[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ent / 777 / posad / i / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix

Pleroma

Mumble

Discord

IRC

Text Boards



File: 1653762899779.jpg (258.41 KB, 1024x1024, 1598214007-0.jpg)

 No.161[View All]

Incel News Thread
114 posts and 39 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.365

Nobody here has kids.
>>

 No.366

>>365
I do
>>

 No.367

>>366
I do not believe that.
>>

 No.368

>>362
If they didn't want to take care of a kid they shouldn't have fucking hard one retard.
>>

 No.369

>>368
They're not your kids, and not having a father makes a bad situation worse. You woulldn't know that because you did have a dad.
>>

 No.370

>>368
>It's okay for the government to kidnap your children if you owe them money.
And why does the father have to support his ex too when supporting his children?
>>

 No.371

>>368
>If they didn't want to take care of a kid they shouldn't have fucking hard one retard.
Agreed, when the father had custody he should pay for all the expenses of his kid. When the mom has custody she should.
Anything else is just turning child support into adult support.
>>

 No.372

>>369
*You woulldn't know that because you didn't have a dad.
>>

 No.373

>>371
Why should only the person who has custody of the child take care of it when both parents are responsible for not only its birth but its development? What do you think that children just stop developing when they come out of the womb? Children need both of their parents for biological and evolutionary reasons among social reasons. Not having a father figure at all, let alone your actual father, in your life can effect you developmentally for the rest of your life.

Again this is about the child you psychopath not the fucking father. You are trying to take the onus away from the biological father for being a shit parent and fucking his kids lifes up.

>>370
This is a nonsequitr I don't believe this and I believe that child support payments should go on a foodstamp esk card that cna only purchase certain commodities.

>>369
Eat shit faggot. You don't know anything or what it is like to grow up with out a father. Pathetic selfish people like you deserve to have your face caved in in the street and strung up for the crows to feast on.

It's about the child not the father
>>

 No.374

File: 1656915109282.gif (28.03 KB, 500x460, boobs8.gif)

>>373
>Why should only the person who has custody of the child take care of it when both parents are responsible for not only its birth but its development? What do you think that children just stop developing when they come out of the womb? Children need both of their parents for biological and evolutionary reasons among social reasons. Not having a father figure at all, let alone your actual father, in your life can effect you developmentally for the rest of your life.
Having only the person with custody pay for the child makes sure that each parent is allowed to support the child as they see if while letting their adult ex completely support themselves. It discourages custody fights since custody is a financial liability and forces the parents to cooperate more, which is best for the child.
>Not having a father figure at all, let alone your actual father, in your life can effect you developmentally for the rest of your life.
100% agree, which is why the current child support system should be abolished because it demonstrably keeps fathers out of the lives of their children.
>Again this is about the child you psychopath not the fucking father. You are trying to take the onus away from the biological father for being a shit parent and fucking his kids lifes up.
No I'm not, it's men that pay the majority of child support. If they only had to pay when they had custody a great number of them would be able to support their children. And not being able to support an adult woman in a separate household does not make you a shit father.
>This is a nonsequitr I don't believe this and I believe that child support payments should go on a foodstamp esk card that cna only purchase certain commodities.
It's not, you literally have the state away a child from a father because he can't pay a woman fealty.
>Eat shit faggot. You don't know anything or what it is like to grow up with out a father.
You're right, this is why I'm more objective about this than you. Like many people from broken homes, your mother raised you to be a simp to deflect criticism of her culpability for the bad situation she put her children in.
>Pathetic selfish people like you deserve to have your face caved in in the street and strung up for the crows to feast on.
Come at me bro.
>It's about the child not the father
Child support is paid by the father, so in this case it's not about children, it's about the father.
>>

 No.383

File: 1656987486710.jpg (1.51 MB, 1242x1527, 1655623157011.jpg)

>>374
>Having only the person with custody pay for the child makes sure that each parent is allowed to support the child as they see if while letting their adult ex completely support themselves. It discourages custody fights since custody is a financial liability and forces the parents to cooperate more, which is best for the child.

Unless you believe in the myth of the welfare queen then you are ignoring the fact that raising a child to maturing costs millions of dollars over the course of a 18 - 20 year life span. It's insane to expect only one person to support a child that was mutually created by two people in order to raise it to maturity. Nonsense.

>100% agree, which is why the current child support system should be abolished because it demonstrably keeps fathers out of the lives of their childre


What alternative do you propose?

>No I'm not, it's men that pay the majority of child support. If they only had to pay when they had custody a great number of them would be able to support their children. And not being able to support an adult woman in a separate household does not make you a shit father.


Because men fucking leave their children in drives in this fucking society lmao. This is insane lmao. It's like saying "oh black people are 36% of the population but commit 78% of the crime." You're ignoring the fact that black people are fucking poor lmao.

Men are leaving their children. That doesn't mean that mean should be given free reign to abandon their children.

Men who refuse to support their children should be put in jail. Support your child and take responsibility for your actions.
>>

 No.385

>>383
You are absolutely retared.
>>

 No.386

>>385
wow what an awesome retort good job 100% skill fam no cap
>>

 No.387

>>386
Your post is a clusterfuck of shit I never said with shit that doesn't even follow.
>>

 No.388

>>383
>Men are leaving their children.
Proofs? Like any at all?
>>

 No.389

File: 1657031415076.jpg (23.72 KB, 540x540, 1655680909624.jpg)

>>388
Aren't divorce rates up isn't the number of fatherless children up I thought this was common knowledge? It's literally 1 in 4 https://www.fatherhood.org/father-absence-statistic

>>387
No you are just to dumb and ideological to actually break it down eat shit retard.
>>

 No.390

>>389
>Aren't divorce rates up isn't the number of fatherless children up I thought this was common knowledge? It's literally 1 in 4
What's divorce got to do with child abandonment? And it's so high BECAUSE of child support.
>No you are just to dumb and ideological to actually break it down eat shit retard
Is it much cheaper to support a child if they live with you?
Yes or No?
Does it take a third to half a person's income to support a child?
Yes or No?
Is a woman completely unaccountable as to how she spends her child support?
Yes or No?
>>

 No.391

>>389
You can smug post all you want, doesn't make your arguments any less incoherent.
You go from claiming raising a single child cost millions to equating divorce with child abandonment. Seek help.
>>

 No.392

File: 1657033782472.png (194.26 KB, 450x505, Black_Man1-1.png)

>>389
1 in 4 children live without fathers because women seek sole custody so they can collect that delicious child support.
Feminists like you put men in an impossible situation. You make men pay half or more of their take home pay in child support regardless of the child's actual needs. Give sole custody to the mother so the father has to travel anytime he wants to spend with their kid and navigate an emotional mind field of both a vindictive ex and estranged child. Then when they are crushed by these demands you declare that they've abandoned their children.
You're simply a porky stooge creating a factory line of alienated adults that are more vulnerable to capitalist exploitation.
>>

 No.393

>>389
How do debtors' prisons and state kidnapping of children help keep fathers in the lives of their children?
>>

 No.394

File: 1657047537238.png (152.59 KB, 379x376, 1656989052794.png)

>>390
>What does diviorce have to do with child abandonment

I can't even

>Is it much cheaper to support a child if they live with you?


Shit it's cheaper to support it from child support lmao. You don't have to buy toys, diapers, birthday parties, nothing. you just gotta mail a check. How hard is that?

>>391
If they are so bad then explain it or shut up you retard.

>>392
No 1 in 4 children grow up with out fathers because capitalism is fucking alienating. This is some anti-materialist ideological bullshit.

>Reee you're a feminist cause you disagree with one on this one point


Meds.


I didn't say that child support was perfect what I did say is that men should pay SOMETHING. You people are deranged.
>>

 No.395

File: 1657053655603.gif (1020.79 KB, 480x348, boobs10.gif)

>>394
>I can't even
It's the state and baby mama's that keep men from children.
>Shit it's cheaper to support it from child support lmao.
It's not though, since the child support is based on your pay, and how the money is spent is completely unaccounted for.
>If they are so bad then explain it or shut up you retard.
I just called you out for saying it cost millions to raise one child. I know you're just trolling, but I can't resist your delicious bait.
>No 1 in 4 children grow up with out fathers because capitalism is fucking alienating.
No dipshit, this is just a deflection to avoid talking about the laws that let women use men as debt serfs. This has nothing to do with alienation.
>>Reee you're a feminist cause you disagree with one on this one point
>I didn't say that child support was perfect what I did say is that men should pay SOMETHING. You people are deranged.
Wanting to maintain the debtors' prison system that is child support is a core tenant of feminism, therefore you are a feminist.
I never said men shouldn't pay for their kids, I said they should only pay when they have custody. You keep ignoring that because you know it's fair but you want to continue to keep the system of male exploitation going because you have been bred to see men as heartless monsters by your narc feminist mother.
>>

 No.396

>>394
>I can't even
Divorce has nothing to do with father's not being in their children's lives. Fathers' would see their children if they could. And women initiate the majority of the divorces regardless.
>>

 No.397

File: 1657054369346.png (194.26 KB, 450x505, childsupport.png)

>>394
>Shit it's cheaper to support it from child support lmao.
Today I will remind them.
>>

 No.398

File: 1657059848704.png (47.34 KB, 147x163, 89827ey23.png)

>>395
>It's the state and baby mama's that keep men from children.

Idealism

>It's not though, since the child support is based on your pay, and how the money is spent is completely unaccounted for.


See and I was talking to my friends at work about this shit; I think yeah that the way the money is un accounted for is fucked and many women mismanage the money. I think that the money should be deposited to an ETB like card that can only be spent on certain items that are for the child.

>No dipshit, this is just a deflection to avoid talking about the laws that let women use men as debt serfs. This has nothing to do with alienation.


We're talking about it right now are you stupid?

>Wanting to maintain the debtors' prison system that is child support is a core tenant of feminism, therefore you are a feminist.

I never said men shouldn't pay for their kids, I said they should only pay when they have custody. You keep ignoring that because you know it's fair but you want to continue to keep the system of male exploitation going because you have been bred to see men as heartless monsters by your narc feminist mother.

I have asked you several times what the alternative that you have in mind is and you keep ignoring me and just calling me names, lmfao. What is the alternative to throwing lazy fathers in jail?


Unlike you my political opinions are extremely nuanced and not really subject to a lot of bias. thanks for the cool pics though.
>>

 No.399

>>397
Yeah I didn't say it was perfect or right and that it doesn't need fixing but it's the only way to really deal with the issue.
My friend has to pay child support and he's with the actual baby momma currently and she wont life the payments. If you have a kid though you should be forced to support them on a fundamental level.
>>

 No.400

>>398
>Idealism
Prison is not idealist.
>>

 No.401

>>398
>Unlike you my political opinions are extremely nuanced and not really subject to a lot of bias. thanks for the cool pics though.
<I don't have an argument
Glad to see we're finally getting somewhere.
>>

 No.402

>>400
It literally is. you opinion is based on ideals not material reality. that's idelism, kek.
>>

 No.403

File: 1657069423581.jpg (195.96 KB, 850x651, 1657035609546.jpg)

>>401
Did you miss the wall of text that preceeded that or are you actually the one with out an argument?
>>

 No.404

>>403
I didn't miss anything homie.
>>

 No.405

>>402
The state will really throw you in prison if you violate custody orders or don't pay child support, how is that idealist?
>>

 No.406

>>404
Except my whole arugment that proceeded that. You're hopeless I am out of here. You're just being stubborn now.

>>405
Because basing your ideology on "It's actually womens fault men are leaving their children!" Is retarded and idealistic and not based on any objective material analysis like capitalism being alienating and making people, including men, hate their lives among making them stupid ignorant retards.
>>

 No.407

>>406
Women have the ability to throw men into debtors' prison and are incentived to do so by child support and welfare.
You're the idealist with bigoted claims that men are doing it because they're irresponsible.
Look we're just going to have to agree to disagree. You're a lib that loves debtors' prison and has fash tier theories abou men having crime bones, While I believe state violence and economics shape society and peoplR's behavior.
>>

 No.408

>>407
See you keep using all this loaded lanugage like reactionaries do when they talk about gay issues, kek. You arn't even listening you're just jerking yourself off.

I'm out.

> While I believe state violence and economics shape society and peoplR's behavior.


You believe that people have genetic predispositions about greed and finance based on their sex and you are caling me a fascist? This is pure cope.

Marx wasn't against jails retard. What do you think should replace the current system? You can't answer me cause you have no idea. You are just rambling and you have never once actually thought about this.

As I stated it should be heavily reformed but it's the only way to make shitty fathers support their children. Cope seethe and dial8
>>

 No.420

File: 1657374781513.mp4 (4.77 MB, 406x720, blackmagicfuckery-vv1g8e.mp4)

It is now possible to become Chad.
>>

 No.422

>>420
What happens if he bangs a chick would that stuff just fall off?
>>

 No.423

>>422
Did you see how sticky it was? She's going to have to grab a handful of it before that shit comes off.
>>

 No.424

>>423
True. That makeup is killer for quick dating app sex I would guess.
>>

 No.438

File: 1658101028245.jpg (148.35 KB, 1080x1350, HolUp-w1ab1r.jpg)

>>

 No.441

>>438
Can't tell if this is beta soy or sigma chad
>>

 No.442

>>441
>Can't tell if this is beta soy or sigma chad
It's just people doing something that they can sell as a story to the attention economy
>>

 No.445

Postmortem Sperm Retrieval Is Turning Dead Men Into Fathers
https://archive.ph/2bdsu
>>

 No.450

File: 1658585362162.mp4 (9.02 MB, 854x480, iamatotalpieceofshit-tqed9….mp4)

>Feminist vlogger advocates for the genocide of men.
>>

 No.464

One in five adults don’t want children — and they’re deciding early in life
https://web.archive.org/web/20220727044725/https://www.futurity.org/adults-dont-want-children-childfree-2772742/
>>

 No.465

File: 1659192211477.jpg (467.64 KB, 1080x1553, 1659191062080336.jpg)

>>

 No.467

>>450
>Wants to kill all men
>To stupid to realize that that will also kill all women.
>>

 No.473

Republican Wants To BAN Child Support To Stop Abortions
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKoiXuMZxDY
This commentator is making fun of this Republican for having a non-nonsensical point but I think it's still politically interesting that the idea of ending child support is making it's first appearance in the US Congress.
This might be a harbinger of more anti-feminist legislation.
>>

 No.486

>>473
Looks more like capitalists trying to roll back more social services, under a pretext.
>>

 No.495

File: 1659736627097.mp4 (36.85 MB, 1334x750, antifeminists-wgtivm.mp4)


Unique IPs: 14

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ent / 777 / posad / i / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]