No.1457
Let me lay out my evidence because when you just step back and look at it, it's obvious.
- In every city in the world, you will find a shady old asian lady who barely speaks English that will jerk you off for $50, and gets lots of business doing it. BUT, the inverse of this exists NOWHERE in the world. NO where will will you find an old asian man that doesn't speak english being paid to schlick women off in shady stores.
- If you take any woman and ask her what her perfect day with an attractive celebrity of the opposing sex includes. Women will almost always say something like, we start out with a date, he is well dressed and treating me well, and all the people I know can see me with him, and see that he likes me, and then maybe we have sex later.
A man would say; we are at cozy/comfy million dollar cabin in the woods, naked, we spend the day fucking and watching movies / cuddling between refractory periods.
This isn't an accident. It betrays what each gender is really looking for.
- Women hate random dick picks. Men tend to love random nudity pics. Why the asymmetry? Women are supremely concerned with WHO'S dick. How did that dick get there. and ultimately they are squirming their way to the question: "Okay beside the dick what else do I get?".
Put all of this together, and ask yourself. Do they really have a 'sex' drive? A DRIVE for sex? No. They do not. At best they have what can be described as a 'sex-trading drive'. A drive to exchange sex for other non-sexual quantities: Peer jealousy, protection, food, money, clout, marking ownership… but in all of these cases the sex is a 'cost' that's paid for something non-sexual in return.
For men, sex IS the return. This is why men are happy to 'pay' for sex, whereas to a woman 'paying' for sex doesn't make sense. Because sex IS the payment.
In light of this many more female behaviours make lots of sense. Why the sex stops after marriage? Because there's nothing to 'trade' for anymore. She experiences this as a lack of sexual desire; There is nothing left to trade for sexually.
Why do women like men that other women also like?
This is an extraordinarily interesting question that has two answers. The first answer is the simple psychology one. Women are constantly attempting to date UP. They understand that when a man dates a woman that woman is declaring publicly that her attractivness is EQUIVALENT to that man.
So a woman sees an ugly man. She immediately puts him in a 'far below her league' bucket. She is above him, and all is well. An extremely attractive woman arrives on the scene. More attractive than her by far. This extremely attractive woman begins to date the ugly man. In her mind, this means that the ugly man, is now more attractive than her. She has been downgraded. Similar to Indians her "Femizzat" has been damaged. The only way she can get it back now, is to make him cheat on the attractive girl with herself. This is not because she likes him. It is purely to re-assert her level of attractiveness, and restore her ego which was 'maimed' when the more attractive woman dated the ugly man.
It's actually very easy to fool women into sex like this, simply hire an attractive prostitute, to pretend like she's dating you, and hang out in circles with your target woman. You will notice it is VERY easy to have sex with her now, simply because making you cheat on your more attractive girlfriend will allow her to recover her self-perceived attractivness.
That's explanation #1. Explanation #2 is simpler. Natural selection, and human biology. Women can't spread genes fast. Men can. Her genes winning move is to hitch her genetic carriage to a 'successful' super-spreader man. How to tell them? Well if other women like him, then other women will also like your son.. spreading your genes.
Part3: Chad doesn't exist.
This is a contentious one. Men are ravenous for sex. It drives men crazy. With enough deprivation of sex, men will resort to violence, and when that avenue is blocked by societal conditioning etc; They will resort to sexual depravity. Femdom, Paypigs, Transexuality etc.
As part of this psychological thrashing men try to understand women. They have been told women have a sex drive too. So they assume women are ALSO desperate for sex. They NEED sex. But to any man it's obvious to see that women clearly don't want sex THAT badly, at least not with them.
Ancient man would strike rocks against each other, and notice a spark; And when he saw lightning from the sky begun to hypothesise, what if there was a giant man in the sky that can also bang giant rocks together and THAT makes the lightinig. Zeus, Thor, Every culture has this myth.
Similarly, men assume the existence of a giant man known as 'chad'. To CHAD women ARE desperate for sex. To Chad women WANT to eat his farts, and rim him. Women want to have sex with chad 24-7! All the depraved things they want to do with women. Women want to do with chad.
But chad doesn't exist. There is no Chad. The truth is sader and worse than just "It's happening to someone else".. The truth is women don't want sex. Not like you do. Sex desire requires a sex drive. Women don't have a sex drive. Women want chad, not because they want sex with chad, but because they want what chad brings. Sex is just the payment. You will NEVER find a woman that is as sex-hungry as a man. Not with Chad. Not with anyone. Women don't have sex drives.
I think explanation #2 requires a deeper explanation. Richard Dawkins showed something quite fascinating. He asked the question, what is the unit that natural selection acts on? Long story short the answer he arrived at was the 'gene'. The lion is not a thing that natural selection applies to. Neither are you and me. Natural selection doesn't apply to 'humans' as a species. Nor whales. Nor cats. Natural selection applies at the level of the gene. You are simply a 'vehicle', your individual genes are piloting you, and each individual gene is trying to replicate more of itself by appearing in your children.
Now zooming out, men have an amazing advantage when it comes to genetic replication. A single man can impregnate hundreds, even thousands of women in his life. This means each of his genes have an amazing chance to replicate. The future will be FILLED with his genes. This is good for the gene.
A woman has a huge disadvantage, she can only be pregnant once every 9 months, and realistically maybe only have 10-20 children in her natural life. Her genes are at an astonishing disadvantage as they are in a woman. As a woman what is her gene's BEST play here?
If she mates with a man, and has a son; Now her genes get on a superhighway of replication. But how can she ENSURE her son mates with lots of women? Pick a father who also mates with lots of women.
This doesn't need to be done willfully. If you randomize these genes so that some women have the trait to seek and fuck men, that other women also fuck. In a few short generations the population will be dominated by the gene that makes them seek and fuck men that other women want to fuck… Because that gene spreads the best.