>>477472The Assange case is about intimidating investigative journalism.
It used to be the case that investigative journalism was enabled by the state, because intimidation of journalists would be decisively frustrated by the state. But Assange's case shows that this may no longer be true because the state has basically enabled wrongful imprisonment and torture of Assange for investigative journalism. Which has the effect of intimidating other investigative journalists.
That means in order to have free press, either you find a way to make the state go back to how it used to be, or there needs to be a new mechanism that frustrates the intimidation of investigative journalism. Also Assange should be freed, he doesn't need to become a martyr for freedom.