>>472872>muh bad>nothing can build gommunismYou are wrong to adopt the boogie-man mentality from the media mainstream.
And nobody is claiming that countries like China achieved socialism, they consider them selves in the lower stages of building socialism.
>conspiratardConspiracies do happen all the time, how do you think ruling classes gain power and keep it. They conspire to make the institutions of society favor their class interests, push their agendas, spread their ideology and so on.
>Neocons>it's just capitalistsSure, they represent imperial capital, but it's still worth having that label, because the neocon flavor of imperialism has it's distinctive particularities that sets it apart from other flavors of imperialism. Compare the Neocons with the Victorians of the British empire for example. The former prefers to use covert military tactics, like arming terrorist groups or reactionary ethno nationalists. They go for indirect attack vectors like messing with economic flows. The latter was very different, the Victorians used very overt military tactics that could be described as bursting through the front door. They didn't bother much with indirect methods when it came to economics, they just installed occupation governments that forcefully changed economics matter by imperial dictates. Ideologically there is a big difference as well, the neocons have a justification-myth about democracy freedom and neoliberal social values. The Victorians pretended to be the """advanced civilizers""" that were uplifting """less evolved species of hominids""".
Maybe that inspired the Prime Directive in Star Trek
>Ramblings about ChinaYou seem to make 3 points.
<1 China's system has a historic precedent in Japan and GermanyI think this is wrong, the Chinese system represents something genuinely new. Their system doesn't follow the development of anything that came before. For example during all the history of imperial capitalism, no other capitalist country managed to develop and reach technological parity with the hegemon. China has done that, they are able to rival the technological abilities of the US. They managed to improve material conditions of Chinese workers during capitalist crisis, the only other country that managed to do that was the Soviet Union. The scale and speed of poverty reduction in China is also unprecedented in the capitalist world.
<2 China's rise is overChina doesn't follow in the foot steps of neo-liberalization, they don't have bourgeois dominated politics, they are able to continue developing the productive forces. The Slow down you see now in China is the result of China adapting to the US's trade war. China isn't lying down like Japan in the 80s when they signed the Plaza Accord, nor is it getting wrecked by war-reperations like postww1-Germany. This trade war has inflicted much more damage to the US than it did to China. We are now witnessing China "pivoting"
to use Obama's favorite word its international economic relations towards Bricks, where it will become the source of industrial development for an absolutely huge trade-network. While you can complain that Chinese Marxism is a bit eclectic, they have taken Marx's warning about not becoming a fetter on development of the productive forces to heart.
<3 India will surpass ChinaIndia isn't even catching up with China. Econ-statistic can be tricky. When you look at the rate of adding industrial capacity and raising technological productivity, China is gaining ground against India. The legacy cast system in India is a major developmental blocker that prevents India from accessing the human potential in it's vast population. China had communist modernization where that kind of backwardness was eliminated.
>If I make insulting personal attacks, your arguments don't countThis is something you have in common with the neocons, they also try to smear and slander their critics. To be fair to you, you do offer at least some arguments, in the mids of all that swearing and cussing.
Tho we do lack a catchy word to describe the ad-hominen fallacy user. You know something to throw back at the neocons rampage of "everybody who disagrees with me is a Chyna-rusky-untermench-jungle-ork"