[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ent / 777 / posad / i / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix

Pleroma

Mumble

Discord

IRC

Text Boards

[ Return / Go to bottom ]

File: 1653762899779.jpg (258.41 KB, 1024x1024, 1598214007-0.jpg)

 No.161[Last 50 Posts]

Incel News Thread
>>

 No.162

>Detective Inspector Sarah White, who leads British Transport Police's sexual offences team, said her officers are receiving daily reports of people committing sexual offences including staring. Last month Transport for London launched a new campaign, amid at tackling sexual harassment of women and girls which included upskirting, cat calling and staring. Posters have now been place in tube stations across the capital stating: "Intrusive staring of a sexual nature is sexual harassment and is not tolerated."

>On Sunday Detective Superintendent Sarah White, a senior British Transport Police (BTP) officer told The Telegraph: "It's human nature to stare at things. However, it's very different when someone is staring, leering, or there’s a sexual motivation. "We want to know about that staring because that is the behaviour that suggests to me that someone is thinking about a sexual behaviour that supports that staring. "We will record them as crimes and we will investigate them - and we have had successful prosecutions in that field."

>Just last month a man was sentenced to 22 weeks in prison after a woman reported him for "continuously staring" at her on a train in Berkshire. Dominik Bullock, 26, of Spurcroft road, Thatcham, was found guilty of causing intentional harassment, alarm or distress after he sat next to the victim on the train and began staring at her "very intently". The victim asked Bullock to stop staring several times as it was making her feel uncomfortable, but he refused. BTP Sergeant Charlotte Collins said at the time of his sentencing, that it was "clear from Bullock’s persistent and distressing actions that he is a danger to women and girls".

https://archive.today/IVtqb

Staring is rape inkwell
>>

 No.163

File: 1653808404852.jpg (377.41 KB, 725x658, gf.jpg)

>The Texas school shooter was a sex haver.
When will the sex haver menace finally be addressed?
>>

 No.165

File: 1653868658341.gif (861.4 KB, 600x900, itsover.gif)

==2k
A Pew Research Center study shows that A MAJORITY of single women in America are not on the dating market. They're not looking for marriage, they're not looking for a committed relationship, they're not looking for casual sex, they're just not interested==
https://web.archive.org/web/20220529235351/https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/08/20/nearly-half-of-u-s-adults-say-dating-has-gotten-harder-for-most-people-in-the-last-10-years/
Western women aren't interested in dating and now science proves it. The only way to find a wife now is to go overseas. Don't feel bad, it's what roasties want.
>>

 No.168

>>165
Maybe there is something wrong with the environment. Some Zoo animals don't reproduce in captivity. Maybe capitalism has a similar effect on people. We should switch to socialism to see if that makes it better, you know for science.
>>

 No.169

>>163
>innocent children
YEAH KILLEM
>>

 No.172

>>163
lmao this got swept under the rug.
>>

 No.194

File: 1654147540817.png (207.52 KB, 675x662, 1654143621061.png)

Roasties BTFO'd
>>

 No.196

>>194
It's funny because she tried so hard to appeal to foids with the "evil men and muh domestic abuse" feminist BS. But then she utterly failed because most foids saw straight through her crap, often even better than men, and stanned the shit out of Johnny lmao.
>>

 No.200

File: 1654339017369.png (380 KB, 474x569, ClipboardImage.png)

Man born without a jaw finds love after lifetime of pain: ‘I deserved more’
https://nypost.com/2022/05/19/man-born-without-a-jaw-finds-love-after-lifetime-of-pain

Anon what's your excuse?
>>

 No.201

>>200
>You can't generalize the material conditions of billions of men if I can find one exception.
Lib detected. Next you're going to say no one should be poor because of that one time a poor person became rich.
>>

 No.204

>>194
she did nothing wrong
>>

 No.206

>>200
how do they kiss though
>>

 No.207

File: 1654433576952.jpg (106.17 KB, 1200x800, boop.jpg)

>>206
nose boops
>>

 No.208

>>207
cute
>>

 No.219

File: 1654585905559-0.jpg (2.02 MB, 1080x1350, LeftWingMaleAdvocates-e9l6….jpg)

File: 1654585905559-1.jpg (955.09 KB, 1080x1350, LeftWingMaleAdvocates-2qnk….jpg)

File: 1654585905559-2.jpg (439.55 KB, 1080x1350, LeftWingMaleAdvocates-i3n8….jpg)

File: 1654585905559-3.jpg (776.68 KB, 1080x1350, LeftWingMaleAdvocates-g07t….jpg)

File: 1654585905559-4.jpg (550.89 KB, 1080x1350, LeftWingMaleAdvocates-1wnj….jpg)

>>

 No.220

File: 1654585999019-0.jpg (573.46 KB, 1080x1350, LeftWingMaleAdvocates-wf28….jpg)

File: 1654585999019-1.jpg (479.99 KB, 1080x1350, LeftWingMaleAdvocates-0y8z….jpg)

File: 1654585999019-2.jpg (635.21 KB, 1080x1350, LeftWingMaleAdvocates-otm4….jpg)

File: 1654585999019-3.jpg (361.52 KB, 1080x1350, LeftWingMaleAdvocates-ws0v….jpg)

File: 1654585999019-4.jpg (631.43 KB, 1080x1350, LeftWingMaleAdvocates-x9ec….jpg)

>>

 No.236

File: 1655496900398.png (1.57 MB, 1440x2960, Screenshot_20220617-131352.png)

Japan's government releases study indicating roughly 40% of single Japanese men in their 20s have never been on a date, a contributing factor to the country's low birth rates
https://archive.ph/BU0H0
>>

 No.237

>>236
We will be seeing numbers like that in the West soon enough.
>>

 No.238

File: 1655765541225.png (1.68 MB, 1350x900, Male Suicides.png)

Most male suicides in U.S. show no link to mental health issues, study reveals
https://web.archive.org/web/20220620225038/https://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/most-male-suicides-show-no-mental-health-link
>>

 No.239

>>238
If you are a low tier male wagie in the US (most guys) you are feeling the brunt of inflation so this is not surprising.
>>

 No.251

World Cup: Qatar will enforce sex ban for unmarried couples. 7 years in jail if caught.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220623162631/https://www.france24.com/en/video/20220622-world-cup-qatar-will-enforce-sex-ban-for-unmarried-couples
Based incelification by Qatarians.
>>

 No.252

File: 1656002134512.jpg (238.71 KB, 370x2000, 1656001058553.jpg)

Another FtM transhumanist that got force fed the blackpill.
>>

 No.253

>>252
Being male is incredibly lonely. I've literally spent the last 3 months totally alone.
>>

 No.262

File: 1656086357003.jpg (249.25 KB, 1280x720, Supreme-Court-overturns-Ro….jpg)

Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, ending the federal right to abortion
https://web.archive.org/web/20220624154813/https://finance.yahoo.com/news/supreme-court-overturns-roe-wade-141521476.html
Roasties utterly and ethernally BTFO'd. Now if you'll excuse me, I've got some travel maxxxing in red states to do.
>>

 No.264

>>262
See rosties get owned is bitter sweet for me here. I like seeing them get owned but also this is over all fucked up.
>>

 No.265

>>262
I'm actually pro-choice but I support this decision because if women are going to support the state forcing men into becoming fathers. Then I'm going to support the state forcing women into becoming mothers.
>>

 No.266

>>265
>The state forcing men into becoming fathers

What are you talking about?
>>

 No.267

>>266
I'm talking about child support. When a woman gets pregnant it's completely up to her if the man becomes a father or not.
>>

 No.270

>>267
That's actually kind of a fair point and I agree rosties can get fucked for doing shit like that but I don't find that contempt helpful
>>

 No.271

File: 1656133147311.jpg (166.63 KB, 1079x814, WorkReform-vjync1.jpg)

>>262
Redditors trying to gin up a general strike this Monday. You think they'll actually follow through on it? I don't.
>>

 No.272

>>262
Lol I'm watching woke.net and tonight's protests are already petering out.
>>

 No.274

File: 1656161688199.jpg (92.28 KB, 1101x686, justice_pepe.jpg)

>>262
>Roasties utterly and ethernally BTFO'd. Now if you'll excuse me, I've got some travel maxxxing in red states to do.
Ngl even though I'm pro-abortion seeing the roastie seethe on the news has been beautiful. They're literally sobbing and think the world is over because they can't get creampied by chad anymore lmfao
>>

 No.275

File: 1656261540954.jpg (416.7 KB, 1080x1605, 1656256741341.jpg)

>>262
Roasties absolutely losing their minds lol. This sex strike will last all of 5 minutes once it's revealed that women are actually much bigger hoes than men.
>>

 No.276

>>275
Now the entire left will be incels.
>>

 No.277

File: 1656261829500.jpg (525.01 KB, 1402x950, 1656260329800.jpg)

>>275
OH NO NO NO NO
>>

 No.278

File: 1656262022872.jpg (1.5 MB, 1423x1770, 1656249107940.jpg)

>>272
They aren't protesting
>>

 No.279

File: 1656263390373.jpg (68.15 KB, 640x853, 1656263019507.jpg)

>>278
The virtue signaling is getting out of hand.
>>

 No.280

>>279
How could anyone possibly not be a doomer after reading this?
>>

 No.281

File: 1656280434482.jpg (587.14 KB, 800x1956, coolguides-vkxz1q.jpg)

Pretty good breakdown of how abortion is practiced. Looks like libs are shifting to a strategy of debate and abandoning cancel culture after the public gave no fucks when abortion rights were removed.
>>

 No.282

>>281

I think a ton of people gave a shit just not everyone put in their pussy hats and started marching in the streets on CNC. A lot of people at my job were talking about it myself included.
>>

 No.283

>>282
>A lot of people at my job were talking about it myself included.
Talk is cheap, if they're not willing to hit the streets than they're just virtue signaling.
>>

 No.285

>>283
Hitting the streets is virtue signaling
>>

 No.286

>>285
Cope
>>

 No.288

>>286
Prove me wrong.
>>

 No.290

File: 1656347459979.jpg (646.41 KB, 3200x1680, B9316206437Z.1_20150301013….jpg)

>>288
Open a history book.
>>

 No.291

File: 1656356199484.jpg (30 KB, 1283x409, 20220627_195535.jpg)

*(unless they're chad)
>>

 No.293

File: 1656409110716.gif (156.15 KB, 536x440, 1652488052344.gif)

>>290

Le civil rights changed the world guys

>Still live in a capitalist dystopia.

mfw. You actually just proved my point. I agree that marginal changes are better than non, but, ultimately, nothing really changed all that much. Liberals want more inclusion into the system of capital and see that as freedom. Communists want total freedom for all away from the systems of capital that influence our lives.
>>

 No.294

>>293
>T-t-the Civil Rights Movement didn't change anything. My smug self satisfaction is a far more powerful political force.
Go back to .orge FAGGOT.
>>

 No.295

>>293
>Liberals want more inclusion into the system of capital and see that as freedom.
Black people were already included into system of capital, what they wanted was an end to American apartide. You're just mad because you're are yet another chinlet spooked by white settler spooks.
>Communists want total freedom for all away from the systems of capital that influence our lives.
Lol blacks are a prole underclass, you probably think Union organizing is liberal too since it doesn't end capitalism either. Liberating blacks was a huge win for workers and was widely supported by socialists at the time.
>>

 No.296

>>293
>Communists want total freedom for all away from the systems of capital that influence our lives.
Not true, Communists are simply state capitalists.
>>

 No.297

>>275
There's been a sex strike against a fair amount of men for decades already
>>

 No.298

>>294
Why is ©HUD word filtered? Damn that's thin skinned fr fr.
>>

 No.299

>>298
It was done over a year ago when libs were still using it unironically. I have just asked one of the mods if we can undo it, I've been meaning to ask about it for a while tbh.

In the meantime, just use C H U D
>>

 No.300

>>298

>fr fr

Zoomer fag detected
>>

 No.302

File: 1656451100441.jpg (59.03 KB, 810x539, 0_GettyImages-1363105061-1.jpg)

Pope Francis tells mums to stop ironing son's shirts and urge them to get married
https://archive.ph/zKkdq
Lol, is he still under the impression that western women still dote on their children this much? My mom didn't even want to feed me once I started High School.
>>

 No.303

File: 1656523947925.jpg (485.85 KB, 500x573, antifeminists-vng3xe.jpg)

>>262
>>

 No.304

>>303

Men should pay child support.
It's when women force them into exploitative situations that it's fucked up.
>>

 No.305

>>304
>Men should pay child support.
Why? Men should get equal custody and pay when they have the kiddo.
>It's when women force them into exploitative situations that it's fucked up.
Women force them BECAUSE OF CHILD SUPPORT. It gives women their own personal debt serf.
>>

 No.306

File: 1656604538583.jpg (269.4 KB, 1080x1067, BlackPeopleTwitter-voay6t.jpg)

>>262
Oh NOW women care about felon voting rights. Didn't give a fuck when it was just male ex cons getting disenfranchised.
>>

 No.307

>>305
Me and my mom lived on section 8 for 15 years of m life and I never met my father once nore did her pay a single dime in child support. If you have kids and you don't plan on so much as speaking to them, fuck you, you should pay child support.

Retards like you have me convinced it's about justice and equality with you so much as it is just about being a vindictive faggot.
>>

 No.308

>>307
Fuck your fake ass sob story. The vast majority of father's want to be in their children's lives and are willing to support their children when they have custody.
Child support is just hoe support for the woman because the majority of the money goes to supporting her.
>>

 No.309

>>307
I didn't say father's shouldn't support their kids. I said they shouldn't have to pay child support.
Making the person with custody pay is fair and best for the child. Why should the man pay for the privilege of his ex to raise his child? If she can't afford to pay for her own kid it should go to the father that can.
>>

 No.310

>>307
Your simp ass ever think that maybe the reason your father wasn't in your life was because he'd be thrown in debtors prison over the child support he owed?
>>

 No.311

>>310
No. my father wasn't in my life because he is a massive piece of shit you retarded faggot. If you abandon your children you should pay child support period and if you don't you are a massive pos. The faggot father is not the victim here. I am.
>>

 No.312

>>311
Your bullshit experience is not representative of men. And men and women abandon their children at the same rate.
You're a stooge of liberal feminism. You think your shitty experience gives you moral authority over others. The number one reason for abandoning children is always money. Eliminate that and you keep fathers in the lives of millions of children.
>>

 No.313

>>311
>muh moral failings
Right, prison just has nothing to do with it. He was just a big ole asshole.
>>

 No.314

>>312
You faggots just hate women you don't want justice or fairness you just want women to suffer, kek. Take your meds you delusional midwit.
You don't remotely know anything bout my life, my mom or my dad. My mom never once pushed for child support on him her entire life. Take your meds.

>>313
Same fag
>>

 No.315

Imagine wanting to allow father to abandon their children. This society has fallen so far, lol.
>>

 No.316

>>283
Hitting the streets is cheap, if they're not willing to do a dance on tiktok they're just virtue signaling.
>>

 No.318

>>315
Imagine thinking that debtor's prison isn't the reason men abandon children.
>>314
And you hate men AND children. And bitch I don't need to know your story which you capping anyway. Society is shaped by the state. It's a childish capitalist myth that people are bad just for the hell of it. While those people exisit they are the exception and not the rule.
You ain't special, if you really were abandoned almost with certainty it wasn't because your dad was inaitely bad, It was because of money.
And even if your bullshit story were true I'd still tell you to take your boomer spooks and shove them up your ass because making children suffer because your childhood was shit is just the epitome of selfishness.
>>

 No.319

>>314
>Same fag
This is just admiting I'm right. Debtor's prison keeps families apart.
>>

 No.320

>>318
>>319
Proving you're samefagging, kek.

Shut up fag. You are dumb your ideas are backwards and you obviously never grew up with out a father figure considering how spoiled and retarded you are. If I met my dad today I would fuck him up, but, the pos is probably dead. You're just a bitter women hating virgin who probably has been cucked for the last 20 years. My dad isn't bad for the hell of it my dad is bad because he abandoned his son.

It's obvious you have some weird pathology.
>>

 No.321

>>320
>Proving you're samefagging.
YES
No prove me wrong broke dick simp.
>It's obvious you have some weird pathology.
Why? Because I want to end vindicitve policies that keep fathers from their children which are based on the "Protocols of Zion" tier patriarchy theory?
Projection, thy name is (you).
>>

 No.322

>>321
*Now prove me wrong broke dick simp.
>>

 No.323

>>320
>you obviously never grew up with out a father figure
Hohohoho, more projection.
>>

 No.324

>>323
Are you retarded? I grew up with out a father. Do you know what words mean? kek. joke.
>>

 No.325

>>321
>Broke dick simp
I guarantee I have had more sex than you ever will.

>Why? Because I want to end vindictive policies

Because you want to excuse shitty behavior from men to spite women. It's pretty obvious. I don't even think that all child support claims are legitimate but you are just a retard who wants to allow men to get away with whatever they want. I bet you would vote to legalize rape if given the choice, kek.
>>

 No.326

>>325
>I guarantee I have had more sex than you ever will.
Doesn't make you any less of a liberal feminist lackey. And fucking blown out western women isn't anything to brag about.
>Because you want to excuse shitty behavior from men to spite women.
No, it's just recognizing the material conditions that drive behavior. Instead of being spooked by feminist that hate you for your sex.
>I don't even think that all child support claims are legitimate but you are just a retard who wants to allow men to get away with whatever they want.
Nah, you just assume men are all heartless rape wolves that would rape and pillage the countrysidea if daddy goverment weren't there to check them. Most men want to raise their kids. You're just a porky bootlicker defending porky's debtor's prisons.
>I bet you would vote to legalize rape if given the choice,
You defend child abuse right now since women beat and kill their children more than men yet you still want policies that favor women keeping custody.
>>

 No.327

>>324
Yes you did, this is why you project this and bootlick man hating feminists.
>>

 No.328

File: 1656698979628.png (262.2 KB, 479x471, ggallinpepe.png)

>>326
>I'm a "liberal feminist lacky guy because I think fathers who abandon their children should face consequences, kek.

>I assume all men are "heartless rape wolves" because I think people who abandon their children should face consequences

>I think men should face consequences for abandoning their children so now I think women who beat their children to death are sinless angles

kek

Take your meds
>>

 No.329

>>326
Is this the same guy who had the idea to write a law allowing incels to go on a pilgrimage every year to have have sex with stereotypically submissive Asian women? Kek.
>>

 No.330

>>329
Yeah, pretty sure its's the same guy. His writing style is undeniable.
>>

 No.331

File: 1656704082284.jpg (40.96 KB, 960x733, CwegwvvUkAAJruG.jpg)

>>330
>>328
>>329
>>

 No.332

>>330
>>329
You all shook because you know it would work.
>>

 No.333

>>332
None of your ideas are close to reality.
>>

 No.334

>>333
>I love porky and support his control over how people travel.
>>

 No.335

>>334
Meds
>>

 No.336

File: 1656706639428.jpg (55.13 KB, 542x616, 1656695842411.jpg)

>>331
What isn't an argument about pointing out how fucking retarded you sound trying to frame me as this man hating simp and how it doesn't make anysense to just allow men to have no consequences for their actions?

Do you think men should be held accountable for anything?
>>

 No.337

>>334
Why not legalize prostitution instead? Your idea is to have incels be subsidized by society to be able to travel for a few weeks and try and have sex with random Asian women, if this did happen they'll probably just end up in some form of brothel.
>>

 No.338

Child support and custody is different in every state, there is no universal body governing over it.
>>

 No.339

File: 1656709020422.png (724.2 KB, 840x840, asian.png)

>>336
No nimrod, you have to actually explain why it's wrong.
>>337
I'm not necessarily against legal prostitution, but it's not a replacement for a relationship. And I never said society should subsidize incel travel. I said they should get several weeks of vacation, pretty much what the rest of the western world gets already, so that they could have the opportunity to travel.
>if this did happen they'll probably just end up in some form of brothel.
Even military personnel wind up getting married when they go overseas so no, this is just a misandrist stereotype.
>>338
It nonetheless overwhelming favors women over men.
>>

 No.340

File: 1656709764539.jpg (187.94 KB, 750x744, 1656698855208.jpg)

>>339
It's a moral disposition retard. There is no objective right or wrong. that isn't how it works.

I can however point out the absurdity of your claims. You're a slimy little faggot, but, I think I've pinned you down pretty well.

So, anyways, should men be held accountable for anything?
>>

 No.341

>>336
>Do you think men should be held accountable for anything?
Do you think debtor's prisons are okay if they only jail men?
>>

 No.342

>>340
>It's a moral disposition retard. There is no objective right or wrong. that isn't how it works.
I never said it was. But it's objectively true that having the father in a child's life is better for the kid.
Child support is a debtor's prison that keeps men from their chlidren.
FACTS.
.I can however point out the absurdity of your claims. You're a slimy little faggot, blah blah blah..
You moo on like a cow.
>So, anyways, should men be held accountable for anything?
Why do you love porky debtor's prisons so much?
>>

 No.343

File: 1656710131920.jpg (121.18 KB, 721x767, support.jpg)

>>340
>So, anyways, should men be held accountable for anything?
Should women?
>>

 No.344

>>342
*misformatted post
>I can however point out the absurdity of your claims. You're a slimy little faggot, blah blah blah..
You moo on like a cow.
>>

 No.345

>>335
Your wife's boyfriend took them.
>>

 No.346

>>339
Just wait until your Asian gf becomes westernized kek.
>>

 No.347

>>346
Still be world's better than a Western Woman who's entire family is feminist.
>>

 No.348

>>347
It could work out if you decided to not have kids, any kids you raise here will be absorbed by retarded zoomer "culture".
>>

 No.349

>>348
It's possible if you are in a strong enough community. The booj do it all the time.
There's this infamous video of one of the facebook founders telling an audience that he doesn't let his own kids on facebook. That's just one small example.
>>

 No.350

>>349
True if I did have a kid no way would I ever give them a smart phone.
>>

 No.351

>>305
>It gives women their own personal debt serf
That's already what men have always been kek.
>>

 No.352

>>341
Jail is a perfectly suitable punishment for crimes that some one has committed if they refuse to support the child they brought into the world, kek. Why wouldn't it be? Are you some type of anarchist?
>>

 No.353

>>343
Obviously the answer to this is yes.
>>

 No.354

>>344
Prove me wrong
>>

 No.355

File: 1656769145040.jpg (34.07 KB, 622x455, capitalistpig.jpg)

>>352
>Jail is a perfectly suitable punishment for crimes that some one has committed if they refuse to support the child they brought into the world, kek. Why wouldn't it be? Are you some type of anarchist?
t.
>>

 No.356

>>354
There's nothing to disprove, it's just you smugly declaring you're right.
>>

 No.358

>>355
Jails exist in communism you retard
Murder and other crimes exist with or with out communism and we need jails to deter that crime you idealist.

>>356
Because I am. If I am wrong explain why i am wrong rather than projecting your insecurities on me like a faggot.
>>

 No.359

>>358
>Owing money is the same as murdering someone.
S
>>

 No.360

>>358
>Because I am. If I am wrong explain why i am wrong
I already have, and your retort was nuh-uh… There's nothing to counter
>>

 No.361

>>360
No you haven't at this point you are just pitching a fit because "I think men should be able to abandon their children is totally ok" and it isn't. Retard.

>>359
No but if you are going to be dumb enough and careless enough to have children in spite of not wanting them then you should pay a cost for that.
At least in the confines of a capitalist society because obviously things would be different in our perfect communist utopia. You are a petulant child
>>

 No.362

>>361
>No but if you are going to be dumb enough and careless enough to have children in spite of not wanting them then you should pay a cost for that.
Not having a father hurts children. Those children don't belong to you or the state. And most fathers' are more than capable of paying for their kids if they live with them. What they can't afford is paying two seperate households, themselves and their baby mama's. If women want to see their kids they should have to pay their children's expenses just like you demand men do.
>>

 No.363

>>358
>Jails exist in communism
But debtors' prisons do not.
>>

 No.365

Nobody here has kids.
>>

 No.366

>>365
I do
>>

 No.367

>>366
I do not believe that.
>>

 No.368

>>362
If they didn't want to take care of a kid they shouldn't have fucking hard one retard.
>>

 No.369

>>368
They're not your kids, and not having a father makes a bad situation worse. You woulldn't know that because you did have a dad.
>>

 No.370

>>368
>It's okay for the government to kidnap your children if you owe them money.
And why does the father have to support his ex too when supporting his children?
>>

 No.371

>>368
>If they didn't want to take care of a kid they shouldn't have fucking hard one retard.
Agreed, when the father had custody he should pay for all the expenses of his kid. When the mom has custody she should.
Anything else is just turning child support into adult support.
>>

 No.372

>>369
*You woulldn't know that because you didn't have a dad.
>>

 No.373

>>371
Why should only the person who has custody of the child take care of it when both parents are responsible for not only its birth but its development? What do you think that children just stop developing when they come out of the womb? Children need both of their parents for biological and evolutionary reasons among social reasons. Not having a father figure at all, let alone your actual father, in your life can effect you developmentally for the rest of your life.

Again this is about the child you psychopath not the fucking father. You are trying to take the onus away from the biological father for being a shit parent and fucking his kids lifes up.

>>370
This is a nonsequitr I don't believe this and I believe that child support payments should go on a foodstamp esk card that cna only purchase certain commodities.

>>369
Eat shit faggot. You don't know anything or what it is like to grow up with out a father. Pathetic selfish people like you deserve to have your face caved in in the street and strung up for the crows to feast on.

It's about the child not the father
>>

 No.374

File: 1656915109282.gif (28.03 KB, 500x460, boobs8.gif)

>>373
>Why should only the person who has custody of the child take care of it when both parents are responsible for not only its birth but its development? What do you think that children just stop developing when they come out of the womb? Children need both of their parents for biological and evolutionary reasons among social reasons. Not having a father figure at all, let alone your actual father, in your life can effect you developmentally for the rest of your life.
Having only the person with custody pay for the child makes sure that each parent is allowed to support the child as they see if while letting their adult ex completely support themselves. It discourages custody fights since custody is a financial liability and forces the parents to cooperate more, which is best for the child.
>Not having a father figure at all, let alone your actual father, in your life can effect you developmentally for the rest of your life.
100% agree, which is why the current child support system should be abolished because it demonstrably keeps fathers out of the lives of their children.
>Again this is about the child you psychopath not the fucking father. You are trying to take the onus away from the biological father for being a shit parent and fucking his kids lifes up.
No I'm not, it's men that pay the majority of child support. If they only had to pay when they had custody a great number of them would be able to support their children. And not being able to support an adult woman in a separate household does not make you a shit father.
>This is a nonsequitr I don't believe this and I believe that child support payments should go on a foodstamp esk card that cna only purchase certain commodities.
It's not, you literally have the state away a child from a father because he can't pay a woman fealty.
>Eat shit faggot. You don't know anything or what it is like to grow up with out a father.
You're right, this is why I'm more objective about this than you. Like many people from broken homes, your mother raised you to be a simp to deflect criticism of her culpability for the bad situation she put her children in.
>Pathetic selfish people like you deserve to have your face caved in in the street and strung up for the crows to feast on.
Come at me bro.
>It's about the child not the father
Child support is paid by the father, so in this case it's not about children, it's about the father.
>>

 No.383

File: 1656987486710.jpg (1.51 MB, 1242x1527, 1655623157011.jpg)

>>374
>Having only the person with custody pay for the child makes sure that each parent is allowed to support the child as they see if while letting their adult ex completely support themselves. It discourages custody fights since custody is a financial liability and forces the parents to cooperate more, which is best for the child.

Unless you believe in the myth of the welfare queen then you are ignoring the fact that raising a child to maturing costs millions of dollars over the course of a 18 - 20 year life span. It's insane to expect only one person to support a child that was mutually created by two people in order to raise it to maturity. Nonsense.

>100% agree, which is why the current child support system should be abolished because it demonstrably keeps fathers out of the lives of their childre

What alternative do you propose?

>No I'm not, it's men that pay the majority of child support. If they only had to pay when they had custody a great number of them would be able to support their children. And not being able to support an adult woman in a separate household does not make you a shit father.

Because men fucking leave their children in drives in this fucking society lmao. This is insane lmao. It's like saying "oh black people are 36% of the population but commit 78% of the crime." You're ignoring the fact that black people are fucking poor lmao.

Men are leaving their children. That doesn't mean that mean should be given free reign to abandon their children.

Men who refuse to support their children should be put in jail. Support your child and take responsibility for your actions.
>>

 No.385

>>383
You are absolutely retared.
>>

 No.386

>>385
wow what an awesome retort good job 100% skill fam no cap
>>

 No.387

>>386
Your post is a clusterfuck of shit I never said with shit that doesn't even follow.
>>

 No.388

>>383
>Men are leaving their children.
Proofs? Like any at all?
>>

 No.389

File: 1657031415076.jpg (23.72 KB, 540x540, 1655680909624.jpg)

>>388
Aren't divorce rates up isn't the number of fatherless children up I thought this was common knowledge? It's literally 1 in 4 https://www.fatherhood.org/father-absence-statistic

>>387
No you are just to dumb and ideological to actually break it down eat shit retard.
>>

 No.390

>>389
>Aren't divorce rates up isn't the number of fatherless children up I thought this was common knowledge? It's literally 1 in 4
What's divorce got to do with child abandonment? And it's so high BECAUSE of child support.
>No you are just to dumb and ideological to actually break it down eat shit retard
Is it much cheaper to support a child if they live with you?
Yes or No?
Does it take a third to half a person's income to support a child?
Yes or No?
Is a woman completely unaccountable as to how she spends her child support?
Yes or No?
>>

 No.391

>>389
You can smug post all you want, doesn't make your arguments any less incoherent.
You go from claiming raising a single child cost millions to equating divorce with child abandonment. Seek help.
>>

 No.392

File: 1657033782472.png (194.26 KB, 450x505, Black_Man1-1.png)

>>389
1 in 4 children live without fathers because women seek sole custody so they can collect that delicious child support.
Feminists like you put men in an impossible situation. You make men pay half or more of their take home pay in child support regardless of the child's actual needs. Give sole custody to the mother so the father has to travel anytime he wants to spend with their kid and navigate an emotional mind field of both a vindictive ex and estranged child. Then when they are crushed by these demands you declare that they've abandoned their children.
You're simply a porky stooge creating a factory line of alienated adults that are more vulnerable to capitalist exploitation.
>>

 No.393

>>389
How do debtors' prisons and state kidnapping of children help keep fathers in the lives of their children?
>>

 No.394

File: 1657047537238.png (152.59 KB, 379x376, 1656989052794.png)

>>390
>What does diviorce have to do with child abandonment

I can't even

>Is it much cheaper to support a child if they live with you?

Shit it's cheaper to support it from child support lmao. You don't have to buy toys, diapers, birthday parties, nothing. you just gotta mail a check. How hard is that?

>>391
If they are so bad then explain it or shut up you retard.

>>392
No 1 in 4 children grow up with out fathers because capitalism is fucking alienating. This is some anti-materialist ideological bullshit.

>Reee you're a feminist cause you disagree with one on this one point

Meds.


I didn't say that child support was perfect what I did say is that men should pay SOMETHING. You people are deranged.
>>

 No.395

File: 1657053655603.gif (1020.79 KB, 480x348, boobs10.gif)

>>394
>I can't even
It's the state and baby mama's that keep men from children.
>Shit it's cheaper to support it from child support lmao.
It's not though, since the child support is based on your pay, and how the money is spent is completely unaccounted for.
>If they are so bad then explain it or shut up you retard.
I just called you out for saying it cost millions to raise one child. I know you're just trolling, but I can't resist your delicious bait.
>No 1 in 4 children grow up with out fathers because capitalism is fucking alienating.
No dipshit, this is just a deflection to avoid talking about the laws that let women use men as debt serfs. This has nothing to do with alienation.
>>Reee you're a feminist cause you disagree with one on this one point
>I didn't say that child support was perfect what I did say is that men should pay SOMETHING. You people are deranged.
Wanting to maintain the debtors' prison system that is child support is a core tenant of feminism, therefore you are a feminist.
I never said men shouldn't pay for their kids, I said they should only pay when they have custody. You keep ignoring that because you know it's fair but you want to continue to keep the system of male exploitation going because you have been bred to see men as heartless monsters by your narc feminist mother.
>>

 No.396

>>394
>I can't even
Divorce has nothing to do with father's not being in their children's lives. Fathers' would see their children if they could. And women initiate the majority of the divorces regardless.
>>

 No.397

File: 1657054369346.png (194.26 KB, 450x505, childsupport.png)

>>394
>Shit it's cheaper to support it from child support lmao.
Today I will remind them.
>>

 No.398

File: 1657059848704.png (47.34 KB, 147x163, 89827ey23.png)

>>395
>It's the state and baby mama's that keep men from children.

Idealism

>It's not though, since the child support is based on your pay, and how the money is spent is completely unaccounted for.

See and I was talking to my friends at work about this shit; I think yeah that the way the money is un accounted for is fucked and many women mismanage the money. I think that the money should be deposited to an ETB like card that can only be spent on certain items that are for the child.

>No dipshit, this is just a deflection to avoid talking about the laws that let women use men as debt serfs. This has nothing to do with alienation.

We're talking about it right now are you stupid?

>Wanting to maintain the debtors' prison system that is child support is a core tenant of feminism, therefore you are a feminist.
I never said men shouldn't pay for their kids, I said they should only pay when they have custody. You keep ignoring that because you know it's fair but you want to continue to keep the system of male exploitation going because you have been bred to see men as heartless monsters by your narc feminist mother.

I have asked you several times what the alternative that you have in mind is and you keep ignoring me and just calling me names, lmfao. What is the alternative to throwing lazy fathers in jail?


Unlike you my political opinions are extremely nuanced and not really subject to a lot of bias. thanks for the cool pics though.
>>

 No.399

>>397
Yeah I didn't say it was perfect or right and that it doesn't need fixing but it's the only way to really deal with the issue.
My friend has to pay child support and he's with the actual baby momma currently and she wont life the payments. If you have a kid though you should be forced to support them on a fundamental level.
>>

 No.400

>>398
>Idealism
Prison is not idealist.
>>

 No.401

>>398
>Unlike you my political opinions are extremely nuanced and not really subject to a lot of bias. thanks for the cool pics though.
<I don't have an argument
Glad to see we're finally getting somewhere.
>>

 No.402

>>400
It literally is. you opinion is based on ideals not material reality. that's idelism, kek.
>>

 No.403

File: 1657069423581.jpg (195.96 KB, 850x651, 1657035609546.jpg)

>>401
Did you miss the wall of text that preceeded that or are you actually the one with out an argument?
>>

 No.404

>>403
I didn't miss anything homie.
>>

 No.405

>>402
The state will really throw you in prison if you violate custody orders or don't pay child support, how is that idealist?
>>

 No.406

>>404
Except my whole arugment that proceeded that. You're hopeless I am out of here. You're just being stubborn now.

>>405
Because basing your ideology on "It's actually womens fault men are leaving their children!" Is retarded and idealistic and not based on any objective material analysis like capitalism being alienating and making people, including men, hate their lives among making them stupid ignorant retards.
>>

 No.407

>>406
Women have the ability to throw men into debtors' prison and are incentived to do so by child support and welfare.
You're the idealist with bigoted claims that men are doing it because they're irresponsible.
Look we're just going to have to agree to disagree. You're a lib that loves debtors' prison and has fash tier theories abou men having crime bones, While I believe state violence and economics shape society and peoplR's behavior.
>>

 No.408

>>407
See you keep using all this loaded lanugage like reactionaries do when they talk about gay issues, kek. You arn't even listening you're just jerking yourself off.

I'm out.

> While I believe state violence and economics shape society and peoplR's behavior.

You believe that people have genetic predispositions about greed and finance based on their sex and you are caling me a fascist? This is pure cope.

Marx wasn't against jails retard. What do you think should replace the current system? You can't answer me cause you have no idea. You are just rambling and you have never once actually thought about this.

As I stated it should be heavily reformed but it's the only way to make shitty fathers support their children. Cope seethe and dial8
>>

 No.420

File: 1657374781513.mp4 (4.77 MB, 406x720, blackmagicfuckery-vv1g8e.mp4)

It is now possible to become Chad.
>>

 No.422

>>420
What happens if he bangs a chick would that stuff just fall off?
>>

 No.423

>>422
Did you see how sticky it was? She's going to have to grab a handful of it before that shit comes off.
>>

 No.424

>>423
True. That makeup is killer for quick dating app sex I would guess.
>>

 No.438

File: 1658101028245.jpg (148.35 KB, 1080x1350, HolUp-w1ab1r.jpg)

>>

 No.441

>>438
Can't tell if this is beta soy or sigma chad
>>

 No.442

>>441
>Can't tell if this is beta soy or sigma chad
It's just people doing something that they can sell as a story to the attention economy
>>

 No.445

Postmortem Sperm Retrieval Is Turning Dead Men Into Fathers
https://archive.ph/2bdsu
>>

 No.450

File: 1658585362162.mp4 (9.02 MB, 854x480, iamatotalpieceofshit-tqed9….mp4)

>Feminist vlogger advocates for the genocide of men.
>>

 No.464

One in five adults don’t want children — and they’re deciding early in life
https://web.archive.org/web/20220727044725/https://www.futurity.org/adults-dont-want-children-childfree-2772742/
>>

 No.465

File: 1659192211477.jpg (467.64 KB, 1080x1553, 1659191062080336.jpg)

https://web.archive.org/web/20220730144123/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/15/business/men-unemployment-jobs.html
>>

 No.467

>>450
>Wants to kill all men
>To stupid to realize that that will also kill all women.
>>

 No.473

Republican Wants To BAN Child Support To Stop Abortions
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKoiXuMZxDY
This commentator is making fun of this Republican for having a non-nonsensical point but I think it's still politically interesting that the idea of ending child support is making it's first appearance in the US Congress.
This might be a harbinger of more anti-feminist legislation.
>>

 No.486

>>473
Looks more like capitalists trying to roll back more social services, under a pretext.
>>

 No.495

File: 1659736627097.mp4 (36.85 MB, 1334x750, antifeminists-wgtivm.mp4)


Unique IPs: 39
[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ent / 777 / posad / i / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ Return / Go to top /