/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Is this good or bad? Or rather do you see it as good or bad?

>>12846
good

“Incel” aren’t communists
They’re sociosexual lumpenproles.

>>12851
Tf you can be lumpen and a commie, kek.

Not all of incels claim that sex should be provided to men. But those who do, yes, they can be called the communists of the sexual economy.

Why do you feel entitled to what women do with their bodies, like they're a resource to be distributed? It's pretty gross.

>>12883
> Why do you feel entitled to what women do with their bodies, like they're a resource to be distributed?

Sex is a resource that should be equally distributed, not their bodies. The problem is that men cannot get sex without women. And men have need of sex. That's why, according to communist principles, women should provide sex to all men. What you are proposing is that incels should work for this society, but don't demand anything from it, that they should suffer in loneliness and don't say a word against this injustice. So you are reactionary.

>>12869
Explain.

>>12883
Because I am stronger than you.
We're on caveman time now.

>>12885
> The problem is that men cannot get sex without women.

Wrong.
There’s femboys and trans women and good looking coshomo males

Women aren’t the only meatspace options

>>12912
Yeah but we need women to breed

>>12912
> There’s femboys and trans women and good looking coshomo males

Normal men are not fags like you. And there are no trans women, women are only those who were born with a vagina. Trans "women" are just mentally ill faggots. Or desperate fooled incels, that didn't find any ways to find a girlfriend and decided to make this choice, ruining their life.

By the way, comrades incels, here you may clearly see, why we should oppose LGBT propaganda. Because it's main objective is to make us believe that fucking male asses is the same as having sex with beautiful young females. It's a politics of cancelling sex, promoted by the elites.

>>12914
No you don’t. As long as IVF and stem cells are a thing.

Plus, you’re forgetting that women can also be hormonally disaffected by pregnancy.

>>12916
> Trans "women" are just mentally ill faggots. Or desperate fooled incels, that didn't find any ways to find a girlfriend and decided to make this choice, ruining their life.

I think you’ve spent too much time on reactionary forums.
Most trans women aren’t mentally I’ll nor are they suffering from any internalized autogynophilia

Also, most cishet males would and do fuck any male figures with a feminine enough look to them

> By the way, comrades incels, here you may clearly see, why we should oppose LGBT propaganda. Because it's main objective is to make us believe that fucking male asses is the same as having sex with beautiful young females. It's a politics of cancelling sex, promoted by the elites.

You’re suffering from persecution complex really bad dude. There’s no gay agenda trying to stop you from fucking women.

You’re doing that to yourself.
If anything, LGBT are being brought to heel by gynomorphicism.

LGBT beings are only promoted if they look youthfully feminine.
Youthful masculine looks are treated as second class.

>>12919

> I think you’ve spent too much time on reactionary forums.

Reactionaries are those who persuade incels not to fight for their right to have sex with women. Particulary via LGBT propaganda.

> Most trans women aren’t mentally I’ll nor are they suffering from any internalized autogynophilia

When a man thinks he's Napoleon, he is mentally ill, when he thinks that he is a woman - he is not mentally ill. Lol.

> Also, most cishet males would and do fuck any male figures with a feminine enough look to them

Most males are incels now, they even fuck 40+ old hags, no surprise that lots of them (though I highly doubt it's 50%+) agree to fuck other men, especially feminine ones, because of total sexual hunger. Let's create a system when every man has the opportunity to have sex with lots of young females and see how many faggots will be left, huh?

> You’re suffering from persecution complex really bad dude

You are suffering from feminazi-faggot-cuckold complex dude. I am promoting male class interests. Men are interested in having sex with young females, not with faggots.

> There’s no gay agenda trying to stop you from fucking women.

There's no bourgeois agenda trying to stop socialist revolutions then, lol.

By the way, LGBT agenda is mainly supposed to affect females (to make them lesbians) and to spoil the meaning of sex (as something that can only be between a man and a woman only). Making men to be faggots is harder.

> LGBT beings are only promoted if they look youthfully feminine.

I'm talking about the ideology and agenda overall. The most important thing here is to understand how it affects the class struggle, in what way it serves the ruling class. It's obvious that one of the main politics today is to cancel sex. Feminism, LGBT, pedohysteria, MeToo, cancelling men for "harassment", demonizing sex, culture of mocking and humiliating men - everything is working for this politics. Only blind ones don't see it.

feedback loops to soft depop!

hegemony ov thee damned in retro-eschaton!

ironic welfare policing the future "who cares"

… get fertile & healthy & sense-able

The ruling class relies on culture war nonsense, over things that would otherwise be inconsequential if everyone was able to mind their own business, by militarizing and making politics/ policies about other people's personal business, to better serve their business of divide and control via distraction and division… to keep the masses less mindful of their own material conditions and aspirations, and to obfuscate the corruption and workings of the state.

>>12914
Not anymore. We can use DNA directly to make a baby in labs.