implies. It says that why should men settle for a 40+ year old women now that they have the opportunity to date younger women when these same young women were unwilling to stop fucking Chad when they were young and had all the leverage.

>>11549
*these same women

>>11545
Then you should admit that criminalizing teen sexuality is hypocritical.
If you wanna go that direction.

If you think sex and romance are not “privileges” but “rights” then so should sociosexual visibility towards ugly/“used”/older women

Your rationalization of viewing sex/love as privileges being “cruel” and wanting to “abolish barriers” comes off as crabs-in-a-bucket mentality

Even if there was no state to enforce worthiness of sex and love, people will still not gravitate towards losers

In fact, incels of today are in a far better position to get laid than back then

I hate the term incel being used for “Allistic able-bodied man suffering from a a dry spell due to social laziness” rather than any actual neurodivergent/crippled man unable to find a woman.

It’s just so obnoxious.

>>11545
>i want to push back on you a little bit, i do think that sex and romance are really really important and valuable parts of the human experience, not just on a stupid biological level (muh perpetuating the species) either

That’s why people get good fashion sense, hygiene, hobbies, and careers

Sex and love are important to the human experience but only if you get good

It’s not given to asocial talentless hacks.

>i mean, okay sure sex and love shouldnt be rights either, but i really dont want to live in a world where you have to fight like hell every day against a rigged system just to have a taste of something not only "natural" but also in many cases incredibly rewarding, and calling that a privilege gives off the impression that such a state of affairs is acceptable, which strikes me as a cruel
i want to get rid of the social, political and economic barriers to love; and yes, those things really do exist… people didnt magically become awkward moralizing prudes or hyper-judgmental jerks, we live in a society

This sounds like the kind of excuses that deadbeats wanna make to get their dicks wet without having anything to reciprocate.

>>11551
>criminalizing teen sexuality
are you talking about sexuality between teens? if so then im not sure what you mean unless youre using the term criminalize as a metaphor
if youre talking about sexuality between teenagers and adults, thats a different matter
youth are human of course but they lack the capacities to fully embody the human experience until they reach adulthood, they are humans in the process of becoming
(unless you think that fetuses are exactly the same as an adult?)
we can debate just what kind of restrictions are or are not acceptable and i do believe that youth are horribly mistreated on this basis, but they still need to be treated differently than adults because they literally are different and in ways that matter
there are good reasons to not allow contracts to be binding on anyone below a certain age
>If you think sex and romance are not “privileges” but “rights”
<okay sure sex and love shouldnt be rights either
i explicitly said that it should be viewed as neither a privilege nor a right
>Even if there was no state to enforce worthiness of sex and love, people will still not gravitate towards losers
1. ive personally known plenty of losers whove been in relationships, though it usually doesnt last long or end well (often due to mental illness or poverty stressors)
2. what do you think a loser is? its a socioeconomic condition, there isnt a loser gene
>incels of today are in a far better position to get laid than back then
unless youre talking about the recent past, inceldom as a concept didnt exist "back then"
>I hate the term incel being used for “Allistic able-bodied man suffering from a a dry spell due to social laziness” rather than any actual neurodivergent/crippled man unable to find a woman.
i never implied the former
you seem to be responding to someone in your head rather than i
>>11553
>That’s why people get good fashion sense, hygiene, hobbies, and careers
you make it so sound simple
its really not
i might be unfair in saying this but this perspective reeks of privilege
>Sex and love are important to the human experience but only if you get good
there are barriers to ones ability to "get good" and even then being able to "get good" has nothing to do with the importance of it
>It’s not given to asocial talentless hacks
again, ive known plenty of "asocial talentless hacks" whove been in relationships
and i didnt say that relationships should be "given" to anyone
>This sounds like the kind of excuses that deadbeats wanna make to get their dicks wet without having anything to reciprocate.
it sounds like it but its not, so give me an argument
i think you sound like privileged elitist jerk but im still willing to give you an argument

>>11563
> lack the capacities to fully embody the human experience until they reach adulthood, they are humans in the process of becoming
(unless you think that fetuses are exactly the same as an adult?)

You’re comparing teens to fetuses;. That’s infantilizing. Also, youths are only less than full compacity due to social conditioning. Teens are biologically adults

Also “fully embody the human experience” doesn’t mean solely sex.

You’re implying that youths don’t experience suffering, compassion, angst, discrimination,etc?
Youths are not “becoming” humans they’re already humans.
You’re saying that they’re not fully people?

It’s one thing to say they’re not fully socially developed but it’s another to say they’re not fully people.


That’s dehumanizing

By your logic, elderly people don’t fully embody the human experience.
Neither do the disabled or comatose.

>1. ive personally known plenty of losers whove been in relationships, though it usually doesnt last long or end well (often due to mental illness or poverty stressors)
2. what do you think a loser is? its a socioeconomic condition, there isnt a loser gene

Loserdom isn’t solely genetics. I’m talking about people who have nothing of value to offer in homesteading, recreational, or industrial skills

A lot of those losers you mentioned were lucky enough to meet other losers or had someone who had compassion for them before it ran out.

>i never implied the former
you seem to be responding to someone in your head rather than i

Because most people who self-proclaim as incel are usually people who aren’t suffering from personal disability. But they’re stuck up, awkward, and picky.

>there are barriers to ones ability to "get good" and even then being able to "get good" has nothing to do with the importance of it

This is copium. Of course people like you would say this.

>again, ive known plenty of "asocial talentless hacks" whove been in relationships
and i didnt say that relationships should be "given" to anyone

You’re complaining about how sex is being “gatekept” by the elites

>it sounds like it but its not, so give me an argument
i think you sound like privileged elitist jerk but im still willing to give you an argument

This is the same emotional defense used by radlib feminists who demand men to adore “subpar” women for vicarious emotional gratification of womankind.

>>11563
>there are good reasons to not allow contracts to be binding on anyone below a certain age

Adults put kids into binding contracts without permission all the time. Forcing them into church, signing them up for public schools,signing them up for extracurricular activities, getting their foreskins cut off, etc

Also, adults don’t even have binding contracts that are permanent.

>>11563
>youth are human of course but they lack the capacities to fully embody the human experience until they reach adulthood, they are humans in the process of becoming
(unless you think that fetuses are exactly the same as an adult?)

Explain then why youths were actively involved in war, industry, religion, the arts, etc not as mere consumers but as contributors?

It’s only in the modern era (post-1600) that the west has reduced them into becoming merely pets, as students.
And now because of that, people re taking much longer to get stability in adulthood. And that’s one of the major factors for the sexlessness epidemic for the post-Gen X adult world

>>11568
How true is this?
It seems more that the social stigma of being single and childless in an era of delayed maturity and economic recession and stranger danger is what’s causing this.

There’s plenty of childrearing adults who shamelessly hedonise but they’re treated as “dismissive outliers”

>>11563
> unless youre talking about the recent past, inceldom as a concept didnt exist "back then"

Inceldom has always existed. It was more common for men and women who weren’t socially or physiognomically endowed to die as virgins. Sex was mainly a or procreational privilege or with very close friends

You’d have to go to the edge of town to brothels to get your dick wet

Nowadays, you can order an escort to come to you.
You can persuade an insecure angsty woman to spread her legs for you
All you have to do is be a small-time e-celeb making cool content. You don’t even have to show your face.

So many so-called incels are too stuck in their contempt for “normies” and aren’t willing to pick up any hobbies that doesn’t involve doomscrolling and doom posting.

They’re also unwilling to appreciate women as platonic beings first and foremost.

This is what I’m talking about.
Sex is viewed too much as an entitlement.

All these “TFw no gf” types are usually twice the pubertal age, yet act like they’re still hung up on the glamorized portrayal of teenage fun that most people (including themselves) don’t get to have.

People like you with your constant need to prioritize sex and romance as primary needs for the “human experience” are pathetic.

Plenty of people that have sex and relationships end up having to raise offspring they regret having with mutually bitter spouses.

A single childless man is in a far better position. Unless if you’re suffering from neurocognitve, mobility, immunological, or socioeconomic disabilities you have no right to complain.

I’m sick and tired of people like you misusing the term “blackpill” for your shallow overpromoted sexual frustrations.

Are you an adult or a post-pubescent brat?

>>11549
No, it implies that women should be punished for how they spent their earlier years (having sex).

>>11588
No it doesn't, I'm not your dad. Stop projecting your childhood neglect on everyone.

>>11571
>You’re comparing teens to fetuses;. That’s infantilizing
no i'm comparing fetuses to adults as an extreme example of this difference, to prove a point
>Also, youths are only less than full compacity due to social conditioning. Teens are biologically adults
this is only partially true, im not claiming that youth are lesser than adults, obviously youth are being socialized in ways that stunt their development and im against this
but we know that teenagers go through a growth spurt that can be delayed, we know that the brains of youth go through a rapid process of synaptic pruning
they just arent fully grown
accepting that fact doesnt mean we have to treat them as less than human, but we cant just act like it doesnt matter either
>You’re implying that youths don’t experience suffering, compassion, angst, discrimination,etc?
of course not
>Youths are not “becoming” humans they’re already humans.
i said that they are humans in the process of becoming
im being very precise here and youre misreading me
is this on purpose or are you just hysterical?
>You’re saying that they’re not fully people?
no
>By your logic, elderly people don’t fully embody the human experience.
>Neither do the disabled or comatose.
elderly people the disabled and the comatose require different treatment from the rest of society
they also are unable to fully embody the human experience which is why they deserve assistance to do so
it really annoys me how some people seem unable or unwilling to accept that there can and should be differences between people without involving a relationship of superiority/inferiority
weve now completely strayed from the point i was making
>I’m talking about people who have nothing of value to offer in homesteading, recreational, or industrial skills
so am i, whats your point, where do you think those lack of skills comes from
do you think that i was arguing for state mandated girlfriends or something?
no of course not, but id really like it if i didnt live in a psychopathic society that constantly produces losers
>Because most people who self-proclaim as incel are usually people who aren’t suffering from personal disability. But they’re stuck up, awkward, and picky.
i never claimed to be an incel, so again whats your point
>This is copium. Of course people like you would say this.
how is it copium?
are you denying the existence of society or something? are you a methodological individualist or something?
i should remind you that this board is full of these crazy people called marxists who reject such irrational illusions
"people like me" (aka marxists) would think this, yes
do you have an argument against it?
>You’re complaining about how sex is being “gatekept” by the elites
no i'm not, i never claimed that there is some elite conspiracy to prevent certain people from having sex
at this point im absolutely certain that youre arguing with someone in your head not with me
>>11572
>Adults put kids into binding contracts without permission all the time. Forcing them into church, signing them up for public schools,signing them up for extracurricular activities, getting their foreskins cut off, etc
yes and a lot of these things are completely unacceptable
youre missing my point
>>11573
you correctly identify that the concept of youth is a relatively recent one, and that it also came with a stunting of development
im arguing that we should retain the concept of youth without also stunting their development
i dont think that the two necessarily go hand in hand, it was a consequence of bourgeois morality not the mere concept that the youth should be treated differently
put in other terms: i want youth to receive a more hand-on education, but i really dont want to see youth losing their hands by being forced to work in coal mines; does this make any sense to you?
>>11575
inceldom isn't merely a condition, otherwise we wouldnt have new terms like the blackpill
inceldom is an ideology that describes a condition of involuntary celibacy
im trying to be precise here
>I’m sick and tired of people like you misusing the term “blackpill” for your shallow overpromoted sexual frustrations.
i never even used the term until just now
seriously, stop debating someone in your head and start talking to me, ask me questions if you dont know what my position is instead of imputing them based on vibes, its making you sound like a hysterical freak

>>11591
>but we know that teenagers go through a growth spurt that can be delayed,

It can also be precocious.
Gender can also be changed via hormones so gender isn't set in stone either.

> we know that the brains of youth go through a rapid process of synaptic pruning
they just arent fully grown
accepting that fact doesnt mean we have to treat them as less than human, but we cant just act like it doesnt matter either

The brain development theory is actually based on an incomplete study. What happens around 25-30 isn't completion but rather decline.

You maybe noticed that neuroscience now says brain development ends at 32 instead of 25. Back in the 1990s,it was said brain development ends at 21


The brain development theory is used as an excuse to infantilize young people. Alot of reckless teen behavior isn't due to neurocognitive development but rather sociocognitive development.

In the old days, teens were put into apprenticeships or rites of passage


Alot of our historical figures started their careers in their teen years.

Hell, it was common for people to be engaged at that age along with a job an maybe a place of their own

That all changed around the eighteenth century


This common philosophy that youth is innocence has become the mainstay of parenting and teaching.
And it results in delayed maturity.
Nowadays your twenties are considered the second decade of adolescence.


>i said that they are humans in the process of becoming
im being very precise here and youre misreading me
is this on purpose or are you just hysterical?

Because usually when people use language like that, it's used to deny personhood for youth.

It's one thing to say they're not fully developed but it's another to say "theyre in the process of becoming"

Becoming what? An adult? Just simply say that. Idk why people wanna mystify the sociobiological status of adulthood.

>elderly people the disabled and the comatose require different treatment from the rest of society
they also are unable to fully embody the human experience which is why they deserve assistance to do so


Again wdymbt. They embody the human experience. The human experience is not limited to one type of sociobiological path. Thats like saying women don't fully embody the human experience because they're not expected to go out and hunt like men are.
That's like saying gays don't embody the human experience because they cannot biologically create offspring.

>it really annoys me how some people seem unable or unwilling to accept that there can and should be differences between people without involving a relationship of superiority/inferiority
weve now completely strayed from the point i was making

You're using "cannot fully embody the human experience" which implies inferiority.
I get you don't mean any bad by it, but language is tricky.

>you correctly identify that the concept of youth is a relatively recent one, and that it also came with a stunting of development
im arguing that we should retain the concept of youth without also stunting their development
i dont think that the two necessarily go hand in hand, it was a consequence of bourgeois morality not the mere concept that the youth should be treated differently
put in other terms: i want youth to receive a more hand-on education, but i really dont want to see youth losing their hands by being forced to work in coal mines; does this make any sense to you?

Yes it makes sense. I just want to be sure of what you meant.

>inceldom isn't merely a condition, otherwise we wouldnt have new terms like the blackpill
inceldom is an ideology that describes a condition of involuntary celibacy
im trying to be precise here

Clarify.

>i never even used the term until just now
seriously, stop debating someone in your head and start talking to me, ask me questions if you dont know what my position is instead of imputing them based on vibes, its making you sound like a hysterical freak

That is fair. I apologize. I'm just tired of people using the term blackpill to mainly mean their sexual frustrations. Blackpill means so more than not being able to get laid. It describes.the macabre of so many industries that exploit animals, plants, fungi, and minerals for products made or human consumption.

>>11598
>The brain development theory is actually based on an incomplete study. What happens around 25-30 isn't completion but rather decline.
>You maybe noticed that neuroscience now says brain development ends at 32 instead of 25. Back in the 1990s,it was said brain development ends at 21
i expected this objection, notice that i specifically mentioned that they go through rapid synaptic pruning, not just that their brains are developing
i agree that the brain development theory is misused but regardless its well understood that the brain development of youth is in many ways different from the brain development of adults
and of course that alone doesnt say much about how we should actually treat youth specifically apart from, say, restricting the sale and use of certain drugs (including in my opinion amphetamine, benzos, things commonly accepted as part of psychiatric treatment)
like i agree with a lot of what your saying which is so puzzling to me, why is what im saying so upsetting to you unless youre just misunderstanding me
do you really think that teenagers and adults are the exact same in every way? obviously not.
>Again wdymbt. They embody the human experience. The human experience is not limited to one type of sociobiological path. Thats like saying women don't fully embody the human experience because they're not expected to go out and hunt like men are.
>That's like saying gays don't embody the human experience because they cannot biologically create offspring.
a person without legs cant experience the same things in the same ways as an able-bodied person, so we create wheelchairs and build access ramps for them
its really not that complicated
i view people living in poverty in a similar way, certain things that are important parts of the human experience are financially inaccessible to them
im not trying to dehumanize anyone, its the exact opposite, people are being dehumanized by circumstances outside of their control and i want to put an end to that by changes those circumstances wherever possible
i happen to think romance is part of that too, which was the point of my first post
youre free to think that im pathetic for putting so much importance on love, fine, whatever, i have my opinion and you have yours
if the rest of what youre objecting to is my use of language then fine again, i concede that im probably not good at writing

>>11599
>youre free to think that im pathetic for putting so much importance on love, fine, whatever, i have my opinion and you have yours

Romantic love is one type of love.
There is fraternal love, the kind we have for friends and familial love, the type we have for parents and offspring.

The problem is that society puts romantic love as the highest form of love.
There's nothing wrong with wanting romance but it's very fickle

Alot of bad romantic partners are often the result of poor fraternal/familial love.

When you date someone,youre not dating just them.
You're dating their friends and family.

>a person without legs cant experience the same things in the same ways as an able-bodied person, so we create wheelchairs and build access ramps for them
>its really not that complicated
i view people living in poverty in a similar way, certain things that are important parts of the human experience are financially inaccessible to them
>im not trying to dehumanize anyone, its the exact opposite, people are being dehumanized by circumstances outside of their control and i want to put an end to that by changes those circumstances wherever possible

I understand what you're saying but these tragedies you mention are part of the human experience. Just not necessarily good parts.

The human experience is basically any sociobiocultural pathway for any demographic of people.

Some guys get all the luck, some get none at all.

>and of course that alone doesnt say much about how we should actually treat youth specifically apart from, say, restricting the sale and use of certain drugs (including in my opinion amphetamine, benzos, things commonly accepted as part of psychiatric treatment)

I think it's fucked up that society thinks nothing wrong with pumping kids full of psych meds when they dont suffer from psychosis but they wanna ban electronic entertainment devices or tobacco and marijuana.


>i agree that the brain development theory is misused but regardless its well understood that the brain development of youth is in many ways different from the brain development of adults

Neuroplasticity

>do you really think that teenagers and adults are the exact same in every way? obviously not.

Never said they were. The main difference is not maturity but biochronological development.

>>11589
Nice ad hominem.

But why can't a 40+ year old women get wifed up, just because they were a different person years ago? Are you also the same person you were when you were 18?

>>11732
>But why can't a 40+ year old women get wifed up,
Because no man is going to want that if he can date younger? Why do men have an obligation to lay down their lives to fix the lives of these wall hitting women? No one was telling these women they had an obligation to sleep with lonely men when they were young.

>>11732
It’s not that they were a different person but rather that they’re no longer in their prime and still relatively intact of emotional baggage from sexual/romantic relations

IMO, I do not like how older men are romanticized as being automatically better romantic partners for young women either.
A lot of these older men are already bogged down with bitterness and have had a lot of STDs on them as well.