[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Tor Only

Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble   Telegram   Discord


Here's the killshot, single mothers predict how bad crime is in an area NOT POVERTY!
>The proportion of single-parent households in a community predicts its rate of violent crime and burglary, but the community’s poverty level does not. Source: D.A. Smith and G.R. Jarjoura, “Social Structure and Criminal Victimization,” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 25. 1988.”
This alone should repudiate feminism in the minds of anyone, left or right. And the high single motherhood rate is the direct result of feminists' sexual revolution that encourages women to be promiscuous which inevitably leads to bastards.
Anyone that's traveled outside of the US can attest to this finding. While no poor area of a city or town is safe. They are not these Falluja style war zones that say Baltimore is.
Eliminating single mothers goes a long long way to eliminating poverty for workers. And it's in the best interest of children, which feminists and women pretend to care about.
These studies were aggregated on https://www.fixfamilycourts.com/single-mother-home-statistics. Here are a few other highlights
>“After controlling for single motherhood, the difference between black and white crime rates disappeared.” Progressive Policy Institute, 1990, quoted by David Blankenhorn, “Fatherless America: Confronting Our Most Urgent Social Problem,” New York, Harper Perennial, 1996, p.31
>Effects of Fatherlessness – Teenage Statistics
>63% of all youth suicides,
>70% of all teen pregnancies,
>71% of all adolescent chemical/substance abusers,
>80% of all prison inmates, and
>90% of all homeless and runaway children, came from single mother homes.
>Bob Ray Sanders, “Hey Y’all, Let’s Fill The Hall (Of Fame), Ft. Worth Star Telegram, Oct.28,2007
>Mona Charen, “More Good News Than Bad?”, Washington Times, Mar.16, 2001 (citing Bill Bennett, “The Index of Leading Cultural Indicators: American society at the end of the 20th Century., New York, Broadway Books, 1994)
How does the left, which claims to care about workers, answer for this. This complete lack of accountability for women throughout every sect of anti capitalist ideology.
Every single critic of women's sexual liberation is pilloried as a bitter loser or incel.
All while this same behavior has had a devastating effect on children and communities. Something that would have been blatantly obvious to anyone not brainwashed but none the less we've had scientific proof of for centuries. these studies go back to the 1930's
And yet in every supposed left wing circle if the idea that maybe we should pressure women not to have children out of wedlock because of the obvious downsides, you'll have leftist quote Engels and other feminist toadies on how regressive women not being able to sleep with whoever they wanted would be just like a handmaids tale. And how this is really the fault of the patriarchy somehow.
Since when in your cucked anticapitalists' did women's whoring around become more sacrosanct then children's welfare?
And before someone strawman's me as some CHUD that wants women to go back to the kitchen, I'll say that there's a dozen fucking forms of female birth control now. There's NOTHING to keep women from planning every single one of their pregnancies. Using a pill does not require you to give up your career.
If the left wants any sort of legitimacy they'd openly admonish women that willingly become single mothers. It is not some terrible circumstance that befalls them, it's something completely in their control.
And before someone brings up the recent abortion bans, abortion in the country is no where near abolished, you can still get one and the left should be all in on facilitating it.
The problem is there's not even social pressure to stop these tragic outcomes.
The left needs to answer to this now.


>If the left wants any sort of legitimacy they'd openly admonish women that willingly become single mothers.
Instead of that retardation, why doesn't the left[ist government] provide support for single-parent families, fund day-care and such, and focus on early childhood education so the kids don't come out abandoned and dumb as fuck?

A socialist society would presumably have more human interaction than now, if kids are more socialized they probably won't turn to drugs so easily. Idk that sounds better than what you're proposing, which would probably do more harm for everyone involved.


Single motherhood is an overused pathology


File: 1709878944375.webm ( 2.7 MB , 853x480 , airlinedrift2.webm )

>70 years of data shows that it causes crime further compounding the challenges of children in poverty.
>overused pathology
Based pussy hat wearer.


Bruh. Alot of dysfunctional homes have asshole dads. Alot of "incompetent" males didnt grow up WITHOUT, they grew up WITH a dad.


Education is over invested.
Also, society is far too sy.oathetic to human breeders. We need to issue mandatory licensing for family planning.

Teenage girls get mandatory hysterectomy which will be undone if they undergo seven years of hospitality training.


No, a lot of homes don't have dysfunctional dads, that's just a feminist myth. Most father's go out of their way to raise their children as best as they can.


lol proofs?


uh yea. Dropping kids off at practice and school so you can go back to watching TV for the twelfth hour today and hrining tutors for thm because you lack the empathy to help them with homework is being emotionally invested.


Children have better out comes when custody is granted to the father.


Just going to pile on more misandry I see.


What proof do you have that most fathers are shitty. Your own LMAO


Except Im not misandrist.
I just think men whom are married and have kids get too much automatic undeserved merit for virrue of using their procreative juices on female volunteers.

Alot of dads are aloof and indifferent towards their kids' personal development. They only care if the kids start displaying "regressive" behaviors.

Alot of boys often learn more about masculinity from uncles, coaches, grandfathers, even bosses than their own dads.


You sure? Yea sure things are tough when it comes to sibgle moms but is it really better when it comes to single dads?
Why do conservatives talk about parental rights but only allude to fathers?

Conservatives seem strangely indifferent towards abusive/neglective dads.




change the inheritance laws and the whole concept of family falls apart


File: 1714911079295.jpg ( 103.9 KB , 767x411 , certified parent moment.jpg )

>Effects of Fatherlessness
Make a ropeflip uyghur. Forcing a kid under a fucking faggot-fatha while their cunt of a mutha is already enough of a constant mindrape is a sure way to murder them for good.
Communist society will raise children COLLECTIVELY you fucking cumwaste, just like it was done for the majority of our history. Who fucking knew that if you want to make childhood as productive & stable in its process as you can then you would want to introduce as many people (= social nodes) in a kid's "family" (= social network of support) as possible.
Now guess what fucking happens when you reduce this number of supporting nodes to 2, & then to 1 ‒ that's right, faggot, you get tyranny over your entire fucking existence & you will have to bend over all the demands of your adult owner, or as the politically correct functionaires say, "parent".

So no, you cunt. Fathas faggots should be sent into fucking mines along with their loose whores & the entire society should be turned responsible for all the kids it produces.
>why do muh fellow leftists not care about the crisis of the class society family unit
try harder feddo. u are lazy.

Dank fucking gott I grew f*thrlss. I can't even imagine what would that shitty fisheyed golem do to me if that abomination which he was dicking would have commanded him to do whenever I pissed her highest holiness off for 20st time a day. & thanks for the shitty interwebs for providing me other sources of data about the world so I wouldn't be dependent on this anticultural lumpen degenerate shithole


File: 1714911831434.jpg ( 51.2 KB , 288x541 , 2890-abolish-the-family.jpg )

Read pic related, it really helped open my eyes and clarify the correct stance


But children don't fall into poverty when the father has sole custody statistics show.


Single mothers are an abolishment of the nuclear family. So your liberal feminist author is clearly wronf


File: 1715880593485-0.jpg ( 269.61 KB , 1170x886 , IMG_5110.jpg )

File: 1715880593485-1.jpg ( 117.93 KB , 720x901 , Typical_roastie.jpg )



damn… damn


why do you post this? this is sad


Who are you sad for, the mom or the son?


>single mothers predict how bad crime is in an area NOT POVERTY!
It could be both, single mothers tend to be working class/low income. What were the material conditions that led to this dysfunction?


It's not both. They looked at poor areas where children had both parents and their poverty was not a predictor of crime.

Unique IPs: 14

[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]