[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble


File: 1792648247513.mp4 ( 5.31 MB , 576x1024 , 5298723045033d5de0a3f76dd2….mp4 )

 No.13627[Last 50 Posts]

Why are these so controversial? They're both adults, and as this guy points out, young adults can consent to anything else ethically BUT sex.
Why is that? Also, these age gap relationships are rare. Is getting mad about age gap relationships just the female equivalent of CHUDs getting mad about white women fucking BBC?
>>

 No.13630

>>13627
it's usually all the guys that can't get laid or weirdos that are the pedo hunters . You ain't never seeing an attractive man with things going for him doing this type of thing .
>>

 No.13634

>>13627
There's already an age of cucksent thread. Also for the .org faggots who inevitably show up, 16 is an adult and is legal in almost the entire world including the majority of the US, with no maximum age gap conditions.
>>

 No.13646

>>13630
18+ year olds are not children. You just can't cope with the fact that you hit the wall.
>>

 No.13647

>>13634
What the age of consent is isn't the same as an age gap. People online are saying that anyone in their 40's dating anyone in their 20's is a groomer, even though no one argues a 20 year old is a child in any other social sphere.
>>

 No.13648

>>13630
This is such a cope and it's exactly backwards. It's usually only the middle aged Chad's that both look good and have money that can pull someone much younger than them selves.
>>

 No.13649

>>13647
Please pardon him, he's retarded and cannot not bring up the AoC.
>>

 No.13651

>>13649
>Please pardon him, he's based and redpilled and cannot not bring up the AoC.
fixed
>>

 No.13652

>>13651
Nope, I got it right the first time.
>>

 No.13655

>>13652
No you didn't we're not talking about what the age of consent should be. We're talking about two adults above the age of consent, however you define tat, dating with a big age gap.
>>

 No.13656

>>13655
I'm not  >>13634, I'm calling >>13634 a retard.
>>

 No.13659

>>13627
The whole sociosexual infantilization of young adukts is promoted by Gen Y and Z to cope with unfullfilled youth
>>

 No.13661

>>13652
>Sorry, I am a stupid midwit faggot and I bow to your superior knowledge.
fixed
>>

 No.13662

>>13661
>superior knowledge
Of how to not tell when you're veering off topic?
Yeah, your knowledge of how to be mentally incapable of having a coherent conversation is on point.
>>

 No.13663

>>13656
Oh sorry.
>>

 No.13667

>>13662
NTA but why are you so hostile about what >>13634 said?

>>13630
Actually it's not all dysgenic low-prospect losers who get pissy about age-gap relationships.

The people whom are the most against it are usually millennials and zoomers, due to being sociocognitively castrated from helicopter parenting, stranger danger, and labor restriction laws for kids.


>>13647
The same people who get grossed about about age-gap relationships will preach about "love is love" and will promote military service to young people.
>>

 No.13669

>>13667
>millennials and zoomers
Only millennial women. Millennial men are much less hostile to it. Boomers on the other hand are by far the biggest haters of age gaps.
>>

 No.13671

File: 1792737665935.png ( 380.66 KB , 633x518 , agegapmacron.png )

>It's okay when we do it.
>>

 No.13672

>>13671
absolutely disgusting
if he lives to be 42 as her wedded son, she'll be a 62 year old skinbag with mara lafo face and flapjack titties
>>

 No.13673

>>13672
In just ten years she will be menopausal, at which point neither will have any reason to be around the other.
>>

 No.13680

>>13669
Boomers aren't that hostile to age-gap relationships, since they're the biggest practitioners of it so far. Millennials and zoomers, regardless if they're male or female, are the biggest haters.
>>

 No.13694

>>13630
You're also forgetting that women are also part of the witch hunts as well.
>>

 No.13720

The way this officer was behaving is coincidentally exactly the way womn behave with men a lot of times. He kept provoking and egging the boy to the point of doing something regrettable. And now the officer would get away with what he did because he has plausible deniability. It is exactly the same way womn get men into trouble.
>>

 No.13730

can we not have a containment board for these OPs or ban them

like why
>>

 No.13752

>>13730
Can you stop being a whiny bitch? Like why?
Go to Ogre if you wanna be on the rag.
>>

 No.13753

>>13730
This is the containment board. Just hide this board if you don't like it. Sheesh what a faggot.
>>

 No.13908

>>13730
roastie melty
>>

 No.13954

>>13680
>Boomers aren't that hostile to age-gap relationships, since they're the biggest practitioners of it so far.
Boomers are literally where age gap hysteria originated. The fact that boomers practiced age gap relationships themselves in no way diminishes their role in promoting pedohysteria. They freely had sex with teenage girls into their 30s and 40s and then pulled up the ladder on it behind them, just like how they had a good economy and pulled up the ladder on that too. They wanted to screw over every subsequent generation on purpose to feel better about themselves. Millennial men were the first victims of this and are by far the most in favor of dating younger out of any currently living demographic.
>>

 No.13955

Challenge for .ogre fucknuggets who wander in here: Justify how a 14-year-old cannot consent to sex with a 20+ guy but can somehow consent to life-altering hormone blocker drugs.

Ultra-veteran 5-star general mode: Do this without using the phrase "power imbalance" or any derivative thereof anywhere in your answer.
>>

 No.13963

>>13955
the worst that can happen if a 14 year old retard takes hormones is that they become a cringe idpol obsessed freak who shits up bluesky and ruins niche hobbies/communities with their BPD faggotry
the worst that can happen if a 14 year old retard fucks a 25 year old retard is that someone gets pregnant and they drop out of high school to become a parent with no job prospects
>>

 No.13964

>>13955
>pretending that everyone who disagrees with the most retarded fucking ""challenge"" anyone has ever heard is from .org
This has to be a .org op unironically.

I'm considering the possibility that /R9K/ is just completely filled with this garbage as an active op to make this site less appealing. Even 4chan's original /R9K/ isn't like this at this point.
>>

 No.13965

>>13964
You're the true Ogre for getting mad at criticism of trans politics and dismissal of possible pro-male views
>>

 No.13966

>>13965
>criticism of trans politics
I said literally nothing about this, but >>13963 already pointed out how retarded your challenge is. Even from an anti-trans POV, it would be easily refutable nonsense. It's very telling that your response to criticism is to once again try pushing the idpol button, even when the bait was ignored.

It's very strange that so much activity on /R9K/ is the most moronic molester-brained arguments imaginable. It would be difficult to write a character who was less subtly idiotic and reprehensible - it would be one thing if this was a smart challenge on a taboo subject, but it's not even that. It's mentally challenged, easily-refuted gobbledegook which would come across as intellectually infantile and embarrassingly perverted even by right-wing standards, and you, for some reason, go to lengths to try and present this dribbling idiocy as though it is characteristic of this website's differences with .org and not just your own dumbassed perspective. It's very suspicious.
>>

 No.13969

>>13966
>Everything I don't like is idpol.
Transgenderism is an actual thing, you know that right? It's been documented to at least ancient Egypt.
.Orges always do this crypto reactionary juke where anything, an I mean ANYTHING, that touches on the race or sex is automatically idpol. So much as mentioning a person's race is enough to be accused of being a lib.
The KKK could literally burn down an entire town full of black people and tankie .ogres would say it's because of captialism because everyone in a white hood was a poor wage laborer.
It's hilariously myopic, you'll never see these dweebs outside organizing. They moral sanctimonious bullshit only works online.    
>>

 No.13970

>>13966
Why is R9K looked down upon while Ogre style moderation would be bad too?
>>

 No.13973

>>13964
You're joking, right?

Just as I think Leftypol patrons cannot make get any more dumb with their rationalizations, you always manage to still make me internally laugh with annoyance and amusement.

>OMG THIS BOARD IS SO BAD THAT EVEN THE 4CHAN VERSION WASNT THIS BAD


>THIS HAS TO BE FROM OGRE


4chan r9k is way worse. This website's r9k is just vanilla-tier compared to there although that's part of what makes it more annoying in a way.

Also, nice way to deflect to Ogre
This site is just an alternate flavor of Ogre

Also, r9k isn't bringing down this website's reputation.

A lot of the vitriol on this board has pre-existed on other boards on this site.
>>

 No.13975

>>13966
> It's very strange that so much activity on /R9K/ is the most moronic molester-brained arguments imaginable. It would be difficult to write a character who was less subtly idiotic and reprehensible - it would be one thing if this was a smart challenge on a taboo subject, but it's not even that. It's mentally challenged, easily-refuted gobbledegook which would come across as intellectually infantile and embarrassingly perverted even by right-wing standards, and you, for some reason, go to lengths to try and present this dribbling idiocy as though it is characteristic of this website's differences with .org and not just your own dumbassed perspective. It's very suspicious.

Not saying that anon is smart nor correct but their take isn't as bad as you think it is.

Also, they're not "brain-dead" nor "mentally challenged".

They're perfectly of sound neurocognitve state. It's just that their sociocognitive state is shot to hell.

Not meaning to sound pedantic, but I really hate how people conflate intellectual dishonesty with neurocognitve disability.

Petulance isn't a symptom of being mentally challenged.

Also, "even by right-wingers standards" is another thing.
I get that a lot of our opponents are right-wing but that doesn't mean right-wing is some inherent neurocognitve flaw.
It only means alot of our right wingers arguments are socially conditioned to be wrong

>>13969
The truth is, these people try too hard to sound like they're colorblind, yet they fall victim to sociobiological classism by doing so

>>13963
Actually, hormones can cause psychosomatic damage.
And it can drive people to suicide when they find that their body doesn't turn out as idealized.
>>

 No.13980

>>13963
>drop out of high school to become a parent with no job prospects
Serious question, who actually still has job prospects in the age of AI? This is going to become completely irrelevant soon. This is an idiotic objection and thinking like this has arguably always been an indicator of bourgeois liberal mentality. You're panicking because somebody might become less appealing to a corporation as their wage slave.

>>13966
>not a single argument detected
Congratulations, you just won the "most outstandingly bourgeois liberal pseudointellectual dreck I've read this week" award. Faggot.
>>

 No.13981

>>13966
>>13975
actually both of you are faggots
i dont give a fuck what 14 year old retards (and they're all retards) do
teenagers have been doing stupid irresponsible shit since the dawn time and 99% of the time whenever adults get involved they only make it worse
adults ought to be responsible for giving teenagers (and the young in general) access to every possible present and future opportunity to grow out of that retardation and become successful later in life
other than that, adults need stay the fuck out of their business and leave them the fuck alone

the invention of adolescence couldve been an opportunity for adults to realize and fulfill their duty to the youth of the world but instead they transformed it into a sick game where they get to control every aspect of their lives
adults have no right to get involved in any aspect of the lives of teenagers beyond their only duty to them
maybe ill humour the idea of lowering the age of consent when adults decide to not make school a concentration camp puts more restrictions on its students than a prison would on its convicts
>>

 No.13982

>>13980
>Serious question, who actually still has job prospects in the age of AI?
<muh Nth industrial revolootion
fell for it again award
>>

 No.13983

>>13963
>14 year old retard gets pregnant by another 14 year old
>this is fine

>14 year old retard gets pregnant by a 20 year old

>oh noes this is a disaster
make it make sense
>>

 No.13984

>>13983
both are a disaster but at least i am justified in preventing the latter
see >>13981
though i probably shouldve just made my actual point instead first
>>

 No.13985

>>13982
t. somebody whose job will be taken by AI next week
>>

 No.13986

>>13984
>i am justified in preventing the latter
Who the fuck decided that? Who gave you the authority to intervene in somebody else's life, you patronizing shit?
>>

 No.13987

>>

 No.13988

>>13986
since youre incapable of scrolling up and reading ill quote the relevant bits for you

>adults ought to be responsible for giving teenagers (and the young in general) access to every possible present and future opportunity to grow out of that retardation and become successful later in life

>other than that, adults need stay the fuck out of their business and leave them the fuck alone

in other words fuck adults
until they give the youth everything they deserve, adults deserve nothing
>>

 No.13989

>>13987
>tfw your fanfiction is about to be a trillion-dollar IPO
I bet all those Harry/Hermione shippers are mad jelly right about now.
>>

 No.13990

>>13988
Not entirely unsympathetic to this; modern schools are prisons. But infantilizing people isn't the solution.
>>

 No.13993

>>13990
who do you think are the ones doing the infantilizing?
like i said as far as im concerned until the old stop being cruel to the young they have no right to interfere with or get involved in the lives of teenagers beyond their sole duty to give them a future
teenagers have a right to be responsible for their own behavior and to choose their own destiny
theres nothing infantilizing about giving teenagers their own space to freely make those choices, quite the opposite in fact

the youth have been treated like utter shit for centuries and the invention of the categories of childhood and adolescence gave us the opportunity to finally stop this madness
but then the adults whose brains have been thoroughly rotted out by corrupted bourgeois morality decided to hijack that golden opportunity in order to satisfy their perverse fantasies
no way in hell are you going to convince me that regressing is somehow the solution to adults being evil sadistic degenerates
its their duty to become real parents, real teachers and real role models rather than exploiting all of it for their own gain
in other words adults are the ones who need to grow the fuck up, and if you disagree then youre the one doing the infantilizing
>>

 No.13995

File: 1793330278332.mp4 ( Spoiler Image, 1.83 MB , 464x688 , who do you think are the o….mp4 )

>>13993
>who do you think are the ones doing the infantilizing?
>>

 No.13998

File: 1793335198658.mp4 ( Spoiler Image, 2.26 MB , 464x688 , infantilizing.mp4 )

>>

 No.14001

>>13995
>>13998
Shit is so fucking hot, we need more like this
>>

 No.14002

>>13995
>>13998
Why is Older Man x Younger Woman looked down upon, while Muscular Man x Heavier Woman is praised and revered?
>>

 No.14007

>>14002
Older woman with younger man is looked down upon even more
>>

 No.14008

>>13993
Adolescence is a modern construct made to rationalize removing young people from industrial experience.

People say teens having even part time work afterschool is abuse.

Yet, teens are more endangered from school drama.

Bullying, drug abuse, unprotected sex, disrespect towards teachers, sexual predation from teachers, ideological predation from teachers, etc.
>>

 No.14010

>>14008
>Adolescence is a modern construct made to rationalize removing young people from industrial experience.
Doesn't make it wrong. The only reason why it didn't exist before was because children were used as labourers pretty much as soon as they could walk and talk.
We know that a lot of important development happens in the teenage years.
>>

 No.14014

>>14010
>Doesn't make it wrong

If it doesn't make it wrong, why is it normal for people to flop horribly in their youth due to this rationalization?

We are seeing an increased age span of dependency.
Nowadays, most people under thirty five are incapable of proper homesteading.

>The only reason why it didn't exist before was because children were used as labourers pretty much as soon as they could walk and talk.


Doesn't make it wrong. He who doesnt work doesn't eat. The reason why child labor is demonized is due to factories using children for unguarded machinery.

Barring kids from basic industrial experience for most their development often results in increased liability.

>We know that a lot of important development happens in the teenage years.


There also important development in middle age.

Your rationalism for artificial extension of childhood is the typical stance being used by postmodern people.

And yet, due to this rationalizing, it's become common to be awkward, retarded, and vulnerable for most of one's prime years.

This is why young adults struggle with stability due to draconian liability laws inhibiting any ounce of proper independence.
>>

 No.14018

File: 1793429365166.jpg ( 283.7 KB , 1170x1379 , IMG_7846.jpg )

Holland Tylor is 30 years older than her wife. But normies are not bothered. Why?
>>

 No.14024

>>13954
> Millennial men were the first victims of this and are by far the most in favor of dating younger out of any currently living demographic.


The second half of this sentence is wrong. Millennials are the current popularized advocates about "muh grooming"

Millennials have popularism's age-sensitivity as the new form of discrimination because racism, sexism, and ableism are considered outdated.

In the 2010s, they started this nonsense that young people dating anyone a couple years outside their calendar age is power imbalance.

They started the whole "Thirty is the start of senescence but twenty is an infant"
>>

 No.14052

Jerry Seinfeld at age 40 married a woman who was 19 at the time of the marriage.
>>

 No.14100

>>13981
> actually both of you are faggots
i dont give a fuck what 14 year old retards (and they're all retards) do
>teenagers have been doing stupid irresponsible shit since the dawn time

This is a sick generalization. I find it funny that it's considered okay to negatively generalize young people but it's considered wrong to do the same to elderly and women.

Also, adults do irresponsible shit as well. Most of our drunk drivers are adults. Adultery is mostly adults.
Religiopolitical radicalism is mostly adults.

Adults cause witch hunts over someone creating an edgy message.
>>

 No.14101

>>13981
> adults ought to be responsible for giving teenagers (and the young in general) access to every possible present and future opportunity to grow out of that retardation and become successful later in life
>other than that, adults need stay the fuck out of their business and leave them the fuck alone

That's why societies had rites of passage for pubescent humans and childhood industrialization


>the invention of adolescence couldve been an opportunity for adults to realize and fulfill their duty to the youth of the world but instead they transformed it into a sick game where they get to control every aspect of their lives


There's been a lot of intellectual criticism against adolescence especially in the early Modern era (sixteenth thru eighteenth century)


>adults have no right to get involved in any aspect of the lives of teenagers beyond their only duty to them



There's actually alot of coop-culture figures such as George Carlin that have said something to this effect. A lot of comic book artists often criticize the draconian social policing of teenagers.

>maybe ill humour the idea of lowering the age of consent when adults decide to not make school a concentration camp puts more restrictions on its students than a prison would on its convicts


Adults are okay with kids being assaulted by their peers than they are with allowing young adults date older people.
>>

 No.14222

>>14100
if you read past the first few sentences youd realize that im saying that the stupid irresponsible shit that teenagers do is nothing compared to the evil and cruelty that adults perpetuate
sorry but the youth are human and thus commit folly and im not going to idealize them
>>

 No.14238

>>14222
I'm not saying youth don't commit folly. I'm just saying the way you generalize them in the same ditzy manner is kinda shallow. In fact, most of the shit that adults do isn't always the extremely evil shit. Most of the time, it's just an enhanced level of "teen stupidity"
>>

 No.14282

>>14024
No, it's right. It's millennial women who are the spearhead of the modern incarnation of age gap hysteria. Millennial men diverge from millennial women substantially.
>>

 No.14285

>>14282
You're wrong. Millennial men are only twenty percent different from their opposite-sex ethno-generational peers when it comes to age-gap sociosexual relations.
>>

 No.14286

>>14285
Wouldn't 20% be a big difference? Depends on how you're counting it I suppose.
>>

 No.14287

>>14285
Not to sound reddity, but do you have a source for this figure?
>>

 No.14288

>>14286
Maybe in certain areas.
>>14287
There's lots of male Reddit patrons whom think young adults intimating with anyone over thirty is predatory
These millennial men are obnoxiously self-deprecative to signal their benevolence. It's quite sad.

They even promote the "it's okay to be cringe in adolescence" myth.
>>

 No.14289

>>14288
And it's not just the radlib ones either. The alt-right and even centrist ones, they're all the same in this area.

Millennial men only have one-fifth cultural difference from their female counterparts.
>>

 No.14291

Seinfeld Got to Bang This
>>

 No.14294

>>14288
If you're just polling reddit cucks for your read on millennial politics you're getting an incomplete picture.

>They even promote the "it's okay to be cringe in adolescence" myth.

It should be OK, but should be and is are different things. Society has to be seriously reformed before this can be the case.

>>14289
Alt-right men have the highest level of difference from the status quo, despite plenty of cuckservative men existing. Centrist men just have no convictions and will go along with whatever seems popular.
>>

 No.14295

>>14291
Jerry Seinfeld also took another dudes wife and made her his wife and mother to his children. He basically cucked the other guy.
>>

 No.14303

>>14294
>If you're just polling reddit cucks for your read on millennial politics you're getting an incomplete picture.


It's not just Reddit. There's also Twitter, 4chan, Quora, DeviantArt, YouTube, Twitch, fbi.gov, Newgrounds,etc.

Besides, millennials were the ones whom popularized those platforms anyway.

>It should be OK, but should be and is are different things. Society has to be seriously reformed before this can be the case.


IMO, it should not be okay. Sympathised? Yes. Condemned? No. Discouraged? Yes.

Cringiness/awkwardness in youth is not completely biopsychologically default. It's promoted.
IDK if you noticed but since the 1990s/2000s, youth media has promoted awkwardness/cringiness/patheticness as youthful virtues.


I see it in Naruto, Diary Of A Wimpy Kid, Fairly Odd Parents, Danny Phantom, etc.

The main characters are all bumbling blushing awkward oafs with no natural prospects.

Any episodes were there's a reality shift for the main characters where they become suave/worldly/successful, they're often portrayed as out-of-touch and narcissistic.


Meanwhile, main characters whom are naturally talented, aloof, prospectful are often portrayed as fake, insecure stuck-up cunts that need tomfoolery to unwind.

However, at least in the realm of cartoons, where everything is zany/surreal, it's tolerable. But when it crosses over into live-action and/or into adult media, then it's worrisome, irritating, and lacking saving graces.

It's sending a bad message.

There's a difference between occasional awkwardness and awkwardness as a daily regime.

In real life, low-status, low-prospect awkward people are prone to vitriol and insecurity. They cannot appreciate people for themselves as they are always comparing an idealized social status chart in their heads of what they think of the world works.

Look at imageboards with the constant screeching about "normies" and "chads" and "betas".



Millennials and zoomers are unironically telling kids to "embrace the cringe" yet when kids do that, the same cultural elders will then accuse them of "brainrot".

The cultural revolution of cringifying the youth is a contributing factor to delayed maturity.

Millennials and zoomers are harassing kids/teens whom don't conform to the pop-cultural tradition of unnecessary obnoxious tomfoolery of ethnoculturally white suburban adolescence.

Kids whom prefer fashion, politics, mechanics, relationships or any constructive worldly activity are being shamed as pretentious and "growing up too fast".

And I believe that it's due to our current era of postboomer adults wanting to save face for wasted potential in youth.

Maturity and adulthood is being gatekept very strongly. I see it in "relatability" memes where late prime-age adults encounter someone whom was born years after them finally hitting adulthood, said late prime-age adult starts having an existential crisis.

Like bruh? Do you really expect your juniors to always remain children forever?
Do you really expect your current adulthood self to be always existing?
People nowadays seem to think that anyone's current-year age number is supposed to be their entire life role until the end of the universe.

It's a serious show of solipsism. And I think it's part of why generation gaps have become more exaggerated.

>Alt-right men have the highest level of difference from the status quo, despite plenty of cuckservative men existing.


Their differences from the status quo isn't really that much. They still succumb to the same wanton of simping for e-thots, indulging in "brainrot", doing hip-hop posse videos, etc.

The redpill is just an alternative blue pill for people whom think themselves as "too cool for school", but still seek adoration from the masses.

>Centrist men just have no convictions and will go along with whatever seems popular.


Lacking convictions doesn't mean lack of personality. If anything, everyone is drowning in convictions. People don't jump on the bandwagon due to lack of convictions. They jump on BECAUSE of shared convictions.

I have met people whom lack convictions and they don't know nor care about status quo of anything. But unfortunately, the people on this board would dismiss them as NPCs.
>>

 No.14304

>>14303
To continue with the discourse about awkwardness being overpromoted in youth media, the late 2000s/early 2010s saw the zeitgeist against "Mary Sues/Gary Stu/Marty Stu's" in fanfiction.

While they were never really accepted in serious fiction, it was still acceptable to safely indulge on Mary Sue characters as a guilty pleasure.

That all changed after 2012.
Having anything that's remotely considered Mary Sue is to be marked as a hack writer.
By the latter half of the 2010s, it's considered a sign of degeneracy.

People would assume you're a sexual predator or a racist or Zionist just because you don't care for writing characters that are exaggerated in personal vices.
>>

 No.14306

>>14303
>Twitter
Almost entirely the same user base as Reddit. This isn't a distinct population from Reddit.

>4chan

uygha what, 4chan is fucking stuffed with people who think the age of consent should be lowered. You yourself said imageboards are full of people talking about chads and betas and how normies are cancer. This is the exact audience that's in favor of age gaps.

>Quora

This isn't a millennial site, it's overrun with literal boomers.

>DeviantArt

People have political discussion on DeviantArt?

>YouTube

Most people who have a contrary opinion on age gaps are banned from YouTube, so again, your sample is very limited.

>Twitch

Who the fuck even watches Twitch anymore except Hasan dickslurpers?

>fbi.gov

lel

>Newgrounds

A lot of Newgrounds users called Tom a faggot for being an agecuck.
>>

 No.14309

>>14306
>4chan is fucking stuffed with people who think the age of consent should be lowered.

Those are a loud minority. They'd be shut down in most other platforms.

>You yourself said imageboards are full of people talking about chads and betas and how normies are cancer.


Yes. And the irony is, they follow along with the normies they hate so much, although not 1:1.

> This is the exact audience that's in favor of age gaps.


Again, they're a loud minority. Imageboards are age-sensitive just like their non-imageboard counterparts but in a more vitriolic manner. They harbor hatred for "underages" while worshipping their own childhood culture.

And even if imageboards are in favor of age-gap relationships, they have an almost tall-poppy syndrome complex towards young people. They ironically fit the stereotype about older people sexually preying on younger people to leech off their vitality.

>Almost entirely the same user base as Reddit. This isn't a distinct population from Reddit


And neither is most other "millennial-majority" platforms.

>People have political discussion on DeviantArt?


As hard as it is to believe, yes. And it's not as obnoxious either. Maybe it's due to how DeviantArt doesn't overpromote itself as a platform for sociopolitical discourse.
Either way, it's a haven.

>Most people who have a contrary opinion on age gaps are banned from YouTube, so again, your sample is very limited


????
People on YouTube are extremely age-sensitive. It's like Reddit. They think anyone who indulges on Roblox and Fornite are all underages or rather that they should be.

Yet ironically, adult patrons on YouTube complain about childrens media franchises not appealing to adults while simultaneously complaining about adult franchises being hijacked by kids enjoying it. Or they complain about childrens media franchises that crossed over generations being ruined because they adapt differing aesthetics. Or they wanna ban/restrict childrens media franchises over concern of "brain rot" in the literal sense of the word. Adults on YouTube are kinda weird like that. They want their generational childhood culture to be eternal.

>This isn't a millennial site, it's overrun with literal boomers.


Wrong. Quora isn't overrun with literal boomers. It's a multigenerational platform not unlike Yahoo Answers where millennials aren't the majority.
There are millennials on there alongside boomers and Gen Xers.

>Who the fuck even watches Twitch anymore except Hasan dickslurpers?


Twitch isn't limited to your C-list political pundits.
There's more gameplay streamers on there that keep Twitch in business.

It's just a nice umpteenth YouTube alternative alongside Rumble.

>A lot of Newgrounds users called Tom a faggot for being an agecuck.


???
Who is this Tom you speak of?
And WDYM by age cuck?

Do you mean they're against age-gap relationships?

If so, just say they're age-sensitive.

>lel


Those incidents of grooming that happens on fbi.gov aren't all without consent from the vulnerable party. In fact, the cases of grooming on fbi.gov aren't all vampiric genius-minded adults preying on weak minded kids

It's often more dysfunctional vulnerable adults clicking up with dysfunctional vulnerable kids.
It's the sick leading the unwell.

The more rational sound minded adults and kids are hysterical over any age-gap relationships even if the younger party is of legal age.
>>

 No.14310

>>14307
How is this off-topic? Also, I'm always amused at how people on imageboards always call any posts they don't like as "bots/AI slop" to the point of buzzword.

It makes the plaintiff look/sound/feel more like a bot than the defendant.

"Every accusation is a confession" as some people would say
>>

 No.14312

>>14291
Damn, she looks 30. And they say zoomers age fast.
>>

 No.14313

>>14312
She looks thirty-five thru forty.
Also white people age terribly
I wish people would stop using white people as the physiognomical standard for anthrobiological aging.
>>

 No.14316

>>14291
One thing that disgusts me is when people refer to young adults as "children" in sociosexual relations.

Yet, they see young adults as proper adults when it comes to criminality and martial affairs.
>>

 No.14317

>>14316
This, and when it comes to parents reasonability to their welfare. All these women will screech about a 21 year old being too young to date a 40 year old, but would never in a million years support obligating parents to housing their children until they were 21.
>>

 No.14318

>>14317
The same people who say 18-24 is too young to date anyone even three years outside their calendar age are the same people who say "18-24 yos need to deprived of familial amenities"
>>

 No.14320

>>14309
>Those are a loud minority.
Brah, they're half the fucking site. /v/ is the most heavily trafficked board on 4chan and it's absolutely overflowing with them.

>Who is this Tom you speak of?

Literally the fucking owner of Newgrounds.

>rational sound minded

>hysterical over any age-gap relationships
These two things are mutually exclusive.
>>

 No.14321

>>14320
>Brah, they're half the fucking site. /v/ is the most heavily trafficked board on 4chan and it's absolutely overflowing with them.

And I thought you people believed that bots are embellishing Internet traffic quantity.

So I guess it's bots when it comes to opinions you don't like?

>Literally the fucking owner of Newgrounds.


Provide the surname and what his sentiments are that got you so vitriolic about him?

>These two things are mutually exclusive.


They're not mutually exclusive, but they're not mutually INCLUSIVE either.
>>

 No.14323

>>14321
Tom Fulp, longtime owner of Newgrounds, recently got involved in some kind of retarded controversy I didn't pay much attention to. It was something about roasties hounding some guy for dating a 16-year-old when he was like 22 or something. You know, another case of feminist whores seething about men doing normal male things. Fulp basically betrayed a longtime friend over it and demonstrated himself to be a hypocrite as well because he had long maintained the free speech line, but just like so many other "free speech" people do when anti-age of consent rhetoric is aired, he turned into a total cuck about it.
>>

 No.14325

>>14323
Poor guy. And you wanna know what's fucked up? These same roasties brag about crushing on older male peers back in their adolescence.

Sixteen and twenty-two isn't that large an age gap. It's reasonable. If it was sixteen and thirty, I could sympathize somewhat.

It's always the good men that are crucified. Yet, Donald Trump bragged about wanting to wanting to date his daughter is they weren't consanguine.

Where were the roasties then?

They only go on Trump for insulting people but not for his age preferences of women.
Yes, he was associated with Epstein but even then, roasties only got on him for that, not for his own individualised preferences of barely legal/underage maidens
>>

 No.14326

>>14325
I don't care even if it's 16 and 80. These roasties need to have a check against their power, and large age gap relationships are the first line of defense against feminists ruining society. Also, a lot of millennial guys who should have gotten to have those 16-and-22 relationships got screwed out of them by boomer Chris Hansen hysteria faggotry when they were that age and deserve the chance to make this right.

>Trump

Roasties go after Trump all the time, he's just the fucking president and doesn't have to give a shit because he could literally order them killed if he wanted to.
>>

 No.14327

>>14323
>Fulp basically betrayed a longtime friend over it and demonstrated himself to be a hypocrite as well because he had long maintained the free speech line, but just like so many other "free speech" people do when anti-age of consent rhetoric is aired, he turned into a total cuck about it.

This is why I never take anyone seriously when they talk about "free speech" or "love is love" or "diversity is our strength"

When you look at the media portrayals of these platitudes, you notice that they always make the characters exactly the same as the WASP culture they complain about.

LGBT characters are all portrayed as being heteronormative child-rearing adults in upper class suburbs indulging in corporate lifestyles.

They're all light-skinned and somewhat Judeo-Christian even in its most paganistic form.

They also wanna make everyone age-segregated.
>>

 No.14329

>>14326
>I don't care even if it's 16 and 80.

Idk man. You say this but do you really mean it? Seriously, imagine a senescent decrepit man trying to get nasty with an adolescent maiden. Unless they're still in good shape and aren't all decrepit looking it's all good. And I don't believe in the philosophy that youth is automatic innocence. Chances are, the teenage girl probably seduced him in order to get his retirement money.


>These roasties need to have a check against their power, and large age gap relationships are the first line of defense against feminists ruining society.


Wrong. The first line of defense against  whiny roastie feminists is that it should be morally acceptable to physically face-slap them for being obnoxious. Or at least, dump beverages on them.

>Also, a lot of millennial guys who should have gotten to have those 16-and-22 relationships got screwed out of them by boomer Chris Hansen hysteria faggotry when they were that age and deserve the chance to make this right.


Millennial men aren't gonna make it right. Not for future generations at least. They're gonna continue the stigma against age-gap relationships. They already have. Remember, millennials have popularized the urban myth that young adults dating anyone even a few years outside their calendar age is "grooming".

They're encouraging their juniors to remind awkward and unworldly for the sake of "being yourself".

Millennial males are the willfully dumbass older brothers who doesn't like seeing his younger siblings outshine him in maturation and life goals.

Why else are millennial males making movies/shows about loserdom being a virtue of youth?

>Roasties go after Trump all the time, he's just the fucking president and doesn't have to give a shit because he could literally order them killed if he wanted to.


Nah, Trump doesn't actually wanna order hits on his naysayers. If anything, Trump thrives off of bad press. Those roasties aren't gonna come down hard on Trump as they would most other men because Trump is a pop-culture icon.

He's known for his glamorous pretense of real-estate business.
If Trump were a serious real estate mogul, he wouldn't be as loud and obnoxious as he is. He would still be chauvinistic, but he wouldn't afford to be so obvious about it.
>>

 No.14332

>>14329
>Millennial males are the willfully dumbass older brothers who doesn't like seeing his younger siblings outshine him in maturation and life goals.

>Why else are millennial males making movies/shows about loserdom being a virtue of youth?


Millennial women are doing the same thing. Remember there's only a one-fifth difference in sociocognition between millennial males and millennial females
>>

 No.14333

>>14329
>You say this but do you really mean it? Seriously, imagine a senescent decrepit man trying to get nasty with an adolescent maiden.
Yeah, so what? I don't like imagining gays doing gay shit, but that doesn't mean I think it should be outlawed. Too many "tolerant" folks go entirely by feels.

>Millennial men aren't gonna make it right.

Millennial normalfags won't, but the based men will.
>>

 No.14334

>>14333
> Yeah, so what? I don't like imagining gays doing gay shit, but that doesn't mean I think it should be outlawed.

By "gay" do you mean homosexual males specifically or homosexual people, regardless if they're male or female, cis or trans?

Even people like you will allow discrimination against homosexual males because you don't think men deserve to be adored and loved by other men

You'd rather men be mindless chasers and sugar daddies for teenage girls.

But if it were woman-on-girl action, you'd be all full-throttle support.


>Too many "tolerant" folks go entirely by feels.


They're not the only ones.

> Millennial normalfags won't, but the based men will.


"Based" men are just sellouts. They only exist to spice up cultural discourse for normies for a couple years.
Then they fade to obscurity

Also, "based" men are often the leaders of the neopuritan zeitgeist when it's their turn to be parents.

Irony is, normiefags are probably gonna be more a solid sincere support when they agree with you
>>

 No.14335

>>14334
>Also, "based" men are often the leaders of the neopuritan zeitgeist when it's their turn to be parents.
Then they were never really based. We've gotten more adept at identifying these cuckservative pretenders.

>Irony is, normiefags are probably gonna be more a solid sincere support when they agree with you

What makes you think that's ever going to happen?
>>

 No.14336

>>14332
>there's only a one-fifth difference in sociocognition between millennial males and millennial females
This is basically the same as "there's only a 20% difference between these two demographics' choice of candidate in the election". 20% is fucking huge, and there's good reason to suspect it's much larger than this.
>>

 No.14337

>>14336
Imma be real: are you retarded or are you so desperate in wanting your cultural practices to be de-stigmatized that any hopium is hitting you full force?
>>

 No.14338

>>14335
> Then they were never really based. We've gotten more adept at identifying these cuckservative pretenders.

It won't matter. History is cyclical

> What makes you think that's ever going to happen?


You're the one bettin on "based men" stopping the feminist hatred of age gap relationships
>>

 No.14349

File: 1793988561990.png ( 424.19 KB , 860x390 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>14338
>>14337
>>14336
>>14335
>>14333
>>13627
You child-fuckers deserve to burn alive.
>>

 No.14351

>>14349
>childfuckers

Anon, are you okay? Why are you equalizing young adults as infants?

Don't you understand that this logic is why society is getting so uptight and hysterical?

You're probably the typical millennial/zoomer that's been plagued by stranger danger and auto infantilism.
>>

 No.14354

File: 1793990059474.png ( 383.03 KB , 768x528 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>14351
Do humanity a favor and sterilize yourself
>>

 No.14356

>>14354
>anon is getting pissy over the fact that some people like dating others older than them.

It's okay anon. We will get you the help you need.
We will sign you up for a community crimewatch program where you can stop actual predators from having their way with toddlers and tweens.
>>

 No.14359

File: 1793991229757.png ( 232.63 KB , 474x248 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.14373

>>14359
No need for that. That's what your regime will do to neopuritans like you as proof of "loyalty"

As a matter of fact, I wish the way you speak to me on here is the same way you speak in meatspace.

(Probably not because youd get your ass handed to you and mocked endlessly. Typical of imageboard patrons with a morality crusade complex)
>>

 No.14394

File: 1793999638897.png ( 1.26 MB , 1260x1250 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.14402

>>14359
>>14394
Uh oh melty
>>

 No.14405

>>14349
You first, you psychopathic piece of shit. Teenagers are not children. Get the fuck out of other people's personal lives.
>>

 No.14406

>>14349
This is OP. I'm not talking about children. You're so unhinged you'll reclassify a 20 year old as a child just to have moral authority. Women like you DGAF about actual children.
>>

 No.14407

File: 1794007144405.gif ( 773.7 KB , 200x111 , Pedobear.gif )

>>14349
Haters gonna hate.
>>

 No.14409

File: 1794013625951.png ( 613.2 KB , 1080x1324 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.14412

>>14394
Ngl that guy looks tasty. Just gotta glaze him up in baby oil and inseminate him. Alot of white land whales are into dark meat
>>

 No.14413

>>14405
That neopuritan isn't in other people's lives. They wish they they were but don't have the skill nor patience for dealing with people. Moral hysteria is usually birthed from relatively asocial or antipathic people.
>>

 No.14414

File: 1794014736415-0.png ( 474.42 KB , 900x477 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1794014736415-1.png ( 619.16 KB , 1200x630 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1794014736415-2.png ( 634.42 KB , 800x711 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1794014736415-3.png ( 807.34 KB , 900x675 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>14405
>>14413
child-raping subhumans like you need to drink gasoline and smoke yourselves
>>

 No.14415

>>13630
That's only one demographic of naysayers.  The most prominent ones are the typical self righteous self proclaimed girl talk queens or usual female envy.
>>

 No.14416

>>14354
Most of humanity doesn't regard adulthood beginning in your mid/late twenties. Well unless you're born a Gen Y or later.
>>

 No.14418

>>14409
Take a seat in a gas chamber, jealous roastie.
>>

 No.14420

File: 1794017137997.png ( 578.78 KB , 768x561 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.14421

File: 1794017532752.jpg ( 77.26 KB , 640x392 , 1132344879344.jpg )

>>14409
I swear, I didn't know she wasn't fictional.
>>

 No.14424

>>14420
lol holy shit this dumb bitch is going to spontaneously combust from melting down so hard

livestream it please
>>

 No.14426

File: 1794019444455.png ( 1.4 MB , 1063x1125 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.14427

>>14414
>posting potential CSAM material
>confusing teenagers and vicenarians for toddlers

Noticed and reported
>>

 No.14428

>>14421
Millennials and zoomers are criminalizing people for fanfiction comics of fictional youth in erotic situations

Mind you these sweetheart same people whom will cheer on fictional kids being slaughtered by murderers for fun while preaching "tolerance" and "diversity".
>>

 No.14429

File: 1794019879135.jpg ( 12.74 KB , 200x200 , free-candy.jpg )

Yo, rate my ride.
>>

 No.14431

>>14426
>Western roasites fantasize about castrating all sub 8 men.
They really hate you this much boyos. Get your passport.
>>

 No.14432

>Age gap thread devolves into another shit storm about the age of consent.
You are all faggots. I'm talking about two adults above the age of consent, whatever age you want that to be, dating with a big age gap.
Stop derailing the thread with your hysterics
>>

 No.14433

>>14431
Western roasties don't care about sub8 men as much as you think they do.

It's always the whiny-ass "incels" whom think everyone is out to get them personally.
Bruh, you wish that bitches acknowledged your existence
>>

 No.14437

>>14433
Right, that's why you have all these bizarre fantasies about sterilizing us on a Botswanan bottle cap trading forum.
I don't think you literally care about us, but you do care if you perceive us to be acting outaide our station.
>>

 No.14438

>>

 No.14440

>>14432
It is really funny, though, watching the pedo-hunting incels melt down.  For real, there is nothing much to say about the OP subject.  Nobody is going to say anything of substance about two adults fucking each other.  All critics of age gaps say is "ick," and proponents making YouTube videos are only out to make up controvery for views.  It's a big whatever.
>>

 No.14441

>>14432
You can't have the second discussion without the first. If you let roasties decide what the correct age is, it will always lead to them calling men pedos for dating a 20-year-old at 30. You have to nip the problem in the bud by maintaining permissive age of consent laws, even if you're only interested in 20-year-olds.

>>14431
Passport? I'm grabbing a gun. These terrorists might attack you before you can get out.
>>

 No.14442

>>14437
>you don't care about us

Nah, it's YOU whom doesn't care about incels. Actual incels and non-normies.
Also need I remind you that you have fantasies of killing people for liking shota loli and want to murder women for salivating over exceptioonally beautiful men
>>

 No.14443

File: 1794022519316.png ( 692.39 KB , 1920x1080 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>14431
We do, now get on the table.
>>

 No.14444

>>14442
I'm hate all eugenics, you'll all get the all wall during the revolution.
>>14443
You can have my privates when you pry them from my cold dead hands.
>>

 No.14447

File: 1794060951415.png ( 645.5 KB , 564x679 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.14449

>>14447
I just had this procedure done, as is my civic duty, and I can confirm to all anons who might be skeptical, that it was 100% worth it!

While I was hesitant at first, because I did like my bollocks very much, after my mandated procedure I received a girlfriend of whatever age and appearance it is that I like! She is very nice and we procreate very often! She is the most beautiful in the world to me, and she respects me and thinks I am a big strong boy because I was brave and had my procedure done!

Come and get your amazing & loyal girlfriend, anons! Every anon gets at least 1 girlfriend complimentary with the mandatory procedure! I'm glad I did!

Polite sage to be respectful of our hardworking medical professionals
>>

 No.14455

>>14447
I'll fight for my right to party.
>>14449
We know you already cut your balls off .orgw.
>>

 No.14526


The age gap crash out is just old roasties mad that their options have dried up.
>>

 No.14530

>>14455
> We know you already cut your balls off .org

Nah, Ogre is too wimpy to do that. They're automisandrist to cope with lack of masculine self-value.
>>

 No.14532

File: 1794101033434.mp4 ( 1.34 MB , 864x1080 , TickleBot.mp4 )

>>14447
Sorry, can't.  My girlfriend is a ten, and she would never forgive me.
>>

 No.14571

>>14406
It's funny how postboomer adults parrot on about "eradicating child abuse" but they semi-jokingly suggest post-natal abortion of kids and restricting cultural amenities for kids.

They wanna ban loli and shota but will allow cartoons of child assault or infanticide in a comical manner
>>

 No.14572

>>14441
Roasties will also criminalize young adult males for dating beautiful women that are older than them.

And unfortunately, roasties aren't all cishet females. In the cishomo male community, older bottoms cry about "pedophilia"
The transhet female community, it's the same thing.
>>

 No.14591

>>14571
>infanticide in a comical manner
? When does that happen?
>cartoons of child assault
Kids being abused by their parents in media is usually portrayed as villainous though?
>>

 No.14597

>>14591
>Kids being abused by their parents in media is usually portrayed as villainous though?

In more somber stories, yes. But most portrayals of child abuse in TV/movies is often comical. Look at Family Guy, Simpsons, Robot Chicken, Squidbillies, etc

>? When does that happen?


People (semi) jokingly talk about wanting to post-natally aborting kids for being hyperactive or for having differing cultural tastes than their elders.
>>

 No.14599

>>14597
>Family Guy
FG is edgy
>Simpsons
They got rid of Apu who was voiced by a white actor, does Homer still choke Bart nowadays? I don't know because I don't watch it anymore.
>People (semi) jokingly talk about wanting to post-natally aborting kids for being hyperactive or for having differing cultural tastes than their elders.
This does happen but it's South Park's fault for making that joke about Cartman's mom wanting to abort him at age 7-10 and SP making it seem okay to be edgy. As well as Lindsay Clancy white main character syndrome.
>>

 No.14600

>>14599
>FG is edgy

Yea I know that, that's why I mentioned it.


>This does happen but it's South Park's fault for making that joke about Cartman's mom wanting to abort him at age 7-10 and SP making it seem okay to be edgy. As well as Lindsay Clancy white main character syndrome.


TBH, I can make an exception for Eric Cartman. He's an asshole through and through and he knows it and revels in it

But, you're correct on the last sentence about "main character syndrome" of the Anglosphere sort sympathizing misopedia. The irony is, the same cultural phenomenon which rationalizes the casual contempt towards children also promotes childhood nostalgia.

Also, South Park isnt solely at fault for normalizing edginess. Especially since Simpsons came before it.
>>

 No.14602

>>14600
Edginess has been a thing since the Jazz Age.  To be honest, it is not a bad thing; it has been responsible for a significant amount of the best media out there.
>>

 No.14615

>>14602
We've had edgy humor in Medieval Times. That's not the problem though.
>>

 No.14619

>>14615
Edgy medieval humor… I want to see some of this.  The Middle Ages were so fucked up, I can't even imagine what they may have considered edgy.
>>

 No.14620

>>14619
Remember the nursery rhyme "Ring Around The Rosy"? It was about the Black Plague.
A lot of our fairy tales were originally macabre Medieval stories
>>

 No.14621

>>14620
Was that supposed to be humor?  I thought it was just a game.

Unique IPs: 45

[Return][Go to top][Catalog]|[Home] [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
Return Catalog Top Bottom Home