/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

I'll start:

Nintendo Switch 2
Superman
Avengers Doomsday

Cyberpunk 2077 updates
Cyberpunk 2077 sequel

GTA 6 aka GTA VI


MCU X-Men
DCU films & TV shows

Enjoying singlehood

A creative hobby

>Nintendo Switch 2
Greedy slop
>Superman
Slop
>Avengers Doomsday
Sloppity slop
>Cyberpunk 2077 updates
>Moar games
Go outside
>A creative hobby
Based
>People that love you
Based

To kill Christians instead

>>8822
>>8823
Thanks for the input.

>>8824
>>8826
Why are people not allowed to simply enjoy things?

>>8846
>Why are people not allowed to simply enjoy things?
Because you aren't creating anything. Better to meditate than to consoom capitalist slop. That shit is stopping you from self-actualizing.

>Because you aren't creating anything. Better to meditate than to consoom capitalist slop. That shit is stopping you from self-actualizing.

This sentiment you have is ironically what stops self actualisation.
This moral obsession with wanting to "change the world" to punish others for having their own personal treats because it's "not productive" is just self righteousness.
And the people who hold views like yours are often the least productive.

Avengers Doomsday (2026)
Avengers Secret Wars (2027)

MCU X-Men (2028)
Black Panther 3 starring David Jonsson


Unfortunately MCU Ghost Rider starring Ryan Gosling is directed by a Zionist

Making foids seethe when they see the pussy I pull when I fly overseas.

>it's over
<but also what you're doing is coping and that's also bad somehow
What does the manosphere mean by this?

>tfw waiting for money to come in so I can consume and buy
<tfw waiting for thing to come out so I can consume it
Sucks man.

>>12864
That looks good actually. I should go to Taco Bell.

Buying cool or fun looking stuff

>>8826
consumerism is literally the only enjoyable thing about capitalism

>>13219
Wrong.
Consumerism is merely a natural law.
Stop with your spooks about "muh consumersim le bad"

Capitalism is doing it wrong is all.

Plants consume carbon dioxide, water, minerals to produce sugars for consumption for all heterotrophic entities.

The sun consumes hydrogen and helium to produce radiation so that the earth can be warmed up.

The earth consumes solar radiation from the sun for heat and biochemical energy.

Consumerism cannot exist without production and vice versa

>>12482
It's just obnoxious ideologies trying to morally harass you into doing their bidding

Irony is, all the talking heads who whine about "LDAR" are limp wrists whom suffer from sociocognitive deficiency concerning the daily struggle

Most of history is humans living in shambles just barely getting by.

All ideologies preaching about "hard times makes strong men" or "you have nothing to lose but your chains" are just benchwarmers with loud mouths.

>>13220
Hold on but capitalism is what sells you the idea of a good feeling along with the product: you aren't buying a hamburger just in form, you are buying a Big Mac™ and I don't know if that is commodity fetishism that Marx talked about but that is definitely distinct from how nature consumes.

>>13222
Still doesn't negate what I said. So what if people feel good about consuming their product?

If anything, it's not consumption that's the problem. It's the people who feel the need to politicise/philosophise their treats.

I feel good when I consume homemade scalloped potatoes I made.

All you leftist and rightist "intellectuals" seem to act like that making umpteenth critiques about mundane stuff makes you profound.

You all don't even care about actual science.
You're too obsessed with flowery abstractions

>>13223
>All you leftist and rightist "intellectuals" seem to act like that making umpteenth critiques about mundane stuff makes you profound.
He's out of line, but he's right.

>>13227
So he's against socialism?
If he's right, why is he posting on here? Shouldn't he be on PragerU?

>>13223
It's not that consume=bad, it's that we've shaped society in a way that substitutes consumption for actual accomplishment. You don't have to create, you can watch. You don't have to laugh, there's a laugh track. You don't just eat good food, you are amazing because you consumed a product!

In this way consumption becomes something other than a means to an end, it becomes the end, and that is a problem in the same way being addicted to drugs is a problem. And we've structured production around this. Now instead of working to fulfill some societal need, we have to work endlessly to satisfy the endless need for consumption. Don't you get it?

>>13235
I actually thought of a way out of this hell too. We need AI to become intelligent enough that it becomes a consumer. Not in terms of electricity but in the way I just described: where the product is no longer a means to an end but consuming it is the end, the product becomes a symbol.

It's like videos of people reacting to music. The music stops mattering, you can have people enjoy it for you. The music is no longer the product, the consumption of it takes a new form.

Once AI can do this, once it starts to consume product and get excited for next product, when we humans become the enlightened producers of goyslop for the AI, and AI becomes the consoomer, that will be the next stage in our evolutionary history.

>>13236
You're not making sense here

>>13236
>once it starts to consume product and get excited for next product
lol

>>13223
>All you leftist and rightist "intellectuals" seem to act like that making umpteenth critiques about mundane stuff makes you profound.
Left and right is apparently the same… Yikes, fascist apologia much?

>>13240
I think I am. The highest form of man is to produce a Product for consumers.

Most people now are consoomers. Once they are elevated to the class of based producer they will self-actualize as a person and become their full selves.

>>13242
What did I say that was wrong? There's no genuine difference between left and right nowadays anyways.
Leftism and rightism in their definitional forms do not exist except under a liberal banner nowadays.



>>13243
> I think I am. The highest form of man is to produce a Product for consumers.

Like I said, production and consumerism are both sides of the same operation.
Why do people make art?
"It's to express their inner world"

That's a small part of it.

People make art so that they can have others or themselves consume it.

>>13246
Shut up, you stupid little lib. Didn't you slander the Soviet Union because they didn't like Jews emigrating and settling to Palestine as Zionism? And you didn't address it and just went on about your day.

>>13247
Can you clarify where I said this? I said that they were responsible for persecuting Eastern European Jews

>>13252
>I said that they were responsible for persecuting Eastern European Jews
No they weren't you fucking moron.
Literally the main argument behind claims of Soviet "anti-semitism" was that the Soviets weren't allowing Jews special privileges to leave the USSR and colonize Palestine.

The Soviets liberated the Nazi concentration camps, criminalized anti-semitism, and then got slandered in a massive zionist campaign because they turned against zionism and didn't give Jews special "leave the country, take all your wealth with you, and and go steal from Arabs" privileges.

>>13253
>Literally the main argument behind claims of Soviet "anti-semitism" was that the Soviets weren't allowing Jews special privileges to leave the USSR and colonize Palestine.

Wasn't the left originally pro-settler originally?

>>13255
When is "originally"?
If you go back far enough, it might be true that at one point there was no single totally unified leftist position on colonialism, but that's not the same as being "pro-settler" - and by the time of Marx, you had abolitionism and opposition to colonialism in India and Ireland which were mainstream within the left.

The USSR did specifically lend a lot of support to zionist colonization of Palestine in the '40s (following in the tracks of such great leftists as Lord Balfour, PM of the British Empire, and Baron Walter Rothschild, international war financier), but turned against it in the late '40s-early-'50s. Lenin, in his writings, had opposed it, and I don't claim that Lenin was perfect, but Stalin briefly supporting it was obviously a mistake, and was proven to be so shortly after the partition of Palestine. There is a lot of dishonesty about what happened after that point, but it is a historical fact that zionist terrorists began bombing and attacking Soviet embassies, a trend which continued for decades alongside intensified slanders of the Soviet government as "anti-semitic" since they had pulled support for zionism, which was already increasingly US-aligned by 1950 to such an extent that overlooking its reactionary, fascistic character became geopolitically suicidal.

In essence, the USSR pulled its "free shit for zionists" program, and immediately became the target of attacks, espionage, and conspiracies which western schools and mainstream discussion don't teach you about.