/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

As much as I hate reggaeton, this is some fucking bullshit and those claimants can go to hell.

>>477194
>this is some fucking bullshit
That it is, indeed.
Also a mask-off moment, it clearly demonstrates that Intellectual monopolies are born from malicious intent.

>those claimants can go to hell.
They just might.
If this goes far enough and makes enough waves, many more people will wake up to the fact that so called """copyright""" is in reality, intellectual liberty infringement.

>>477211
>They just might. If this goes far enough and makes enough waves, many more people will wake up to the fact that so called """copyright""" is in reality, intellectual liberty infringement.

Idk. People will still see copyrught as potential revenue generators.
But they will reb against bullshit loke "copyraping."

>>477211
>intellectual liberty infringement.
we have to meme this concept into existence

>>478397
>Idk. People will still see copyrught as potential revenue generators.
Even from a capitalist perspective it's shit.

The best business-model is ransom-release.
Step_1 split your piece of "content" into demo/teaser-material and main-material.
Step_2 upload the demo/teaser online
Step_3 lock the main-material behind a ransom-pay-bucket
Step_4 When enough people have contributed to the ransom-bucket to cross your revenue-threshold, the main-material releases as creative commons or public domain.

The benefits are
- No need to fuss with copy censorship mechanisms or legal bullshit
- Predictable income
- Once you get a reputation for delivering, people will fill up your ransom-pay-bucket before you start production, removing all financial risk for the producer.

>But they will reb against bullshit loke "copyraping."
I don't know what that means, are you objecting to the terminology ?

It's appropriate to call it copyrape because it's not about economics, it's about exerting control over people.
Even the ideological story about the musician making money from selling copies of music recordings, is bullshit. Musicians make more money by releasing the recordings for free and then charging people money for tickets to their live shows (because that shifts leverage from distributors to authors and to an extend show-technicians). Don't forget that small authors are frequently the victim of copyrape. It's grown into an industrial protection racket that scans through the releases of authors to find a "content-component" they can copyrape and use it for extorting authors.

It's a mafia that has infiltrated parts of states to attempt to institutionalize their terror.
Maybe copy-racket would be better terminology than copy-rape

The copy-racket does not benefit creators. The internet has weakened the grip of the copy-monopoly-mafia and as a result the income and business opportunities for creatives increased dramatically, that is not a coincidence. This is the classical story of a monopoly getting broken causing a virtuous economic cycle.