>>7662>Men get infertile when they're like 90? It's dumb to try and even make that an issue.Men get lower sperm coub
nt with age. they still secrete semen.
Also, havin a biological father over forty impregnating a bitch can cause bodily dosrders such as weakened immune sytems, premature balding, autism, etc.
Men who forgo having kids thrkugh ther twe ties and early thirties should not be allowed to procreate.
>Most would if they could. Especially if it's just sex and they don't have to pretend to care about their snaptoks over dinner.Again with the stupid ass assumptions..
.ost teen girls who get woth older guys are aware that they dont care about whateergab they have.
Teen girls are only going with older guys for attention and money not to make friends.
Also, social media is used by people over thirty-five.
>>7647>newgeneThats not me but wy are you gettin upset about someone choosing to watch porn and wy are ypu bringing pedophilia into it?
You sound like a bitchass uygha.
>>7665>Of course they do, because americunt men have always been simps and assholes. This agecuck cancer could only have originated in America because Americans only respect Chad and believe that only teen Chad has the right to access teen pussy.Ypurr wromg on the last sentence.
But the rest o your post is right.
Angloid culture is massively anti-precocious/pro-infantilisation.
Why else do Millennials and Gen X whine aout adulting?