>>3081>No one has ever said that labor has to be "creative"In my motherfucker tongue it is. Well, worse for you then lmao.
Now I get it why it is precisely English that is considered as
the business language ‒ it seemingly doesn't have a way to distinguish a machine-like, executionary, human activity from a creative one.
>It doesn't matter what you think n33t means idealistically it's the fact of the matter than if you do not productive labor or work for society then you are leeching off society for nothing.<Your opinion: idealist. My opinion: materialist.1) It is one of the first ideological
class social theories that whoever doesn't work is a disgusting leech on the whole class
society (= societal
system). It was made up because that way the leading class could "recruit" their new profit slaves into forcing other people, who were out of class-relation production system, into werking their lives off along with them because,
supposedly, this social behavior is "normal".
In reality, it is promoted into societal culture because this is the most
profitable meme for the ruling class(es) to have in their social system, which was specifically modified for extracting as much profit from human work as fast as currently (due to the class struggle) possible.
1.1) Need I remind you that it is not some little group of alienated kids who take your goods away for nothing but your bitch boss who wants more & more production of things
nobody really needs anymore? Problem is not some neets, it is the
hyperproduction which has already gone to such degrees that we're destroying our own home with massive emitions, waste pollution & overconsumption of goods that's made just to
try to sell them for whatever reason invented.
Point of Gommunizm, as a revolutionary movement, is in restructuring (
not "improving"!) the industry in such a way
that nobody would need to work anymore just for maintaining the present consumption rate, which will liberate people from wasting their lives just for producing stuff. This point of improving the production forces has been achieved long ago, the problem
now is in nation-alienated production forces along with the localized resources, born by the
inherently hierarchical capitalist system of humanity-wide division of work. This alienation of one group of humanity from another is upholding the system of economy (= the
trade/
exchange of commodified things),
which inevitably forces any such
nation to compete against other
nations in having more goods to sell & less goods to buy,
which inevitably leads to constant
planned overproduction of things to sell (no any
overcompletion of production plan is in any way possible under socialist system of production!),
which inevitably leads to oversaturation of market due to physical (not even financial!) inability of humans to consume more & more goods indefinetily (except… see further),
which inevitably leads to a clash of overproducing
nations with each other,
which inevitably leads to a humanity-wide war for crushing the competition & getting even more monopolistic position in the capitalist system of division of labor for getting even more market share for even more production dominance. This war will also open up many new markets for repairing destroyed commodities, people included, so a total war is profitable even for the smallest of
nations, due to
nations being a bourgeoise invention for mobilizing as many less-contradictory populations living in a designated area as possible for turning it to producing as much goods as possible.
So yes, the retarded rightoids are completely
right: communism
is bad for the
economy, since it aims to abolish it as a phenomenon by removing any societal barriers to unalienated production of goods, which will eliminate any need in trade or exchange of goods between human populations & any need in (@ least economical) competition between them.
2) & just to remind you, Garl Margz himself is defined as NEET too, since neither was he obtaining knowledge for upgrading the current,
capitalist, social system (= not in
Education), neither he himself in any way participated in production of commodities (= not in
Employment), neither he was getting any training/conditioning for being a competent addition to the industrial
commodity producing machine (= not in
Training).
Man, the reactos were completely right! What a dogdamned parasite of
the working class! (inherently layzee proles are not included)
>it's not their society it's our societyThen why do you live like
the elites of this same society tell you to? Why don't you own the fruits of your labor, in
your society? Why is your voice in this society
of yours doesn't mean anything?
Maybe you were just memed into solidarizing with your exploiters
through belonging to the same society relations system, like billions of other people?
>you are capitalistically worthlessA usual state for an agitator.
>revisionismYou mean
heresy, as defined by the catholic one & only Papal State of Moscow/Beijing/whatever whenever its elites were/are pissed off @ anyone rejecting their profit-preferable strain of theology economics.
& yea, the og revisionista was
Lenin who was criticised by the entirety of SuccDam reactionary dismovement in the likes of Plekhanov, lmao. & the most ferocious fighter for
revisionism was Marx along with his bro Engels, who understood very well who & what for would like to use their incomplete theories as a dogmatic approach to societal problems. In one moment, all of the antirevisionistic aktion scicoms became the most ferocious & fascistic apologets of neofash reyganomics in post-USSR. I wonder why.
Same stuff with
adventurism, a derogatory term which the United States of Soviet Rushia's ruling class was putting onto any uncontrolled popular guerrilla movement,
including the Cuban one.
>You will cope and seetheno
>>3083>HeWE