[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/edu/ - Education

Learn, learn, and learn!
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble   Telegram   Discord


File: 1608528390176.jpg ( 39.54 KB , 306x472 , 1606178934137.jpg )

 No.4415

Has anyone read it? What do you think of its attempt at refuting marxism, its socioeconomic analysis, and Hegelian logic?
>>

 No.4416

Gib .pdf plz
>>

 No.4418

>>4417
Ty but my phone won't let me load that link

Did you know you can upload .pdfs here?

Or is it a huuuge file and that's why my phone no like?
>>

 No.4419

Not OP. It's 23 MB.
>>

 No.4426

Former Marxists make the worst Enemies imo
>>

 No.4427

>>4426
Why the worst? Shouldn't they be the best enemies because they have the most ammo and a better understanding than your average reactionary?
>>

 No.4428

>>4427
Yeah because they have an understanding, they make the worst enemies. It'll be much harder to convince them again
>>

 No.4429

>>4428
Nah if they ever did understand the material they wouldn't be former Marxists

At least hopefully they'll have some superficial understanding of theory which makes things easier
>>

 No.4430

>>4429
>Nah if they ever did understand the material they wouldn't be former Marxists
No one can ever have an intellectually honest disagreement with Marx? C'mon man I'm a Marxist and this is religious tier thinking.
>>

 No.4432

Does anyone have a critique of the Book?
>>

 No.4434

>>4430
Not without being Marxist in the same way that one cannot have an intellectually honest disagreement over the fact that objects tend to fall down within a gravity well absent countervailing force

Well that is unless one misunderstands the material
>>

 No.4436

>>4415
Bunkerchan is super slow for me. I'll hopefully look into it soon. I'm of the thought that materialist hegelianism is the peak of human thought. I don't think it can be refuted, only transcended. Maybe the way he build his arguments is bunk, but the conclusions seem very sound.
>>

 No.4437

>>4436
I can only guess because I just started the Book, but I think he will argue that, because Hegelian Dialectics can't be refuted, it is dangerous. It serves as a way to justify every Despotical System etc. Completely Bollocks in my Mind, but he is probably an Analytic Faggot
>>

 No.4439

The Cover looks Badass ngl
>>

 No.4472

>>4434
stop embarrassing yourself
>>

 No.4725

>>4415
Bump
>>

 No.4727

>>4472
he was spot on though
>>

 No.4728

>>4434
lmfao

Unique IPs: 1

[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome