[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble


File: 1702922690622.jpg ( 138.76 KB , 785x2048 , 20231218_110355.jpg )

 No.4595

Should paternity testing be mandatory at birth regardless of whether there's a dispute about who the father is?
>>

 No.4597

Yes.
>>

 No.4598

File: 1703001424255.jpg ( 103.77 KB , 671x945 , 20231219_085624.jpg )

Why are men so petty?
>>

 No.4600

Those posts in the OP are typical gaslighting ghetto feminists.

"A real man would X". Yet these women would never ever take responsibilitity for their own actiins. They would dump a man for not appealimg to their sexual fetishes.
>>

 No.4601

>>4595
That, outlawing male genital mutilation and making conscription for both genders in case of war would give us gender equality.

I have been told feminists are for gender equality.
>>

 No.4604

File: 1703177317778.jpg ( 173.78 KB , 1024x1024 , 1698369788097494.jpg )

It's rumored that they banned a certain kind of heredity homework from schools because it would always uncover paternity fraud for at least one child in the class.
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT8HKSrjW/
>>

 No.4607

>>4604
that sounds pretty plausible in a class of anything above thirty lol. Even if it's super rare you'll still have an expected number in a given year with enough trials. the more you fish the more fish you catch
>>

 No.4656

>>4595
>Thinking about improving the stability of the family unit instead of exterminating this abomination of a social relationship in the societal reproduction process
uyghur faggot go back & kys
>>

 No.10021

>>4656
>>4607
>>4604

This is why singlehood is a blessing.
All this talk about “declining birth rates” is hogwash.
Even if it weren’t, so what?
Humanity had a good run
May as well go out without a bang
>>

 No.10022

>>10021
Yikes. Malthusian much?
>>

 No.10023

>>10022
>we need greater anthropological quanta on earth. Anthropological quanta is the only natural resource on earth that matters, everything else revolves around it
>>

 No.10024

>>10021
Yikes. Anti-human much?
>>

 No.10025

>>10024
This is rich coming from a site that hates women and wishes death and slavery upon them.
>>

 No.10032

>>10025
State-assigned girlfriend program is NOT slavery! Amongst the proposals it is often mentioned that it would be on a voluntary basis and through a state-owned enterprise dedicated to social ends instead of a privately-owned app that is designed to milk people's money.
>>

 No.10033

>>10032
I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about how sites like these wanna take away female autonomy to mediate male misery.

Also, state assigned GFs is just mail-in order brides which was outlawed in the 1990s.
>>

 No.10034

>>10033
Maybe women should be less of massive bitches.
>>

 No.10035

>>10034
Men should abolish chivalry to curb female entitlement.
Unfortunately, men are too much of simps to stop.

Just invest in pornographic VR or something.
>>

 No.10036

>>10034

>I'm only misogynist because women are bitchy



.neet never fails
>>

 No.10037

>>10036
Ruthless critique of all that exists, that includes women. You'll have to go back to Reddit if you can't handle m'lady's honor impinged.
>>

 No.10066

>>10037
Yea, but if your critique of women is based on lack of sexual prospects, that says more about you than women.
>>

 No.10067

>>10066
Critiques stand and fall on their own. This is just boring old liberal moral failure rhetoric. If you have a substantive argument against our critique by all means share it.
Also there's this staggering naive just world fallacy built into your accusation. That someone who cannot get women is "bad" in someway. Material reality contradicts this. 80% of all violence inflicted on women are done by their domestic partner, aka boyfriend or husband. A.K.A. Someone who, by definition, is having sex.

You also ignore the possibility that someone can advocate for incels, all while still have sexual relationships with women.
People who are having sex are not "good", some of the most reprehensible men are swimming in pussy.
Please touch grass because this reddit tier belief that women rewards "goodness" with sex is so insanely out of touch.
>>

 No.10070

>>10036
No I am a mysogonist because women have taken advantage of the rights that have been granted to them by liberal democratic institutions and have used them to treat men like exposable commodities rather than people.

Dumb ass.
>>

 No.10071

>>10067
Actually most women reward being a complete dick.
>>

 No.10074

>>10071
They don't. They just want amusement
>>

 No.10075

>>10067
Then I guess critiquing Jews is not racism even though most of the things they're accused of doing is prevalent in other ethnoracial groups.

Also, using "liberal" as a slur for disagreements show that your point is moot.
Much like Chris Poole's rectum.
>>

 No.10076

>>10067
>Also there's this staggering naive just world fallacy built into your accusation. That someone who cannot get women is "bad" in someway.

Where did I say that incels are bad for being unable to score?

I simply said that inceldom is due to chivalry.
>>

 No.10077

>>10076
Would you consider simping to count as chivalry?
>>

 No.10081

>>

 No.10086

>>

 No.10097

>>10086
Chivalry is smiling.
It's just men showing off like jackasses to appease maidens.
Degrading themselves and their fellow gender-mates to appeal to the opposite sex.
>>

 No.10098

>>10097
>Chivalry is simping

Ftfy
>>

 No.10100

>>10077
Yes, chivalry only works when women have no rights. Basically it was fine because the first woman a man would court would become his wife.
It didn't turn into this endless parade of women leading men on for a free meal.
>>

 No.10103

>>10100
>Yes, chivalry only works when women have no rights. Basically it was fine because the first woman a man would court would become his wife.

Chivalry only worked with men of prestige. It wasn’t just women whom lacked rights. Most men were seen as expendable working machines unworthy of personhood.


>It didn't turn into this endless parade of women leading men on for a free meal.


It was like that even in the old days. But the difference was, it was encouraged for men to be aggressive showoffs.

Unique IPs: 23

[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome