>>467161>Yup liberalism detected.
Choke on my dick pathetic theorylet twerp
I've had enough of your moronic takes
>The liberals invented political term limits
>Which meant that reformers could be re-elected often enough to reform out of capitalism. And they put in term-limits to prevent that.
Shit pet theory. Any reformer would be offed long before he could "reform" out of capitalism.
Also I guess Hitler doing away with term limits was the epitome of democracy now lol.
>It's very undemocratic, because it's basically overriding the democratic will of the electorate.
"democratic will of the electorate" is an oxymoron
"the electorate" by definition has no political will, it's just impotent cattle
"democratic will" is when you execute all of the archons cause you fucking feel like it
"democratic will" is when you proclaim your own Emperor, take the Eternal City by force, purge the senators, decimate the praetorian guard, and have your Emperor's last words of advice be "enrich the soldiers and despise everyone else"
"democratic will" is when you threaten to sack London if the King's head doesn't roll
>They didn't have much power in tribal society, and in slave society the slavers were the most powerful.
slaveowners also were owners of land retardoid
>I don't know to what extend you can say that people claiming land in earlier modes of production already constituted private property, because that usually entails state enforcement
state along with hereditary aristocracy emerged out of the dissolution of clan societies
>I find your claim that ML systems were unstable, unconvincing.
I don't give a fuck
you're a nobody
>State socialism managed to endure the most extreme situations.
The only thing that ML retardation has "managed to" by itself is shitting the bed like no other society before it.
Soviet Union weathered the storm on Stalin's watch.
>No Capitalist bourgeois political system has even come close to this.
illiterate historylet mouth breather
The First Republic weathered no lesser storm than the Soviet Union, and the newborn French Empire has gone on to steamrolling all of the old feudal Europe.
>What does this even mean ?
It means that the Kim is the general secretary by default.
>Previously you said the DPRK wasn't an ML state
Try rereading multiple times if your illiterate ass can't understand simple sentences.
>You sound like a monarchy apologist.
I don't give a fuck what I sound like to some nobody retard on the internet.
It's my take on it, deal with it.
it's called a metaphor..
>great man theory
nah, Soviet Union collapsed in the end after all
only without Stalin it would've collapsed much earlier
I don't care if this fact of life rattles your dogmoid sensibilities
All you need to do to understand the importance of Stalin factor is to look at his contemporaries, what someone has aptly noted as a "sea of gray"
limpdicks Molotov, Kaganovich, Voroshilov
this is your elite vanguard, mltard
a bunch of blind kittens bumbling in the dark
this is what your political system amounts to without the Stalin factor
and your own vegetable tier mental level is just another proof of this
>So now you admit that the DPRK is socialism and not a monarchy.
Monarchy is a form of government. A superstructure.
Socialism is an economic system. A base.
Basic things, retard. BASIC.
>It kinda does.
It does not, historylet.
Google Hellenistic period.
>No monarchical rule is the super structure of a feudal base
>which usually means an agricultural mode of production
there is no such thing as an "agrarian mode of production" theorylet
>I think your motives might be to define the DPRK as a monarchy to comply within the ruling narrative of imperialism.
It IS a monarchy.
Reality doesn't care about your feeling, and neither do I.