[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble
ReturnCatalogBottom

File: 1750535122176-0.jpg ( 143.39 KB , 712x978 , state-issued girlfriends.jpg )

File: 1750535122177-1.png ( 292.31 KB , 816x846 , 67ggpbiuk1591.png )

File: 1750535122177-2.jpg ( 37.46 KB , 304x304 , Gf compass PoliticalCompas….jpg )

File: 1750535122177-3.jpg ( 194.89 KB , 1080x977 , State issued rule_-_4eFJA0….jpg )

File: 1750535122177-4.jpg ( 405.84 KB , 2048x1534 , 2021-11-09_mulch_tv_145792….jpg )

 No.8759

State-issued girlfriend program thread


Alternate titles for this program/policy/initiative/plan:
state-assigned
state-issued
state-mandated
state-appointed
state-ordered
state-mediated
state-arranged

government-assigned
government-issued
government-mandated
government-appointed
government-ordered
government-mediated
government-arranged
>>

 No.8760

File: 1750535567680-0.png ( 541.77 KB , 1345x1802 , Your state-mandated girlfr….png )

File: 1750535567680-1.jpg ( 216.78 KB , 1080x1630 , c2b2a37ce1640575a1816e329e….jpg )

File: 1750535567680-2.jpg ( 121.61 KB , 1125x1114 , fk0n1owslcz91_.jpg )

>>

 No.8761

File: 1750535601771-0.png ( 65.01 KB , 807x483 , The only way I could ever ….png )

File: 1750535601771-1.jpg ( 117.17 KB , 750x1334 , kp9mbrljdu761.jpg )

some inputs
>>

 No.8762

Do you even want a girlfriend?

Having a gf is pretty hard. It's difficult emotionally, she's going to make you feel all sorts of ways and you have to figure out how to process all that, you have to figure out how to talk to her in a way that she understands and doesn't lead to fights. And then there are the inevitable fights themselves. Finally the worst part of all there is the breakup.

You also need to do all of that shit like set boundaries for yourself, respect hers, do things for her ALL the fuckin time, get her flowers, bail her out, it's like having a kid.

Are you even prepared to deal with all that? Because the benefits aren't clear cut either: you're on a roller coaster the whole time.
>>

 No.8763

>>8762
I don't know man, I just like the idea of it
>>

 No.8769

Or maybe we should like, stop criminalising teenage romance?
Part of the problem with lack of sex/romance is because of juvenoia preventing meaningful connections in your prime years.

In the old days, the village elders used to have social functions to teach newfound adults how to socialize and get mates.

Unfortunately, North America and Western Europe discouraged that kind of child rearing in the eighteenth century, preferring to infantilise young adults, telling the that they should focus only on academia and prepubescent-level leisure.
>>

 No.8770

>>8763
You're absolutely not ready for a gf.

>>8762
This.
Romantic relationships are just like parent-child relations with some added benefits.
>>

 No.8771

>>8769
and then, when those youth start "adulting" they shame them for being unable to find a partner, it's perverse
>>

 No.8809

File: 1751306141779-0.jpg ( 351.15 KB , 1080x1346 , state ass gf tumblr_51b045….jpg )

File: 1751306141779-1.jpg ( 77.4 KB , 650x701 , stat ass gf 29524369c30ee0….jpg )

File: 1751306141779-2.jpg ( 77.19 KB , 650x701 , stat ass gf 29524369c30ee0….jpg )

File: 1751306141779-3.jpg ( 99.63 KB , 429x634 , state ass gf prog 1e652003….jpg )

File: 1751306141779-4.jpg ( 269.43 KB , 768x1365 , state assigned gf program ….jpg )

some propaganda posters
>>

 No.8828

The idea of a state assigned gf would work for teens.
In fact. I would rather we have mandatory courtship training starting in childhood.
>>

 No.8831

>>8759
>state assigned job
>state assigned housing
>state assigned gf
At what point do you just admit you are a failure of a man who can't do anything himself.
>>

 No.8833

>>8831
>nooo just the anarchy of the market decide everything
fuck you reactionary
>>

 No.8836

File: 1751493393411.png ( 233.94 KB , 498x325 , 123456789.png )

I propose we pilot the state-mandated GF initiative by first matching older women over 25(Christmas Cakes) with healthy young males aged 13 to 22. This mutually beneficial arrangement could offer much, addressing the vitality of youth while offering their mature counterparts an escape from an otherwise barren existence. Naturally, participation would scarcely need to be enforced.
>>

 No.8837

>>8833
>nooo just the anarchy of the market decide everything
Why do you not have agency? Why is it either the government or the market that decides for you? Why can't you do anything yourself? Is communism just childhood 2.0? Instead of your parents providing food, housing etc. you want to state to do everything for you?
>>

 No.8839

>>8831
>>8833
this is a false dichotomy that rejects civil society and is therefore at odds with the historic goals of socialism
>>

 No.8844

>>8837
>Why do you not have agency? Why is it either the government or the market that decides for you? Why can't you do anything yourself? Is communism just childhood 2.0? Instead of your parents providing food, housing etc. you want to state to do everything for you?
fuck off with this libertarian toddler tantrum. "Agency" is a fucking myth.The "free market" is just feudalism with a fucking spreadsheet.congrats on deepthroating the boot while they auction off your future.You want "personal responsibility"? Cool, go build your own roads, sew your own stitches, and die quietly in a ditch
>>

 No.8845

>>8837
You seem to think these are individual problems that only affect anon, when in reality housing, jobs and relationships depend entirely on the machinery of society. Those things can only meaningfully improve for everyone if you treat them as a social problem. Conversely treating it as an individual problem is mystifying the reality of capitalism and hurts the proletariat.
>>

 No.8860

>>8836
What in the absolute fuck is this pedophilic, misogynistic schizophrenia? you’ve spent way too much in incel forums.Women don’t exist to "fix" your warped sense of entitlement and are not your fucking social welfare program.
>>

 No.8861

>>8844
>"Agency" is a fucking myth
If you don't believe in free will then why are you responding? You can't change anybody's mind with words if free will doesn't exist. Why are you getting upset? Smoke a joint and have a fap instead.

>>8845
>in reality housing, jobs and relationships depend entirely on the machinery of society
You don't want to buy a house or interview for a job or ask a girl out. You want somebody else to do the work and give you the result. That's the problem.
>>

 No.8865

>>8831
>>8837
>>8861
This is the result of adulthood being reduced to customer rewards program being based on age and finances rather than skill.

Leftism has been reduced to mean reparations for willful losers rather than salvation for the working man.
>>

 No.8866

>>8860
>Pedophilia
>Misogyny

It's not that.
But it is entitlement
Idk why people have no problem with sending male youths to die in war or work in factories but have a problem with them having sex or romantic relationships

Also,I don't see much backlash against social programs suggesting make elders with female juniors.
>>

 No.8917

People don't even have a good argument against state-issued GF programs.

The future tide is coming, you can't stop it.

The future belongs to state-issued girlfriends and their companion recipient!
>>

 No.8924

>>8917
>People don't even have a good argument against state-issued GF programs.

I can't tell if you're joking but the argument is autonomy and consent.
>>

 No.8925

>>8866
>but have a problem with them having sex or romantic relationships
No one has a problem with you having sex
>>

 No.8926

>>8924
If you read >>8761
then you'd read in the first image of this particular proposal is that it's on a voluntary basis with licensing. Furthermore, there could be government bureau systems that oversees state-assigned companionship.

Also random, but in the 2nd image they take an anti-Israel stance which is a progressive stance.
>>

 No.8974

File: 1753642952661.jpg ( 105.56 KB , 867x1390 , back-view-of-young-housewi….jpg )

>>

 No.8975

File: 1753643840794.jpg ( 150.96 KB , 500x500 , K.Schwab.jpg )

>You WILL be single and you WILL enjoy it.
The synthetic left can't help but tail the views of the Demoncrat/Devil-Republican Great Reset elite.
>>

 No.8980

>>8761
If they're gonna do that, they will also have to de-criminalise teen dating
>>

 No.8981

>>8980
Why do you lionize teen dating while looking down on chronically single adult men?
>>

 No.8986

>>8975
they help but cede every point of economic and political tension to the right, they are always ready to defend the worst examples of elite behavior, they are constantly affirm the worst excesses of capitalism even when it appears to take the form of criticism
cutrone was absolutely correct in pointing out how the contemporary left is just the right, they peddle anticapitalism like how a sweatshop peddles a che t-shirt, it isnt even liberalism its just conservative talking points in socialist garb
>>

 No.8994

>>8981
I don't patronise single men.
I'm a single man myself.

I'm just saying that a major reason for why us single men have problems with getting sex and learning ve in our adult lives is due to lack of opportunity to date in our teen years.


Alot of men like us are going through our teens, twenties, and even early thirties with no romantic experience.

In the old days, village elders held social functions to teach youngsters to interact with the opposite sex.

Of course the Anglo American culture with their puritanical neurosis over sex and romance wants to infantilise us.

Teen dating is criminalized
It's adult dating that's lionised, especially when it's started late in life.
>>

 No.8995

>>8986
Leftism died in the 1950s thru the 70s.
>>

 No.9153

File: 1756677238762-0.jpg ( 58.79 KB , 700x717 , cia feminism western oppos….jpg )

File: 1756677238762-1.jpg ( 60.22 KB , 840x485 , why one in four women is o….jpg )

File: 1756677238762-2.jpg ( 89.47 KB , 717x620 , demographics long term ant….jpg )

N-no, you don't understand, liberal feminism is the way. There is no way a thing can get co-opted and used against the people…

The way things are are just the way things are and nothing should change that!!
>>

 No.9154

>>9153
Is this why men kill themselves more? Because they aren't in antidepressants?
>>

 No.9155

After COVID everyone over the age of 20 something is fat and smelly. Although this could only be a fantasy for young people with high metabolism who avoided that whole nonsense… you too will become fat and smelly cuz this is murica.

Why anyone even laments being an incel today is a mystery to me.
>>

 No.9156

>>9155
Bruh, COVID is exaggerated as the cause of social problems

Also:
>Although this could only be a fantasy for young people with high metabolism who avoided that whole nonsense… you too will become fat and smelly cuz this is murica.

Where do you get this logic from?

This reads like some bitter old person who acts like the world owes them something for losing their spark
>>

 No.9157

>>9153
How true is this?
Or rather, how true is the interpretation of said leak!
>>

 No.9158

>>8761
>muh smol plantations
>muh wankeristocracy
Inceloids turn out to be failed normieshits, more news at 11.

>>8833
>noooo muh volkstaat must give me everything

>>8860
>misoginy
Pretentious reverse-incel hitlerite whore.

>>8986
>no! it isnt even liberalism! its just conservative talking points in–
So it's liberalism.

>>9157
Who do you think is always the most bloodthirsty degenerate hitlerite in times of war? Shitskins, faggots, troons and cunts, of course! No one ever collaborates with militant reaction as much as these parts of the populus since WWI.
>>

 No.9161

>>9158
> Who do you think is always the most bloodthirsty degenerate hitlerite in times of war? Shitskins, faggots, troons and cunts, of course! No one ever collaborates with militant reaction as much as these parts of the populus since WWI.

You sure? This is something indignant white males say only to then vote for societal collapse en masse and cheer on rape and murder of innocent bystanders
>>

 No.9162

>>9156
>acts like the world owes them something

what?
>>

 No.9164

>>9158
>So it's liberalism.
yes and no, it's true that the contemporary conservative position is ultimately a liberal one in some sense, but not vice-versa
liberalism is contradictory, it was the progenitor of both socialism and fascism, it combined moments of progress with moments of regress
this all relates to the failure of the enlightenment project and the dual births of science as a systematic enterprise and ideology as a secular religion
when i say that the left isnt even liberal im also saying that what we call liberalism often isnt really liberalism either, i would rather have genuine liberalism than what we have now just because it would at least not condemn history into a permanent stasis
>>

 No.9174

"Jacobin
@jacobin
More and more people are using apps like Tinder and
Hinge to date and meet life partners. Dating apps are
increasingly a key aspect of our lives — they shouldn't
be under the control of unaccountable, for-profit
companies.
jacobin.com
Tinder Wants Money. We Want Love. The Solution: Socialize Dating Apps.
Mare and mare people are using apps like Tinder and Hinge to date and meet life
partners. Dating apps are increasingly a key aspect of our lives
they shouldn…"

Uhm… That's just the way it should be, okay, insult!
>>

 No.9214

File: 1758994717240-0.jpg ( 64.23 KB , 436x442 , stat ass gf cart 9b54fdb7e….jpg )

File: 1758994717240-1.jpg ( 49.75 KB , 540x376 , stat ass gf field ec51b412….jpg )

File: 1758994717240-2.jpg ( 52.89 KB , 750x500 , stat ass gf a214149217e9b1….jpg )

File: 1758994717240-3.jpg ( 66.97 KB , 650x662 , girl noodle spaghetti eat ….jpg )

>>

 No.9414

Socialism is the only solution. Bump.
>>

 No.9833

Governments have a responsibility to ensure the well-being of their citizens.

According to things like Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, a romantic relationship contributes to an individual's overall well-being. This program can address issues such as social isolation, mental health challenges, and even population decline in certain regions.

The program can provide an opportunity for individuals who struggle to find romantic partners or maintain relationships to experience companionship, emotional support, and intimacy. I believe it can enhance mental well-being and contribute to a healthier society overall.

That is why I am in favor a State-Assigned Girlfriend Program.
>>

 No.9855

As much as a state assigned girlfriend program sounds nice and scientific planned matchmaking looks the correct way for a developed society, in reality if you already assign stable jobs to people and put them in mass organizations their entire life the need of it is going to fade away
>>

 No.9878

Many relationships are artificial and transactional. Why not let the state mediate it?
>>

 No.9879

>>9855
>As much as a state assigned girlfriend program sounds nice and scientific planned matchmaking looks the correct way for a developed society, in reality if you already assign stable jobs to people and put them in mass organizations their entire life the need of it is going to fade away
Doesn't Singapore have government supported dating and romance programs?
>>

 No.9884

mf'rs will complain about ai companionship and then fantasize about state mandated gf's
>>

 No.9885

>>9884
AI companionship worries me because what if the company/entity decides to stop providing services?

State mandated GFs on the other hand is a distant fantasy in some possible future.
>>

 No.9887

>>9885
>AI companionship worries me because what if the company/entity decides to stop providing services?
>State mandated GFs on the other hand is a distant fantasy in some possible future.
It's possible at any time, what if there are violent men paired up with women?
My proposal for state mandated girlfriends is
>Anybody over the age of 19
>Without any history of drug abuse, alcoholism, violence
>Without a previous relationship or without any legal issues relating to any of the matters
>Psychiatric traits wouldn't be accounted for
It could work on the small scale, very, very well. They could appeal to the city office, and they could set up a date.
It's probably the best way to revive a country's birth rate. They could be dealing it in a private cupid like context, because if it's public, it'll probably be avoided since it'd resemble a humiliation ritual.
It does depend upon whether a culture would want to branch out though, since a lot of people would be over there.
>>

 No.9894

>>9885
You don't think state assigned gfs will have red tape like AI gfs? Remember, state services often use civilian enterprises.
>>

 No.9905

I don't know
>>

 No.9906

>>9894
Socialism will be the panacea.
>>

 No.9928

>>9887
>It's possible at any time, what if there are violent men paired up with women?
>My proposal for state mandated girlfriends is
>Anybody over the age of 19

Eighteen is age of majority though?

>Without any history of drug abuse, alcoholism, violence
>Without a previous relationship or without any legal issues relating to any of the matters

That's gonna result in a great thinning of the herd.
The closest you'll get is socially-defective people, neurotypical and divergent.

They may or may not be that good-looking nor have many talents

One thing to notice is that people's romantic value is determined by assets, wit, looks, and talents.

Most people are mediocre in all areas.

So imagine the social outcasts, neurotypical or divergent.

They will be less likely to have any romantic problem history because no one normal would actively want them unless to use them for disability benefits.
>>

 No.9929

>>9906
Define socialism.
Because it sounds to me more like loserdom-reparational capitalism
>>

 No.9931

>>9928
Bump
>>

 No.10316

Championing the 'state-assigned gf' cause would literally increase communism's momentum meteorically.
>>

 No.10321

>>10316
THIS
>>

 No.10324

>>8759
OP hang yourself.
>>

 No.10374

>>8759
That goth gf is hot ngl.

We already tried arranged marriages before… Didn't really turn out all that well.
>>10324
YASSSS, QUEEN, SLAYYYY (literally)!!
>>

 No.10387

>>10374
>We already tried arranged marriages before…
This would be different because the socialist state would do it instead of random parents.
>>

 No.10392

>>10387
>This would be different because the [state] would do it instead of [parents].
And somehow the state knows better who a woman should fuck than a woman does?

I'd understand if the state created a dating program or an incentive to start a family but this is just state-mandated patriarchy with a socialist coat of paint.
>>

 No.10393

>>10392
>I'd understand if the state created a dating program or an incentive to start a family but this is just state-mandated patriarchy with a socialist coat of paint.
My friend, you accidentally opened /R9K/.
>>

 No.10414

>>10393
Stop being a dirtbag forcing women to be with chuds is not leftist stop co opting the movement. Leave this to the nazi elliot rodger cock suckers.
>>

 No.10415

>>10392
Tankies and anarchkiddies are simps for liberal feminism. They claim to be materialists but won't recognize the very obvious fact that dating is a zero sum game. Since there's equal amounts of men and women there's only one man per woman. Some restrictions on female sexuality will need to be placed in order to make dating equitable.
These "leftists" will go on and on about The looming threat of imaginary scenarios like the handmade tail or state mandated girlfriends but say nothing about the very real Every day, occurrence of men being forced into debt, peonage via child support.
These so-called leftists will never admit that marriage and monogamy is actually progressive and liberatory and that having the current promiscuous sexual revolution is a step backwards and reflects more of a animalistic, and backwards way of building a society.
And no, you don't have to force women into relationships that they don't want, but you do have to recognize how women abuse their leverage in the current dating market either by doing foodie dates, sex work, or marrying men as single mothers.
>>

 No.10418

>>10393
>My friend, you accidentally opened /R9K/.
But this board is on Leftychan. And chuds give incels a bad name anyway, incels complain that they're being discriminated against because of chuds.
>>10415
>WEEEH, YOU ALL ARE ACTUALLY WOKE SJWS BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT THE 1950S BACK REEEEEE!!!!!!
Infantile disorder.
>>

 No.10423

>>10415
This is a strawman. Tankie countries are usually socially conservative. The phenomenon you describe about being pro-sexual revolution is just Western left or Western-oriented liberalism
>>

 No.10425

>>10414
>Stop being a dirtbag forcing women to be with chuds is not leftist stop co opting the movement.
Sigh, it doesn't have to be forced, it could be on a voluntary basis…
>>

 No.10426

>>10418
incels give themselves a bad name you dork
>>

 No.10427

How come UBI and disabled people welfare is praised and revered, while state-assigned gf programs are looked down upon, ridiculed and met with scorn?
>>

 No.10429

>>8760
That glasses girl is hot. Clearly glasses girls are superior.
>>8759
>state-mediated
That's a completely different thing. "State-mandated" implies some lack of consent. Nationalizing dating apps in comparasent is a pretty mild thing.
>>

 No.10430

>>10423
Then why is it always coming out of the mouths of tankies and anarchkiddies. Yeah it's liberalism so liberals say it too.
>>

 No.10432

>>10418
>>WEEEH, YOU ALL ARE ACTUALLY WOKE SJWS BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT THE >1950S BACK REEEEEE!!!!!!
Infantile disorder.
>Noooo, you can't restrict the promiscuity of women even if it's the the detriment of men and children. I DON'T ARE ABOUT CHILDREN, THE PUSSY IS ALL!
You do realize the institution of marriage is millennial old, and doesn't just date back to the "1950's".
>>

 No.10436

>>10427
People have unironically suggested stipends for disabled people to pay sex workers.
It's something I also support. Sexual gratification needs to become more widely recognized as a necessity.
>>

 No.10441

>>10432
>Supporting the promiscuity of women is NOT COOL, MAN!
<Supporting the promiscuity of men is totally fine. Actually, you know what? Women are required to be promiscuous to me specifically whenever I want, however I want.
Standard conservative hypocrisy.
>sees themselves getting compared to those who want to retvrn to the 1950s
<takes the joke completely seriously
Your autism is showing, anon.
>>

 No.10442

>>10441 (me)
But alas, I'll be called an idpol-obsessed Anita Sarkeesian fan just for having the most milquetoast moderately progressive opinions like "Maybe we shouldn't support sex slavery" or "Women are persons with their own free will too." I don't think we should replicate reactionary patterns of thinking on LEFTYCHAN.NET just because it's an incel board or just because .ogre is woke trash. What are we, /pol/?
>>

 No.10443

>>10442
>Hey, maybe we should do something about the harm the liberal sexual revolution is doing to men and children
<IF YOU WON'T ACCEPT NEGLECTED CHILDREN AND DEBT PEONAGE YOU HATE WOMEN
Every time
>>

 No.10445

>>10443
>IF I WRITE MY OPPONENT'S TEXT IN ALL CAPS THAT'LL MAKE THEM LOOK LIKE A CRAZY FEMINAZI WOKE SJW LIBERAL!!
Stop it. Get some help.
>the harm the liberal sexual revolution is doing
And how is sexual revolution responsible for hypergamy that existed since the dawn of freaking humanity and the male loneliness epidemic that came after neoliberalism broke down?
>IF YOU WON'T ACCEPT NEGLECTED CHILDREN AND DEBT PEONAGE
I don't even understand your schizophrenia at this point.
>>

 No.10446

>>10445
>IF I WRITE MY OPPONENT'S TEXT IN ALL CAPS THAT'LL MAKE THEM LOOK LIKE A CRAZY FEMINAZI WOKE SJW LIBERAL!!
You're the literally calling us Rwandan genociders for saying "Hey, these empirical studies show women doing real harm. Maybe hold them accountable?"
>Stop it.
Nooooo…
>And how is sexual revolution responsible for hypergamy that existed since the dawn of freaking humanity
Are you daft? It stopped it by at least pressuring women to settle down with one man. In the 1990's barely 5% of men over 25 were unwed. Now 1/3 aren't even having sex much less in a relationship.
And no this isn't a choice, the vast majority of those people want a partner.
>and the male loneliness epidemic that came after neoliberalism broke down?
Neoliberalism starts in the 1970's. This male loneliness crisis wasn't a this until the 2010's. It's mostly caused by ideology (feminism), and the law (which is influenced by feminism.
>I don't even understand your schizophrenia at this point.
You don't understand how being thrown in jail if you don't pay a women for 18 years isn't debt peonage. Maybe read a book.
>>

 No.10448

>>10446
>You're the literally calling us Rwandan genociders for saying "Hey, these empirical studies show women doing real harm. Maybe hold them accountable?"
It's an anonymous imageboard, I have no idea what you're referring to.
>It stopped it by at least pressuring women to settle down with one man.
Okay, a woman settles for Chad or Brad or a betabuxx, now what? What is this 4D chess you're playing? You're not getting any pussy anyway, the beneficiaries of the patriarchal system are chads, not incels. Corbyn is suggesting something constructive at least.
>>

 No.10449

>>10441
<Supporting the promiscuity of men is totally fine.
Can you at least read the Wikipedia article on what marriage is. Men aren't allowed to have other partners either.
>>

 No.10450

>>10449
>Men aren't allowed to have other partners either.
<depends on the state religion
<marriage doesn't prevent cheating
<unmarried men are excluded from this rule
>>

 No.10451

>>10450
<depends on the state religion
Bruh, we're obviously not talking about theocratic gulf states or innawoods de facto failed African states. I'm talking about secular legal marriages which 95% of the world falls under.
>>

 No.10452

>>10450
<marriage doesn't prevent cheating
Infantile argument. Laws don't prevent murder either. Should we not have had the Nuremberg trials? They didn't stop the Holocaust did they?
>>

 No.10453

>>10450
my uygha wtf do you think the religion of a socialist state will be
>>

 No.10456

>>10451
>Bruh, we're obviously not talking about theocratic gulf states or innawoods de facto failed African states.
Even in other states the elites have lovers on a side, although that doesn't affect poor people tbh (proof that betabuxxes rule the world).
>Laws don't prevent murder either.
False equivalence. Internet piracy is illegal too but it ain't stopping anyone. Same for homosexuality in homophobicstates (KCD2 is pretty historically accurate in that regard).
>>10453
>my uygha wtf do you think the religion of a socialist state will be
None because religion is spooked bourgeois ideology.

Where is this discussion going? This thread is supposed to be about "state-mandated girlfriends." I voiced my opinion saying the state shouldn't force women (or men) to date someone they don't like and that Corbyn's youth socialization program is fine. That is all.
>>

 No.10457

>>10456
Why do people here look down on religion and then praise Hamas?
>>

 No.10458

File: 1776359402480.jpg ( 49.75 KB , 460x215 , header.jpg )

Before I go furthar insane from this discussion, what's your opinion of this game, guys? Seems like fun.
>>

 No.10459

>>10457
Well, I criticize Israel but I don't praise Hamas. Maybe others do but we aren't a hivemind.
>>

 No.10467

>>10458
Reddit tier preachy anti male game. It's not even realistic, even bums in Russia can pull hotties because there's so few men to go around.
>>

 No.10473

>>10467
>a dating sim about an incel ordering a state-assigned gf made by Russians
<Reddit tier
<preachy
<anti male
No idea how you were able to find anti-male propaganda in this game. That's just feminist idpol but male by this point.
>even bums in Russia can pull hotties because there's so few men to go around
When will gaijins stop idealizing a country they have never lived in?
>>

 No.10499

>>10473
>No idea how you were able to find anti-male propaganda in this game. That's just feminist idpol but male by this point.
The story of the game is that a "Skoof" or middle aged poverty stricken hermit basically a middle aged NEET goes on a website that promises visitors dates with real, attractive "alt" young women.
The site is actually a honey pot for the Russian military to ensnare draft dodgers.
Every single one of the women, save one, is trying to scam the "skoof" in some way. By either trying to get his personal details like his address, so the Russian military can abduct him and send him to the front, or scam money from him.
The one woman that is interested in a real relationship is a busted fellow middle aged single mother. The whole game is just a giant lecture on how "delusional" it is for a middle aged unemployed man to think young women would be genuinely interested in a relationship with him.
It blew up in the feminist Reddit sphere because it appealed to their man hating biases. They really view any man, particularly older men, with such contempt that having simply fantasizing about having sex with younger women is a big sin. They really believe unattached men "deserve" to be single and are all lazy, poor and out of shape.
Redditors like you loved it because it was a dating sim that "told the truth" to the type of men regularly play dating sims. That even thinking that a young woman would want them sexually, even in a fictionally setting, was actually destructive and made them vulnerable to scams like this.
Redditors and libs like you voluntarily promoted the game so that more incels could "learn the truth" which is how someone like me even knows about the game even though it's originally a Russian language game.
Like how much media is made directed at single mom's or middle aged women scolding them for reading romance novels. And how unrealistic it is to even imagine that the hunks they swoon over would ever want them in real life? None.
It's it just such fucking patronizing bullshit for you to even try to pretend otherwise just shows how much of a feminist cuck you are.
>>

 No.10500

>>10499
>>10473
If you want an example of a non man hating parody of dating sims. Watch the episode of Gravity Falls titled "Soos and the Real Girl".
It's able to make fun of the type of parasocial relationship that do develop with some players of dating sims, without completely shitting on the guy as a irredeemable loser.
>>

 No.10519

>>10499
>Redditors like you
You're retarded. And the game is blackpilled and critical of the Russian government.
>Like how much media is made directed at single mom's or middle aged women scolding them for reading romance novels.
How many works mock middle-oged virgins that are actually good though? But they are more than zero, I'll give you that.
>And how unrealistic it is to even imagine that the hunks they swoon over would ever want them in real life?
I mean, yeah, shoujo romance is unrealistic, I'm not saying it is (lol no).
>just shows how much of a feminist cuck you are
What a pearl-clutching faggot you are. It's a fucking video game, I'm asking your opinion and you're being an asshole.
>>10500
>"Soos and the Real Girl"
Yeah, I liked it.
>>

 No.10520

Why are you objectifying women and treating them as a resource to be distributed rather than a person with free will? The only reason you think that there is a distribution problem that the government needs to step in to solve is because capitalism has commodified women, just like everything else.

Unique IPs: 30
[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome