>>8556>Yes. Because they're conservatives. And conservatives are dumb.>Every woman that isn't a whoremonger is a conservative.Ha ha, cope. Most women in Asia and Europe also find high body counts gross. And women in Europe are by no means virginal.
This unchecked promiscuity on the part of women is really only a US phenomenon. A big part of the reason is the prohibition of prostitution.
Without the prohibition of prostitution, Women outside of the US don't have an army of simps to fall back on once they've been thrown off the cock carousel.
>That's 'cause you're cucked by conservative social norms.No, it's because I'm not a raging narcissist like you. I can respect the boundaries of other people, particularly when it comes to intimate relationships where you will be the most vulnerable than at any point in your entire life.
>Marrying very early for the sake of marrying doesn't lead to a satisfying relationship. I never suggested marrying early. You obviously have a compulsion for Chad Cock, since you are incapable of imagining a woman pursing a string serious long-term relationships before getting married. and therefore having a low body count.
You've convinced yourself of this false virgin whore dichotomy that if a woman isn't having a carousel of cock parade through their her bedroom, it means that she is a stunted naive virgin.
>It's not just "le women," men also act like that: fuck around in their youth but then settle down when they're older. This is demonstratively not true and is in alpha fallacy. Since the only males you see as even human are chads and yes, chads are quite promiscuous and have high body counts, but you project that onto all men. The fact of the matter is that nearly half of all men under 35 haven't been in a sexual relationship in over a year.
>It's only when women do it is it considered bad because of the patriarchal gender norms.The West is a matriarchy with the prohibition of prostitution. Women have far more leverage in expressing their sexuality than men do. The only way men can seek sexual fulfillment in a societally accepted way is through a relationship. And rosties like you use that as ransom to squeeze every drop of money, blood, sweat, tears, and dignity out of men.
>And it's only considered bad because of the obsession with the ideal of "purity" which is a remnant of Christianity, nothing more.No, it has to do with the idea of marriages being monogamous. You cannot reasonably expect someone to be happy in a monogamous relationship when they spent their entire life being promiscuous, it's like asking a tiger to change their stripes.
This is what I mean when I say Western women need to really interrogate why they want to be married in the first place.
When you live your entire life in an alternative lifestyle, why do you suddenly want a traditional one? It's very obvious that it's an act of desperation.
And all your crying screams of entitlement. If you truly desire a traditional marriage, you must do the prerequisite work it requires.
But it's pretty clear you just feel entitled to the benefits of a marriage. i.e. having a long-term emotional bond with another adult as well as a long shared history as well as the social capital being a married woman gives you.
But you spend your entire youth chasing Chad. It's clear to anyone with even a modicum of self-respect that that is what you truly value. Why not continue pursuing it? While Chad may not marry you. Perhaps you can arrange some sort of harem. Or be a mistress. Regardless, the material conditions are working against you. War in Ukraine is already bringing the balance of male to females back in favor of men. And there's every reason to believe there will be more warfare in the future.