/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

>>9906
Define socialism.
Because it sounds to me more like loserdom-reparational capitalism

>>9928
Bump

Championing the 'state-assigned gf' cause would literally increase communism's momentum meteorically.

>>8759
OP hang yourself.

>>8759
That goth gf is hot ngl.

We already tried arranged marriages before… Didn't really turn out all that well.
>>10324
YASSSS, QUEEN, SLAYYYY (literally)!!

>>10374
>We already tried arranged marriages before…
This would be different because the socialist state would do it instead of random parents.

>>10387
>This would be different because the [state] would do it instead of [parents].
And somehow the state knows better who a woman should fuck than a woman does?

I'd understand if the state created a dating program or an incentive to start a family but this is just state-mandated patriarchy with a socialist coat of paint.

>>10392
>I'd understand if the state created a dating program or an incentive to start a family but this is just state-mandated patriarchy with a socialist coat of paint.
My friend, you accidentally opened /R9K/.

>>10393
Stop being a dirtbag forcing women to be with chuds is not leftist stop co opting the movement. Leave this to the nazi elliot rodger cock suckers.

>>10392
Tankies and anarchkiddies are simps for liberal feminism. They claim to be materialists but won't recognize the very obvious fact that dating is a zero sum game. Since there's equal amounts of men and women there's only one man per woman. Some restrictions on female sexuality will need to be placed in order to make dating equitable.
These "leftists" will go on and on about The looming threat of imaginary scenarios like the handmade tail or state mandated girlfriends but say nothing about the very real Every day, occurrence of men being forced into debt, peonage via child support.
These so-called leftists will never admit that marriage and monogamy is actually progressive and liberatory and that having the current promiscuous sexual revolution is a step backwards and reflects more of a animalistic, and backwards way of building a society.
And no, you don't have to force women into relationships that they don't want, but you do have to recognize how women abuse their leverage in the current dating market either by doing foodie dates, sex work, or marrying men as single mothers.

>>10393
>My friend, you accidentally opened /R9K/.
But this board is on Leftychan. And chuds give incels a bad name anyway, incels complain that they're being discriminated against because of chuds.
>>10415
>WEEEH, YOU ALL ARE ACTUALLY WOKE SJWS BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT THE 1950S BACK REEEEEE!!!!!!
Infantile disorder.

>>10415
This is a strawman. Tankie countries are usually socially conservative. The phenomenon you describe about being pro-sexual revolution is just Western left or Western-oriented liberalism

>>10414
>Stop being a dirtbag forcing women to be with chuds is not leftist stop co opting the movement.
Sigh, it doesn't have to be forced, it could be on a voluntary basis…

>>10418
incels give themselves a bad name you dork

How come UBI and disabled people welfare is praised and revered, while state-assigned gf programs are looked down upon, ridiculed and met with scorn?

>>8760
That glasses girl is hot. Clearly glasses girls are superior.
>>8759
>state-mediated
That's a completely different thing. "State-mandated" implies some lack of consent. Nationalizing dating apps in comparasent is a pretty mild thing.

>>10423
Then why is it always coming out of the mouths of tankies and anarchkiddies. Yeah it's liberalism so liberals say it too.

>>10418
>>WEEEH, YOU ALL ARE ACTUALLY WOKE SJWS BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT THE >1950S BACK REEEEEE!!!!!!
Infantile disorder.
>Noooo, you can't restrict the promiscuity of women even if it's the the detriment of men and children. I DON'T ARE ABOUT CHILDREN, THE PUSSY IS ALL!
You do realize the institution of marriage is millennial old, and doesn't just date back to the "1950's".

>>10427
People have unironically suggested stipends for disabled people to pay sex workers.
It's something I also support. Sexual gratification needs to become more widely recognized as a necessity.

>>10432
>Supporting the promiscuity of women is NOT COOL, MAN!
<Supporting the promiscuity of men is totally fine. Actually, you know what? Women are required to be promiscuous to me specifically whenever I want, however I want.
Standard conservative hypocrisy.
>sees themselves getting compared to those who want to retvrn to the 1950s
<takes the joke completely seriously
Your autism is showing, anon.

>>10441 (me)
But alas, I'll be called an idpol-obsessed Anita Sarkeesian fan just for having the most milquetoast moderately progressive opinions like "Maybe we shouldn't support sex slavery" or "Women are persons with their own free will too." I don't think we should replicate reactionary patterns of thinking on LEFTYCHAN.NET just because it's an incel board or just because .ogre is woke trash. What are we, /pol/?

>>10442
>Hey, maybe we should do something about the harm the liberal sexual revolution is doing to men and children
<IF YOU WON'T ACCEPT NEGLECTED CHILDREN AND DEBT PEONAGE YOU HATE WOMEN
Every time

>>10443
>IF I WRITE MY OPPONENT'S TEXT IN ALL CAPS THAT'LL MAKE THEM LOOK LIKE A CRAZY FEMINAZI WOKE SJW LIBERAL!!
Stop it. Get some help.
>the harm the liberal sexual revolution is doing
And how is sexual revolution responsible for hypergamy that existed since the dawn of freaking humanity and the male loneliness epidemic that came after neoliberalism broke down?
>IF YOU WON'T ACCEPT NEGLECTED CHILDREN AND DEBT PEONAGE
I don't even understand your schizophrenia at this point.

>>10445
>IF I WRITE MY OPPONENT'S TEXT IN ALL CAPS THAT'LL MAKE THEM LOOK LIKE A CRAZY FEMINAZI WOKE SJW LIBERAL!!
You're the literally calling us Rwandan genociders for saying "Hey, these empirical studies show women doing real harm. Maybe hold them accountable?"
>Stop it.
Nooooo…
>And how is sexual revolution responsible for hypergamy that existed since the dawn of freaking humanity
Are you daft? It stopped it by at least pressuring women to settle down with one man. In the 1990's barely 5% of men over 25 were unwed. Now 1/3 aren't even having sex much less in a relationship.
And no this isn't a choice, the vast majority of those people want a partner.
>and the male loneliness epidemic that came after neoliberalism broke down?
Neoliberalism starts in the 1970's. This male loneliness crisis wasn't a this until the 2010's. It's mostly caused by ideology (feminism), and the law (which is influenced by feminism.
>I don't even understand your schizophrenia at this point.
You don't understand how being thrown in jail if you don't pay a women for 18 years isn't debt peonage. Maybe read a book.

>>10446
>You're the literally calling us Rwandan genociders for saying "Hey, these empirical studies show women doing real harm. Maybe hold them accountable?"
It's an anonymous imageboard, I have no idea what you're referring to.
>It stopped it by at least pressuring women to settle down with one man.
Okay, a woman settles for Chad or Brad or a betabuxx, now what? What is this 4D chess you're playing? You're not getting any pussy anyway, the beneficiaries of the patriarchal system are chads, not incels. Corbyn is suggesting something constructive at least.

>>10441
<Supporting the promiscuity of men is totally fine.
Can you at least read the Wikipedia article on what marriage is. Men aren't allowed to have other partners either.

>>10450
<depends on the state religion
Bruh, we're obviously not talking about theocratic gulf states or innawoods de facto failed African states. I'm talking about secular legal marriages which 95% of the world falls under.

>>10450
<marriage doesn't prevent cheating
Infantile argument. Laws don't prevent murder either. Should we not have had the Nuremberg trials? They didn't stop the Holocaust did they?

>>10450
my uygha wtf do you think the religion of a socialist state will be

>>10451
>Bruh, we're obviously not talking about theocratic gulf states or innawoods de facto failed African states.
Even in other states the elites have lovers on a side, although that doesn't affect poor people tbh (proof that betabuxxes rule the world).
>Laws don't prevent murder either.
False equivalence. Internet piracy is illegal too but it ain't stopping anyone. Same for homosexuality in homophobicstates (KCD2 is pretty historically accurate in that regard).
>>10453
>my uygha wtf do you think the religion of a socialist state will be
None because religion is spooked bourgeois ideology.

Where is this discussion going? This thread is supposed to be about "state-mandated girlfriends." I voiced my opinion saying the state shouldn't force women (or men) to date someone they don't like and that Corbyn's youth socialization program is fine. That is all.

>>10456
Why do people here look down on religion and then praise Hamas?

Before I go furthar insane from this discussion, what's your opinion of this game, guys? Seems like fun.

>>10457
Well, I criticize Israel but I don't praise Hamas. Maybe others do but we aren't a hivemind.

>>10458
Reddit tier preachy anti male game. It's not even realistic, even bums in Russia can pull hotties because there's so few men to go around.

>>10467
>a dating sim about an incel ordering a state-assigned gf made by Russians
<Reddit tier
<preachy
<anti male
No idea how you were able to find anti-male propaganda in this game. That's just feminist idpol but male by this point.
>even bums in Russia can pull hotties because there's so few men to go around
When will gaijins stop idealizing a country they have never lived in?

>>10473
>No idea how you were able to find anti-male propaganda in this game. That's just feminist idpol but male by this point.
The story of the game is that a "Skoof" or middle aged poverty stricken hermit basically a middle aged NEET goes on a website that promises visitors dates with real, attractive "alt" young women.
The site is actually a honey pot for the Russian military to ensnare draft dodgers.
Every single one of the women, save one, is trying to scam the "skoof" in some way. By either trying to get his personal details like his address, so the Russian military can abduct him and send him to the front, or scam money from him.
The one woman that is interested in a real relationship is a busted fellow middle aged single mother. The whole game is just a giant lecture on how "delusional" it is for a middle aged unemployed man to think young women would be genuinely interested in a relationship with him.
It blew up in the feminist Reddit sphere because it appealed to their man hating biases. They really view any man, particularly older men, with such contempt that having simply fantasizing about having sex with younger women is a big sin. They really believe unattached men "deserve" to be single and are all lazy, poor and out of shape.
Redditors like you loved it because it was a dating sim that "told the truth" to the type of men regularly play dating sims. That even thinking that a young woman would want them sexually, even in a fictionally setting, was actually destructive and made them vulnerable to scams like this.
Redditors and libs like you voluntarily promoted the game so that more incels could "learn the truth" which is how someone like me even knows about the game even though it's originally a Russian language game.
Like how much media is made directed at single mom's or middle aged women scolding them for reading romance novels. And how unrealistic it is to even imagine that the hunks they swoon over would ever want them in real life? None.
It's it just such fucking patronizing bullshit for you to even try to pretend otherwise just shows how much of a feminist cuck you are.

>>10499
>>10473
If you want an example of a non man hating parody of dating sims. Watch the episode of Gravity Falls titled "Soos and the Real Girl".
It's able to make fun of the type of parasocial relationship that do develop with some players of dating sims, without completely shitting on the guy as a irredeemable loser.

>>10499
>Redditors like you
You're retarded. And the game is blackpilled and critical of the Russian government.
>Like how much media is made directed at single mom's or middle aged women scolding them for reading romance novels.
How many works mock middle-oged virgins that are actually good though? But they are more than zero, I'll give you that.
>And how unrealistic it is to even imagine that the hunks they swoon over would ever want them in real life?
I mean, yeah, shoujo romance is unrealistic, I'm not saying it is (lol no).
>just shows how much of a feminist cuck you are
What a pearl-clutching faggot you are. It's a fucking video game, I'm asking your opinion and you're being an asshole.
>>10500
>"Soos and the Real Girl"
Yeah, I liked it.

Why are you objectifying women and treating them as a resource to be distributed rather than a person with free will? The only reason you think that there is a distribution problem that the government needs to step in to solve is because capitalism has commodified women, just like everything else.

>>10520
>a person with free will
AHAHAHAH

>>10520
because this board is full of the ncel gooner rejects from .ogre

>>10520
>Why are you objectifying women
Why are you objectifying Chad and reducing non-Chad men to walking wallets rather than people with free will who are allowed to have standards for women that you don't meet, such as virginity and being under 18 years old?

>>10532
We really need to bully all the chuds so they go back to /pol/ and so this board becomes a real community for purplepillers. Because the purplepill needs more exposure.
>>10533
I don't think the anon does anything you accuse them of doing.
>who are allowed to have standards for women that you don't meet, such as virginity and being under 18 years old
lolwut?

>>10520
Why are you infantilizing women and men who may be interested in volunteering for state-assigned/state-arranged romantic companionship programs, while instead, you are giving virtual erogenous massages to privatized apps that control our love lives?

Furthermore, Marx said:
What we have to deal with here is a communist society, not as it has developed on its own foundations, but, on the contrary, just as it emerges from capitalist society; which is thus in every respect, economically, morally, and intellectually, still stamped with the birthmarks of the old society from whose womb it emerges.

>>10533
Capitalism commodifies both sexes. Plus you're a pedo.
>>10571
Saying that there is no liberation from capitalism without the liberation of women is not infantalizing anyone. Women are not a resource; people are not resources. Once people are liberated from being resources for the capitalist system they will date who they want to date and will have more resources to do so. The issues in romantic relationships you see under capitalism will largely go away when people are free to self-actualize as a true human being.

>>10576
>hurr durr pedo is when you like any girl who's objectively more attractive than me
kys roastie bitch

>>10576
>they will date who they want to date
that's great I will date the 10/10 stacy or else I call the nkvd on her and her parents

>>10576
>>they will date who they want to date
That's great, so 15-year-old girls will date 30-something men if they want. You have such an inspiring vision, how do I subscribe to your newsletter?